Git command to reset to previous commit without losing commits












0















Case:



The commit history is:



A -> B -> C -> D


I hope to reset the current work dir to B on current branch with history:



A -> B -> C -> D -> E


The result of the tree is same to B, which means



git diff B..E --name-only


should returns empty list.



A stupid way is:



# we assume current work directory is `tree`, and branch is `master`
# and work directory HEAD at `D`

# reset HEAD to D
cd tree
git checkout -f D

# create a copy work directory
cd ..
rm -rf copy
cp -r tree copy

# clean old work directory
rm -rf tree
mkdir tree
cp -r copy/.git tree/.git

# reset copy directory to revision `B`
cd copy
git checkout -f B

# copy tree from copy directory to tree
rm -rf .git
cp -r ./.* ./* ../tree

# commit changes, current revision is we wanted `E`
git add .
git ci -m 'revert to commit B'


Is there a simplified way to do this?










share|improve this question























  • This is just an all-files variant of stackoverflow.com/q/215718/1256452, not sure if I should close as duplicate though.

    – torek
    Nov 22 '18 at 23:21
















0















Case:



The commit history is:



A -> B -> C -> D


I hope to reset the current work dir to B on current branch with history:



A -> B -> C -> D -> E


The result of the tree is same to B, which means



git diff B..E --name-only


should returns empty list.



A stupid way is:



# we assume current work directory is `tree`, and branch is `master`
# and work directory HEAD at `D`

# reset HEAD to D
cd tree
git checkout -f D

# create a copy work directory
cd ..
rm -rf copy
cp -r tree copy

# clean old work directory
rm -rf tree
mkdir tree
cp -r copy/.git tree/.git

# reset copy directory to revision `B`
cd copy
git checkout -f B

# copy tree from copy directory to tree
rm -rf .git
cp -r ./.* ./* ../tree

# commit changes, current revision is we wanted `E`
git add .
git ci -m 'revert to commit B'


Is there a simplified way to do this?










share|improve this question























  • This is just an all-files variant of stackoverflow.com/q/215718/1256452, not sure if I should close as duplicate though.

    – torek
    Nov 22 '18 at 23:21














0












0








0








Case:



The commit history is:



A -> B -> C -> D


I hope to reset the current work dir to B on current branch with history:



A -> B -> C -> D -> E


The result of the tree is same to B, which means



git diff B..E --name-only


should returns empty list.



A stupid way is:



# we assume current work directory is `tree`, and branch is `master`
# and work directory HEAD at `D`

# reset HEAD to D
cd tree
git checkout -f D

# create a copy work directory
cd ..
rm -rf copy
cp -r tree copy

# clean old work directory
rm -rf tree
mkdir tree
cp -r copy/.git tree/.git

# reset copy directory to revision `B`
cd copy
git checkout -f B

# copy tree from copy directory to tree
rm -rf .git
cp -r ./.* ./* ../tree

# commit changes, current revision is we wanted `E`
git add .
git ci -m 'revert to commit B'


Is there a simplified way to do this?










share|improve this question














Case:



The commit history is:



A -> B -> C -> D


I hope to reset the current work dir to B on current branch with history:



A -> B -> C -> D -> E


The result of the tree is same to B, which means



git diff B..E --name-only


should returns empty list.



A stupid way is:



# we assume current work directory is `tree`, and branch is `master`
# and work directory HEAD at `D`

# reset HEAD to D
cd tree
git checkout -f D

# create a copy work directory
cd ..
rm -rf copy
cp -r tree copy

# clean old work directory
rm -rf tree
mkdir tree
cp -r copy/.git tree/.git

# reset copy directory to revision `B`
cd copy
git checkout -f B

# copy tree from copy directory to tree
rm -rf .git
cp -r ./.* ./* ../tree

# commit changes, current revision is we wanted `E`
git add .
git ci -m 'revert to commit B'


Is there a simplified way to do this?







git






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:13









kcatskcats

489314




489314













  • This is just an all-files variant of stackoverflow.com/q/215718/1256452, not sure if I should close as duplicate though.

    – torek
    Nov 22 '18 at 23:21



















  • This is just an all-files variant of stackoverflow.com/q/215718/1256452, not sure if I should close as duplicate though.

    – torek
    Nov 22 '18 at 23:21

















This is just an all-files variant of stackoverflow.com/q/215718/1256452, not sure if I should close as duplicate though.

– torek
Nov 22 '18 at 23:21





This is just an all-files variant of stackoverflow.com/q/215718/1256452, not sure if I should close as duplicate though.

– torek
Nov 22 '18 at 23:21












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Just revert the intermediate commits:



git revert D C


You might need to squash the resulting commits then.






share|improve this answer


























  • This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

    – kcats
    Nov 22 '18 at 8:19



















0














checkout files in commit B



git checkout B -- .


you can see the changes B and D



git diff HEAD


then commit it






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426452%2fgit-command-to-reset-to-previous-commit-without-losing-commits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Just revert the intermediate commits:



    git revert D C


    You might need to squash the resulting commits then.






    share|improve this answer


























    • This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

      – kcats
      Nov 22 '18 at 8:19
















    0














    Just revert the intermediate commits:



    git revert D C


    You might need to squash the resulting commits then.






    share|improve this answer


























    • This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

      – kcats
      Nov 22 '18 at 8:19














    0












    0








    0







    Just revert the intermediate commits:



    git revert D C


    You might need to squash the resulting commits then.






    share|improve this answer















    Just revert the intermediate commits:



    git revert D C


    You might need to squash the resulting commits then.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 22 '18 at 8:19

























    answered Nov 22 '18 at 8:16









    chorobachoroba

    157k14142205




    157k14142205













    • This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

      – kcats
      Nov 22 '18 at 8:19



















    • This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

      – kcats
      Nov 22 '18 at 8:19

















    This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

    – kcats
    Nov 22 '18 at 8:19





    This leads to two problems: the first is it will create multiple commits, the result will be A -> B -> C -> D -> D' -> C', and the second is that may be meat a merge commit or conflicts, it could not be handled automatically.

    – kcats
    Nov 22 '18 at 8:19













    0














    checkout files in commit B



    git checkout B -- .


    you can see the changes B and D



    git diff HEAD


    then commit it






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      checkout files in commit B



      git checkout B -- .


      you can see the changes B and D



      git diff HEAD


      then commit it






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        checkout files in commit B



        git checkout B -- .


        you can see the changes B and D



        git diff HEAD


        then commit it






        share|improve this answer













        checkout files in commit B



        git checkout B -- .


        you can see the changes B and D



        git diff HEAD


        then commit it







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 22 '18 at 9:09









        jumpgoblinjumpgoblin

        13




        13






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426452%2fgit-command-to-reset-to-previous-commit-without-losing-commits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]