Email Id validation according to RFC5322 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Validating E-mail Ids according to RFC5322 and following



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address



Below is the sample code using java and a regular expression to validate E-mail Ids.



public void checkValid() {
List<String> emails = new ArrayList();
//Valid Email Ids
emails.add("simple@example.com");
emails.add("very.common@example.com");
emails.add("disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com");
emails.add("other.email-with-hyphen@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("user.name+tag+sorting@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("x@example.com");
emails.add("carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar");
emails.add("example-indeed@strange-example.com");
emails.add("admin@mailserver1");
emails.add("example@s.example");
emails.add("" "@example.org");
emails.add(""john..doe"@example.org");

//Invalid emails Ids
emails.add("Abc.example.com");
emails.add("A@b@c@example.com");
emails.add("a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\k]l@example.com");
emails.add("just"not"right@example.com");
emails.add("this is"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("this\ still"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com");
emails.add("john..doe@example.com");
emails.add("john.doe@example..com");

String regex = "^[a-zA-Z0-9_!#$%&'*+/=? \"`{|}~^.-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+$";

Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(regex);
int i=0;
for(String email : emails){
Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(email);
System.out.println(++i +"."+email +" : "+ matcher.matches());
}
}


Actual Output:



   1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : true
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : true
22.john..doe@example.com : true
23.john.doe@example..com : true


Expected Ouput:



1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : false
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : false
22.john..doe@example.com : false
23.john.doe@example..com : false


How can I change my regular expression so that it will invalidate the below patterns of email ids.



1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com
john..doe@example.com
john.doe@example..com
just"not"right@example.com


Below are the criteria for regular expression:



Local-part



The local-part of the email address may use any of these ASCII characters:




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9;

  3. special characters !#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~

  4. dot ., provided that it is not the first or last character unless
    quoted, and provided also that it does not appear consecutively
    unless quoted (e.g. John..Doe@example.com is not allowed but
    "John..Doe"@example.com is allowed);


  5. space and "(),:;<>@[] characters are allowed with restrictions
    (they are only allowed inside a quoted string, as described in the
    paragraph below, and in addition, a backslash or double-quote must
    be preceded by a backslash); comments are allowed with parentheses
    at either end of the local-part; e.g.
    john.smith(comment)@example.com and
    (comment)john.smith@example.com are both equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.


Domain




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9, provided that top-level domain names are not
    all-numeric;

  3. hyphen -, provided that it is not the first or last character.
    Comments are allowed in the domain as well as in the local-part; for
    example, john.smith@(comment)example.com and
    john.smith@example.com(comment) are equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.










share|improve this question
























  • stackoverflow.com/questions/13992403/…
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:41










  • @assylias The regex given in above link is specific to some other language.I have also tried same but it is not working.
    – Mihir
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • And more importantly: stackoverflow.com/a/1903368/829571 (read the introductory comment)
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • Even better: stackoverflow.com/questions/624581/…
    – Sofo Gial
    Nov 14 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Mihir: Those four emails that you want to invalidate, can you give the logic why they should not be considered valid? This will help me design a precise regex that works for you.
    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    Nov 17 at 17:20















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Validating E-mail Ids according to RFC5322 and following



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address



Below is the sample code using java and a regular expression to validate E-mail Ids.



public void checkValid() {
List<String> emails = new ArrayList();
//Valid Email Ids
emails.add("simple@example.com");
emails.add("very.common@example.com");
emails.add("disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com");
emails.add("other.email-with-hyphen@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("user.name+tag+sorting@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("x@example.com");
emails.add("carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar");
emails.add("example-indeed@strange-example.com");
emails.add("admin@mailserver1");
emails.add("example@s.example");
emails.add("" "@example.org");
emails.add(""john..doe"@example.org");

//Invalid emails Ids
emails.add("Abc.example.com");
emails.add("A@b@c@example.com");
emails.add("a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\k]l@example.com");
emails.add("just"not"right@example.com");
emails.add("this is"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("this\ still"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com");
emails.add("john..doe@example.com");
emails.add("john.doe@example..com");

String regex = "^[a-zA-Z0-9_!#$%&'*+/=? \"`{|}~^.-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+$";

Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(regex);
int i=0;
for(String email : emails){
Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(email);
System.out.println(++i +"."+email +" : "+ matcher.matches());
}
}


Actual Output:



   1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : true
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : true
22.john..doe@example.com : true
23.john.doe@example..com : true


Expected Ouput:



1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : false
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : false
22.john..doe@example.com : false
23.john.doe@example..com : false


How can I change my regular expression so that it will invalidate the below patterns of email ids.



