Where people invest during stock market crash (USA Q4 2018 crash)? [on hold]












2














Question: Where people invest during stock market crash (USA Q4 2018 crash)?



Assumptions:




  • When viewing S&P500 as a proxy to the USA market we can observe that it loses market cap (and price respectively)

  • Also, investments AREN'T moving into 'safe heaven' 3-Month Treasury Bills

    (based on the assumption that currently it's interest rate rises because investors prefer other means of investing)


S&P 500 price



Sources:

- S&P 500 price

- S&P 500 market cap

- 3-month Treasury Bills



This question isn't financial advice, just a way to learn/discuss economics/finances.



UPD: I've changed the question because original version has no sense, so you may find some strange conversations.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as too broad by Nathan L, Dheer, JoeTaxpayer 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Lost value is just lost value, it's not movement of money. Today someone is willing to pay $500 for one of your rare tulip bulbs, tomorrow you can only sell them for $10. The value of your market cap dropped, but no money changed hands outside of the individual purchases.
    – Hart CO
    Dec 24 at 19:56












  • Yeah, my question is incorrect, I see it now, so instead i should ask where do people invest after stock market crash, aren't I ?
    – Artem Bernatskyi
    Dec 24 at 20:19










  • At least for today, Dec 24, most folks are just leaving their money right where it is The NASDAQ only traded 1,724,366,735 shares today, which is quite low. Last Friday 7,609,010,000 shares traded hands. The fact that the price or the market cap changed by a lot doesn't necessarily mean that a lot of money is moving around right now, though they may certainly change in the near future.
    – Charles E. Grant
    2 days ago








  • 1




    This might be stating the obvious but you do know that every transaction has a buyer and a seller, right? In order for someone to take money out of the S&P500 (say the SPY ETF) they would have to sell to a buyer... The stock market is not a supermarket, the NYSE doesn't set prices and sell stock. And looking back over the historical charts, the best place to invest after the crash was the market.
    – quid
    2 days ago








  • 1




    That was hardly a crash, simply a correction for overestimated growth.
    – Mast
    2 days ago
















2














Question: Where people invest during stock market crash (USA Q4 2018 crash)?



Assumptions:




  • When viewing S&P500 as a proxy to the USA market we can observe that it loses market cap (and price respectively)

  • Also, investments AREN'T moving into 'safe heaven' 3-Month Treasury Bills

    (based on the assumption that currently it's interest rate rises because investors prefer other means of investing)


S&P 500 price



Sources:

- S&P 500 price

- S&P 500 market cap

- 3-month Treasury Bills



This question isn't financial advice, just a way to learn/discuss economics/finances.



UPD: I've changed the question because original version has no sense, so you may find some strange conversations.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as too broad by Nathan L, Dheer, JoeTaxpayer 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Lost value is just lost value, it's not movement of money. Today someone is willing to pay $500 for one of your rare tulip bulbs, tomorrow you can only sell them for $10. The value of your market cap dropped, but no money changed hands outside of the individual purchases.
    – Hart CO
    Dec 24 at 19:56












  • Yeah, my question is incorrect, I see it now, so instead i should ask where do people invest after stock market crash, aren't I ?
    – Artem Bernatskyi
    Dec 24 at 20:19










  • At least for today, Dec 24, most folks are just leaving their money right where it is The NASDAQ only traded 1,724,366,735 shares today, which is quite low. Last Friday 7,609,010,000 shares traded hands. The fact that the price or the market cap changed by a lot doesn't necessarily mean that a lot of money is moving around right now, though they may certainly change in the near future.
    – Charles E. Grant
    2 days ago








  • 1




    This might be stating the obvious but you do know that every transaction has a buyer and a seller, right? In order for someone to take money out of the S&P500 (say the SPY ETF) they would have to sell to a buyer... The stock market is not a supermarket, the NYSE doesn't set prices and sell stock. And looking back over the historical charts, the best place to invest after the crash was the market.
    – quid
    2 days ago








  • 1




    That was hardly a crash, simply a correction for overestimated growth.
    – Mast
    2 days ago














2












2








2







Question: Where people invest during stock market crash (USA Q4 2018 crash)?



