Is it erroneous to use “nude” and “naked” to refer to a half-covered body?












0














I am a person who like exact language and from my knowledge of the definition is that one has to be COMPLETELY uncovered to use those 2 terms.



However I have seen it being used in shows (and maybe books) where a half-covered person is referred to as naked/nude, e.g. only topless or pantsless.



Is this erroneous colloquial English whose proliferation is only by improper usage or is this actually permissible as proper English. If it is proper English now, then was there ever a time when it wasn't (since proper language is fluid with the times)?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    It depends on which half is covered.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:28






  • 1




    @HotLicks The front half.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:39






  • 1




    @tchrist - I think you got that bass-ackwards.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:40






  • 1




    @HotLicks Fine, have it your way: the right half then, with a demi-tux.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:50












  • I have seen the use you mention ("I saw a naked man" when they are wearing pants but no shirt). That always sounded strange to me, but maybe there is an 'official' use for what I would call 'half-naked'. What did a dictionary say?
    – Mitch
    2 days ago
















0














I am a person who like exact language and from my knowledge of the definition is that one has to be COMPLETELY uncovered to use those 2 terms.



However I have seen it being used in shows (and maybe books) where a half-covered person is referred to as naked/nude, e.g. only topless or pantsless.



Is this erroneous colloquial English whose proliferation is only by improper usage or is this actually permissible as proper English. If it is proper English now, then was there ever a time when it wasn't (since proper language is fluid with the times)?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    It depends on which half is covered.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:28






  • 1




    @HotLicks The front half.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:39






  • 1




    @tchrist - I think you got that bass-ackwards.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:40






  • 1




    @HotLicks Fine, have it your way: the right half then, with a demi-tux.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:50












  • I have seen the use you mention ("I saw a naked man" when they are wearing pants but no shirt). That always sounded strange to me, but maybe there is an 'official' use for what I would call 'half-naked'. What did a dictionary say?
    – Mitch
    2 days ago














0












0








0


2





I am a person who like exact language and from my knowledge of the definition is that one has to be COMPLETELY uncovered to use those 2 terms.



However I have seen it being used in shows (and maybe books) where a half-covered person is referred to as naked/nude, e.g. only topless or pantsless.



Is this erroneous colloquial English whose proliferation is only by improper usage or is this actually permissible as proper English. If it is proper English now, then was there ever a time when it wasn't (since proper language is fluid with the times)?










share|improve this question













I am a person who like exact language and from my knowledge of the definition is that one has to be COMPLETELY uncovered to use those 2 terms.



However I have seen it being used in shows (and maybe books) where a half-covered person is referred to as naked/nude, e.g. only topless or pantsless.



Is this erroneous colloquial English whose proliferation is only by improper usage or is this actually permissible as proper English. If it is proper English now, then was there ever a time when it wasn't (since proper language is fluid with the times)?







word-choice word-usage linguistics dictionaries






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 14 '18 at 11:41









shoryuushoryuu

1323




1323








  • 1




    It depends on which half is covered.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:28






  • 1




    @HotLicks The front half.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:39






  • 1




    @tchrist - I think you got that bass-ackwards.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:40






  • 1




    @HotLicks Fine, have it your way: the right half then, with a demi-tux.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:50












  • I have seen the use you mention ("I saw a naked man" when they are wearing pants but no shirt). That always sounded strange to me, but maybe there is an 'official' use for what I would call 'half-naked'. What did a dictionary say?
    – Mitch
    2 days ago














  • 1




    It depends on which half is covered.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:28






  • 1




    @HotLicks The front half.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:39






  • 1




    @tchrist - I think you got that bass-ackwards.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 23:40






  • 1




    @HotLicks Fine, have it your way: the right half then, with a demi-tux.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:50












  • I have seen the use you mention ("I saw a naked man" when they are wearing pants but no shirt). That always sounded strange to me, but maybe there is an 'official' use for what I would call 'half-naked'. What did a dictionary say?
    – Mitch
    2 days ago








1




1




It depends on which half is covered.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 23:28




It depends on which half is covered.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 23:28




1




1




@HotLicks The front half.
– tchrist
Jan 5 at 23:39




@HotLicks The front half.
– tchrist
Jan 5 at 23:39




1




1




@tchrist - I think you got that bass-ackwards.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 23:40




@tchrist - I think you got that bass-ackwards.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 23:40




1




1




@HotLicks Fine, have it your way: the right half then, with a demi-tux.
– tchrist
Jan 5 at 23:50






@HotLicks Fine, have it your way: the right half then, with a demi-tux.
– tchrist
Jan 5 at 23:50














I have seen the use you mention ("I saw a naked man" when they are wearing pants but no shirt). That always sounded strange to me, but maybe there is an 'official' use for what I would call 'half-naked'. What did a dictionary say?
– Mitch
2 days ago




I have seen the use you mention ("I saw a naked man" when they are wearing pants but no shirt). That always sounded strange to me, but maybe there is an 'official' use for what I would call 'half-naked'. What did a dictionary say?
– Mitch
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














“Naked” means totally unclothed, unless the term is qualified, as in “naked from the waist up”. I don’t think that option exists for “nude”. As you probably know, “nude” (and not naked) is also used as a noun meaning an artistic representation of the unclothed body.






share|improve this answer











Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.