1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com
john..doe@example.com
john.doe@example..com
just"not"right@example.com


Below are the criteria for regular expression:



Local-part



The local-part of the email address may use any of these ASCII characters:




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9;

  3. special characters !#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~

  4. dot ., provided that it is not the first or last character unless
    quoted, and provided also that it does not appear consecutively
    unless quoted (e.g. John..Doe@example.com is not allowed but
    "John..Doe"@example.com is allowed);


  5. space and "(),:;<>@[] characters are allowed with restrictions
    (they are only allowed inside a quoted string, as described in the
    paragraph below, and in addition, a backslash or double-quote must
    be preceded by a backslash); comments are allowed with parentheses
    at either end of the local-part; e.g.
    john.smith(comment)@example.com and
    (comment)john.smith@example.com are both equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.


Domain




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9, provided that top-level domain names are not
    all-numeric;

  3. hyphen -, provided that it is not the first or last character.
    Comments are allowed in the domain as well as in the local-part; for
    example, john.smith@(comment)example.com and
    john.smith@example.com(comment) are equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.










share|improve this question
























  • stackoverflow.com/questions/13992403/…
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:41










  • @assylias The regex given in above link is specific to some other language.I have also tried same but it is not working.
    – Mihir
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • And more importantly: stackoverflow.com/a/1903368/829571 (read the introductory comment)
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • Even better: stackoverflow.com/questions/624581/…
    – Sofo Gial
    Nov 14 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Mihir: Those four emails that you want to invalidate, can you give the logic why they should not be considered valid? This will help me design a precise regex that works for you.
    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    Nov 17 at 17:20













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Validating E-mail Ids according to RFC5322 and following



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address



Below is the sample code using java and a regular expression to validate E-mail Ids.



public void checkValid() {
List<String> emails = new ArrayList();
//Valid Email Ids
emails.add("simple@example.com");
emails.add("very.common@example.com");
emails.add("disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com");
emails.add("other.email-with-hyphen@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("user.name+tag+sorting@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("x@example.com");
emails.add("carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar");
emails.add("example-indeed@strange-example.com");
emails.add("admin@mailserver1");
emails.add("example@s.example");
emails.add("" "@example.org");
emails.add(""john..doe"@example.org");

//Invalid emails Ids
emails.add("Abc.example.com");
emails.add("A@b@c@example.com");
emails.add("a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\k]l@example.com");
emails.add("just"not"right@example.com");
emails.add("this is"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("this\ still"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com");
emails.add("john..doe@example.com");
emails.add("john.doe@example..com");

String regex = "^[a-zA-Z0-9_!#$%&'*+/=? \"`{|}~^.-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+$";

Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(regex);
int i=0;
for(String email : emails){
Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(email);
System.out.println(++i +"."+email +" : "+ matcher.matches());
}
}


Actual Output:



   1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : true
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : true
22.john..doe@example.com : true
23.john.doe@example..com : true


Expected Ouput:



1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : false
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : false
22.john..doe@example.com : false
23.john.doe@example..com : false


How can I change my regular expression so that it will invalidate the below patterns of email ids.



1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com
john..doe@example.com
john.doe@example..com
just"not"right@example.com


Below are the criteria for regular expression:



Local-part



The local-part of the email address may use any of these ASCII characters:




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9;

  3. special characters !#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~

  4. dot ., provided that it is not the first or last character unless
    quoted, and provided also that it does not appear consecutively
    unless quoted (e.g. John..Doe@example.com is not allowed but
    "John..Doe"@example.com is allowed);


  5. space and "(),:;<>@[] characters are allowed with restrictions
    (they are only allowed inside a quoted string, as described in the
    paragraph below, and in addition, a backslash or double-quote must
    be preceded by a backslash); comments are allowed with parentheses
    at either end of the local-part; e.g.
    john.smith(comment)@example.com and
    (comment)john.smith@example.com are both equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.