Assumptions:




  • When viewing S&P500 as a proxy to the USA market we can observe that it loses market cap (and price respectively)

  • Also, investments AREN'T moving into 'safe heaven' 3-Month Treasury Bills

    (based on the assumption that currently it's interest rate rises because investors prefer other means of investing)


S&P 500 price



Sources:

- S&P 500 price

- S&P 500 market cap

- 3-month Treasury Bills



This question isn't financial advice, just a way to learn/discuss economics/finances.



UPD: I've changed the question because original version has no sense, so you may find some strange conversations.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Question: Where people invest during stock market crash (USA Q4 2018 crash)?



Assumptions:




  • When viewing S&P500 as a proxy to the USA market we can observe that it loses market cap (and price respectively)

  • Also, investments AREN'T moving into 'safe heaven' 3-Month Treasury Bills

    (based on the assumption that currently it's interest rate rises because investors prefer other means of investing)


S&P 500 price



Sources:

- S&P 500 price

- S&P 500 market cap

- 3-month Treasury Bills



This question isn't financial advice, just a way to learn/discuss economics/finances.



UPD: I've changed the question because original version has no sense, so you may find some strange conversations.







stocks stock-markets standard-and-poors-500






share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday





















New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 24 at 19:45









Artem Bernatskyi

1144




1144




New contributor




Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Artem Bernatskyi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as too broad by Nathan L, Dheer, JoeTaxpayer 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as too broad by Nathan L, Dheer, JoeTaxpayer 2 days ago


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Lost value is just lost value, it's not movement of money. Today someone is willing to pay $500 for one of your rare tulip bulbs, tomorrow you can only sell them for $10. The value of your market cap dropped, but no money changed hands outside of the individual purchases.
    – Hart CO
    Dec 24 at 19:56












  • Yeah, my question is incorrect, I see it now, so instead i should ask where do people invest after stock market crash, aren't I ?
    – Artem Bernatskyi
    Dec 24 at 20:19










  • At least for today, Dec 24, most folks are just leaving their money right where it is The NASDAQ only traded 1,724,366,735 shares today, which is quite low. Last Friday 7,609,010,000 shares traded hands. The fact that the price or the market cap changed by a lot doesn't necessarily mean that a lot of money is moving around right now, though they may certainly change in the near future.
    – Charles E. Grant
    2 days ago








  • 1




    This might be stating the obvious but you do know that every transaction has a buyer and a seller, right? In order for someone to take money out of the S&P500 (say the SPY ETF) they would have to sell to a buyer... The stock market is not a supermarket, the NYSE doesn't set prices and sell stock. And looking back over the historical charts, the best place to invest after the crash was the market.
    – quid
    2 days ago








  • 1




    That was hardly a crash, simply a correction for overestimated growth.
    – Mast
    2 days ago


















  • Lost value is just lost value, it's not movement of money. Today someone is willing to pay $500 for one of your rare tulip bulbs, tomorrow you can only sell them for $10. The value of your market cap dropped, but no money changed hands outside of the individual purchases.
    – Hart CO
    Dec 24 at 19:56












  • Yeah, my question is incorrect, I see it now, so instead i should ask where do people invest after stock market crash, aren't I ?
    – Artem Bernatskyi
    Dec 24 at 20:19










  • At least for today, Dec 24, most folks are just leaving their money right where it is The NASDAQ only traded 1,724,366,735 shares today, which is quite low. Last Friday 7,609,010,000 shares traded hands. The fact that the price or the market cap changed by a lot doesn't necessarily mean that a lot of money is moving around right now, though they may certainly change in the near future.
    – Charles E. Grant
    2 days ago








  • 1




    This might be stating the obvious but you do know that every transaction has a buyer and a seller, right? In order for someone to take money out of the S&P500 (say the SPY ETF) they would have to sell to a buyer... The stock market is not a supermarket, the NYSE doesn't set prices and sell stock. And looking back over the historical charts, the best place to invest after the crash was the market.
    – quid
    2 days ago








  • 1




    That was hardly a crash, simply a correction for overestimated growth.
    – Mast
    2 days ago
















