Use of the possessive apostrophe in a list












12














If I was to label something




The Poets and Painters' Distillery




do I only apply the possessive apostrophe after 'Painters' as in the text written above, or do I also need to apply one to 'Poets' so that it becomes




The Poets' and Painters' Distillery ?




I'm thinking the former is correct, but cannot be too sure.










share|improve this question





























    12














    If I was to label something




    The Poets and Painters' Distillery




    do I only apply the possessive apostrophe after 'Painters' as in the text written above, or do I also need to apply one to 'Poets' so that it becomes




    The Poets' and Painters' Distillery ?




    I'm thinking the former is correct, but cannot be too sure.










    share|improve this question



























      12












      12








      12


      2





      If I was to label something




      The Poets and Painters' Distillery




      do I only apply the possessive apostrophe after 'Painters' as in the text written above, or do I also need to apply one to 'Poets' so that it becomes




      The Poets' and Painters' Distillery ?




      I'm thinking the former is correct, but cannot be too sure.










      share|improve this question















      If I was to label something




      The Poets and Painters' Distillery




      do I only apply the possessive apostrophe after 'Painters' as in the text written above, or do I also need to apply one to 'Poets' so that it becomes




      The Poets' and Painters' Distillery ?




      I'm thinking the former is correct, but cannot be too sure.







      saxon-genitive compound-possessives






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      tchrist

      108k28290463




      108k28290463










      asked Jul 26 '13 at 5:38









      Simon

      61113




      61113






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          16














          You are right. If the distillery is jointly possessed by the poets and painters then you only need the apostrophe after Painters.



          Similarly, John and Mary's house is the house owned jointly by John and Mary. If John and Mary each have their own houses, then you need apostrophes after both possessive nouns: John's and Mary's houses. Note, however, that to remove any ambiguity as to how many houses each has you need to repeat the possessed noun: John's house and Mary's houses.






          share|improve this answer





















          • +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
            – Mari-Lou A
            Jul 26 '13 at 6:52










          • +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
            – bib
            Jul 26 '13 at 13:45










          • bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
            – Shoe
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:34












          • @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:47











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120449%2fuse-of-the-possessive-apostrophe-in-a-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          16














          You are right. If the distillery is jointly possessed by the poets and painters then you only need the apostrophe after Painters.



          Similarly, John and Mary's house is the house owned jointly by John and Mary. If John and Mary each have their own houses, then you need apostrophes after both possessive nouns: John's and Mary's houses. Note, however, that to remove any ambiguity as to how many houses each has you need to repeat the possessed noun: John's house and Mary's houses.






          share|improve this answer





















          • +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
            – Mari-Lou A
            Jul 26 '13 at 6:52










          • +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
            – bib
            Jul 26 '13 at 13:45










          • bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
            – Shoe
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:34












          • @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:47
















          16














          You are right. If the distillery is jointly possessed by the poets and painters then you only need the apostrophe after Painters.



          Similarly, John and Mary's house is the house owned jointly by John and Mary. If John and Mary each have their own houses, then you need apostrophes after both possessive nouns: John's and Mary's houses. Note, however, that to remove any ambiguity as to how many houses each has you need to repeat the possessed noun: John's house and Mary's houses.






          share|improve this answer





















          • +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
            – Mari-Lou A
            Jul 26 '13 at 6:52










          • +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
            – bib
            Jul 26 '13 at 13:45










          • bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
            – Shoe
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:34












          • @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:47














          16












          16








          16






          You are right. If the distillery is jointly possessed by the poets and painters then you only need the apostrophe after Painters.



          Similarly, John and Mary's house is the house owned jointly by John and Mary. If John and Mary each have their own houses, then you need apostrophes after both possessive nouns: John's and Mary's houses. Note, however, that to remove any ambiguity as to how many houses each has you need to repeat the possessed noun: John's house and Mary's houses.






          share|improve this answer












          You are right. If the distillery is jointly possessed by the poets and painters then you only need the apostrophe after Painters.



          Similarly, John and Mary's house is the house owned jointly by John and Mary. If John and Mary each have their own houses, then you need apostrophes after both possessive nouns: John's and Mary's houses. Note, however, that to remove any ambiguity as to how many houses each has you need to repeat the possessed noun: John's house and Mary's houses.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jul 26 '13 at 5:56









          Shoe

          25k43684




          25k43684












          • +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
            – Mari-Lou A
            Jul 26 '13 at 6:52










          • +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
            – bib
            Jul 26 '13 at 13:45










          • bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
            – Shoe
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:34












          • @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:47


















          • +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
            – Mari-Lou A
            Jul 26 '13 at 6:52










          • +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
            – bib
            Jul 26 '13 at 13:45










          • bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
            – Shoe
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:34












          • @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            Jul 26 '13 at 14:47
















          +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
          – Mari-Lou A
          Jul 26 '13 at 6:52




          +1 confirm I was about to write the same when I saw Shoe's answer.
          – Mari-Lou A
          Jul 26 '13 at 6:52












          +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
          – bib
          Jul 26 '13 at 13:45




          +1 But John may have two houses and Mary three. Then "John's and Mary's houses" is unambiguous (although some information is not provided).
          – bib
          Jul 26 '13 at 13:45












          bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
          – Shoe
          Jul 26 '13 at 14:34






          bib, agreed. To remove all ambiguity you would need to specify as follows: John's one house and Mary's two houses / John's two houses and Mary's three houses ... e.g. have been repossessed.
          – Shoe
          Jul 26 '13 at 14:34














          @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
          – Janus Bahs Jacquet
          Jul 26 '13 at 14:47




          @Shoe, “John’s one house” is not really necessary: if ‘house’ is kept in the singular, you know there is only one. “John’s house and Mary’s three houses” works equally well (or awkwardly).
          – Janus Bahs Jacquet
          Jul 26 '13 at 14:47


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120449%2fuse-of-the-possessive-apostrophe-in-a-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Alcedinidae

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]