Domain




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9, provided that top-level domain names are not
    all-numeric;

  3. hyphen -, provided that it is not the first or last character.
    Comments are allowed in the domain as well as in the local-part; for
    example, john.smith@(comment)example.com and
    john.smith@example.com(comment) are equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.










share|improve this question















Validating E-mail Ids according to RFC5322 and following



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address



Below is the sample code using java and a regular expression to validate E-mail Ids.



public void checkValid() {
List<String> emails = new ArrayList();
//Valid Email Ids
emails.add("simple@example.com");
emails.add("very.common@example.com");
emails.add("disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com");
emails.add("other.email-with-hyphen@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("user.name+tag+sorting@example.com");
emails.add("fully-qualified-domain@example.com");
emails.add("x@example.com");
emails.add("carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar");
emails.add("example-indeed@strange-example.com");
emails.add("admin@mailserver1");
emails.add("example@s.example");
emails.add("" "@example.org");
emails.add(""john..doe"@example.org");

//Invalid emails Ids
emails.add("Abc.example.com");
emails.add("A@b@c@example.com");
emails.add("a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\k]l@example.com");
emails.add("just"not"right@example.com");
emails.add("this is"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("this\ still"not\allowed@example.com");
emails.add("1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com");
emails.add("john..doe@example.com");
emails.add("john.doe@example..com");

String regex = "^[a-zA-Z0-9_!#$%&'*+/=? \"`{|}~^.-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+$";

Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(regex);
int i=0;
for(String email : emails){
Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(email);
System.out.println(++i +"."+email +" : "+ matcher.matches());
}
}


Actual Output:



   1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : true
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : true
22.john..doe@example.com : true
23.john.doe@example..com : true


Expected Ouput:



1.simple@example.com : true
2.very.common@example.com : true
3.disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com : true
4.other.email-with-hyphen@example.com : true
5.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
6.user.name+tag+sorting@example.com : true
7.fully-qualified-domain@example.com : true
8.x@example.com : true
9.carlosd'intino@arnet.com.ar : true
10.example-indeed@strange-example.com : true
11.admin@mailserver1 : true
12.example@s.example : true
13." "@example.org : true
14."john..doe"@example.org : true
15.Abc.example.com : false
16.A@b@c@example.com : false
17.a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[jk]l@example.com : false
18.just"not"right@example.com : false
19.this is"notallowed@example.com : false
20.this still"notallowed@example.com : false
21.1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com : false
22.john..doe@example.com : false
23.john.doe@example..com : false


How can I change my regular expression so that it will invalidate the below patterns of email ids.



1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234+x@example.com
john..doe@example.com
john.doe@example..com
just"not"right@example.com


Below are the criteria for regular expression:



Local-part



The local-part of the email address may use any of these ASCII characters:




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9;

  3. special characters !#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~

  4. dot ., provided that it is not the first or last character unless
    quoted, and provided also that it does not appear consecutively
    unless quoted (e.g. John..Doe@example.com is not allowed but
    "John..Doe"@example.com is allowed);


  5. space and "(),:;<>@[] characters are allowed with restrictions
    (they are only allowed inside a quoted string, as described in the
    paragraph below, and in addition, a backslash or double-quote must
    be preceded by a backslash); comments are allowed with parentheses
    at either end of the local-part; e.g.
    john.smith(comment)@example.com and
    (comment)john.smith@example.com are both equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.