Lost value is just lost value, it's not movement of money. Today someone is willing to pay $500 for one of your rare tulip bulbs, tomorrow you can only sell them for $10. The value of your market cap dropped, but no money changed hands outside of the individual purchases.
– Hart CO
Dec 24 at 19:56






Lost value is just lost value, it's not movement of money. Today someone is willing to pay $500 for one of your rare tulip bulbs, tomorrow you can only sell them for $10. The value of your market cap dropped, but no money changed hands outside of the individual purchases.
– Hart CO
Dec 24 at 19:56














Yeah, my question is incorrect, I see it now, so instead i should ask where do people invest after stock market crash, aren't I ?
– Artem Bernatskyi
Dec 24 at 20:19




Yeah, my question is incorrect, I see it now, so instead i should ask where do people invest after stock market crash, aren't I ?
– Artem Bernatskyi
Dec 24 at 20:19












At least for today, Dec 24, most folks are just leaving their money right where it is The NASDAQ only traded 1,724,366,735 shares today, which is quite low. Last Friday 7,609,010,000 shares traded hands. The fact that the price or the market cap changed by a lot doesn't necessarily mean that a lot of money is moving around right now, though they may certainly change in the near future.
– Charles E. Grant
2 days ago






At least for today, Dec 24, most folks are just leaving their money right where it is The NASDAQ only traded 1,724,366,735 shares today, which is quite low. Last Friday 7,609,010,000 shares traded hands. The fact that the price or the market cap changed by a lot doesn't necessarily mean that a lot of money is moving around right now, though they may certainly change in the near future.
– Charles E. Grant
2 days ago






1




1




This might be stating the obvious but you do know that every transaction has a buyer and a seller, right? In order for someone to take money out of the S&P500 (say the SPY ETF) they would have to sell to a buyer... The stock market is not a supermarket, the NYSE doesn't set prices and sell stock. And looking back over the historical charts, the best place to invest after the crash was the market.
– quid
2 days ago






This might be stating the obvious but you do know that every transaction has a buyer and a seller, right? In order for someone to take money out of the S&P500 (say the SPY ETF) they would have to sell to a buyer... The stock market is not a supermarket, the NYSE doesn't set prices and sell stock. And looking back over the historical charts, the best place to invest after the crash was the market.
– quid
2 days ago






1




1




That was hardly a crash, simply a correction for overestimated growth.
– Mast
2 days ago




That was hardly a crash, simply a correction for overestimated growth.
– Mast
2 days ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6














There is no money, and it doesn’t go anywhere. A company’s market cap is just the market’s opinion of what it’s worth. That opinion changes all the time, but no actual money is involved. Money only comes into it when shares (or derivatives) are actually bought and sold.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
    – Hart CO
    Dec 24 at 20:00






  • 2




    If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
    – Bob Baerker
    Dec 24 at 20:12






  • 2




    This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
    – Bob Baerker
    2 days ago










  • @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
    – Artem Bernatskyi
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
    – quid
    2 days ago



















3














The price of U.S. Treasury securities are up in the past month. Gold is up and the Yen is up. The Swiss Franc is not completely at a one month high.



There have been ETF inflows into a Treasury fund that has a duration of about 1.9 years. But it appears that an investor could outperform the income of that fund with a three-month bill in their own Treasury Direct account. However, there is gain in the securities price of the longer term duration.



There have also been ETF inflows into emerging-markets but ETF outflows out of high-yield debt. So I don't agree with the inflows into emerging-markets.



Even six-month non-government bond funds are down in the past month.



But investors that outperform the market over long term periods basically buy what is down as long as there is no bad news specific to the stock or bond being bought.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • All true. Welcome4 new user.
    – Fattie
    2 days ago












  • And Merry Christmas! :)
    – Fattie
    2 days ago



















0














Other answers list some excellent investment options.



One choice, both obvious and counter-intuitive, depending on how you approach it, is to invest (or continue investing) in stocks. S&P 500 index fund shares are about 20% cheaper now than they were 3 months ago. This is a great time to buy!



