Less of a + noun












1















I would like to understand the meaning of the expression: less of a + noun.



Here a some example sentences:

1. Getting there is less of a problem if you have a car.

2. It is less of a problem than I'd expected.



What's the meaning of that expression?
How can I say/express the same without using less of a ?










share|improve this question























  • Less of: to a smaller extent or degree: we see less of John these days - less of a success than I'd hoped collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/less-of

    – user240918
    2 days ago













  • What is it you don't understand about it?

    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago











  • if I rewrite those sentences as follows, do they mean the same? 1. Getting there is NOT REALLY a problem if you have a car. 2. It is NOT REALLY a problem than I'd expected.

    – Jorge El Soñador
    2 days ago
















1















I would like to understand the meaning of the expression: less of a + noun.



Here a some example sentences:

1. Getting there is less of a problem if you have a car.

2. It is less of a problem than I'd expected.



What's the meaning of that expression?
How can I say/express the same without using less of a ?










share|improve this question























  • Less of: to a smaller extent or degree: we see less of John these days - less of a success than I'd hoped collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/less-of

    – user240918
    2 days ago













  • What is it you don't understand about it?

    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago











  • if I rewrite those sentences as follows, do they mean the same? 1. Getting there is NOT REALLY a problem if you have a car. 2. It is NOT REALLY a problem than I'd expected.

    – Jorge El Soñador
    2 days ago














1












1








1


1






I would like to understand the meaning of the expression: less of a + noun.



Here a some example sentences:

1. Getting there is less of a problem if you have a car.

2. It is less of a problem than I'd expected.



What's the meaning of that expression?
How can I say/express the same without using less of a ?










share|improve this question














I would like to understand the meaning of the expression: less of a + noun.



Here a some example sentences:

1. Getting there is less of a problem if you have a car.

2. It is less of a problem than I'd expected.



What's the meaning of that expression?
How can I say/express the same without using less of a ?







meaning






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









Jorge El SoñadorJorge El Soñador

253




253













  • Less of: to a smaller extent or degree: we see less of John these days - less of a success than I'd hoped collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/less-of

    – user240918
    2 days ago













  • What is it you don't understand about it?

    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago











  • if I rewrite those sentences as follows, do they mean the same? 1. Getting there is NOT REALLY a problem if you have a car. 2. It is NOT REALLY a problem than I'd expected.

    – Jorge El Soñador
    2 days ago



















  • Less of: to a smaller extent or degree: we see less of John these days - less of a success than I'd hoped collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/less-of

    – user240918
    2 days ago













  • What is it you don't understand about it?

    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago











  • if I rewrite those sentences as follows, do they mean the same? 1. Getting there is NOT REALLY a problem if you have a car. 2. It is NOT REALLY a problem than I'd expected.

    – Jorge El Soñador
    2 days ago

















Less of: to a smaller extent or degree: we see less of John these days - less of a success than I'd hoped collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/less-of

– user240918
2 days ago







Less of: to a smaller extent or degree: we see less of John these days - less of a success than I'd hoped collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/less-of

– user240918
2 days ago















What is it you don't understand about it?

– Colin Fine
2 days ago





What is it you don't understand about it?

– Colin Fine
2 days ago













if I rewrite those sentences as follows, do they mean the same? 1. Getting there is NOT REALLY a problem if you have a car. 2. It is NOT REALLY a problem than I'd expected.

– Jorge El Soñador
2 days ago





if I rewrite those sentences as follows, do they mean the same? 1. Getting there is NOT REALLY a problem if you have a car. 2. It is NOT REALLY a problem than I'd expected.

– Jorge El Soñador
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1















How can I say/express the same without using less of a?




In your specific sentences, you are talking about less of a problem.



A single-word replacement for less of a problem is easier:




Getting there is easier if you have a car.

It is easier than I'd expected.






But note that there can be a slight difference in meaning that could make any replacement of problem inappropriate.



Some people could consider not having a car to be an actual problem. Others could simply be using the word problem in the sentence as an indication of degree of effort.



If all you're trying to express is that having a car requires less effort than not having a car, then there is no reason to keep problem in the sentence. (And the single-word replacement of easier is fine.)



But if you want to maintain the fact that getting there is a problem regardless of how you do it (getting to the moon will always present a problem, whether you have a car or not), then removing the word problem may not be what you want.



If you keep problem, but are still comparing lesser problems with greater problems, then either less of a problem or lesser problem (if the sentence is additionally reworded) would remain appropriate.





On the other hand, if you really want to express that not having a car results in a problem in a way that having a car does not, then it's no longer a matter of degree but of the simple assignment of a category. In that case, you could say:




Getting there is not a problem if you have a car.






If you are following less of a with something other than problem, there would likely be different variations. But the use of less of a in general is used to compare the degree of one thing with another thing: X is less of a burden than Y; X is less of a celebration than Y.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482717%2fless-of-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1















    How can I say/express the same without using less of a?




    In your specific sentences, you are talking about less of a problem.



    A single-word replacement for less of a problem is easier:




    Getting there is easier if you have a car.