Domain




  1. uppercase and lowercase Latin letters A to Z and a to z;

  2. digits 0 to 9, provided that top-level domain names are not
    all-numeric;

  3. hyphen -, provided that it is not the first or last character.
    Comments are allowed in the domain as well as in the local-part; for
    example, john.smith@(comment)example.com and
    john.smith@example.com(comment) are equivalent to
    john.smith@example.com.







java regex email-validation rfc5322






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 at 8:40

























asked Nov 14 at 11:39









Mihir

327319




327319












  • stackoverflow.com/questions/13992403/…
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:41










  • @assylias The regex given in above link is specific to some other language.I have also tried same but it is not working.
    – Mihir
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • And more importantly: stackoverflow.com/a/1903368/829571 (read the introductory comment)
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • Even better: stackoverflow.com/questions/624581/…
    – Sofo Gial
    Nov 14 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Mihir: Those four emails that you want to invalidate, can you give the logic why they should not be considered valid? This will help me design a precise regex that works for you.
    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    Nov 17 at 17:20


















  • stackoverflow.com/questions/13992403/…
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:41










  • @assylias The regex given in above link is specific to some other language.I have also tried same but it is not working.
    – Mihir
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • And more importantly: stackoverflow.com/a/1903368/829571 (read the introductory comment)
    – assylias
    Nov 14 at 11:43










  • Even better: stackoverflow.com/questions/624581/…
    – Sofo Gial
    Nov 14 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Mihir: Those four emails that you want to invalidate, can you give the logic why they should not be considered valid? This will help me design a precise regex that works for you.
    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    Nov 17 at 17:20
















stackoverflow.com/questions/13992403/…
– assylias
Nov 14 at 11:41




stackoverflow.com/questions/13992403/…
– assylias
Nov 14 at 11:41












@assylias The regex given in above link is specific to some other language.I have also tried same but it is not working.
– Mihir
Nov 14 at 11:43




@assylias The regex given in above link is specific to some other language.I have also tried same but it is not working.
– Mihir
Nov 14 at 11:43












And more importantly: stackoverflow.com/a/1903368/829571 (read the introductory comment)
– assylias
Nov 14 at 11:43




And more importantly: stackoverflow.com/a/1903368/829571 (read the introductory comment)
– assylias
Nov 14 at 11:43












Even better: stackoverflow.com/questions/624581/…
– Sofo Gial
Nov 14 at 11:43




Even better: stackoverflow.com/questions/624581/…
– Sofo Gial
Nov 14 at 11:43




1




1




@Mihir: Those four emails that you want to invalidate, can you give the logic why they should not be considered valid? This will help me design a precise regex that works for you.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
Nov 17 at 17:20




@Mihir: Those four emails that you want to invalidate, can you give the logic why they should not be considered valid? This will help me design a precise regex that works for you.
– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
Nov 17 at 17:20












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+50










You could RFC5322 like this

( reference regex modified )



"(?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:\.(?!\.)|[-!#\$%&'\*\+/=\?\^`\{\}\|~\w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:(\[(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\])|((?:(?=.{1,63}\.)[0-9a-z][-\w]*[0-9a-z]*\.)+[a-z0-9][\-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-\w]*))$"  


https://regex101.com/r/ObS3QZ/1



 # (?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\]*(?:\.[^"\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:.(?!.)|[-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:([(?:d{1,3}.){3}d{1,3}])|((?:(?=.{1,63}.)[0-9a-z][-w]*[0-9a-z]*.)+[a-z0-9][-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-w]*))$

# Note - remove all comments '(comments)' before runninig this regex
# Find ([^)]*) replace with nothing

(?im) # Case insensitive
^ # BOS

# Local part
(?= .{1,64} @ ) # 64 max chars
(?:
( # (1 start), Quoted
" [^"\]*
(?: \ . [^"\]* )*
"
@
) # (1 end)
| # or,
( # (2 start), Non-quoted
(?:
[0-9a-z]
(?:
.
(?! . )
| # or,
[-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w]
)*
)?
[0-9a-z]
@
) # (2 end)
)
# Domain part
(?= .{1,255} $ ) # 255 max chars
(?:
( # (3 start), IP
[
(?: d{1,3} . ){3}
d{1,3} ]
) # (3 end)
| # or,
( # (4 start), Others
(?: # Labels (63 max chars each)
(?= .{1,63} . )
[0-9a-z] [-w]* [0-9a-z]*
.
)+
[a-z0-9] [-a-z0-9]{0,22} [a-z0-9]
) # (4 end)
| # or,
( # (5 start), Localdomain
(?= .{1,63} $ )
[0-9a-z] [-w]*
) # (5 end)
)
$ # EOS





share|improve this answer























  • Working as expected.Thanks
    – Mihir
    Nov 20 at 7:31


















up vote
3
down vote













It's not the question you asked, but why re-invent the wheel?



