Why do I keep getting this incorrect solution when trying to find all the real solutions for $sqrt{2x-3}...












4














The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    2 days ago






  • 7




    Possible duplicate of Why do extraneous solutions exist? or When do we get extraneous roots?
    – Carmeister
    2 days ago












  • The simplest way to "debug" such things is to check the solutions at each step, then you can (usually) find out the first wrong step.
    – user202729
    2 days ago








  • 2




    It's not duplicate of course.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    yesterday
















4














The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    2 days ago






  • 7




    Possible duplicate of Why do extraneous solutions exist? or When do we get extraneous roots?
    – Carmeister
    2 days ago












  • The simplest way to "debug" such things is to check the solutions at each step, then you can (usually) find out the first wrong step.
    – user202729
    2 days ago








  • 2




    It's not duplicate of course.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    yesterday














4












4








4







The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?










share|cite|improve this question















The problem is to find all real solutions (if any exists) for $sqrt{2x-3} +x=3$.



Now, my textbook says the answer is {2}, however, I keep getting {2, 6}. I've tried multiple approaches, but here is one of them:



I got rid of the root by squaring both sides,
$$sqrt{2x-3}^2=(3-x)^2$$
$$0=12-8x+x^2$$
Using the AC method, I got
$$(-x^2+6x)(2x-12)=0$$
$$-x(x-6)2(x-6)=0$$
$$(-x+2)(x-6)=0$$
hence, $$x=2, x=6$$



Of course, I can always just check my solutions and I'd immediately recognize 6 does not work. But that's a bit too tedious for my taste. Can anyone explain where I went wrong with my approach?







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Asaf Karagila

301k32424754




301k32424754










asked 2 days ago









Lex_i

707




707








  • 2




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    2 days ago






  • 7




    Possible duplicate of Why do extraneous solutions exist? or When do we get extraneous roots?
    – Carmeister
    2 days ago












  • The simplest way to "debug" such things is to check the solutions at each step, then you can (usually) find out the first wrong step.
    – user202729
    2 days ago








  • 2




    It's not duplicate of course.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    yesterday














  • 2




    Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
    – T. Ford
    2 days ago






  • 7




    Possible duplicate of Why do extraneous solutions exist? or When do we get extraneous roots?
    – Carmeister
    2 days ago












  • The simplest way to "debug" such things is to check the solutions at each step, then you can (usually) find out the first wrong step.
    – user202729
    2 days ago








  • 2




    It's not duplicate of course.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    yesterday








2




2




Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
– T. Ford
2 days ago




Small typo: $sqrt{2x-2}^2$ should read $sqrt{2x-3}^2$.
– T. Ford
2 days ago




7




7




Possible duplicate of Why do extraneous solutions exist? or When do we get extraneous roots?
– Carmeister
2 days ago






Possible duplicate of Why do extraneous solutions exist? or When do we get extraneous roots?
– Carmeister
2 days ago














The simplest way to "debug" such things is to check the solutions at each step, then you can (usually) find out the first wrong step.
– user202729
2 days ago






The simplest way to "debug" such things is to check the solutions at each step, then you can (usually) find out the first wrong step.
– user202729
2 days ago






2




2




It's not duplicate of course.
– Michael Rozenberg
yesterday




It's not duplicate of course.
– Michael Rozenberg
yesterday










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















16














Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



$$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



$$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



$$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



$$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



$$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



$$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
    – Kai
    2 days ago



















10














When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



An extreme example is as follows:



Solve $x=1$.



The solution is just $x=1$.



However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    To build off of the other answers provided, the equation you wish to solve is



    $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



    To do so, you square both sides, and solve



    $$2x-3 = (3-x)^2$$



    which has two solutions. However this equation can also be obtained by squaring



    $$-sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



    The second solution is the solution to this second equation. This is easy to see with a plot:



    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer































      1














      The initial question is actually:



      If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



      With each logically sound algebraic step, the initial question is rephrased, eventually leading to:



      If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x = 2text{ or } x= 6$. What is $x$?



      Unfortunately, we still have done nothing to prove x exists. If all the logical steps are if and only if , or reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the square root function is not the same as the inverse of the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



      All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, its easier to just check your answers every time.






      share|cite|improve this answer































        0














        Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



        Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






        share|cite|improve this answer





























          0














          Your reasoning is a chain of implications: if $x_0$ is a solution, then..., then $x_0$ should be $cdot$ or $cdot$. As you do not have equivalences instead of implications at each step, the final potential $x$s are only a superset of solutions, that should be plugged into the original problem, to see if they fit.



          A change in variables can show some additional insights. To get rid of the root, you can choose a positive $y$ such that $y^2 = 2x-3$, and thus $ 2x-3=sqrt{y}$.



