Carry and Rolldown of a Premium bond












1












$begingroup$


I'm hoping that you may help me understand how the pull to par of a premium bond impacts the carry and roll calculations over a year.



I understand that carry = Coupon income - cost of funds and that the forward price = Spot-carry



If a 5y bond paying a 5% coupon was priced at 110 to yield 3% with a cost of funds of 2.5%, I would say that the carry of the position is 5 - 110*0.025 = 225bp. This tells me that the 1y forward price must be 107.75. A lot of traders will take 225/5 = 25bp and say that there is 25bp of spread cushion over the year before the trade breaks even. I can see doing that on a par bond but am not sure that it applies on a premium bond.



Now, the pull to par on this 5y bond is going to be roughly 2 points a year (coup-ytm). Does this mean that out of the 2.25% carry, 2% is from rolling to par and 25bp is true carry?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm hoping that you may help me understand how the pull to par of a premium bond impacts the carry and roll calculations over a year.



    I understand that carry = Coupon income - cost of funds and that the forward price = Spot-carry



    If a 5y bond paying a 5% coupon was priced at 110 to yield 3% with a cost of funds of 2.5%, I would say that the carry of the position is 5 - 110*0.025 = 225bp. This tells me that the 1y forward price must be 107.75. A lot of traders will take 225/5 = 25bp and say that there is 25bp of spread cushion over the year before the trade breaks even. I can see doing that on a par bond but am not sure that it applies on a premium bond.



    Now, the pull to par on this 5y bond is going to be roughly 2 points a year (coup-ytm). Does this mean that out of the 2.25% carry, 2% is from rolling to par and 25bp is true carry?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I'm hoping that you may help me understand how the pull to par of a premium bond impacts the carry and roll calculations over a year.



      I understand that carry = Coupon income - cost of funds and that the forward price = Spot-carry



      If a 5y bond paying a 5% coupon was priced at 110 to yield 3% with a cost of funds of 2.5%, I would say that the carry of the position is 5 - 110*0.025 = 225bp. This tells me that the 1y forward price must be 107.75. A lot of traders will take 225/5 = 25bp and say that there is 25bp of spread cushion over the year before the trade breaks even. I can see doing that on a par bond but am not sure that it applies on a premium bond.



      Now, the pull to par on this 5y bond is going to be roughly 2 points a year (coup-ytm). Does this mean that out of the 2.25% carry, 2% is from rolling to par and 25bp is true carry?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I'm hoping that you may help me understand how the pull to par of a premium bond impacts the carry and roll calculations over a year.



      I understand that carry = Coupon income - cost of funds and that the forward price = Spot-carry



      If a 5y bond paying a 5% coupon was priced at 110 to yield 3% with a cost of funds of 2.5%, I would say that the carry of the position is 5 - 110*0.025 = 225bp. This tells me that the 1y forward price must be 107.75. A lot of traders will take 225/5 = 25bp and say that there is 25bp of spread cushion over the year before the trade breaks even. I can see doing that on a par bond but am not sure that it applies on a premium bond.



      Now, the pull to par on this 5y bond is going to be roughly 2 points a year (coup-ytm). Does this mean that out of the 2.25% carry, 2% is from rolling to par and 25bp is true carry?







      fixed-income






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      WadstkWadstk

      62




      62




      New contributor




      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Wadstk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          To determine the yield, you need to solve the following equation ($R$ being the yield, $N=5$ in your example):



          $P_{bond}=frac{100}{(1+R)^{N}}+sum_{i=1}^{N}frac{mathit{coupon}}{(1+R)^{i}}$



          For $P_{bond}=110$ and $mathit{coupon}=5$, this results in a yield of 2.83% and not 3%, as stated above.



          The pull to par of the bond would be determined via revaluing the bond after 1 year with the above formula as a 4-year bond with 5% coupon (still assuming the 2.83% yield determined above), resulting in 108.11.



