Running a process in the background












1














I have 2 questions about starting the processes in the background:





  1. Why does starting a process in the background like so:



    ./my_program &



    (my_program have exe permission set of course) doesn't make the
    bash to print the command prompt like any other commands? It just
    left a empty new line with blinking cursor.




  2. When i run a next new processes in the background bash displays sth.
    like that:



    ./my_program &
    [30] 1439
    [27] Done ./my_program
    [28] Done ./my_program
    [29] Done ./my_program



    does this mean that starting
    another extra processes in the background makes the system to
    display an info about the previews processes ([27], [28], [29]
    lines) as long as the currently started) ([30] line)?












share|improve this question






















  • What happens if you just press <return> again? do you get a prompt?
    – Attie
    Dec 10 at 16:22
















1














I have 2 questions about starting the processes in the background:





  1. Why does starting a process in the background like so:



    ./my_program &



    (my_program have exe permission set of course) doesn't make the
    bash to print the command prompt like any other commands? It just
    left a empty new line with blinking cursor.




  2. When i run a next new processes in the background bash displays sth.
    like that:



    ./my_program &
    [30] 1439
    [27] Done ./my_program
    [28] Done ./my_program
    [29] Done ./my_program



    does this mean that starting
    another extra processes in the background makes the system to
    display an info about the previews processes ([27], [28], [29]
    lines) as long as the currently started) ([30] line)?












share|improve this question






















  • What happens if you just press <return> again? do you get a prompt?
    – Attie
    Dec 10 at 16:22














1












1








1







I have 2 questions about starting the processes in the background:





  1. Why does starting a process in the background like so:



    ./my_program &



    (my_program have exe permission set of course) doesn't make the
    bash to print the command prompt like any other commands? It just
    left a empty new line with blinking cursor.




  2. When i run a next new processes in the background bash displays sth.
    like that:



    ./my_program &
    [30] 1439
    [27] Done ./my_program
    [28] Done ./my_program
    [29] Done ./my_program



    does this mean that starting
    another extra processes in the background makes the system to
    display an info about the previews processes ([27], [28], [29]
    lines) as long as the currently started) ([30] line)?












share|improve this question













I have 2 questions about starting the processes in the background:





  1. Why does starting a process in the background like so:



    ./my_program &



    (my_program have exe permission set of course) doesn't make the
    bash to print the command prompt like any other commands? It just
    left a empty new line with blinking cursor.




  2. When i run a next new processes in the background bash displays sth.
    like that:



    ./my_program &
    [30] 1439
    [27] Done ./my_program
    [28] Done ./my_program
    [29] Done ./my_program



    does this mean that starting
    another extra processes in the background makes the system to
    display an info about the previews processes ([27], [28], [29]
    lines) as long as the currently started) ([30] line)?









linux bash






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 10 at 16:21









Mulligun007

122




122












  • What happens if you just press <return> again? do you get a prompt?
    – Attie
    Dec 10 at 16:22


















  • What happens if you just press <return> again? do you get a prompt?
    – Attie
    Dec 10 at 16:22
















What happens if you just press <return> again? do you get a prompt?
– Attie
Dec 10 at 16:22




What happens if you just press <return> again? do you get a prompt?
– Attie
Dec 10 at 16:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0
















  1. This shouldn't happen. When you run a command in the background bash usually just prints the job number and pid (see below) and then drops back to a command prompt.



    The only reason I know of that leads bash to leave you with a new line in this situation is if your command doesn't actually exist, as it will somehow give the error message for that after printing PS1:



    $ nonexistant_command &
    [1] 13856
    $
    nonexistant_command: command not found
    <empty line with blinking cursor here>


    Whatever the cause may be, pressing enter while on this empty line should print a new line with your usual prompt (and, possibly, the message that the job you just spawned finished; see below).




  2. The additional output you see is bash telling you about current background jobs:



    First, it tells you the current job number of any newly created background process together with its pid, like so:



    $ some_command
    [1] 1234


    This means that the command some_command is now being run with the pid 1234 as job 1.



    Once a background job finishes, bash will notify you of this the next time it prints a command prompt (whether it be because you spawned another background process, ran a command in the foreground or simply pressed enter with an empty command line) by printing a message like this:



    [1]  Done                    some_command


    This means that the job with the number 1 which ran some_command has now finished.



    To find out what background jobs bash is currently tracking, you can use the jobs builtin like so:



    $ jobs
    [1] Running some_command &
    [2] Running some_other_command &


    To bring a job to the foreground, you can use fg:



    $ fg 2
    some_other_command


    For more info on this, try help jobs








share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1382366%2frunning-a-process-in-the-background%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0
















    1. This shouldn't happen. When you run a command in the background bash usually just prints the job number and pid (see below) and then drops back to a command prompt.



      The only reason I know of that leads bash to leave you with a new line in this situation is if your command doesn't actually exist, as it will somehow give the error message for that after printing PS1:



      $ nonexistant_command &
      [1] 13856
      $
      nonexistant_command: command not found
      <empty line with blinking cursor here>


      Whatever the cause may be, pressing enter while on this empty line should print a new line with your usual prompt (and, possibly, the message that the job you just spawned finished; see below).