          You can rewrite your equation as:



          $$y+(y^2+3)/2 = 3$$



          or



          $$2y+y^2 = 3$$



          This system has at most two solutions $y_a$ and $y_b$: an obvious solution is real, satisfying $2times 1+1^2=3$, or $y_a=1$, which yields $x=2$. Since $y_atimes y_b = -3$, the second solution would be negative, which is ruled out by hypothesis.



          So $x=2$ is the only solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            -1














            We can use also the following way.



            We need to solve
            $$2sqrt{2x-3}+2x=6$$ or
            $$2x-3+2sqrt{2x-3}+1=4$$ or
            $$left(sqrt{2x-3}+1right)^2=4$$ or
            $$sqrt{2x-3}+1=2$$ or
            $$sqrt{2x-3}=1$$ or $$x=2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055574%2fwhy-do-i-keep-getting-this-incorrect-solution-when-trying-to-find-all-the-real-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              7 Answers
              7






              active

              oldest

              votes








              7 Answers
              7






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              16














              Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



              As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



              $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



              $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



              The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



              The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



              $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



              $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
                – Kai
                2 days ago
















              16














              Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



              As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



              $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



              $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



              The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



              The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



              $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



              $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
                – Kai
                2 days ago














              16












              16








              16






              Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



              As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



              $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



              $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



              The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



              The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



              $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



              $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              Because squaring both sides of an equation always introduces the “risk” of an extraneous solution.



              As a very simple example, notice the following two equations:



              $$x = sqrt 4 iff x = +2$$



              $$x^2 = 4 iff vert xvert = 2 iff x = pm 2$$



              The first equation has only one solution: $+sqrt 4$. The second, however, has two solutions: $pmsqrt 4$. And you get the second equation by squaring the first one.



              The exact same idea applies to your example. You have



              $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which refers only to the non-negative square root of $2x-3$. So, if a solution makes the LHS negative, it is extraneous. But, when you square both sides, you’re actually solving



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2 iff color{blue}{pm}sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



              which has a $pm$ sign and is therefore not the same equation. Now, to be precise, you’d have to add the condition that the LHS must be non-negative:



              $$2x-3 = 9-6x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              $$0 = 12-8x+x^2; quad color{blue}{x leq 3}$$



              Now, your equation is equivalent to the first with the given constraint. If you get any solution greater than $3$, (in this case, $6$), you’d know it satisfies the new equation but not the original one.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited 2 days ago

























              answered 2 days ago









              KM101

              4,886421




              4,886421












              • Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
                – Kai
                2 days ago


















              • Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
                – Kai
                2 days ago
















              Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
              – Kai
              2 days ago




              Maybe it would be a little bit more correct to say that the RHS should be non-negative, since the LHS must be non-negative. There is no way to make the LHS negative.
              – Kai
              2 days ago











              10














              When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



              An extreme example is as follows:



              Solve $x=1$.



              The solution is just $x=1$.



              However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



              Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



              there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                10














                When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                An extreme example is as follows:



                Solve $x=1$.



                The solution is just $x=1$.



                However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  10












                  10








                  10






                  When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                  An extreme example is as follows:



                  Solve $x=1$.



                  The solution is just $x=1$.



                  However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                  Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                  there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  When we square both sides, we could have introduce additional solution.



                  An extreme example is as follows:



                  Solve $x=1$.



                  The solution is just $x=1$.



                  However, if we square them, $x^2=1$. Now $x=-1$ also satisfies the new equation which is no longer the original problem.



                  Remark: Note that as we write $$sqrt{2x-3}=3-x,$$



                  there is an implicit constraint that we need $3-x ge 0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Siong Thye Goh

                  99.3k1464117




                  99.3k1464117























                      1














                      To build off of the other answers provided, the equation you wish to solve is



                      $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                      To do so, you square both sides, and solve



                      $$2x-3 = (3-x)^2$$



                      which has two solutions. However this equation can also be obtained by squaring



                      $$-sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                      The second solution is the solution to this second equation. This is easy to see with a plot:



                      enter image description here






                      share|cite|improve this answer




























                        1














                        To build off of the other answers provided, the equation you wish to solve is



                        $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                        To do so, you square both sides, and solve



                        $$2x-3 = (3-x)^2$$



                        which has two solutions. However this equation can also be obtained by squaring



                        $$-sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                        The second solution is the solution to this second equation. This is easy to see with a plot:



                        enter image description here






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          1












                          1








                          1






                          To build off of the other answers provided, the equation you wish to solve is



                          $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                          To do so, you square both sides, and solve



                          $$2x-3 = (3-x)^2$$



                          which has two solutions. However this equation can also be obtained by squaring



                          $$-sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                          The second solution is the solution to this second equation. This is easy to see with a plot:



