“impute” as an intransitive verb












2















I came across a sentence in a Wikipedia article that went like this (MEMRI stands for Middle East Media Research Institute):




In 2006, Finkelstein accused MEMRI of editing a television interview he gave in Lebanon in order to falsely impute that he was a Holocaust denier.
MEMRI article




This sounded strange to me as I think I've always heard it as imputing 'something' to 'something/someone', meaning it's transitive. I know anyone can edit Wikipedia, so I didn't make much of it. However I did try to search for more instances of an intransitive use of impute. None of the dictionaries I've seen list "impute" as intransitive, but it is used in this way (relevant parts have been made bold by me.




If a tweet advises readers not to leave their wallets lying around if John Smith's in the room, the meaning on which Mr Smith's lawyers will fight the case is that the words impute that he's a thief.
Defamation law in the online age: for beginners - Sydney Morning Herald article



A statutory audit results in the auditor giving either an unqualified audit opinion so that the reader can impute that the entitity's financial statements reflect a 'true and fair view', or on the contrary an audit opinion that indicates...
Health and Safety, Environment and Quality Audits: A risk-based approach, 2014



I will not single out any of the many individuals who have been helpful, and, most importantly, I do not mean to impute that the contents of this work have passed their final muster.
Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights Into Human Prehistory, 1996



It stated that a defendant will have a ‘non-delegable’ duty of care when: ... There is a pre-existing relationship between the claimant and the defendant which places the claimant in the care or custody of the defendant and from which it is reasonable to impute that the defendant owes the claimant a ‘positive duty’ to protect him or her from harm;
Boys & Maugham Solicitors website, a UK a law firm



The Fifth District court now has the latitude to impute whether the legislators believed they were taking “the only course of action which appeared open” in adopting a piece of legislation, or it can impute that the legislators had no other options open to them.
Analysis of a Florida Supreme Court decision in 2017



Plaintiff first contends that the statements in the article are defamatory per se because they impute that the Plaintiff has committed a crime, namely the illegal cyberattack.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, Memorandum opinion and order.



Here, Dziagwa's alleged statement did not
fairly impute that the plaintiff had committed a car theft or any other indictable criminal offense.
Illinois Appellate Court decision, 1997




I'm just wondering if this use is acceptable or standard.










share|improve this question























  • Am I right in thinking that some of the quotations overlap 'impute' with 'imply' ? My understanding of 'impute' is a matter of transferring attribute.

    – Nigel J
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NigelJ I was thinking that maybe some may mix it with imply and impugn. Maybe these words play some part.

    – Zebrafish
    9 hours ago


















2















I came across a sentence in a Wikipedia article that went like this (MEMRI stands for Middle East Media Research Institute):




In 2006, Finkelstein accused MEMRI of editing a television interview he gave in Lebanon in order to falsely impute that he was a Holocaust denier.
MEMRI article




This sounded strange to me as I think I've always heard it as imputing 'something' to 'something/someone', meaning it's transitive. I know anyone can edit Wikipedia, so I didn't make much of it. However I did try to search for more instances of an intransitive use of impute. None of the dictionaries I've seen list "impute" as intransitive, but it is used in this way (relevant parts have been made bold by me.




If a tweet advises readers not to leave their wallets lying around if John Smith's in the room, the meaning on which Mr Smith's lawyers will fight the case is that the words impute that he's a thief.
Defamation law in the online age: for beginners - Sydney Morning Herald article



A statutory audit results in the auditor giving either an unqualified audit opinion so that the reader can impute that the entitity's financial statements reflect a 'true and fair view', or on the contrary an audit opinion that indicates...
Health and Safety, Environment and Quality Audits: A risk-based approach, 2014



I will not single out any of the many individuals who have been helpful, and, most importantly, I do not mean to impute that the contents of this work have passed their final muster.
Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights Into Human Prehistory, 1996



It stated that a defendant will have a ‘non-delegable’ duty of care when: ... There is a pre-existing relationship between the claimant and the defendant which places the claimant in the care or custody of the defendant and from which it is reasonable to impute that the defendant owes the claimant a ‘positive duty’ to protect him or her from harm;
Boys & Maugham Solicitors website, a UK a law firm



The Fifth District court now has the latitude to impute whether the legislators believed they were taking “the only course of action which appeared open” in adopting a piece of legislation, or it can impute that the legislators had no other options open to them.
Analysis of a Florida Supreme Court decision in 2017



Plaintiff first contends that the statements in the article are defamatory per se because they impute that the Plaintiff has committed a crime, namely the illegal cyberattack.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, Memorandum opinion and order.



