Monitor image became offset to the right. How to fix this?












11















Got this odd problem where the image in the monitor is offset to the right. It’s offset a lot.



I have an external monitor, which is connected to a laptop. I don’t use the laptop’s display, only the external monitor. The monitor is Asus AL2216W (found a manual). It’s connected through VGA. The video card is Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset.



Today, I needed to connect the monitor to another laptop. It worked. When I’ve connected the monitor back to my main laptop, the image in the monitor is offset.



Here's what I've tried so far:




  1. My monitor has a button for auto adjustment. I didn’t remove the offset

  2. My monitor has a menu for manual adjustment for the horizontal position. But, the offset is so large that this adjustment doesn’t have enough range.

  3. I have unplugged and powered down the monitor. The offset is still there.

  4. If I change the resolution to 1600 by 1200, the image becomes properly centered, and there is no offset. But, when I change it back to 1680 by 1050, the offset is back.

  5. Connected the monitor to yet another laptop. The offset is still there; same amount of offset. That implies that the problem is in the monitor, and not in the video card.


Are there more things I could try?



update: I've bought another monitor with 1680 by 1050 resolution. It's a different model, although I don't know if that matters. It worked right away. The mystery of the offset will, probably, remain unsolved.










share|improve this question

























  • Check out this thread: superuser.com/questions/641684/… It seems to be something related to the refresh rate. My display adapter does not work with the maximum resolution + refresh rate > 60hertz, and sometimes I bump into this problem. However, when I change it to a minor resolution and 75hertz, it goes back to normal. Weird, but its true.

    – Dvd Franco
    Jul 25 '16 at 11:18











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because OP replaced the monitor and the problem can no longer be reproduced.

    – fixer1234
    Jul 25 '16 at 15:24
















11















Got this odd problem where the image in the monitor is offset to the right. It’s offset a lot.



I have an external monitor, which is connected to a laptop. I don’t use the laptop’s display, only the external monitor. The monitor is Asus AL2216W (found a manual). It’s connected through VGA. The video card is Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset.



Today, I needed to connect the monitor to another laptop. It worked. When I’ve connected the monitor back to my main laptop, the image in the monitor is offset.



Here's what I've tried so far:




  1. My monitor has a button for auto adjustment. I didn’t remove the offset

  2. My monitor has a menu for manual adjustment for the horizontal position. But, the offset is so large that this adjustment doesn’t have enough range.

  3. I have unplugged and powered down the monitor. The offset is still there.

  4. If I change the resolution to 1600 by 1200, the image becomes properly centered, and there is no offset. But, when I change it back to 1680 by 1050, the offset is back.

  5. Connected the monitor to yet another laptop. The offset is still there; same amount of offset. That implies that the problem is in the monitor, and not in the video card.


Are there more things I could try?



update: I've bought another monitor with 1680 by 1050 resolution. It's a different model, although I don't know if that matters. It worked right away. The mystery of the offset will, probably, remain unsolved.










share|improve this question

























  • Check out this thread: superuser.com/questions/641684/… It seems to be something related to the refresh rate. My display adapter does not work with the maximum resolution + refresh rate > 60hertz, and sometimes I bump into this problem. However, when I change it to a minor resolution and 75hertz, it goes back to normal. Weird, but its true.

    – Dvd Franco
    Jul 25 '16 at 11:18











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because OP replaced the monitor and the problem can no longer be reproduced.

    – fixer1234
    Jul 25 '16 at 15:24














11












11








11








Got this odd problem where the image in the monitor is offset to the right. It’s offset a lot.



I have an external monitor, which is connected to a laptop. I don’t use the laptop’s display, only the external monitor. The monitor is Asus AL2216W (found a manual). It’s connected through VGA. The video card is Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset.



Today, I needed to connect the monitor to another laptop. It worked. When I’ve connected the monitor back to my main laptop, the image in the monitor is offset.



Here's what I've tried so far:




  1. My monitor has a button for auto adjustment. I didn’t remove the offset

  2. My monitor has a menu for manual adjustment for the horizontal position. But, the offset is so large that this adjustment doesn’t have enough range.

  3. I have unplugged and powered down the monitor. The offset is still there.

  4. If I change the resolution to 1600 by 1200, the image becomes properly centered, and there is no offset. But, when I change it back to 1680 by 1050, the offset is back.

  5. Connected the monitor to yet another laptop. The offset is still there; same amount of offset. That implies that the problem is in the monitor, and not in the video card.


Are there more things I could try?



update: I've bought another monitor with 1680 by 1050 resolution. It's a different model, although I don't know if that matters. It worked right away. The mystery of the offset will, probably, remain unsolved.










share|improve this question
















Got this odd problem where the image in the monitor is offset to the right. It’s offset a lot.