          Therefore, the overall balance looks as follows:




          1. Cost of funding for 1 year the purchase price: 110*2.5%=2.75

          2. Coupon received at T=1: 5

          3. Value of bond after 1 year (now a 5% 4-yr bond): 108.11


          Makes for a new value of the position (after paying interest) of 108.11+5-2.75=110.36. So, net interest effect equals 5-2.75=2.25, or in yield terms 2.25/110=2.05% (gain), and pull-to-par loss equals (110-108.11)/110=1.72% (loss). Net effect is thus 2.05%-1.72%=33bp. With your simplified formula you would have said it should be 225bp.



          As for the forward price, this would be the 108.11 price that the bond would have in a year's time, discounted back to today at the yield, i.e. 105.14.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
            $endgroup$
            – Alex C
            3 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            3 hours ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          No, the 225p is your pure carry. This is the portion related to known cash flows. You know exactly what your coupon earned is and what your repo financing costs are.



          The pull to par effect is separate. If your bond is currently priced at 110 at 3% yield, then you would basically price what the bond would yield assuming the same 110 price but one year shorter. This will give you the pull to par effect.



          The roll down effect assumes a static environment where the yield curve is unchanged. In one year, your 5 year bond will become a 4 year bond. If the 4 year point is currently yielding 2%, this means the yield curve is upwards sloping so your bond will roll down from 3% to 2%.



          In sum, you will have pull to par plus roll down effect.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
            $endgroup$
            – ZRH
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
            $endgroup$
            – VanillaCall
            6 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "204"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Wadstk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44116%2fcarry-and-rolldown-of-a-premium-bond%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          To determine the yield, you need to solve the following equation ($R$ being the yield, $N=5$ in your example):



          $P_{bond}=frac{100}{(1+R)^{N}}+sum_{i=1}^{N}frac{mathit{coupon}}{(1+R)^{i}}$



          For $P_{bond}=110$ and $mathit{coupon}=5$, this results in a yield of 2.83% and not 3%, as stated above.



          The pull to par of the bond would be determined via revaluing the bond after 1 year with the above formula as a 4-year bond with 5% coupon (still assuming the 2.83% yield determined above), resulting in 108.11.



          Therefore, the overall balance looks as follows:




          1. Cost of funding for 1 year the purchase price: 110*2.5%=2.75

          2. Coupon received at T=1: 5

          3. Value of bond after 1 year (now a 5% 4-yr bond): 108.11


          Makes for a new value of the position (after paying interest) of 108.11+5-2.75=110.36. So, net interest effect equals 5-2.75=2.25, or in yield terms 2.25/110=2.05% (gain), and pull-to-par loss equals (110-108.11)/110=1.72% (loss). Net effect is thus 2.05%-1.72%=33bp. With your simplified formula you would have said it should be 225bp.



          As for the forward price, this would be the 108.11 price that the bond would have in a year's time, discounted back to today at the yield, i.e. 105.14.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
            $endgroup$
            – Alex C
            3 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            3 hours ago
















          2












          $begingroup$

          To determine the yield, you need to solve the following equation ($R$ being the yield, $N=5$ in your example):



          $P_{bond}=frac{100}{(1+R)^{N}}+sum_{i=1}^{N}frac{mathit{coupon}}{(1+R)^{i}}$



          For $P_{bond}=110$ and $mathit{coupon}=5$, this results in a yield of 2.83% and not 3%, as stated above.



          The pull to par of the bond would be determined via revaluing the bond after 1 year with the above formula as a 4-year bond with 5% coupon (still assuming the 2.83% yield determined above), resulting in 108.11.



          Therefore, the overall balance looks as follows:




          1. Cost of funding for 1 year the purchase price: 110*2.5%=2.75

          2. Coupon received at T=1: 5

          3. Value of bond after 1 year (now a 5% 4-yr bond): 108.11


          Makes for a new value of the position (after paying interest) of 108.11+5-2.75=110.36. So, net interest effect equals 5-2.75=2.25, or in yield terms 2.25/110=2.05% (gain), and pull-to-par loss equals (110-108.11)/110=1.72% (loss). Net effect is thus 2.05%-1.72%=33bp. With your simplified formula you would have said it should be 225bp.