    2. The additional output you see is bash telling you about current background jobs:



      First, it tells you the current job number of any newly created background process together with its pid, like so:



      $ some_command
      [1] 1234


      This means that the command some_command is now being run with the pid 1234 as job 1.



      Once a background job finishes, bash will notify you of this the next time it prints a command prompt (whether it be because you spawned another background process, ran a command in the foreground or simply pressed enter with an empty command line) by printing a message like this:



      [1]  Done                    some_command


      This means that the job with the number 1 which ran some_command has now finished.



      To find out what background jobs bash is currently tracking, you can use the jobs builtin like so:



      $ jobs
      [1] Running some_command &
      [2] Running some_other_command &


      To bring a job to the foreground, you can use fg:



      $ fg 2
      some_other_command


      For more info on this, try help jobs








    share|improve this answer


























      0
















      1. This shouldn't happen. When you run a command in the background bash usually just prints the job number and pid (see below) and then drops back to a command prompt.



        The only reason I know of that leads bash to leave you with a new line in this situation is if your command doesn't actually exist, as it will somehow give the error message for that after printing PS1:



        $ nonexistant_command &
        [1] 13856
        $
        nonexistant_command: command not found
        <empty line with blinking cursor here>


        Whatever the cause may be, pressing enter while on this empty line should print a new line with your usual prompt (and, possibly, the message that the job you just spawned finished; see below).




      2. The additional output you see is bash telling you about current background jobs:



        First, it tells you the current job number of any newly created background process together with its pid, like so:



        $ some_command
        [1] 1234


        This means that the command some_command is now being run with the pid 1234 as job 1.



        Once a background job finishes, bash will notify you of this the next time it prints a command prompt (whether it be because you spawned another background process, ran a command in the foreground or simply pressed enter with an empty command line) by printing a message like this:



        [1]  Done                    some_command


        This means that the job with the number 1 which ran some_command has now finished.



        To find out what background jobs bash is currently tracking, you can use the jobs builtin like so:



        $ jobs
        [1] Running some_command &
        [2] Running some_other_command &


        To bring a job to the foreground, you can use fg:



        $ fg 2
        some_other_command


        For more info on this, try help jobs








      share|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0








        1. This shouldn't happen. When you run a command in the background bash usually just prints the job number and pid (see below) and then drops back to a command prompt.



          The only reason I know of that leads bash to leave you with a new line in this situation is if your command doesn't actually exist, as it will somehow give the error message for that after printing PS1:



          $ nonexistant_command &
          [1] 13856
          $
          nonexistant_command: command not found
          <empty line with blinking cursor here>


          Whatever the cause may be, pressing enter while on this empty line should print a new line with your usual prompt (and, possibly, the message that the job you just spawned finished; see below).




        2. The additional output you see is bash telling you about current background jobs:



          First, it tells you the current job number of any newly created background process together with its pid, like so:



          $ some_command
          [1] 1234


          This means that the command some_command is now being run with the pid 1234 as job 1.



          Once a background job finishes, bash will notify you of this the next time it prints a command prompt (whether it be because you spawned another background process, ran a command in the foreground or simply pressed enter with an empty command line) by printing a message like this:



          [1]  Done                    some_command


          This means that the job with the number 1 which ran some_command has now finished.



          To find out what background jobs bash is currently tracking, you can use the jobs builtin like so:



          $ jobs
          [1] Running some_command &
          [2] Running some_other_command &


          To bring a job to the foreground, you can use fg:



          $ fg 2
          some_other_command


          For more info on this, try help jobs








        share|improve this answer














        1. This shouldn't happen. When you run a command in the background bash usually just prints the job number and pid (see below) and then drops back to a command prompt.



          The only reason I know of that leads bash to leave you with a new line in this situation is if your command doesn't actually exist, as it will somehow give the error message for that after printing PS1:



          $ nonexistant_command &
          [1] 13856
          $
          nonexistant_command: command not found
          <empty line with blinking cursor here>


          Whatever the cause may be, pressing enter while on this empty line should print a new line with your usual prompt (and, possibly, the message that the job you just spawned finished; see below).




        2. The additional output you see is bash telling you about current background jobs:



          First, it tells you the current job number of any newly created background process together with its pid, like so:



          $ some_command
          [1] 1234


          This means that the command some_command is now being run with the pid 1234 as job 1.



          Once a background job finishes, bash will notify you of this the next time it prints a command prompt (whether it be because you spawned another background process, ran a command in the foreground or simply pressed enter with an empty command line) by printing a message like this:



          [1]  Done                    some_command


          This means that the job with the number 1 which ran some_command has now finished.



          To find out what background jobs bash is currently tracking, you can use the jobs builtin like so:



          $ jobs
          [1] Running some_command &
          [2] Running some_other_command &


          To bring a job to the foreground, you can use fg:



          $ fg 2
          some_other_command


          For more info on this, try help jobs









        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 20 at 12:41









        Entropy0

        112




        112






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1382366%2frunning-a-process-in-the-background%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]