    It is easier than I'd expected.






    But note that there can be a slight difference in meaning that could make any replacement of problem inappropriate.



    Some people could consider not having a car to be an actual problem. Others could simply be using the word problem in the sentence as an indication of degree of effort.



    If all you're trying to express is that having a car requires less effort than not having a car, then there is no reason to keep problem in the sentence. (And the single-word replacement of easier is fine.)



    But if you want to maintain the fact that getting there is a problem regardless of how you do it (getting to the moon will always present a problem, whether you have a car or not), then removing the word problem may not be what you want.



    If you keep problem, but are still comparing lesser problems with greater problems, then either less of a problem or lesser problem (if the sentence is additionally reworded) would remain appropriate.





    On the other hand, if you really want to express that not having a car results in a problem in a way that having a car does not, then it's no longer a matter of degree but of the simple assignment of a category. In that case, you could say:




    Getting there is not a problem if you have a car.






    If you are following less of a with something other than problem, there would likely be different variations. But the use of less of a in general is used to compare the degree of one thing with another thing: X is less of a burden than Y; X is less of a celebration than Y.






    share|improve this answer




























      1















      How can I say/express the same without using less of a?




      In your specific sentences, you are talking about less of a problem.



      A single-word replacement for less of a problem is easier:




      Getting there is easier if you have a car.

      It is easier than I'd expected.






      But note that there can be a slight difference in meaning that could make any replacement of problem inappropriate.



      Some people could consider not having a car to be an actual problem. Others could simply be using the word problem in the sentence as an indication of degree of effort.



      If all you're trying to express is that having a car requires less effort than not having a car, then there is no reason to keep problem in the sentence. (And the single-word replacement of easier is fine.)



      But if you want to maintain the fact that getting there is a problem regardless of how you do it (getting to the moon will always present a problem, whether you have a car or not), then removing the word problem may not be what you want.



      If you keep problem, but are still comparing lesser problems with greater problems, then either less of a problem or lesser problem (if the sentence is additionally reworded) would remain appropriate.





      On the other hand, if you really want to express that not having a car results in a problem in a way that having a car does not, then it's no longer a matter of degree but of the simple assignment of a category. In that case, you could say:




      Getting there is not a problem if you have a car.






      If you are following less of a with something other than problem, there would likely be different variations. But the use of less of a in general is used to compare the degree of one thing with another thing: X is less of a burden than Y; X is less of a celebration than Y.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1








        How can I say/express the same without using less of a?




        In your specific sentences, you are talking about less of a problem.



        A single-word replacement for less of a problem is easier:




        Getting there is easier if you have a car.

        It is easier than I'd expected.






        But note that there can be a slight difference in meaning that could make any replacement of problem inappropriate.



        Some people could consider not having a car to be an actual problem. Others could simply be using the word problem in the sentence as an indication of degree of effort.



        If all you're trying to express is that having a car requires less effort than not having a car, then there is no reason to keep problem in the sentence. (And the single-word replacement of easier is fine.)



        But if you want to maintain the fact that getting there is a problem regardless of how you do it (getting to the moon will always present a problem, whether you have a car or not), then removing the word problem may not be what you want.



        If you keep problem, but are still comparing lesser problems with greater problems, then either less of a problem or lesser problem (if the sentence is additionally reworded) would remain appropriate.





        On the other hand, if you really want to express that not having a car results in a problem in a way that having a car does not, then it's no longer a matter of degree but of the simple assignment of a category. In that case, you could say:




        Getting there is not a problem if you have a car.






        If you are following less of a with something other than problem, there would likely be different variations. But the use of less of a in general is used to compare the degree of one thing with another thing: X is less of a burden than Y; X is less of a celebration than Y.






        share|improve this answer














        How can I say/express the same without using less of a?




        In your specific sentences, you are talking about less of a problem.



        A single-word replacement for less of a problem is easier:




        Getting there is easier if you have a car.

        It is easier than I'd expected.






        But note that there can be a slight difference in meaning that could make any replacement of problem inappropriate.



        Some people could consider not having a car to be an actual problem. Others could simply be using the word problem in the sentence as an indication of degree of effort.



        If all you're trying to express is that having a car requires less effort than not having a car, then there is no reason to keep problem in the sentence. (And the single-word replacement of easier is fine.)



        But if you want to maintain the fact that getting there is a problem regardless of how you do it (getting to the moon will always present a problem, whether you have a car or not), then removing the word problem may not be what you want.



        If you keep problem, but are still comparing lesser problems with greater problems, then either less of a problem or lesser problem (if the sentence is additionally reworded) would remain appropriate.





        On the other hand, if you really want to express that not having a car results in a problem in a way that having a car does not, then it's no longer a matter of degree but of the simple assignment of a category. In that case, you could say:




        Getting there is not a problem if you have a car.






        If you are following less of a with something other than problem, there would likely be different variations. But the use of less of a in general is used to compare the degree of one thing with another thing: X is less of a burden than Y; X is less of a celebration than Y.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Jason BassfordJason Bassford

        16.6k31942




        16.6k31942






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482717%2fless-of-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]