How much had really been ordered? [on hold]












16












$begingroup$


The clerk misunderstood the order for rope. He reversed feet and inches, and the customer got only 30% of what he ordered.



How much rope had really been ordered?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is off-topic as it appears to be a mathematics problem, as opposed to a mathematical puzzle. For more info, see "Are math-textbook-style problems on topic?" on meta." – TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 8




    $begingroup$
    This would never happen in a metric rope shop!
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday
















16












$begingroup$


The clerk misunderstood the order for rope. He reversed feet and inches, and the customer got only 30% of what he ordered.



How much rope had really been ordered?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is off-topic as it appears to be a mathematics problem, as opposed to a mathematical puzzle. For more info, see "Are math-textbook-style problems on topic?" on meta." – TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 8




    $begingroup$
    This would never happen in a metric rope shop!
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday














16












16








16


1



$begingroup$


The clerk misunderstood the order for rope. He reversed feet and inches, and the customer got only 30% of what he ordered.



How much rope had really been ordered?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




The clerk misunderstood the order for rope. He reversed feet and inches, and the customer got only 30% of what he ordered.



How much rope had really been ordered?







mathematics






share|improve this question









New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









JonMark Perry

18.9k63891




18.9k63891






New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









JoanneJoanne

843




843




New contributor




Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Joanne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is off-topic as it appears to be a mathematics problem, as opposed to a mathematical puzzle. For more info, see "Are math-textbook-style problems on topic?" on meta." – TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is off-topic as it appears to be a mathematics problem, as opposed to a mathematical puzzle. For more info, see "Are math-textbook-style problems on topic?" on meta." – TwoBitOperation, deep thought, A. P., athin, Omega Krypton

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    This would never happen in a metric rope shop!
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday














  • 8




    $begingroup$
    This would never happen in a metric rope shop!
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday








8




8




$begingroup$
This would never happen in a metric rope shop!
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday




$begingroup$
This would never happen in a metric rope shop!
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















19












$begingroup$


Assume the order was for $x$ feet and $y$ inches, a total of $12x+y$ inches, and the customer got $y$ feet and $x$ inches, a total of $12y+x$ inches. We know that $12x+y=frac{10}{3}(12y+x)$, so that $36x+3y=120y+10x$, or $26x=117y$. As $gcd(26,117)=13$, we have $2x=9y$. So for any positive integer $k$, there is a solution $x=9k,y=2k$. As @Jaap points out, $x,ylt12$ can be assumed, therefore $k=1$, and so $x=9, y=2$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
    $endgroup$
    – Jaap Scherphuis
    yesterday








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
    $endgroup$
    – Krad Cigol
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
    $endgroup$
    – Mea Culpa Nay
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
    $endgroup$
    – ZanyG
    18 hours ago



















10












$begingroup$

With some trial and error:



Seems he ordered:




9 feet and 2 inches and received only 2 feet and 9 inches







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$


    First, we know that a foot is 12 inches.

    Let the length of the rope be $x$ feet and $y$ inches.

    In other words, the rope is $12x+y$ inches long.
    Since the clerk misunderstood, the rope he got was $y$ feet and $x$ inches long, which can also be expressed as $12y+x$ inches.

    With some trial and error, it is not hard to find that he ordered 9 feet and 2 inches of rope at first but received 2 feet and 9 inches of rope.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for upvoting!
      $endgroup$
      – H_D
      yesterday



















    2












    $begingroup$


    $0.3 times (12x + y)$ is what he received, with the ordered length being $xtext{'}ytext{"}$, $12y + x$ is what the clerk understood. $0 leq x < 12$ and $0 leq y < 12$

    $0.3 times (12x + y) = 12y + x Rightarrow 3.6x + 0.3y = 12y + x Rightarrow 2.6x = 11.7y$
    $y$ can further be limited because $frac{11.7}{2.6}y = 4.5y < 12$, leaving us with $0 leq y < 3$. $0$ and $1$ clearly don't work, which leaves us with $2$.

    Set $y = 2 Rightarrow 2.6x = 23.4 Rightarrow x = 9$

    $0.3 times (9text{'}2text{"}) = 33text{"} = 2text{'}9text{"}$







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      If you do not place a restriction on inches, there are an infinite number of answers. If you place the restriction that it must be less than 12, but can be any real number > 0, I believe there are still an infinite number of solutions. If it must be an integer, then I would think there is only a finite number of solution in this case.



      Either way, below outlines my process for deriving this solution:




      12i+f = 0.3(12f+i) -> Left side is swapped inches and feet, right side is 30% of expected amount of rope

      12i+f = 0.3i+3.6f -> Reduction

      11.7i = 2.6f -> Reduction

      f=4.5i => i = 2/9f -> This is a relationship between the value for inches and feet that will satisfy the requirements of this problem.

      Arbitrarily pick a value for f => 27

      i = 2/9*27 = 6

      Verify solution: 12*6+27 = 0.3(12*27+6) -> True


      This will be valid for any pick for f or i.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
        $endgroup$
        – Timbo
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
        $endgroup$
        – blakeoft
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
        $endgroup$
        – Baldrickk
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
        $endgroup$
        – blakeoft
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon Dixon
        11 hours ago


















      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      19












      $begingroup$


      Assume the order was for $x$ feet and $y$ inches, a total of $12x+y$ inches, and the customer got $y$ feet and $x$ inches, a total of $12y+x$ inches. We know that $12x+y=frac{10}{3}(12y+x)$, so that $36x+3y=120y+10x$, or $26x=117y$. As $gcd(26,117)=13$, we have $2x=9y$. So for any positive integer $k$, there is a solution $x=9k,y=2k$. As @Jaap points out, $x,ylt12$ can be assumed, therefore $k=1$, and so $x=9, y=2$.