Apache commons has a class that covers this already.



org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(email)


This way you aren't responsible for keeping up to date with changing email format standards.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    A regular expression is the most difficult and error-prone way to validate emails addresses. If you are using an implementation of javax.mail to send the emails, then the simplest way to determine if it will work is by using the provided parser, because whether the email is compliant or not, if the library cannot use it, then it doesn't matter.



    public static boolean validateEmail(String address) {
    try {
    // if this fails, the mail library can't send emails to this address
    InternetAddress ia = new InternetAddress(address, true);
    return ia.isGroup() && ia.getAddress().charAt(0) != '@';
    }
    catch (Throwable t) {
    return false;
    }
    }


    Invoking it with false allows emails without a @domain part when strict parsing. And since the checkAddress function invoked internally is private and we can't just call checkAddress(addr,false,true) since we don't want routing information (a feature practically designed for fraud through server bouncing), we have to check the first letter of the validated address.



    Now what you may notice here is that this validation method is actually compliant to RFC 2822, rather than 5822. The reason for this is because unless you are implementing your own SMTP sender library, then you're using one that depends on this one, and if you have an address that is 5822-valid but 2822-invalid, then your 5822-validation is rendered useless. But if you are implementing your own 5822 SMTP library, then you should learn from the existing ones and write a parser function, rather than a regular expression.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53299385%2femail-id-validation-according-to-rfc5322-and-https-en-wikipedia-org-wiki-email%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted
      +50










      You could RFC5322 like this

      ( reference regex modified )



      "(?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:\.(?!\.)|[-!#\$%&'\*\+/=\?\^`\{\}\|~\w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:(\[(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\])|((?:(?=.{1,63}\.)[0-9a-z][-\w]*[0-9a-z]*\.)+[a-z0-9][\-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-\w]*))$"  


      https://regex101.com/r/ObS3QZ/1



       # (?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\]*(?:\.[^"\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:.(?!.)|[-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:([(?:d{1,3}.){3}d{1,3}])|((?:(?=.{1,63}.)[0-9a-z][-w]*[0-9a-z]*.)+[a-z0-9][-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-w]*))$

      # Note - remove all comments '(comments)' before runninig this regex
      # Find ([^)]*) replace with nothing

      (?im) # Case insensitive
      ^ # BOS

      # Local part
      (?= .{1,64} @ ) # 64 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (1 start), Quoted
      " [^"\]*
      (?: \ . [^"\]* )*
      "
      @
      ) # (1 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (2 start), Non-quoted
      (?:
      [0-9a-z]
      (?:
      .
      (?! . )
      | # or,
      [-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w]
      )*
      )?
      [0-9a-z]
      @
      ) # (2 end)
      )
      # Domain part
      (?= .{1,255} $ ) # 255 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (3 start), IP
      [
      (?: d{1,3} . ){3}
      d{1,3} ]
      ) # (3 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (4 start), Others
      (?: # Labels (63 max chars each)
      (?= .{1,63} . )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]* [0-9a-z]*
      .
      )+
      [a-z0-9] [-a-z0-9]{0,22} [a-z0-9]
      ) # (4 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (5 start), Localdomain
      (?= .{1,63} $ )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]*
      ) # (5 end)
      )
      $ # EOS





      share|improve this answer























      • Working as expected.Thanks
        – Mihir
        Nov 20 at 7:31















      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted
      +50










      You could RFC5322 like this

      ( reference regex modified )