Of course, there is no "one size fits all" answer to this question. Time horizon and risk tolerance, among other things, affect your choices greatly. But there is one important thing to keep in mind: what matters is how high your investments are valued at the time when you decide to sell them. Until then, the lower they are valued, the more you can buy.






share|improve this answer





























    -1














    You are wrong on your assumption about tbills. These are considered a safe haven asset. Getting 2.27% is better than zero or negative. Also they are liquid so you can always get out easily. A long only portfolio manager has a relative benchmark he is trying to beat. So with the S&P heading south, cash is king.



    Typically, a couple of the following will be happening:
    1) raising cash (if already owning stocks). I.e. selling stock and putting the money into a money market fund. If have cash, put in money market fund.
    2) selling calls against the position this offsets partially the loss from the stock going down.
    3) a long only portfolio manager (i.e. can't use derivatives) would be doing #1 and has a list of stocks that he/she likes with price entry points. If the stock reaches that point then they will buy some. (Right now things keep going down and so there is little incentive to buy, if you can buy it tomorrow at a lower price). For example AAPL might be too expensive at 210 based upon p/e, dividend yield, but at 170, it might be a buy.
    4) a long/short portfolio manager is currently worried that his long short trade is working and most likely is reducing risk if risk is based upon volatility.
    5) a long only manager who is required to be at least xx% invested most likely would move to what is considered defensive plays and out of agressive plays (i.e. shift from high beta stocks to low beta stocks (i.e. tech to big pharma/utilities. He would also move out of more speculative plays into more slow and steady wins the race types.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      There is no money, and it doesn’t go anywhere. A company’s market cap is just the market’s opinion of what it’s worth. That opinion changes all the time, but no actual money is involved. Money only comes into it when shares (or derivatives) are actually bought and sold.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
        – Hart CO
        Dec 24 at 20:00






      • 2




        If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
        – Bob Baerker
        Dec 24 at 20:12






      • 2




        This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
        – Bob Baerker
        2 days ago










      • @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
        – Artem Bernatskyi
        2 days ago






      • 2




        Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
        – quid
        2 days ago
















      6














      There is no money, and it doesn’t go anywhere. A company’s market cap is just the market’s opinion of what it’s worth. That opinion changes all the time, but no actual money is involved. Money only comes into it when shares (or derivatives) are actually bought and sold.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
        – Hart CO
        Dec 24 at 20:00






      • 2




        If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
        – Bob Baerker
        Dec 24 at 20:12






      • 2




        This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
        – Bob Baerker
        2 days ago










      • @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
        – Artem Bernatskyi
        2 days ago






      • 2




        Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
        – quid
        2 days ago














      6












      6








      6






      There is no money, and it doesn’t go anywhere. A company’s market cap is just the market’s opinion of what it’s worth. That opinion changes all the time, but no actual money is involved. Money only comes into it when shares (or derivatives) are actually bought and sold.






      share|improve this answer












      There is no money, and it doesn’t go anywhere. A company’s market cap is just the market’s opinion of what it’s worth. That opinion changes all the time, but no actual money is involved. Money only comes into it when shares (or derivatives) are actually bought and sold.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Dec 24 at 19:55









      Mike Scott

      13.3k3748




      13.3k3748








      • 1




        @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
        – Hart CO
        Dec 24 at 20:00






      • 2




        If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
        – Bob Baerker
        Dec 24 at 20:12






      • 2




        This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
        – Bob Baerker
        2 days ago










      • @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
        – Artem Bernatskyi
        2 days ago






      • 2




        Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
        – quid
        2 days ago














      • 1




        @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
        – Hart CO
        Dec 24 at 20:00






      • 2




        If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
        – Bob Baerker
        Dec 24 at 20:12






      • 2




        This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
        – Bob Baerker
        2 days ago










      • @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
        – Artem Bernatskyi
        2 days ago






      • 2




        Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
        – quid
        2 days ago








      1




      1




      @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
      – Hart CO
      Dec 24 at 20:00




      @ArtemBernatskyi The S&P 500 is just an aggregate of individual stocks, where the individual companies that comprise it go, so it goes.
      – Hart CO
      Dec 24 at 20:00




      2




      2




      If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
      – Bob Baerker
      Dec 24 at 20:12




