Can the Minor Illusion spell be cast without line of sight?












5














Can minor illusion be cast without line of sight?



For example, could you cast it behind a wall or through a closed door? Or do you need to see where it’s being manifested? I can't seem to find any threads on this.










share|improve this question





























    5














    Can minor illusion be cast without line of sight?



    For example, could you cast it behind a wall or through a closed door? Or do you need to see where it’s being manifested? I can't seem to find any threads on this.










    share|improve this question



























      5












      5








      5







      Can minor illusion be cast without line of sight?



      For example, could you cast it behind a wall or through a closed door? Or do you need to see where it’s being manifested? I can't seem to find any threads on this.










      share|improve this question















      Can minor illusion be cast without line of sight?



      For example, could you cast it behind a wall or through a closed door? Or do you need to see where it’s being manifested? I can't seem to find any threads on this.







      dnd-5e spells illusion line-of-sight line-of-effect






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 16 '18 at 20:40









      V2Blast

      19.8k357123




      19.8k357123










      asked Dec 16 '18 at 14:25









      JaafaJaafa

      282




      282






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10














          You don't have to see the target but you must have a clear path to it



          If a spell requires that you must be able to see the target to cast it, it says so. Minor illusion does not say so:




          You create a sound or an image of an object within range that lasts for the duration.




          All it requires is that the target area be within range.



          However, there is a more general restriction that you have to meet that affects all spells: you must have a clear path to the target (from the PHB section on Targets):




          To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




          And, from the description of Total Cover:




          A target with total cover can't be targeted directly by an attack or
          a spell, although some spells can reach such a target by including it
          in an area of effect. A target has total cover if it is completely
          concealed by an obstacle.




          So, if the wall or door completely conceals the area you want to target with the spell, you cannot cast minor illusion.






          share|improve this answer





















          • A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
            – L0neGamer
            Dec 16 '18 at 20:26












          • Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
            – MarkTO
            Dec 17 '18 at 15:51






          • 1




            @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
            – Rubiksmoose
            Dec 17 '18 at 17:50











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137469%2fcan-the-minor-illusion-spell-be-cast-without-line-of-sight%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10














          You don't have to see the target but you must have a clear path to it



          If a spell requires that you must be able to see the target to cast it, it says so. Minor illusion does not say so:




          You create a sound or an image of an object within range that lasts for the duration.




          All it requires is that the target area be within range.



          However, there is a more general restriction that you have to meet that affects all spells: you must have a clear path to the target (from the PHB section on Targets):




          To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




          And, from the description of Total Cover:




          A target with total cover can't be targeted directly by an attack or
          a spell, although some spells can reach such a target by including it
          in an area of effect. A target has total cover if it is completely
          concealed by an obstacle.




          So, if the wall or door completely conceals the area you want to target with the spell, you cannot cast minor illusion.






          share|improve this answer





















          • A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
            – L0neGamer
            Dec 16 '18 at 20:26












          • Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
            – MarkTO
            Dec 17 '18 at 15:51






          • 1




            @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
            – Rubiksmoose
            Dec 17 '18 at 17:50
















          10














          You don't have to see the target but you must have a clear path to it



          If a spell requires that you must be able to see the target to cast it, it says so. Minor illusion does not say so:




          You create a sound or an image of an object within range that lasts for the duration.




          All it requires is that the target area be within range.



          However, there is a more general restriction that you have to meet that affects all spells: you must have a clear path to the target (from the PHB section on Targets):




          To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




          And, from the description of Total Cover:




          A target with total cover can't be targeted directly by an attack or
          a spell, although some spells can reach such a target by including it
          in an area of effect. A target has total cover if it is completely
          concealed by an obstacle.




          So, if the wall or door completely conceals the area you want to target with the spell, you cannot cast minor illusion.






          share|improve this answer





















          • A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
            – L0neGamer
            Dec 16 '18 at 20:26












          • Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
            – MarkTO
            Dec 17 '18 at 15:51






          • 1




            @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
            – Rubiksmoose
            Dec 17 '18 at 17:50














          10












          10








          10






          You don't have to see the target but you must have a clear path to it



          If a spell requires that you must be able to see the target to cast it, it says so. Minor illusion does not say so:




          You create a sound or an image of an object within range that lasts for the duration.




          All it requires is that the target area be within range.



          However, there is a more general restriction that you have to meet that affects all spells: you must have a clear path to the target (from the PHB section on Targets):




          To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




          And, from the description of Total Cover:




          A target with total cover can't be targeted directly by an attack or
          a spell, although some spells can reach such a target by including it
          in an area of effect. A target has total cover if it is completely
          concealed by an obstacle.




          So, if the wall or door completely conceals the area you want to target with the spell, you cannot cast minor illusion.






          share|improve this answer












          You don't have to see the target but you must have a clear path to it



          If a spell requires that you must be able to see the target to cast it, it says so. Minor illusion does not say so:




          You create a sound or an image of an object within range that lasts for the duration.




          All it requires is that the target area be within range.



          However, there is a more general restriction that you have to meet that affects all spells: you must have a clear path to the target (from the PHB section on Targets):




          To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover.




          And, from the description of Total Cover:




          A target with total cover can't be targeted directly by an attack or
          a spell, although some spells can reach such a target by including it
          in an area of effect. A target has total cover if it is completely
          concealed by an obstacle.




          So, if the wall or door completely conceals the area you want to target with the spell, you cannot cast minor illusion.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 16 '18 at 17:05









          RubiksmooseRubiksmoose

          49.1k6243370




          49.1k6243370












          • A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
            – L0neGamer
            Dec 16 '18 at 20:26












          • Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
            – MarkTO
            Dec 17 '18 at 15:51






          • 1




            @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
            – Rubiksmoose
            Dec 17 '18 at 17:50


















          • A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
            – L0neGamer
            Dec 16 '18 at 20:26












          • Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
            – MarkTO
            Dec 17 '18 at 15:51






          • 1




            @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
            – Rubiksmoose
            Dec 17 '18 at 17:50
















          A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
          – L0neGamer
          Dec 16 '18 at 20:26






          A possible expansion that could be explored: could minor illusion (and similar) be casted via keyhole or some such?
          – L0neGamer
          Dec 16 '18 at 20:26














          Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
          – MarkTO
          Dec 17 '18 at 15:51




          Another point, could a creature inside a closed off opaque paper tent hear an illusory sound? It would have 'total cover' and by RAW, the illusion of yelling next to the tent could not be heard inside, but an actual yell could be.
          – MarkTO
          Dec 17 '18 at 15:51




          1




          1




          @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
          – Rubiksmoose
          Dec 17 '18 at 17:50




          @MarkTO depends on the spell, in the case of minor illusion, the creature isn't a target, the area the illusion is cast on is. So there shouldn't be a direct path issue.
          – Rubiksmoose
          Dec 17 '18 at 17:50


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137469%2fcan-the-minor-illusion-spell-be-cast-without-line-of-sight%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Alcedinidae

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]