Here, Dziagwa's alleged statement did not
fairly impute that the plaintiff had committed a car theft or any other indictable criminal offense.
Illinois Appellate Court decision, 1997




I'm just wondering if this use is acceptable or standard.










share|improve this question























  • Am I right in thinking that some of the quotations overlap 'impute' with 'imply' ? My understanding of 'impute' is a matter of transferring attribute.

    – Nigel J
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NigelJ I was thinking that maybe some may mix it with imply and impugn. Maybe these words play some part.

    – Zebrafish
    9 hours ago
















2












2








2








I came across a sentence in a Wikipedia article that went like this (MEMRI stands for Middle East Media Research Institute):




In 2006, Finkelstein accused MEMRI of editing a television interview he gave in Lebanon in order to falsely impute that he was a Holocaust denier.
MEMRI article




This sounded strange to me as I think I've always heard it as imputing 'something' to 'something/someone', meaning it's transitive. I know anyone can edit Wikipedia, so I didn't make much of it. However I did try to search for more instances of an intransitive use of impute. None of the dictionaries I've seen list "impute" as intransitive, but it is used in this way (relevant parts have been made bold by me.




If a tweet advises readers not to leave their wallets lying around if John Smith's in the room, the meaning on which Mr Smith's lawyers will fight the case is that the words impute that he's a thief.
Defamation law in the online age: for beginners - Sydney Morning Herald article



A statutory audit results in the auditor giving either an unqualified audit opinion so that the reader can impute that the entitity's financial statements reflect a 'true and fair view', or on the contrary an audit opinion that indicates...
Health and Safety, Environment and Quality Audits: A risk-based approach, 2014



I will not single out any of the many individuals who have been helpful, and, most importantly, I do not mean to impute that the contents of this work have passed their final muster.
Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights Into Human Prehistory, 1996



It stated that a defendant will have a ‘non-delegable’ duty of care when: ... There is a pre-existing relationship between the claimant and the defendant which places the claimant in the care or custody of the defendant and from which it is reasonable to impute that the defendant owes the claimant a ‘positive duty’ to protect him or her from harm;
Boys & Maugham Solicitors website, a UK a law firm



The Fifth District court now has the latitude to impute whether the legislators believed they were taking “the only course of action which appeared open” in adopting a piece of legislation, or it can impute that the legislators had no other options open to them.
Analysis of a Florida Supreme Court decision in 2017



Plaintiff first contends that the statements in the article are defamatory per se because they impute that the Plaintiff has committed a crime, namely the illegal cyberattack.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, Memorandum opinion and order.



Here, Dziagwa's alleged statement did not
fairly impute that the plaintiff had committed a car theft or any other indictable criminal offense.
Illinois Appellate Court decision, 1997




I'm just wondering if this use is acceptable or standard.










share|improve this question














I came across a sentence in a Wikipedia article that went like this (MEMRI stands for Middle East Media Research Institute):




In 2006, Finkelstein accused MEMRI of editing a television interview he gave in Lebanon in order to falsely impute that he was a Holocaust denier.
MEMRI article




This sounded strange to me as I think I've always heard it as imputing 'something' to 'something/someone', meaning it's transitive. I know anyone can edit Wikipedia, so I didn't make much of it. However I did try to search for more instances of an intransitive use of impute. None of the dictionaries I've seen list "impute" as intransitive, but it is used in this way (relevant parts have been made bold by me.




If a tweet advises readers not to leave their wallets lying around if John Smith's in the room, the meaning on which Mr Smith's lawyers will fight the case is that the words impute that he's a thief.
Defamation law in the online age: for beginners - Sydney Morning Herald article



A statutory audit results in the auditor giving either an unqualified audit opinion so that the reader can impute that the entitity's financial statements reflect a 'true and fair view', or on the contrary an audit opinion that indicates...
Health and Safety, Environment and Quality Audits: A risk-based approach, 2014



I will not single out any of the many individuals who have been helpful, and, most importantly, I do not mean to impute that the contents of this work have passed their final muster.
Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights Into Human Prehistory, 1996



It stated that a defendant will have a ‘non-delegable’ duty of care when: ... There is a pre-existing relationship between the claimant and the defendant which places the claimant in the care or custody of the defendant and from which it is reasonable to impute that the defendant owes the claimant a ‘positive duty’ to protect him or her from harm;
Boys & Maugham Solicitors website, a UK a law firm



The Fifth District court now has the latitude to impute whether the legislators believed they were taking “the only course of action which appeared open” in adopting a piece of legislation, or it can impute that the legislators had no other options open to them.
Analysis of a Florida Supreme Court decision in 2017



Plaintiff first contends that the statements in the article are defamatory per se because they impute that the Plaintiff has committed a crime, namely the illegal cyberattack.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, Memorandum opinion and order.