I have an external monitor, which is connected to a laptop. I don’t use the laptop’s display, only the external monitor. The monitor is Asus AL2216W (found a manual). It’s connected through VGA. The video card is Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset.



Today, I needed to connect the monitor to another laptop. It worked. When I’ve connected the monitor back to my main laptop, the image in the monitor is offset.



Here's what I've tried so far:




  1. My monitor has a button for auto adjustment. I didn’t remove the offset

  2. My monitor has a menu for manual adjustment for the horizontal position. But, the offset is so large that this adjustment doesn’t have enough range.

  3. I have unplugged and powered down the monitor. The offset is still there.

  4. If I change the resolution to 1600 by 1200, the image becomes properly centered, and there is no offset. But, when I change it back to 1680 by 1050, the offset is back.

  5. Connected the monitor to yet another laptop. The offset is still there; same amount of offset. That implies that the problem is in the monitor, and not in the video card.


Are there more things I could try?



update: I've bought another monitor with 1680 by 1050 resolution. It's a different model, although I don't know if that matters. It worked right away. The mystery of the offset will, probably, remain unsolved.







troubleshooting vga lcd






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '13 at 0:47







Nick Alexeev

















asked Dec 18 '13 at 6:17









Nick AlexeevNick Alexeev

3851413




3851413













  • Check out this thread: superuser.com/questions/641684/… It seems to be something related to the refresh rate. My display adapter does not work with the maximum resolution + refresh rate > 60hertz, and sometimes I bump into this problem. However, when I change it to a minor resolution and 75hertz, it goes back to normal. Weird, but its true.

    – Dvd Franco
    Jul 25 '16 at 11:18











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because OP replaced the monitor and the problem can no longer be reproduced.

    – fixer1234
    Jul 25 '16 at 15:24



















  • Check out this thread: superuser.com/questions/641684/… It seems to be something related to the refresh rate. My display adapter does not work with the maximum resolution + refresh rate > 60hertz, and sometimes I bump into this problem. However, when I change it to a minor resolution and 75hertz, it goes back to normal. Weird, but its true.

    – Dvd Franco
    Jul 25 '16 at 11:18











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because OP replaced the monitor and the problem can no longer be reproduced.

    – fixer1234
    Jul 25 '16 at 15:24

















Check out this thread: superuser.com/questions/641684/… It seems to be something related to the refresh rate. My display adapter does not work with the maximum resolution + refresh rate > 60hertz, and sometimes I bump into this problem. However, when I change it to a minor resolution and 75hertz, it goes back to normal. Weird, but its true.

– Dvd Franco
Jul 25 '16 at 11:18





Check out this thread: superuser.com/questions/641684/… It seems to be something related to the refresh rate. My display adapter does not work with the maximum resolution + refresh rate > 60hertz, and sometimes I bump into this problem. However, when I change it to a minor resolution and 75hertz, it goes back to normal. Weird, but its true.

– Dvd Franco
Jul 25 '16 at 11:18













I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because OP replaced the monitor and the problem can no longer be reproduced.

– fixer1234
Jul 25 '16 at 15:24





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because OP replaced the monitor and the problem can no longer be reproduced.

– fixer1234
Jul 25 '16 at 15:24










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1














I had a similar Problem and it helped to change the refresh rate with the corresponding resolution.



For Example, I was able to choose between




  • 1920x1080:60Hz

  • 1920x1080:59Hz

  • 1920x1080:58Hz


With 60Hz I had a split and an offset in my screen but with 59Hz everything worked fine.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Sounds like you solved the problem yourself. This is NOT an issue with the actual monitor.



    Set the resolution to 1600x1200. That's most likely either the native resolution of the monitor OR the best that your laptop can do without jacking the image. Either way that's what appears to work.






    share|improve this answer
























    • The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

      – Nick Alexeev
      Dec 18 '13 at 19:41











    • @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

      – NotMe
      Dec 18 '13 at 19:46





















    0














    It sounds like the offsets for the video card and external monitor don't match up; barring simplistic software issues (the driver got part of the offset wrong), the basic issue is probably that the video card is sending out the VGA signal in a way that the monitor is interpreting incorrectly.



    Part of the answer to this question lies in how pixel data is transmitted over VGA: If you could look at the data coming over the cable, it would basically look like a line-by-line scan of each frame coming in; this protocol was designed for CRT monitors, where each pixel on the screen is basically hit in sequence, based on the signal coming in.




    • Between the rows of actual pixel data, there's a few rows of "blank" pixels between each frame, which allow time for the CRT beam to travel from the bottom right corner back to the upper left (since the protocol was designed for CRT monitors)

    • There's also a few "blank" pixels past the end of the scan line that allow time for the beam to travel to the start of the next scan line.