          As for the forward price, this would be the 108.11 price that the bond would have in a year's time, discounted back to today at the yield, i.e. 105.14.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
            $endgroup$
            – Alex C
            3 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            3 hours ago














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          To determine the yield, you need to solve the following equation ($R$ being the yield, $N=5$ in your example):



          $P_{bond}=frac{100}{(1+R)^{N}}+sum_{i=1}^{N}frac{mathit{coupon}}{(1+R)^{i}}$



          For $P_{bond}=110$ and $mathit{coupon}=5$, this results in a yield of 2.83% and not 3%, as stated above.



          The pull to par of the bond would be determined via revaluing the bond after 1 year with the above formula as a 4-year bond with 5% coupon (still assuming the 2.83% yield determined above), resulting in 108.11.



          Therefore, the overall balance looks as follows:




          1. Cost of funding for 1 year the purchase price: 110*2.5%=2.75

          2. Coupon received at T=1: 5

          3. Value of bond after 1 year (now a 5% 4-yr bond): 108.11


          Makes for a new value of the position (after paying interest) of 108.11+5-2.75=110.36. So, net interest effect equals 5-2.75=2.25, or in yield terms 2.25/110=2.05% (gain), and pull-to-par loss equals (110-108.11)/110=1.72% (loss). Net effect is thus 2.05%-1.72%=33bp. With your simplified formula you would have said it should be 225bp.



          As for the forward price, this would be the 108.11 price that the bond would have in a year's time, discounted back to today at the yield, i.e. 105.14.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          To determine the yield, you need to solve the following equation ($R$ being the yield, $N=5$ in your example):



          $P_{bond}=frac{100}{(1+R)^{N}}+sum_{i=1}^{N}frac{mathit{coupon}}{(1+R)^{i}}$



          For $P_{bond}=110$ and $mathit{coupon}=5$, this results in a yield of 2.83% and not 3%, as stated above.



          The pull to par of the bond would be determined via revaluing the bond after 1 year with the above formula as a 4-year bond with 5% coupon (still assuming the 2.83% yield determined above), resulting in 108.11.



          Therefore, the overall balance looks as follows:




          1. Cost of funding for 1 year the purchase price: 110*2.5%=2.75

          2. Coupon received at T=1: 5

          3. Value of bond after 1 year (now a 5% 4-yr bond): 108.11


          Makes for a new value of the position (after paying interest) of 108.11+5-2.75=110.36. So, net interest effect equals 5-2.75=2.25, or in yield terms 2.25/110=2.05% (gain), and pull-to-par loss equals (110-108.11)/110=1.72% (loss). Net effect is thus 2.05%-1.72%=33bp. With your simplified formula you would have said it should be 225bp.



          As for the forward price, this would be the 108.11 price that the bond would have in a year's time, discounted back to today at the yield, i.e. 105.14.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago









          Emma

          1788




          1788










          answered 6 hours ago









          ZRHZRH

          466110




          466110












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
            $endgroup$
            – Alex C
            3 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            3 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
            $endgroup$
            – Alex C
            3 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
            $endgroup$
            – Wadstk
            3 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
          $endgroup$
          – Wadstk
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thanks. Concerning the no arbitrage forward price, the formula forward px = spot-carry must really only apply to a bond that starts in the future, not a bond that actually ages over the carry period as it doesn't take into account the pull to par.
          $endgroup$
          – Wadstk
          6 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
          $endgroup$
          – Wadstk
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Im saying, pull to par is known income in a sense, so that carry = (coupon income - financing rate) - pull to par
          $endgroup$
          – Wadstk
          5 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
          $endgroup$
          – Alex C
          3 hours ago






          $begingroup$
          If you look at this answer by @Helin quant.stackexchange.com/questions/25329/… you will find some useful info. "[carry] is basically coupon income + pull-to-par - financing cost, in yield terms", and "forward price = spot price – carry"
          $endgroup$
          – Alex C
          3 hours ago














          $begingroup$
          I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
          $endgroup$
          – Wadstk
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I have seen that. It is really the only time i have ever seen pull to par added to the basic carry = CI-financing cost equation. Using this equation, then, I get a arbitrage free forward price of 110-(5-1.9-2.75) = 109.65 which is silly. No one would buy a forward contract on this bond at that price given pull to par
          $endgroup$
          – Wadstk
          3 hours ago











          0












          $begingroup$

          No, the 225p is your pure carry. This is the portion related to known cash flows. You know exactly what your coupon earned is and what your repo financing costs are.