Here, Dziagwa's alleged statement did not
fairly impute that the plaintiff had committed a car theft or any other indictable criminal offense.
Illinois Appellate Court decision, 1997




I'm just wondering if this use is acceptable or standard.







transitive-verbs intransitive-verbs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 12 hours ago









ZebrafishZebrafish

10k31336




10k31336













  • Am I right in thinking that some of the quotations overlap 'impute' with 'imply' ? My understanding of 'impute' is a matter of transferring attribute.

    – Nigel J
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NigelJ I was thinking that maybe some may mix it with imply and impugn. Maybe these words play some part.

    – Zebrafish
    9 hours ago





















  • Am I right in thinking that some of the quotations overlap 'impute' with 'imply' ? My understanding of 'impute' is a matter of transferring attribute.

    – Nigel J
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NigelJ I was thinking that maybe some may mix it with imply and impugn. Maybe these words play some part.

    – Zebrafish
    9 hours ago



















Am I right in thinking that some of the quotations overlap 'impute' with 'imply' ? My understanding of 'impute' is a matter of transferring attribute.

– Nigel J
9 hours ago





Am I right in thinking that some of the quotations overlap 'impute' with 'imply' ? My understanding of 'impute' is a matter of transferring attribute.

– Nigel J
9 hours ago




1




1





@NigelJ I was thinking that maybe some may mix it with imply and impugn. Maybe these words play some part.

– Zebrafish
9 hours ago







@NigelJ I was thinking that maybe some may mix it with imply and impugn. Maybe these words play some part.

– Zebrafish
9 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














As far as I can tell most instances of impute used in this way come from subject matter dealing with law, and seem to have been more common in earlier times. However this usage seems to have carried on through into legal and legislative (parliamentary etc.) contexts and settings up to this day. Also, it seems that some people have adopted this type of use in writing or speaking about general topics, as shown in the stone tools book citation in my question, but there are also other examples I found, such as in Figures of Simplicity: Sensation and Thinking in Kleist and Melville, 2010, a book that analyzes literature from various authors.



I have checked the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and it only lists "impute" as a transitive verb. This is also the case in the 1828 edition of Webster's. I've also checked a law dictionary but its examples show a use which is consistent with all dictionaries, eg.:




The mother's negligence can be imputed to the child in any claim on behalf of the child against the truck driver.
The People's Law Dictionary




Based on what I've seen, this intransitive usage is generally nonstandard, and when seen or heard it's likely said in a legal or parliamentary setting or context. Also, when impute is used in this way it seems to mean something like the intransitive claim or charge. Eg.:




The Treasurer's legal team argues the Fairfax articles, published last May, impute that he is corrupt and accepted bribes,...
Financial Times article




However there are plenty of examples of both individuals, media outlets and writers using it in this way in general terms, though I can't tell how common this is as a proportion of all uses of the word.



Also, I'm not sure if this is of any value, but a Google NGram search gave the following result.






share|improve this answer

































    0














    The verb impute can be complemented by a clause:




    Are you imputing that the company was negligent?




    and by a noun phrase:




    Are you imputing negligence on the company's part?




    and by prepositional phrase + clause:




    Are you imputing to him that he intended to defraud the bank by exaggerating the worth of his collateral?



    An intention to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



    That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



    That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed.



    Are you imputing to them that they were motivated by greed?







    share|improve this answer


























    • Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

      – Zebrafish
      9 hours ago











    • In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

      – TRomano
      9 hours ago











    • It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

      – John Lawler
      8 hours ago











    • @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

      – TRomano
      8 hours ago













    • @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

      – Zebrafish
      7 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484836%2fimpute-as-an-intransitive-verb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    As far as I can tell most instances of impute used in this way come from subject matter dealing with law, and seem to have been more common in earlier times. However this usage seems to have carried on through into legal and legislative (parliamentary etc.) contexts and settings up to this day. Also, it seems that some people have adopted this type of use in writing or speaking about general topics, as shown in the stone tools book citation in my question, but there are also other examples I found, such as in Figures of Simplicity: Sensation and Thinking in Kleist and Melville, 2010, a book that analyzes literature from various authors.