                          enter image description here






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          To build off of the other answers provided, the equation you wish to solve is



                          $$sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                          To do so, you square both sides, and solve



                          $$2x-3 = (3-x)^2$$



                          which has two solutions. However this equation can also be obtained by squaring



                          $$-sqrt{2x-3} = 3-x$$



                          The second solution is the solution to this second equation. This is easy to see with a plot:



                          enter image description here







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited 2 days ago

























                          answered 2 days ago









                          Kai

                          22326




                          22326























                              1














                              The initial question is actually:



                              If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                              With each logically sound algebraic step, the initial question is rephrased, eventually leading to:



                              If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x = 2text{ or } x= 6$. What is $x$?



                              Unfortunately, we still have done nothing to prove x exists. If all the logical steps are if and only if , or reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the square root function is not the same as the inverse of the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                              All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, its easier to just check your answers every time.






                              share|cite|improve this answer




























                                1














                                The initial question is actually:



                                If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                With each logically sound algebraic step, the initial question is rephrased, eventually leading to:



                                If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x = 2text{ or } x= 6$. What is $x$?



                                Unfortunately, we still have done nothing to prove x exists. If all the logical steps are if and only if , or reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the square root function is not the same as the inverse of the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, its easier to just check your answers every time.






                                share|cite|improve this answer


























                                  1












                                  1








                                  1






                                  The initial question is actually:



                                  If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                  With each logically sound algebraic step, the initial question is rephrased, eventually leading to:



                                  If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x = 2text{ or } x= 6$. What is $x$?



                                  Unfortunately, we still have done nothing to prove x exists. If all the logical steps are if and only if , or reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the square root function is not the same as the inverse of the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                  All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, its easier to just check your answers every time.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                  The initial question is actually:



                                  If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $sqrt{2x-3}+x=3$. What is $x$?



                                  With each logically sound algebraic step, the initial question is rephrased, eventually leading to:



                                  If $x$ exists, then it satisfies $x = 2text{ or } x= 6$. What is $x$?



                                  Unfortunately, we still have done nothing to prove x exists. If all the logical steps are if and only if , or reversible, then we are done. We could 'let $x = 2$ or $x = 6$' and follow the logic backwards to demonstrate that x is a solution to the original equation. Unfortunately, as noted on other answers, squaring is not a reversible step; the square root function is not the same as the inverse of the square function. We can see this by noting that the square function takes positive and negative numbers and maps them to positive numbers. Meanwhile, the square root function takes positive numbers only and maps them to positive numbers only.



                                  All this is a long way of saying that the alternative to checking answers is understanding which algebraic steps are reversible and which are not. In practice, its easier to just check your answers every time.







                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                  share|cite|improve this answer








                                  edited 2 days ago

























                                  answered 2 days ago









                                  David Diaz

                                  944420




                                  944420























                                      0














                                      Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                                      Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                                        0














                                        Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                                        Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                                          0












                                          0








                                          0






                                          Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                                          Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                          Squaring both sides of an equation can introduce extraneous solutions. Thus it is necessary when doing so to check your answer.



                                          Notice:$$sqrt{2cdot 6-3}+6=9neq3$$.







                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer










                                          answered 2 days ago









                                          Chris Custer

                                          10.8k3724




                                          10.8k3724























                                              0














                                              Your reasoning is a chain of implications: if $x_0$ is a solution, then..., then $x_0$ should be $cdot$ or $cdot$. As you do not have equivalences instead of implications at each step, the final potential $x$s are only a superset of solutions, that should be plugged into the original problem, to see if they fit.



                                              A change in variables can show some additional insights. To get rid of the root, you can choose a positive $y$ such that $y^2 = 2x-3$, and thus $ 2x-3=sqrt{y}$.



                                              You can rewrite your equation as:



                                              $$y+(y^2+3)/2 = 3$$



                                              or



                                              $$2y+y^2 = 3$$



                                              This system has at most two solutions $y_a$ and $y_b$: an obvious solution is real, satisfying $2times 1+1^2=3$, or $y_a=1$, which yields $x=2$. Since $y_atimes y_b = -3$, the second solution would be negative, which is ruled out by hypothesis.



                                              So $x=2$ is the only solution.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer


























                                                0














                                                Your reasoning is a chain of implications: if $x_0$ is a solution, then..., then $x_0$ should be $cdot$ or $cdot$. As you do not have equivalences instead of implications at each step, the final potential $x$s are only a superset of solutions, that should be plugged into the original problem, to see if they fit.



                                                A change in variables can show some additional insights. To get rid of the root, you can choose a positive $y$ such that $y^2 = 2x-3$, and thus $ 2x-3=sqrt{y}$.