      "(?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:\.(?!\.)|[-!#\$%&'\*\+/=\?\^`\{\}\|~\w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:(\[(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\])|((?:(?=.{1,63}\.)[0-9a-z][-\w]*[0-9a-z]*\.)+[a-z0-9][\-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-\w]*))$"  


      https://regex101.com/r/ObS3QZ/1



       # (?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\]*(?:\.[^"\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:.(?!.)|[-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:([(?:d{1,3}.){3}d{1,3}])|((?:(?=.{1,63}.)[0-9a-z][-w]*[0-9a-z]*.)+[a-z0-9][-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-w]*))$

      # Note - remove all comments '(comments)' before runninig this regex
      # Find ([^)]*) replace with nothing

      (?im) # Case insensitive
      ^ # BOS

      # Local part
      (?= .{1,64} @ ) # 64 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (1 start), Quoted
      " [^"\]*
      (?: \ . [^"\]* )*
      "
      @
      ) # (1 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (2 start), Non-quoted
      (?:
      [0-9a-z]
      (?:
      .
      (?! . )
      | # or,
      [-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w]
      )*
      )?
      [0-9a-z]
      @
      ) # (2 end)
      )
      # Domain part
      (?= .{1,255} $ ) # 255 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (3 start), IP
      [
      (?: d{1,3} . ){3}
      d{1,3} ]
      ) # (3 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (4 start), Others
      (?: # Labels (63 max chars each)
      (?= .{1,63} . )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]* [0-9a-z]*
      .
      )+
      [a-z0-9] [-a-z0-9]{0,22} [a-z0-9]
      ) # (4 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (5 start), Localdomain
      (?= .{1,63} $ )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]*
      ) # (5 end)
      )
      $ # EOS





      share|improve this answer























      • Working as expected.Thanks
        – Mihir
        Nov 20 at 7:31













      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted
      +50







      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted
      +50




      +50




      You could RFC5322 like this

      ( reference regex modified )



      "(?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:\.(?!\.)|[-!#\$%&'\*\+/=\?\^`\{\}\|~\w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:(\[(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\])|((?:(?=.{1,63}\.)[0-9a-z][-\w]*[0-9a-z]*\.)+[a-z0-9][\-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-\w]*))$"  


      https://regex101.com/r/ObS3QZ/1



       # (?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\]*(?:\.[^"\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:.(?!.)|[-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:([(?:d{1,3}.){3}d{1,3}])|((?:(?=.{1,63}.)[0-9a-z][-w]*[0-9a-z]*.)+[a-z0-9][-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-w]*))$

      # Note - remove all comments '(comments)' before runninig this regex
      # Find ([^)]*) replace with nothing

      (?im) # Case insensitive
      ^ # BOS

      # Local part
      (?= .{1,64} @ ) # 64 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (1 start), Quoted
      " [^"\]*
      (?: \ . [^"\]* )*
      "
      @
      ) # (1 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (2 start), Non-quoted
      (?:
      [0-9a-z]
      (?:
      .
      (?! . )
      | # or,
      [-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w]
      )*
      )?
      [0-9a-z]
      @
      ) # (2 end)
      )
      # Domain part
      (?= .{1,255} $ ) # 255 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (3 start), IP
      [
      (?: d{1,3} . ){3}
      d{1,3} ]
      ) # (3 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (4 start), Others
      (?: # Labels (63 max chars each)
      (?= .{1,63} . )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]* [0-9a-z]*
      .
      )+
      [a-z0-9] [-a-z0-9]{0,22} [a-z0-9]
      ) # (4 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (5 start), Localdomain
      (?= .{1,63} $ )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]*
      ) # (5 end)
      )
      $ # EOS





      share|improve this answer














      You could RFC5322 like this

      ( reference regex modified )