      If your house is worth $300k and the real estate market collapses and your house is now worth $250k, where did $50k of cash go to? It didn't go anywhere because there was no $50k of cash involved. The market value of your simply changed (dropped $50k). Stocks are the same. Last week Facebook was trading at $145. Today it's $125. Its market value changed. Anyone who sold it during that period received money. Even if they took that money out of the market and put it in a bank, the buyer put the money back into the market. The market doesn't create money.
      – Bob Baerker
      Dec 24 at 20:12




      2




      2




      This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
      – Bob Baerker
      2 days ago




      This is a bear market not a crash. For the latter, see 1929 or 1987. People put their money anywhere they want: Cash or MM account, banks, bonds, bond ETFs, Treasuries, preferred stocks, mattresses (?).
      – Bob Baerker
      2 days ago












      @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
      – Artem Bernatskyi
      2 days ago




      @BobBaerker thx, I've updated the question, if you think it's too broad feel free to close it.Question originated because a lot of experts are calling this not a recession (they are telling us that we will go in the bull market for a 0.5 - year and then there will be a recession). BUT how can they tell so if they base their assumptions on the previous data (during which there were no quantitative easing implemented in USA comparable to now)?
      – Artem Bernatskyi
      2 days ago




      2




      2




      Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
      – quid
      2 days ago




      Stock market "experts" on the news are right less than the weather people.
      – quid
      2 days ago













      3














      The price of U.S. Treasury securities are up in the past month. Gold is up and the Yen is up. The Swiss Franc is not completely at a one month high.



      There have been ETF inflows into a Treasury fund that has a duration of about 1.9 years. But it appears that an investor could outperform the income of that fund with a three-month bill in their own Treasury Direct account. However, there is gain in the securities price of the longer term duration.



      There have also been ETF inflows into emerging-markets but ETF outflows out of high-yield debt. So I don't agree with the inflows into emerging-markets.



      Even six-month non-government bond funds are down in the past month.



      But investors that outperform the market over long term periods basically buy what is down as long as there is no bad news specific to the stock or bond being bought.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • All true. Welcome4 new user.
        – Fattie
        2 days ago












      • And Merry Christmas! :)
        – Fattie
        2 days ago
















      3














      The price of U.S. Treasury securities are up in the past month. Gold is up and the Yen is up. The Swiss Franc is not completely at a one month high.



      There have been ETF inflows into a Treasury fund that has a duration of about 1.9 years. But it appears that an investor could outperform the income of that fund with a three-month bill in their own Treasury Direct account. However, there is gain in the securities price of the longer term duration.



      There have also been ETF inflows into emerging-markets but ETF outflows out of high-yield debt. So I don't agree with the inflows into emerging-markets.



      Even six-month non-government bond funds are down in the past month.



      But investors that outperform the market over long term periods basically buy what is down as long as there is no bad news specific to the stock or bond being bought.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • All true. Welcome4 new user.
        – Fattie
        2 days ago












      • And Merry Christmas! :)
        – Fattie
        2 days ago














      3












      3








      3






      The price of U.S. Treasury securities are up in the past month. Gold is up and the Yen is up. The Swiss Franc is not completely at a one month high.



      There have been ETF inflows into a Treasury fund that has a duration of about 1.9 years. But it appears that an investor could outperform the income of that fund with a three-month bill in their own Treasury Direct account. However, there is gain in the securities price of the longer term duration.



      There have also been ETF inflows into emerging-markets but ETF outflows out of high-yield debt. So I don't agree with the inflows into emerging-markets.



      Even six-month non-government bond funds are down in the past month.



      But investors that outperform the market over long term periods basically buy what is down as long as there is no bad news specific to the stock or bond being bought.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      The price of U.S. Treasury securities are up in the past month. Gold is up and the Yen is up. The Swiss Franc is not completely at a one month high.



      There have been ETF inflows into a Treasury fund that has a duration of about 1.9 years. But it appears that an investor could outperform the income of that fund with a three-month bill in their own Treasury Direct account. However, there is gain in the securities price of the longer term duration.



      There have also been ETF inflows into emerging-markets but ETF outflows out of high-yield debt. So I don't agree with the inflows into emerging-markets.



