Can you cast Sanctuary after initiating a grapple without causing the spell to immediately end?












15












$begingroup$


I think it's pretty well established that if you cast Sanctuary on yourself, then initiate a grapple, sanctuary is broken because initiating a grapple is a "special melee attack." However, a situation came up that is a little less clear.



If a character has the War Caster feat, a spell focus that is accessible, one open hand, and the ability to cast Sanctuary, can she initiate a grapple with her action, then cast Sanctuary with her bonus action, and have the effect work on the grappled creature?



RAW, only the initiation of the grapple is an attack, after that, the grappled creature simply has the "grappled" condition, and may try and escape the grapple. The grappler in this case doesn't have to make additional special melee attacks to keep the target grappled.



In subsequent rounds, the grappler could do a number of actions (move, cast buffs or healing on the party, take the dodge action, etc) that wouldn't constitute an attack or spell that affects the enemy creature.



One aspect I'm not clear on is when the grappled creature tries to escape. The grappled creature has to succeed on a contested Acrobatics or Athletics against the grappler's Athletics. Would this satisfy the criteria of "mak(ing) an attack or cast(ing) a spell that affects an enemy creature"?



Does this work? Could the grappler maintain the grapple and the effect of Sanctuary in this scenario, as long as the grapple was initiated before the casting of Sanctuary?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    15












    $begingroup$


    I think it's pretty well established that if you cast Sanctuary on yourself, then initiate a grapple, sanctuary is broken because initiating a grapple is a "special melee attack." However, a situation came up that is a little less clear.



    If a character has the War Caster feat, a spell focus that is accessible, one open hand, and the ability to cast Sanctuary, can she initiate a grapple with her action, then cast Sanctuary with her bonus action, and have the effect work on the grappled creature?



    RAW, only the initiation of the grapple is an attack, after that, the grappled creature simply has the "grappled" condition, and may try and escape the grapple. The grappler in this case doesn't have to make additional special melee attacks to keep the target grappled.



    In subsequent rounds, the grappler could do a number of actions (move, cast buffs or healing on the party, take the dodge action, etc) that wouldn't constitute an attack or spell that affects the enemy creature.



    One aspect I'm not clear on is when the grappled creature tries to escape. The grappled creature has to succeed on a contested Acrobatics or Athletics against the grappler's Athletics. Would this satisfy the criteria of "mak(ing) an attack or cast(ing) a spell that affects an enemy creature"?



    Does this work? Could the grappler maintain the grapple and the effect of Sanctuary in this scenario, as long as the grapple was initiated before the casting of Sanctuary?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      15












      15








      15





      $begingroup$


      I think it's pretty well established that if you cast Sanctuary on yourself, then initiate a grapple, sanctuary is broken because initiating a grapple is a "special melee attack." However, a situation came up that is a little less clear.



      If a character has the War Caster feat, a spell focus that is accessible, one open hand, and the ability to cast Sanctuary, can she initiate a grapple with her action, then cast Sanctuary with her bonus action, and have the effect work on the grappled creature?



      RAW, only the initiation of the grapple is an attack, after that, the grappled creature simply has the "grappled" condition, and may try and escape the grapple. The grappler in this case doesn't have to make additional special melee attacks to keep the target grappled.



      In subsequent rounds, the grappler could do a number of actions (move, cast buffs or healing on the party, take the dodge action, etc) that wouldn't constitute an attack or spell that affects the enemy creature.



      One aspect I'm not clear on is when the grappled creature tries to escape. The grappled creature has to succeed on a contested Acrobatics or Athletics against the grappler's Athletics. Would this satisfy the criteria of "mak(ing) an attack or cast(ing) a spell that affects an enemy creature"?



      Does this work? Could the grappler maintain the grapple and the effect of Sanctuary in this scenario, as long as the grapple was initiated before the casting of Sanctuary?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I think it's pretty well established that if you cast Sanctuary on yourself, then initiate a grapple, sanctuary is broken because initiating a grapple is a "special melee attack." However, a situation came up that is a little less clear.



      If a character has the War Caster feat, a spell focus that is accessible, one open hand, and the ability to cast Sanctuary, can she initiate a grapple with her action, then cast Sanctuary with her bonus action, and have the effect work on the grappled creature?



      RAW, only the initiation of the grapple is an attack, after that, the grappled creature simply has the "grappled" condition, and may try and escape the grapple. The grappler in this case doesn't have to make additional special melee attacks to keep the target grappled.



      In subsequent rounds, the grappler could do a number of actions (move, cast buffs or healing on the party, take the dodge action, etc) that wouldn't constitute an attack or spell that affects the enemy creature.



      One aspect I'm not clear on is when the grappled creature tries to escape. The grappled creature has to succeed on a contested Acrobatics or Athletics against the grappler's Athletics. Would this satisfy the criteria of "mak(ing) an attack or cast(ing) a spell that affects an enemy creature"?



      Does this work? Could the grappler maintain the grapple and the effect of Sanctuary in this scenario, as long as the grapple was initiated before the casting of Sanctuary?







      dnd-5e spells actions grapple






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 9 hours ago









      V2Blast

      22.5k369142




      22.5k369142










      asked 12 hours ago









      Max BrownMax Brown

      1035




      1035






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          13












          $begingroup$

          Yes, this would work



          Maintaining a grapple is not an attack or spell and does not deal damage




          If the warded creature makes an attack, casts a spell that affects an enemy, or deals damage to another creature, this spell ends.