          The pull to par effect is separate. If your bond is currently priced at 110 at 3% yield, then you would basically price what the bond would yield assuming the same 110 price but one year shorter. This will give you the pull to par effect.



          The roll down effect assumes a static environment where the yield curve is unchanged. In one year, your 5 year bond will become a 4 year bond. If the 4 year point is currently yielding 2%, this means the yield curve is upwards sloping so your bond will roll down from 3% to 2%.



          In sum, you will have pull to par plus roll down effect.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
            $endgroup$
            – ZRH
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
            $endgroup$
            – VanillaCall
            6 hours ago


















          0












          $begingroup$

          No, the 225p is your pure carry. This is the portion related to known cash flows. You know exactly what your coupon earned is and what your repo financing costs are.



          The pull to par effect is separate. If your bond is currently priced at 110 at 3% yield, then you would basically price what the bond would yield assuming the same 110 price but one year shorter. This will give you the pull to par effect.



          The roll down effect assumes a static environment where the yield curve is unchanged. In one year, your 5 year bond will become a 4 year bond. If the 4 year point is currently yielding 2%, this means the yield curve is upwards sloping so your bond will roll down from 3% to 2%.



          In sum, you will have pull to par plus roll down effect.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
            $endgroup$
            – ZRH
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
            $endgroup$
            – VanillaCall
            6 hours ago
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          No, the 225p is your pure carry. This is the portion related to known cash flows. You know exactly what your coupon earned is and what your repo financing costs are.



          The pull to par effect is separate. If your bond is currently priced at 110 at 3% yield, then you would basically price what the bond would yield assuming the same 110 price but one year shorter. This will give you the pull to par effect.



          The roll down effect assumes a static environment where the yield curve is unchanged. In one year, your 5 year bond will become a 4 year bond. If the 4 year point is currently yielding 2%, this means the yield curve is upwards sloping so your bond will roll down from 3% to 2%.



          In sum, you will have pull to par plus roll down effect.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          No, the 225p is your pure carry. This is the portion related to known cash flows. You know exactly what your coupon earned is and what your repo financing costs are.



          The pull to par effect is separate. If your bond is currently priced at 110 at 3% yield, then you would basically price what the bond would yield assuming the same 110 price but one year shorter. This will give you the pull to par effect.



          The roll down effect assumes a static environment where the yield curve is unchanged. In one year, your 5 year bond will become a 4 year bond. If the 4 year point is currently yielding 2%, this means the yield curve is upwards sloping so your bond will roll down from 3% to 2%.



          In sum, you will have pull to par plus roll down effect.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          VanillaCallVanillaCall

          305112




          305112












          • $begingroup$
            i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
            $endgroup$
            – ZRH
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
            $endgroup$
            – VanillaCall
            6 hours ago




















          • $begingroup$
            i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
            $endgroup$
            – ZRH
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
            $endgroup$
            – VanillaCall
            6 hours ago


















          $begingroup$
          i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
          $endgroup$
          – ZRH
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          i dont see a 5% 5yr bond pricing at 110, if the yield is 3%
          $endgroup$
          – ZRH
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
          $endgroup$
          – VanillaCall
          6 hours ago






          $begingroup$
          I'm just using the OP's hypothetical example for discussion purposes of the pull to par and carry effects
          $endgroup$
          – VanillaCall
          6 hours ago












          Wadstk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Wadstk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Wadstk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Wadstk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44116%2fcarry-and-rolldown-of-a-premium-bond%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Alcedinidae

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]