      Even six-month non-government bond funds are down in the past month.



      But investors that outperform the market over long term periods basically buy what is down as long as there is no bad news specific to the stock or bond being bought.







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 2 days ago





















      New contributor




      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 2 days ago









      S Spring

      1352




      1352




      New contributor




      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      S Spring is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      • All true. Welcome4 new user.
        – Fattie
        2 days ago












      • And Merry Christmas! :)
        – Fattie
        2 days ago


















      • All true. Welcome4 new user.
        – Fattie
        2 days ago












      • And Merry Christmas! :)
        – Fattie
        2 days ago
















      All true. Welcome4 new user.
      – Fattie
      2 days ago






      All true. Welcome4 new user.
      – Fattie
      2 days ago














      And Merry Christmas! :)
      – Fattie
      2 days ago




      And Merry Christmas! :)
      – Fattie
      2 days ago











      0














      Other answers list some excellent investment options.



      One choice, both obvious and counter-intuitive, depending on how you approach it, is to invest (or continue investing) in stocks. S&P 500 index fund shares are about 20% cheaper now than they were 3 months ago. This is a great time to buy!



      Of course, there is no "one size fits all" answer to this question. Time horizon and risk tolerance, among other things, affect your choices greatly. But there is one important thing to keep in mind: what matters is how high your investments are valued at the time when you decide to sell them. Until then, the lower they are valued, the more you can buy.






      share|improve this answer


























        0














        Other answers list some excellent investment options.



        One choice, both obvious and counter-intuitive, depending on how you approach it, is to invest (or continue investing) in stocks. S&P 500 index fund shares are about 20% cheaper now than they were 3 months ago. This is a great time to buy!



        Of course, there is no "one size fits all" answer to this question. Time horizon and risk tolerance, among other things, affect your choices greatly. But there is one important thing to keep in mind: what matters is how high your investments are valued at the time when you decide to sell them. Until then, the lower they are valued, the more you can buy.






        share|improve this answer
























          0












          0








          0






          Other answers list some excellent investment options.



          One choice, both obvious and counter-intuitive, depending on how you approach it, is to invest (or continue investing) in stocks. S&P 500 index fund shares are about 20% cheaper now than they were 3 months ago. This is a great time to buy!



          Of course, there is no "one size fits all" answer to this question. Time horizon and risk tolerance, among other things, affect your choices greatly. But there is one important thing to keep in mind: what matters is how high your investments are valued at the time when you decide to sell them. Until then, the lower they are valued, the more you can buy.






          share|improve this answer












          Other answers list some excellent investment options.



          One choice, both obvious and counter-intuitive, depending on how you approach it, is to invest (or continue investing) in stocks. S&P 500 index fund shares are about 20% cheaper now than they were 3 months ago. This is a great time to buy!



          Of course, there is no "one size fits all" answer to this question. Time horizon and risk tolerance, among other things, affect your choices greatly. But there is one important thing to keep in mind: what matters is how high your investments are valued at the time when you decide to sell them. Until then, the lower they are valued, the more you can buy.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          void_ptr

          98739




          98739























              -1














              You are wrong on your assumption about tbills. These are considered a safe haven asset. Getting 2.27% is better than zero or negative. Also they are liquid so you can always get out easily. A long only portfolio manager has a relative benchmark he is trying to beat. So with the S&P heading south, cash is king.



              Typically, a couple of the following will be happening:
              1) raising cash (if already owning stocks). I.e. selling stock and putting the money into a money market fund. If have cash, put in money market fund.
              2) selling calls against the position this offsets partially the loss from the stock going down.
              3) a long only portfolio manager (i.e. can't use derivatives) would be doing #1 and has a list of stocks that he/she likes with price entry points. If the stock reaches that point then they will buy some. (Right now things keep going down and so there is little incentive to buy, if you can buy it tomorrow at a lower price). For example AAPL might be too expensive at 210 based upon p/e, dividend yield, but at 170, it might be a buy.
              4) a long/short portfolio manager is currently worried that his long short trade is working and most likely is reducing risk if risk is based upon volatility.
              5) a long only manager who is required to be at least xx% invested most likely would move to what is considered defensive plays and out of agressive plays (i.e. shift from high beta stocks to low beta stocks (i.e. tech to big pharma/utilities. He would also move out of more speculative plays into more slow and steady wins the race types.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                -1














                You are wrong on your assumption about tbills. These are considered a safe haven asset. Getting 2.27% is better than zero or negative. Also they are liquid so you can always get out easily. A long only portfolio manager has a relative benchmark he is trying to beat. So with the S&P heading south, cash is king.