    So imagine getting a long sequence of pixels over the wire; if you guess the height/width of the signal wrong, it'll look wrong. If the front porch/back porch of the signal is out of spec, this kind of offset can occur. (See this diagram for more details.)






    share|improve this answer































      -1














      I resolved it by reducing the colour depth to 16bit. Guess too much information is sent across with 32bit and the slow VGA standard/cable/whatever isn't coping






      share|improve this answer






















        protected by Ramhound Jan 9 at 12:37



        Thank you for your interest in this question.
        Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



        Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1














        I had a similar Problem and it helped to change the refresh rate with the corresponding resolution.



        For Example, I was able to choose between




        • 1920x1080:60Hz

        • 1920x1080:59Hz

        • 1920x1080:58Hz


        With 60Hz I had a split and an offset in my screen but with 59Hz everything worked fine.






        share|improve this answer




























          1














          I had a similar Problem and it helped to change the refresh rate with the corresponding resolution.



          For Example, I was able to choose between




          • 1920x1080:60Hz

          • 1920x1080:59Hz

          • 1920x1080:58Hz


          With 60Hz I had a split and an offset in my screen but with 59Hz everything worked fine.






          share|improve this answer


























            1












            1








            1







            I had a similar Problem and it helped to change the refresh rate with the corresponding resolution.



            For Example, I was able to choose between




            • 1920x1080:60Hz

            • 1920x1080:59Hz

            • 1920x1080:58Hz


            With 60Hz I had a split and an offset in my screen but with 59Hz everything worked fine.






            share|improve this answer













            I had a similar Problem and it helped to change the refresh rate with the corresponding resolution.



            For Example, I was able to choose between




            • 1920x1080:60Hz

            • 1920x1080:59Hz

            • 1920x1080:58Hz


            With 60Hz I had a split and an offset in my screen but with 59Hz everything worked fine.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Aug 8 '18 at 11:55









            azakazak

            112




            112

























                0














                Sounds like you solved the problem yourself. This is NOT an issue with the actual monitor.



                Set the resolution to 1600x1200. That's most likely either the native resolution of the monitor OR the best that your laptop can do without jacking the image. Either way that's what appears to work.






                share|improve this answer
























                • The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

                  – Nick Alexeev
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:41











                • @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

                  – NotMe
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:46


















                0














                Sounds like you solved the problem yourself. This is NOT an issue with the actual monitor.



                Set the resolution to 1600x1200. That's most likely either the native resolution of the monitor OR the best that your laptop can do without jacking the image. Either way that's what appears to work.






                share|improve this answer
























                • The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

                  – Nick Alexeev
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:41











                • @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

                  – NotMe
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:46
















                0












                0








                0







                Sounds like you solved the problem yourself. This is NOT an issue with the actual monitor.



                Set the resolution to 1600x1200. That's most likely either the native resolution of the monitor OR the best that your laptop can do without jacking the image. Either way that's what appears to work.






                share|improve this answer













                Sounds like you solved the problem yourself. This is NOT an issue with the actual monitor.



                Set the resolution to 1600x1200. That's most likely either the native resolution of the monitor OR the best that your laptop can do without jacking the image. Either way that's what appears to work.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 18 '13 at 19:34









                NotMeNotMe

                356316




                356316













                • The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

                  – Nick Alexeev
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:41











                • @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

                  – NotMe
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:46





















                • The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

                  – Nick Alexeev
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:41











                • @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

                  – NotMe
                  Dec 18 '13 at 19:46



















                The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

                – Nick Alexeev
                Dec 18 '13 at 19:41





                The native resolution is 1680 by 1050. The laptop in question worked with the LCD monitor in question with 1680 by 1050 resolution for years. The offset appeared after the monitor was temporarily connected to another laptop.

                – Nick Alexeev
                Dec 18 '13 at 19:41













                @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

                – NotMe
                Dec 18 '13 at 19:46







                @NickAlexeev: are you using the same cable arrangement? In other words when it was plugged up to this laptop before was it using DVI and now you are using VGA?

                – NotMe
                Dec 18 '13 at 19:46













                0














                It sounds like the offsets for the video card and external monitor don't match up; barring simplistic software issues (the driver got part of the offset wrong), the basic issue is probably that the video card is sending out the VGA signal in a way that the monitor is interpreting incorrectly.



                Part of the answer to this question lies in how pixel data is transmitted over VGA: If you could look at the data coming over the cable, it would basically look like a line-by-line scan of each frame coming in; this protocol was designed for CRT monitors, where each pixel on the screen is basically hit in sequence, based on the signal coming in.