          Maintaining a grapple falls under none of these categories, and neither do opposed ability checks in general. Thus, there is nothing RAW preventing this from working.



          As long as you initiated the grapple before casting the spell, maintaining the grapple will not break the spell according to the rules.



          Trying to break free does not trigger a Wisdom save




          Escaping a Grapple. A grappled creature can use its action to escape. To do so, it must succeed on a Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check contested by your Strength (Athletics) check.




          This attempt by the creature to escape also does not fit into the outline of things that will trigger the wisdom save effect of sanctuary:




          [...] any creature who targets the warded creature with an attack or harmful spell must first make a Wisdom saving throw.




          An opposed check is not an attack or harmful spell, so it would not count.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            11 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140986%2fcan-you-cast-sanctuary-after-initiating-a-grapple-without-causing-the-spell-to-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          13












          $begingroup$

          Yes, this would work



          Maintaining a grapple is not an attack or spell and does not deal damage




          If the warded creature makes an attack, casts a spell that affects an enemy, or deals damage to another creature, this spell ends.




          Maintaining a grapple falls under none of these categories, and neither do opposed ability checks in general. Thus, there is nothing RAW preventing this from working.



          As long as you initiated the grapple before casting the spell, maintaining the grapple will not break the spell according to the rules.



          Trying to break free does not trigger a Wisdom save




          Escaping a Grapple. A grappled creature can use its action to escape. To do so, it must succeed on a Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check contested by your Strength (Athletics) check.




          This attempt by the creature to escape also does not fit into the outline of things that will trigger the wisdom save effect of sanctuary:




          [...] any creature who targets the warded creature with an attack or harmful spell must first make a Wisdom saving throw.




          An opposed check is not an attack or harmful spell, so it would not count.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            11 hours ago
















          13












          $begingroup$

          Yes, this would work



          Maintaining a grapple is not an attack or spell and does not deal damage




          If the warded creature makes an attack, casts a spell that affects an enemy, or deals damage to another creature, this spell ends.




          Maintaining a grapple falls under none of these categories, and neither do opposed ability checks in general. Thus, there is nothing RAW preventing this from working.



          As long as you initiated the grapple before casting the spell, maintaining the grapple will not break the spell according to the rules.



          Trying to break free does not trigger a Wisdom save




          Escaping a Grapple. A grappled creature can use its action to escape. To do so, it must succeed on a Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check contested by your Strength (Athletics) check.




          This attempt by the creature to escape also does not fit into the outline of things that will trigger the wisdom save effect of sanctuary:




          [...] any creature who targets the warded creature with an attack or harmful spell must first make a Wisdom saving throw.




          An opposed check is not an attack or harmful spell, so it would not count.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            11 hours ago














          13












          13








          13





          $begingroup$

          Yes, this would work



          Maintaining a grapple is not an attack or spell and does not deal damage




          If the warded creature makes an attack, casts a spell that affects an enemy, or deals damage to another creature, this spell ends.




          Maintaining a grapple falls under none of these categories, and neither do opposed ability checks in general. Thus, there is nothing RAW preventing this from working.



          As long as you initiated the grapple before casting the spell, maintaining the grapple will not break the spell according to the rules.



          Trying to break free does not trigger a Wisdom save




          Escaping a Grapple. A grappled creature can use its action to escape. To do so, it must succeed on a Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check contested by your Strength (Athletics) check.




          This attempt by the creature to escape also does not fit into the outline of things that will trigger the wisdom save effect of sanctuary:




          [...] any creature who targets the warded creature with an attack or harmful spell must first make a Wisdom saving throw.




          An opposed check is not an attack or harmful spell, so it would not count.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Yes, this would work



          Maintaining a grapple is not an attack or spell and does not deal damage




          If the warded creature makes an attack, casts a spell that affects an enemy, or deals damage to another creature, this spell ends.




          Maintaining a grapple falls under none of these categories, and neither do opposed ability checks in general. Thus, there is nothing RAW preventing this from working.



          As long as you initiated the grapple before casting the spell, maintaining the grapple will not break the spell according to the rules.



          Trying to break free does not trigger a Wisdom save




          Escaping a Grapple. A grappled creature can use its action to escape. To do so, it must succeed on a Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check contested by your Strength (Athletics) check.




          This attempt by the creature to escape also does not fit into the outline of things that will trigger the wisdom save effect of sanctuary:




          [...] any creature who targets the warded creature with an attack or harmful spell must first make a Wisdom saving throw.




          An opposed check is not an attack or harmful spell, so it would not count.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 10 hours ago

























          answered 11 hours ago









          RubiksmooseRubiksmoose

          54.5k9265410




          54.5k9265410








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            11 hours ago














          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            11 hours ago








          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
          $endgroup$
          – NautArch
          11 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          This is a really neat way of locking down a creature via grapple.
          $endgroup$
          – NautArch
          11 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140986%2fcan-you-cast-sanctuary-after-initiating-a-grapple-without-causing-the-spell-to-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Alcedinidae

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]