                Typically, a couple of the following will be happening:
                1) raising cash (if already owning stocks). I.e. selling stock and putting the money into a money market fund. If have cash, put in money market fund.
                2) selling calls against the position this offsets partially the loss from the stock going down.
                3) a long only portfolio manager (i.e. can't use derivatives) would be doing #1 and has a list of stocks that he/she likes with price entry points. If the stock reaches that point then they will buy some. (Right now things keep going down and so there is little incentive to buy, if you can buy it tomorrow at a lower price). For example AAPL might be too expensive at 210 based upon p/e, dividend yield, but at 170, it might be a buy.
                4) a long/short portfolio manager is currently worried that his long short trade is working and most likely is reducing risk if risk is based upon volatility.
                5) a long only manager who is required to be at least xx% invested most likely would move to what is considered defensive plays and out of agressive plays (i.e. shift from high beta stocks to low beta stocks (i.e. tech to big pharma/utilities. He would also move out of more speculative plays into more slow and steady wins the race types.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  -1












                  -1








                  -1






                  You are wrong on your assumption about tbills. These are considered a safe haven asset. Getting 2.27% is better than zero or negative. Also they are liquid so you can always get out easily. A long only portfolio manager has a relative benchmark he is trying to beat. So with the S&P heading south, cash is king.



                  Typically, a couple of the following will be happening:
                  1) raising cash (if already owning stocks). I.e. selling stock and putting the money into a money market fund. If have cash, put in money market fund.
                  2) selling calls against the position this offsets partially the loss from the stock going down.
                  3) a long only portfolio manager (i.e. can't use derivatives) would be doing #1 and has a list of stocks that he/she likes with price entry points. If the stock reaches that point then they will buy some. (Right now things keep going down and so there is little incentive to buy, if you can buy it tomorrow at a lower price). For example AAPL might be too expensive at 210 based upon p/e, dividend yield, but at 170, it might be a buy.
                  4) a long/short portfolio manager is currently worried that his long short trade is working and most likely is reducing risk if risk is based upon volatility.
                  5) a long only manager who is required to be at least xx% invested most likely would move to what is considered defensive plays and out of agressive plays (i.e. shift from high beta stocks to low beta stocks (i.e. tech to big pharma/utilities. He would also move out of more speculative plays into more slow and steady wins the race types.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  You are wrong on your assumption about tbills. These are considered a safe haven asset. Getting 2.27% is better than zero or negative. Also they are liquid so you can always get out easily. A long only portfolio manager has a relative benchmark he is trying to beat. So with the S&P heading south, cash is king.



                  Typically, a couple of the following will be happening:
                  1) raising cash (if already owning stocks). I.e. selling stock and putting the money into a money market fund. If have cash, put in money market fund.
                  2) selling calls against the position this offsets partially the loss from the stock going down.
                  3) a long only portfolio manager (i.e. can't use derivatives) would be doing #1 and has a list of stocks that he/she likes with price entry points. If the stock reaches that point then they will buy some. (Right now things keep going down and so there is little incentive to buy, if you can buy it tomorrow at a lower price). For example AAPL might be too expensive at 210 based upon p/e, dividend yield, but at 170, it might be a buy.
                  4) a long/short portfolio manager is currently worried that his long short trade is working and most likely is reducing risk if risk is based upon volatility.
                  5) a long only manager who is required to be at least xx% invested most likely would move to what is considered defensive plays and out of agressive plays (i.e. shift from high beta stocks to low beta stocks (i.e. tech to big pharma/utilities. He would also move out of more speculative plays into more slow and steady wins the race types.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 2 days ago









                  quinn

                  21




                  21




                  New contributor




                  quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]