  • 1




    Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
    – Nigel J
    Mar 14 '18 at 13:38










  • While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:14



















0














A combustion process constitutes a 'naked flame' so long as the relevant part[s] is[are] exposed to the general environment. The same is true in the case of a naked or nude human being. The entire surface of the flame need not be exposed, any part is sufficient.



If we were to describe a spill of boiling water, it would be perfectly reasonable and correct to say 'it splashed onto naked skin' without implying that he was in fact in an entirely naked state, that some portion of the contacted surface is skin is enough.



It seems to follow that what constitutes naked in any given scenario is not laid out in any quantitative fashion. If you want specificity perhaps we need a nakedness metric, other than ergs of discomfiture.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:51












  • proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
    – Giu Piete
    Jan 6 at 0:23






  • 1




    No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
    – tchrist
    Jan 6 at 0:27





















-1














The key to nakedness is, I think, coverage of the genitals, and breasts in the case of women. A man wearing a speedo would not be called naked even though he is only, say, 5% clothed, but a man wearing a shirt but no pants might be described as naked, even though he might be, say, 40% clothed, by total area of skin.



For many, then, "naked" means "Visible genitals", and this might extend to breasts in the case of women.






share|improve this answer











Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.














  • I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:16











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435383%2fis-it-erroneous-to-use-nude-and-naked-to-refer-to-a-half-covered-body%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














“Naked” means totally unclothed, unless the term is qualified, as in “naked from the waist up”. I don’t think that option exists for “nude”. As you probably know, “nude” (and not naked) is also used as a noun meaning an artistic representation of the unclothed body.






share|improve this answer











Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.










  • 1




    Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
    – Nigel J
    Mar 14 '18 at 13:38










  • While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:14
















0














“Naked” means totally unclothed, unless the term is qualified, as in “naked from the waist up”. I don’t think that option exists for “nude”. As you probably know, “nude” (and not naked) is also used as a noun meaning an artistic representation of the unclothed body.






share|improve this answer











Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.










  • 1




    Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
    – Nigel J
    Mar 14 '18 at 13:38










  • While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:14














0












0








0






“Naked” means totally unclothed, unless the term is qualified, as in “naked from the waist up”. I don’t think that option exists for “nude”. As you probably know, “nude” (and not naked) is also used as a noun meaning an artistic representation of the unclothed body.






share|improve this answer












“Naked” means totally unclothed, unless the term is qualified, as in “naked from the waist up”. I don’t think that option exists for “nude”. As you probably know, “nude” (and not naked) is also used as a noun meaning an artistic representation of the unclothed body.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 '18 at 13:35









Antwerp SmerleAntwerp Smerle

11




11



Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.




Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.









  • 1




    Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
    – Nigel J
    Mar 14 '18 at 13:38










  • While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:14














  • 1




    Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
    – Nigel J
    Mar 14 '18 at 13:38










  • While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:14








1




1




Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
– Nigel J
Mar 14 '18 at 13:38




Some references would be helpful here to demonstrate that it is not just opinion.
– Nigel J
Mar 14 '18 at 13:38












While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
– Jelila
Mar 14 '18 at 14:14




While naked and nude means ‘completely unclothed’, you can say ‘semi-nude’ or ‘partly naked’.
– Jelila
Mar 14 '18 at 14:14













0














A combustion process constitutes a 'naked flame' so long as the relevant part[s] is[are] exposed to the general environment. The same is true in the case of a naked or nude human being. The entire surface of the flame need not be exposed, any part is sufficient.



If we were to describe a spill of boiling water, it would be perfectly reasonable and correct to say 'it splashed onto naked skin' without implying that he was in fact in an entirely naked state, that some portion of the contacted surface is skin is enough.



It seems to follow that what constitutes naked in any given scenario is not laid out in any quantitative fashion. If you want specificity perhaps we need a nakedness metric, other than ergs of discomfiture.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:51












  • proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
    – Giu Piete
    Jan 6 at 0:23






  • 1




    No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
    – tchrist
    Jan 6 at 0:27


















0














A combustion process constitutes a 'naked flame' so long as the relevant part[s] is[are] exposed to the general environment. The same is true in the case of a naked or nude human being. The entire surface of the flame need not be exposed, any part is sufficient.