                • Between the rows of actual pixel data, there's a few rows of "blank" pixels between each frame, which allow time for the CRT beam to travel from the bottom right corner back to the upper left (since the protocol was designed for CRT monitors)

                • There's also a few "blank" pixels past the end of the scan line that allow time for the beam to travel to the start of the next scan line.


                So imagine getting a long sequence of pixels over the wire; if you guess the height/width of the signal wrong, it'll look wrong. If the front porch/back porch of the signal is out of spec, this kind of offset can occur. (See this diagram for more details.)






                share|improve this answer




























                  0














                  It sounds like the offsets for the video card and external monitor don't match up; barring simplistic software issues (the driver got part of the offset wrong), the basic issue is probably that the video card is sending out the VGA signal in a way that the monitor is interpreting incorrectly.



                  Part of the answer to this question lies in how pixel data is transmitted over VGA: If you could look at the data coming over the cable, it would basically look like a line-by-line scan of each frame coming in; this protocol was designed for CRT monitors, where each pixel on the screen is basically hit in sequence, based on the signal coming in.




                  • Between the rows of actual pixel data, there's a few rows of "blank" pixels between each frame, which allow time for the CRT beam to travel from the bottom right corner back to the upper left (since the protocol was designed for CRT monitors)

                  • There's also a few "blank" pixels past the end of the scan line that allow time for the beam to travel to the start of the next scan line.


                  So imagine getting a long sequence of pixels over the wire; if you guess the height/width of the signal wrong, it'll look wrong. If the front porch/back porch of the signal is out of spec, this kind of offset can occur. (See this diagram for more details.)






                  share|improve this answer


























                    0












                    0








                    0







                    It sounds like the offsets for the video card and external monitor don't match up; barring simplistic software issues (the driver got part of the offset wrong), the basic issue is probably that the video card is sending out the VGA signal in a way that the monitor is interpreting incorrectly.



                    Part of the answer to this question lies in how pixel data is transmitted over VGA: If you could look at the data coming over the cable, it would basically look like a line-by-line scan of each frame coming in; this protocol was designed for CRT monitors, where each pixel on the screen is basically hit in sequence, based on the signal coming in.




                    • Between the rows of actual pixel data, there's a few rows of "blank" pixels between each frame, which allow time for the CRT beam to travel from the bottom right corner back to the upper left (since the protocol was designed for CRT monitors)

                    • There's also a few "blank" pixels past the end of the scan line that allow time for the beam to travel to the start of the next scan line.


                    So imagine getting a long sequence of pixels over the wire; if you guess the height/width of the signal wrong, it'll look wrong. If the front porch/back porch of the signal is out of spec, this kind of offset can occur. (See this diagram for more details.)






                    share|improve this answer













                    It sounds like the offsets for the video card and external monitor don't match up; barring simplistic software issues (the driver got part of the offset wrong), the basic issue is probably that the video card is sending out the VGA signal in a way that the monitor is interpreting incorrectly.



                    Part of the answer to this question lies in how pixel data is transmitted over VGA: If you could look at the data coming over the cable, it would basically look like a line-by-line scan of each frame coming in; this protocol was designed for CRT monitors, where each pixel on the screen is basically hit in sequence, based on the signal coming in.




                    • Between the rows of actual pixel data, there's a few rows of "blank" pixels between each frame, which allow time for the CRT beam to travel from the bottom right corner back to the upper left (since the protocol was designed for CRT monitors)

                    • There's also a few "blank" pixels past the end of the scan line that allow time for the beam to travel to the start of the next scan line.


                    So imagine getting a long sequence of pixels over the wire; if you guess the height/width of the signal wrong, it'll look wrong. If the front porch/back porch of the signal is out of spec, this kind of offset can occur. (See this diagram for more details.)







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 26 '17 at 22:39









                    trapezoidtrapezoid

                    1675




                    1675























                        -1














                        I resolved it by reducing the colour depth to 16bit. Guess too much information is sent across with 32bit and the slow VGA standard/cable/whatever isn't coping






                        share|improve this answer




























                          -1














                          I resolved it by reducing the colour depth to 16bit. Guess too much information is sent across with 32bit and the slow VGA standard/cable/whatever isn't coping






                          share|improve this answer


























                            -1












                            -1








                            -1







                            I resolved it by reducing the colour depth to 16bit. Guess too much information is sent across with 32bit and the slow VGA standard/cable/whatever isn't coping






                            share|improve this answer













                            I resolved it by reducing the colour depth to 16bit. Guess too much information is sent across with 32bit and the slow VGA standard/cable/whatever isn't coping







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 9 at 11:19









                            AlbertAlbert

                            1




                            1

















                                protected by Ramhound Jan 9 at 12:37



                                Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Alcedinidae

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]