                                                You can rewrite your equation as:



                                                $$y+(y^2+3)/2 = 3$$



                                                or



                                                $$2y+y^2 = 3$$



                                                This system has at most two solutions $y_a$ and $y_b$: an obvious solution is real, satisfying $2times 1+1^2=3$, or $y_a=1$, which yields $x=2$. Since $y_atimes y_b = -3$, the second solution would be negative, which is ruled out by hypothesis.



                                                So $x=2$ is the only solution.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer
























                                                  0












                                                  0








                                                  0






                                                  Your reasoning is a chain of implications: if $x_0$ is a solution, then..., then $x_0$ should be $cdot$ or $cdot$. As you do not have equivalences instead of implications at each step, the final potential $x$s are only a superset of solutions, that should be plugged into the original problem, to see if they fit.



                                                  A change in variables can show some additional insights. To get rid of the root, you can choose a positive $y$ such that $y^2 = 2x-3$, and thus $ 2x-3=sqrt{y}$.



                                                  You can rewrite your equation as:



                                                  $$y+(y^2+3)/2 = 3$$



                                                  or



                                                  $$2y+y^2 = 3$$



                                                  This system has at most two solutions $y_a$ and $y_b$: an obvious solution is real, satisfying $2times 1+1^2=3$, or $y_a=1$, which yields $x=2$. Since $y_atimes y_b = -3$, the second solution would be negative, which is ruled out by hypothesis.



                                                  So $x=2$ is the only solution.






                                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                                  Your reasoning is a chain of implications: if $x_0$ is a solution, then..., then $x_0$ should be $cdot$ or $cdot$. As you do not have equivalences instead of implications at each step, the final potential $x$s are only a superset of solutions, that should be plugged into the original problem, to see if they fit.



                                                  A change in variables can show some additional insights. To get rid of the root, you can choose a positive $y$ such that $y^2 = 2x-3$, and thus $ 2x-3=sqrt{y}$.



                                                  You can rewrite your equation as:



                                                  $$y+(y^2+3)/2 = 3$$



                                                  or



                                                  $$2y+y^2 = 3$$



                                                  This system has at most two solutions $y_a$ and $y_b$: an obvious solution is real, satisfying $2times 1+1^2=3$, or $y_a=1$, which yields $x=2$. Since $y_atimes y_b = -3$, the second solution would be negative, which is ruled out by hypothesis.



                                                  So $x=2$ is the only solution.







                                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                                  answered yesterday









                                                  Laurent Duval

                                                  5,28811239




                                                  5,28811239























                                                      -1














                                                      We can use also the following way.



                                                      We need to solve
                                                      $$2sqrt{2x-3}+2x=6$$ or
                                                      $$2x-3+2sqrt{2x-3}+1=4$$ or
                                                      $$left(sqrt{2x-3}+1right)^2=4$$ or
                                                      $$sqrt{2x-3}+1=2$$ or
                                                      $$sqrt{2x-3}=1$$ or $$x=2.$$






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                                                        -1














                                                        We can use also the following way.



                                                        We need to solve
                                                        $$2sqrt{2x-3}+2x=6$$ or
                                                        $$2x-3+2sqrt{2x-3}+1=4$$ or
                                                        $$left(sqrt{2x-3}+1right)^2=4$$ or
                                                        $$sqrt{2x-3}+1=2$$ or
                                                        $$sqrt{2x-3}=1$$ or $$x=2.$$






                                                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                                                          -1












                                                          -1








                                                          -1






                                                          We can use also the following way.



                                                          We need to solve
                                                          $$2sqrt{2x-3}+2x=6$$ or
                                                          $$2x-3+2sqrt{2x-3}+1=4$$ or
                                                          $$left(sqrt{2x-3}+1right)^2=4$$ or
                                                          $$sqrt{2x-3}+1=2$$ or
                                                          $$sqrt{2x-3}=1$$ or $$x=2.$$






                                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                                          We can use also the following way.



                                                          We need to solve
                                                          $$2sqrt{2x-3}+2x=6$$ or
                                                          $$2x-3+2sqrt{2x-3}+1=4$$ or
                                                          $$left(sqrt{2x-3}+1right)^2=4$$ or
                                                          $$sqrt{2x-3}+1=2$$ or
                                                          $$sqrt{2x-3}=1$$ or $$x=2.$$







                                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                                          share|cite|improve this answer










                                                          answered 2 days ago









                                                          Michael Rozenberg

                                                          96.2k1588186




                                                          96.2k1588186






























                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded




















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055574%2fwhy-do-i-keep-getting-this-incorrect-solution-when-trying-to-find-all-the-real-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                                              Alcedinidae

                                                              Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]