    I have checked the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and it only lists "impute" as a transitive verb. This is also the case in the 1828 edition of Webster's. I've also checked a law dictionary but its examples show a use which is consistent with all dictionaries, eg.:




    The mother's negligence can be imputed to the child in any claim on behalf of the child against the truck driver.
    The People's Law Dictionary




    Based on what I've seen, this intransitive usage is generally nonstandard, and when seen or heard it's likely said in a legal or parliamentary setting or context. Also, when impute is used in this way it seems to mean something like the intransitive claim or charge. Eg.:




    The Treasurer's legal team argues the Fairfax articles, published last May, impute that he is corrupt and accepted bribes,...
    Financial Times article




    However there are plenty of examples of both individuals, media outlets and writers using it in this way in general terms, though I can't tell how common this is as a proportion of all uses of the word.



    Also, I'm not sure if this is of any value, but a Google NGram search gave the following result.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      As far as I can tell most instances of impute used in this way come from subject matter dealing with law, and seem to have been more common in earlier times. However this usage seems to have carried on through into legal and legislative (parliamentary etc.) contexts and settings up to this day. Also, it seems that some people have adopted this type of use in writing or speaking about general topics, as shown in the stone tools book citation in my question, but there are also other examples I found, such as in Figures of Simplicity: Sensation and Thinking in Kleist and Melville, 2010, a book that analyzes literature from various authors.



      I have checked the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and it only lists "impute" as a transitive verb. This is also the case in the 1828 edition of Webster's. I've also checked a law dictionary but its examples show a use which is consistent with all dictionaries, eg.:




      The mother's negligence can be imputed to the child in any claim on behalf of the child against the truck driver.
      The People's Law Dictionary




      Based on what I've seen, this intransitive usage is generally nonstandard, and when seen or heard it's likely said in a legal or parliamentary setting or context. Also, when impute is used in this way it seems to mean something like the intransitive claim or charge. Eg.:




      The Treasurer's legal team argues the Fairfax articles, published last May, impute that he is corrupt and accepted bribes,...
      Financial Times article




      However there are plenty of examples of both individuals, media outlets and writers using it in this way in general terms, though I can't tell how common this is as a proportion of all uses of the word.



      Also, I'm not sure if this is of any value, but a Google NGram search gave the following result.






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        As far as I can tell most instances of impute used in this way come from subject matter dealing with law, and seem to have been more common in earlier times. However this usage seems to have carried on through into legal and legislative (parliamentary etc.) contexts and settings up to this day. Also, it seems that some people have adopted this type of use in writing or speaking about general topics, as shown in the stone tools book citation in my question, but there are also other examples I found, such as in Figures of Simplicity: Sensation and Thinking in Kleist and Melville, 2010, a book that analyzes literature from various authors.



        I have checked the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and it only lists "impute" as a transitive verb. This is also the case in the 1828 edition of Webster's. I've also checked a law dictionary but its examples show a use which is consistent with all dictionaries, eg.:




        The mother's negligence can be imputed to the child in any claim on behalf of the child against the truck driver.
        The People's Law Dictionary




        Based on what I've seen, this intransitive usage is generally nonstandard, and when seen or heard it's likely said in a legal or parliamentary setting or context. Also, when impute is used in this way it seems to mean something like the intransitive claim or charge. Eg.:




        The Treasurer's legal team argues the Fairfax articles, published last May, impute that he is corrupt and accepted bribes,...
        Financial Times article




        However there are plenty of examples of both individuals, media outlets and writers using it in this way in general terms, though I can't tell how common this is as a proportion of all uses of the word.



        Also, I'm not sure if this is of any value, but a Google NGram search gave the following result.






        share|improve this answer















        As far as I can tell most instances of impute used in this way come from subject matter dealing with law, and seem to have been more common in earlier times. However this usage seems to have carried on through into legal and legislative (parliamentary etc.) contexts and settings up to this day. Also, it seems that some people have adopted this type of use in writing or speaking about general topics, as shown in the stone tools book citation in my question, but there are also other examples I found, such as in Figures of Simplicity: Sensation and Thinking in Kleist and Melville, 2010, a book that analyzes literature from various authors.



        I have checked the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and it only lists "impute" as a transitive verb. This is also the case in the 1828 edition of Webster's. I've also checked a law dictionary but its examples show a use which is consistent with all dictionaries, eg.:




        The mother's negligence can be imputed to the child in any claim on behalf of the child against the truck driver.
        The People's Law Dictionary




        Based on what I've seen, this intransitive usage is generally nonstandard, and when seen or heard it's likely said in a legal or parliamentary setting or context. Also, when impute is used in this way it seems to mean something like the intransitive claim or charge. Eg.:




        The Treasurer's legal team argues the Fairfax articles, published last May, impute that he is corrupt and accepted bribes,...
        Financial Times article




        However there are plenty of examples of both individuals, media outlets and writers using it in this way in general terms, though I can't tell how common this is as a proportion of all uses of the word.