If we were to describe a spill of boiling water, it would be perfectly reasonable and correct to say 'it splashed onto naked skin' without implying that he was in fact in an entirely naked state, that some portion of the contacted surface is skin is enough.



It seems to follow that what constitutes naked in any given scenario is not laid out in any quantitative fashion. If you want specificity perhaps we need a nakedness metric, other than ergs of discomfiture.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:51












  • proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
    – Giu Piete
    Jan 6 at 0:23






  • 1




    No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
    – tchrist
    Jan 6 at 0:27
















0












0








0






A combustion process constitutes a 'naked flame' so long as the relevant part[s] is[are] exposed to the general environment. The same is true in the case of a naked or nude human being. The entire surface of the flame need not be exposed, any part is sufficient.



If we were to describe a spill of boiling water, it would be perfectly reasonable and correct to say 'it splashed onto naked skin' without implying that he was in fact in an entirely naked state, that some portion of the contacted surface is skin is enough.



It seems to follow that what constitutes naked in any given scenario is not laid out in any quantitative fashion. If you want specificity perhaps we need a nakedness metric, other than ergs of discomfiture.






share|improve this answer












A combustion process constitutes a 'naked flame' so long as the relevant part[s] is[are] exposed to the general environment. The same is true in the case of a naked or nude human being. The entire surface of the flame need not be exposed, any part is sufficient.



If we were to describe a spill of boiling water, it would be perfectly reasonable and correct to say 'it splashed onto naked skin' without implying that he was in fact in an entirely naked state, that some portion of the contacted surface is skin is enough.



It seems to follow that what constitutes naked in any given scenario is not laid out in any quantitative fashion. If you want specificity perhaps we need a nakedness metric, other than ergs of discomfiture.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 5 at 23:45









Giu PieteGiu Piete

413




413








  • 1




    This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:51












  • proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
    – Giu Piete
    Jan 6 at 0:23






  • 1




    No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
    – tchrist
    Jan 6 at 0:27
















  • 1




    This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
    – tchrist
    Jan 5 at 23:51












  • proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
    – Giu Piete
    Jan 6 at 0:23






  • 1




    No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
    – tchrist
    Jan 6 at 0:27










1




1




This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
– tchrist
Jan 5 at 23:51






This is the start of a good answer, but it would be a lot better with citations.
– tchrist
Jan 5 at 23:51














proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
– Giu Piete
Jan 6 at 0:23




proceeds to trawl through search results for 'totally naked'..not.
– Giu Piete
Jan 6 at 0:23




1




1




No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
– tchrist
Jan 6 at 0:27






No, I mean go to a proper dictionary (preferably an historical one) and show us what it has to say about each of those two words. There’s also more meat just begging to be exposed here in the partially covered arena.
– tchrist
Jan 6 at 0:27













-1














The key to nakedness is, I think, coverage of the genitals, and breasts in the case of women. A man wearing a speedo would not be called naked even though he is only, say, 5% clothed, but a man wearing a shirt but no pants might be described as naked, even though he might be, say, 40% clothed, by total area of skin.



For many, then, "naked" means "Visible genitals", and this might extend to breasts in the case of women.






share|improve this answer











Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.














  • I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:16
















-1














The key to nakedness is, I think, coverage of the genitals, and breasts in the case of women. A man wearing a speedo would not be called naked even though he is only, say, 5% clothed, but a man wearing a shirt but no pants might be described as naked, even though he might be, say, 40% clothed, by total area of skin.



For many, then, "naked" means "Visible genitals", and this might extend to breasts in the case of women.






share|improve this answer











Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.














  • I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:16














-1












-1








-1






The key to nakedness is, I think, coverage of the genitals, and breasts in the case of women. A man wearing a speedo would not be called naked even though he is only, say, 5% clothed, but a man wearing a shirt but no pants might be described as naked, even though he might be, say, 40% clothed, by total area of skin.



For many, then, "naked" means "Visible genitals", and this might extend to breasts in the case of women.






share|improve this answer












The key to nakedness is, I think, coverage of the genitals, and breasts in the case of women. A man wearing a speedo would not be called naked even though he is only, say, 5% clothed, but a man wearing a shirt but no pants might be described as naked, even though he might be, say, 40% clothed, by total area of skin.



For many, then, "naked" means "Visible genitals", and this might extend to breasts in the case of women.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 '18 at 13:45









Max WilliamsMax Williams

21k54067




21k54067



Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.




Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.













  • I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:16


















  • I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
    – Jelila
    Mar 14 '18 at 14:16
















I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
– Jelila
Mar 14 '18 at 14:16




I think you’d need to say ‘almost naked’ for someone wearing only a shirt. Naked and nude really mean ‘bare’.
– Jelila
Mar 14 '18 at 14:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435383%2fis-it-erroneous-to-use-nude-and-naked-to-refer-to-a-half-covered-body%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]