      "(?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:\.(?!\.)|[-!#\$%&'\*\+/=\?\^`\{\}\|~\w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:(\[(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\])|((?:(?=.{1,63}\.)[0-9a-z][-\w]*[0-9a-z]*\.)+[a-z0-9][\-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-\w]*))$"  


      https://regex101.com/r/ObS3QZ/1



       # (?im)^(?=.{1,64}@)(?:("[^"\]*(?:\.[^"\]*)*"@)|((?:[0-9a-z](?:.(?!.)|[-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w])*)?[0-9a-z]@))(?=.{1,255}$)(?:([(?:d{1,3}.){3}d{1,3}])|((?:(?=.{1,63}.)[0-9a-z][-w]*[0-9a-z]*.)+[a-z0-9][-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9])|((?=.{1,63}$)[0-9a-z][-w]*))$

      # Note - remove all comments '(comments)' before runninig this regex
      # Find ([^)]*) replace with nothing

      (?im) # Case insensitive
      ^ # BOS

      # Local part
      (?= .{1,64} @ ) # 64 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (1 start), Quoted
      " [^"\]*
      (?: \ . [^"\]* )*
      "
      @
      ) # (1 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (2 start), Non-quoted
      (?:
      [0-9a-z]
      (?:
      .
      (?! . )
      | # or,
      [-!#$%&'*+/=?^`{}|~w]
      )*
      )?
      [0-9a-z]
      @
      ) # (2 end)
      )
      # Domain part
      (?= .{1,255} $ ) # 255 max chars
      (?:
      ( # (3 start), IP
      [
      (?: d{1,3} . ){3}
      d{1,3} ]
      ) # (3 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (4 start), Others
      (?: # Labels (63 max chars each)
      (?= .{1,63} . )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]* [0-9a-z]*
      .
      )+
      [a-z0-9] [-a-z0-9]{0,22} [a-z0-9]
      ) # (4 end)
      | # or,
      ( # (5 start), Localdomain
      (?= .{1,63} $ )
      [0-9a-z] [-w]*
      ) # (5 end)
      )
      $ # EOS






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 19 at 20:34

























      answered Nov 19 at 20:23









      sln

      26.1k31536




      26.1k31536












      • Working as expected.Thanks
        – Mihir
        Nov 20 at 7:31


















      • Working as expected.Thanks
        – Mihir
        Nov 20 at 7:31
















      Working as expected.Thanks
      – Mihir
      Nov 20 at 7:31




      Working as expected.Thanks
      – Mihir
      Nov 20 at 7:31












      up vote
      3
      down vote













      It's not the question you asked, but why re-invent the wheel?



      Apache commons has a class that covers this already.



      org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(email)


      This way you aren't responsible for keeping up to date with changing email format standards.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        It's not the question you asked, but why re-invent the wheel?



        Apache commons has a class that covers this already.



        org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(email)


        This way you aren't responsible for keeping up to date with changing email format standards.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          It's not the question you asked, but why re-invent the wheel?



          Apache commons has a class that covers this already.



          org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(email)


          This way you aren't responsible for keeping up to date with changing email format standards.






          share|improve this answer












          It's not the question you asked, but why re-invent the wheel?



          Apache commons has a class that covers this already.



          org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(email)


          This way you aren't responsible for keeping up to date with changing email format standards.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 17 at 0:41









          Jakg

          327211




          327211






















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              A regular expression is the most difficult and error-prone way to validate emails addresses. If you are using an implementation of javax.mail to send the emails, then the simplest way to determine if it will work is by using the provided parser, because whether the email is compliant or not, if the library cannot use it, then it doesn't matter.



              public static boolean validateEmail(String address) {
              try {
              // if this fails, the mail library can't send emails to this address
              InternetAddress ia = new InternetAddress(address, true);
              return ia.isGroup() && ia.getAddress().charAt(0) != '@';
              }
              catch (Throwable t) {
              return false;
              }
              }


              Invoking it with false allows emails without a @domain part when strict parsing. And since the checkAddress function invoked internally is private and we can't just call checkAddress(addr,false,true) since we don't want routing information (a feature practically designed for fraud through server bouncing), we have to check the first letter of the validated address.



              Now what you may notice here is that this validation method is actually compliant to RFC 2822, rather than 5822. The reason for this is because unless you are implementing your own SMTP sender library, then you're using one that depends on this one, and if you have an address that is 5822-valid but 2822-invalid, then your 5822-validation is rendered useless. But if you are implementing your own 5822 SMTP library, then you should learn from the existing ones and write a parser function, rather than a regular expression.