        Also, I'm not sure if this is of any value, but a Google NGram search gave the following result.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        answered 12 hours ago


























        community wiki





        Zebrafish


























            0














            The verb impute can be complemented by a clause:




            Are you imputing that the company was negligent?




            and by a noun phrase:




            Are you imputing negligence on the company's part?




            and by prepositional phrase + clause:




            Are you imputing to him that he intended to defraud the bank by exaggerating the worth of his collateral?



            An intention to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed.



            Are you imputing to them that they were motivated by greed?







            share|improve this answer


























            • Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

              – Zebrafish
              9 hours ago











            • In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

              – TRomano
              9 hours ago











            • It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

              – John Lawler
              8 hours ago











            • @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

              – TRomano
              8 hours ago













            • @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

              – Zebrafish
              7 hours ago
















            0














            The verb impute can be complemented by a clause:




            Are you imputing that the company was negligent?




            and by a noun phrase:




            Are you imputing negligence on the company's part?




            and by prepositional phrase + clause:




            Are you imputing to him that he intended to defraud the bank by exaggerating the worth of his collateral?



            An intention to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed.



            Are you imputing to them that they were motivated by greed?







            share|improve this answer


























            • Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

              – Zebrafish
              9 hours ago











            • In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

              – TRomano
              9 hours ago











            • It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

              – John Lawler
              8 hours ago











            • @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

              – TRomano
              8 hours ago













            • @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

              – Zebrafish
              7 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            The verb impute can be complemented by a clause:




            Are you imputing that the company was negligent?




            and by a noun phrase:




            Are you imputing negligence on the company's part?




            and by prepositional phrase + clause:




            Are you imputing to him that he intended to defraud the bank by exaggerating the worth of his collateral?



            An intention to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed.



            Are you imputing to them that they were motivated by greed?







            share|improve this answer















            The verb impute can be complemented by a clause:




            Are you imputing that the company was negligent?




            and by a noun phrase:




            Are you imputing negligence on the company's part?




            and by prepositional phrase + clause:




            Are you imputing to him that he intended to defraud the bank by exaggerating the worth of his collateral?



            An intention to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed to him.



            That he intended to defraud the bank has been imputed.



            Are you imputing to them that they were motivated by greed?








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 9 hours ago









            TRomanoTRomano

            15.1k21943




            15.1k21943













            • Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

              – Zebrafish
              9 hours ago











            • In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

              – TRomano
              9 hours ago











            • It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

              – John Lawler
              8 hours ago











            • @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

              – TRomano
              8 hours ago













            • @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

              – Zebrafish
              7 hours ago



















            • Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

              – Zebrafish
              9 hours ago











            • In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

              – TRomano
              9 hours ago











            • It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

              – John Lawler
              8 hours ago











            • @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

              – TRomano
              8 hours ago













            • @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

              – Zebrafish
              7 hours ago

















            Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

            – Zebrafish
            9 hours ago





            Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the first example impute is being used intransitively, right?

            – Zebrafish
            9 hours ago













            In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

            – TRomano
            9 hours ago





            In old-school terms, right, it is not transitive in the sense that it has no direct object.

            – TRomano
            9 hours ago













            It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

            – John Lawler
            8 hours ago





            It has a direct object and it is transitive. There is no intransitive use of impute, *unless you impute. The direct object of impute in the first example is the complement that-clause that the company was negligent. Complement clauses act as noun phrases and can be subjects or direct objects. The odd part about this construction is that impute normally takes an indirect object in a to-phrase, as well as a direct object. Usually one imputes something to someone, but not here.

            – John Lawler
            8 hours ago













            @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

            – TRomano
            8 hours ago







            @John Lawler: That is not the "old-school" understanding (what BillJ calls "mickey mouse grammar") of direct object, as in "He painted the fence".

            – TRomano
            8 hours ago















            @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

            – Zebrafish
            7 hours ago





            @JohnLawler This is where I'm confused, and I may have to ask another question about it. Definitions of "impute" give "attribute" and "ascribe" as synonyms. In "I impute that the company was negligent" I don't see "attribute" or "ascribe" being able to replace "impute", or at least if it can, I wouldn't understand it. The issue I'm having is that these words usually link a causative factor to a result. I'm not sure whether "impute" works differently from these other two words. I guess it does, I don't think I could say "I attribute/ascribe that the company was negligent"

            – Zebrafish
            7 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484836%2fimpute-as-an-intransitive-verb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]