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                A regular expression is the most difficult and error-prone way to validate emails addresses. If you are using an implementation of javax.mail to send the emails, then the simplest way to determine if it will work is by using the provided parser, because whether the email is compliant or not, if the library cannot use it, then it doesn't matter.



                public static boolean validateEmail(String address) {
                try {
                // if this fails, the mail library can't send emails to this address
                InternetAddress ia = new InternetAddress(address, true);
                return ia.isGroup() && ia.getAddress().charAt(0) != '@';
                }
                catch (Throwable t) {
                return false;
                }
                }


                Invoking it with false allows emails without a @domain part when strict parsing. And since the checkAddress function invoked internally is private and we can't just call checkAddress(addr,false,true) since we don't want routing information (a feature practically designed for fraud through server bouncing), we have to check the first letter of the validated address.



                Now what you may notice here is that this validation method is actually compliant to RFC 2822, rather than 5822. The reason for this is because unless you are implementing your own SMTP sender library, then you're using one that depends on this one, and if you have an address that is 5822-valid but 2822-invalid, then your 5822-validation is rendered useless. But if you are implementing your own 5822 SMTP library, then you should learn from the existing ones and write a parser function, rather than a regular expression.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  A regular expression is the most difficult and error-prone way to validate emails addresses. If you are using an implementation of javax.mail to send the emails, then the simplest way to determine if it will work is by using the provided parser, because whether the email is compliant or not, if the library cannot use it, then it doesn't matter.



                  public static boolean validateEmail(String address) {
                  try {
                  // if this fails, the mail library can't send emails to this address
                  InternetAddress ia = new InternetAddress(address, true);
                  return ia.isGroup() && ia.getAddress().charAt(0) != '@';
                  }
                  catch (Throwable t) {
                  return false;
                  }
                  }


                  Invoking it with false allows emails without a @domain part when strict parsing. And since the checkAddress function invoked internally is private and we can't just call checkAddress(addr,false,true) since we don't want routing information (a feature practically designed for fraud through server bouncing), we have to check the first letter of the validated address.



                  Now what you may notice here is that this validation method is actually compliant to RFC 2822, rather than 5822. The reason for this is because unless you are implementing your own SMTP sender library, then you're using one that depends on this one, and if you have an address that is 5822-valid but 2822-invalid, then your 5822-validation is rendered useless. But if you are implementing your own 5822 SMTP library, then you should learn from the existing ones and write a parser function, rather than a regular expression.






                  share|improve this answer














                  A regular expression is the most difficult and error-prone way to validate emails addresses. If you are using an implementation of javax.mail to send the emails, then the simplest way to determine if it will work is by using the provided parser, because whether the email is compliant or not, if the library cannot use it, then it doesn't matter.



                  public static boolean validateEmail(String address) {
                  try {
                  // if this fails, the mail library can't send emails to this address
                  InternetAddress ia = new InternetAddress(address, true);
                  return ia.isGroup() && ia.getAddress().charAt(0) != '@';
                  }
                  catch (Throwable t) {
                  return false;
                  }
                  }


                  Invoking it with false allows emails without a @domain part when strict parsing. And since the checkAddress function invoked internally is private and we can't just call checkAddress(addr,false,true) since we don't want routing information (a feature practically designed for fraud through server bouncing), we have to check the first letter of the validated address.



                  Now what you may notice here is that this validation method is actually compliant to RFC 2822, rather than 5822. The reason for this is because unless you are implementing your own SMTP sender library, then you're using one that depends on this one, and if you have an address that is 5822-valid but 2822-invalid, then your 5822-validation is rendered useless. But if you are implementing your own 5822 SMTP library, then you should learn from the existing ones and write a parser function, rather than a regular expression.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 17 at 6:40

























                  answered Nov 16 at 13:59









                  coladict

                  1,739517




                  1,739517






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53299385%2femail-id-validation-according-to-rfc5322-and-https-en-wikipedia-org-wiki-email%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]