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
        $endgroup$
        – Jaap Scherphuis
        yesterday








      • 5




        $begingroup$
        Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
        $endgroup$
        – Krad Cigol
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
        $endgroup$
        – JonMark Perry
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
        $endgroup$
        – Mea Culpa Nay
        yesterday






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
        $endgroup$
        – ZanyG
        18 hours ago
















      19












      $begingroup$


      Assume the order was for $x$ feet and $y$ inches, a total of $12x+y$ inches, and the customer got $y$ feet and $x$ inches, a total of $12y+x$ inches. We know that $12x+y=frac{10}{3}(12y+x)$, so that $36x+3y=120y+10x$, or $26x=117y$. As $gcd(26,117)=13$, we have $2x=9y$. So for any positive integer $k$, there is a solution $x=9k,y=2k$. As @Jaap points out, $x,ylt12$ can be assumed, therefore $k=1$, and so $x=9, y=2$.







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
        $endgroup$
        – Jaap Scherphuis
        yesterday








      • 5




        $begingroup$
        Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
        $endgroup$
        – Krad Cigol
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
        $endgroup$
        – JonMark Perry
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
        $endgroup$
        – Mea Culpa Nay
        yesterday






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
        $endgroup$
        – ZanyG
        18 hours ago














      19












      19








      19





      $begingroup$


      Assume the order was for $x$ feet and $y$ inches, a total of $12x+y$ inches, and the customer got $y$ feet and $x$ inches, a total of $12y+x$ inches. We know that $12x+y=frac{10}{3}(12y+x)$, so that $36x+3y=120y+10x$, or $26x=117y$. As $gcd(26,117)=13$, we have $2x=9y$. So for any positive integer $k$, there is a solution $x=9k,y=2k$. As @Jaap points out, $x,ylt12$ can be assumed, therefore $k=1$, and so $x=9, y=2$.







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




      Assume the order was for $x$ feet and $y$ inches, a total of $12x+y$ inches, and the customer got $y$ feet and $x$ inches, a total of $12y+x$ inches. We know that $12x+y=frac{10}{3}(12y+x)$, so that $36x+3y=120y+10x$, or $26x=117y$. As $gcd(26,117)=13$, we have $2x=9y$. So for any positive integer $k$, there is a solution $x=9k,y=2k$. As @Jaap points out, $x,ylt12$ can be assumed, therefore $k=1$, and so $x=9, y=2$.








      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 18 hours ago

























      answered yesterday









      JonMark PerryJonMark Perry

      18.9k63891




      18.9k63891








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
        $endgroup$
        – Jaap Scherphuis
        yesterday








      • 5




        $begingroup$
        Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
        $endgroup$
        – Krad Cigol
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
        $endgroup$
        – JonMark Perry
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
        $endgroup$
        – Mea Culpa Nay
        yesterday






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
        $endgroup$
        – ZanyG
        18 hours ago














      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
        $endgroup$
        – Jaap Scherphuis
        yesterday








      • 5




        $begingroup$
        Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
        $endgroup$
        – Krad Cigol
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
        $endgroup$
        – JonMark Perry
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
        $endgroup$
        – Mea Culpa Nay
        yesterday






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
        $endgroup$
        – ZanyG
        18 hours ago








      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
      $endgroup$
      – Jaap Scherphuis
      yesterday






      $begingroup$
      I think it is safe to assume x<12 and y<12, because any more than 11 inches would be converted to feet. So there really is only one solution, with k=1.
      $endgroup$
      – Jaap Scherphuis
      yesterday






      5




      5




      $begingroup$
      Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
      $endgroup$
      – Krad Cigol
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      Proof is more useful than brute force answers! +1
      $endgroup$
      – Krad Cigol
      yesterday












      $begingroup$
      @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      @JaapScherphuis; good point - a semi-stupid tailor!
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      yesterday












      $begingroup$
      Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
      $endgroup$
      – Mea Culpa Nay
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      Why x ( measurement of feet) should be less than 12?
      $endgroup$
      – Mea Culpa Nay
      yesterday




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
      $endgroup$
      – ZanyG
      18 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      It's pretty obvious what it is from the working out, but should the answer include the actual answer?
      $endgroup$
      – ZanyG
      18 hours ago











      10












      $begingroup$

      With some trial and error:



      Seems he ordered:




      9 feet and 2 inches and received only 2 feet and 9 inches







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        10












        $begingroup$

        With some trial and error:



        Seems he ordered:




        9 feet and 2 inches and received only 2 feet and 9 inches







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          With some trial and error:



          Seems he ordered:




          9 feet and 2 inches and received only 2 feet and 9 inches







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          With some trial and error:



          Seems he ordered:




          9 feet and 2 inches and received only 2 feet and 9 inches








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          piratepirate

          1,041220




          1,041220























              6












              $begingroup$


              First, we know that a foot is 12 inches.

              Let the length of the rope be $x$ feet and $y$ inches.

              In other words, the rope is $12x+y$ inches long.
              Since the clerk misunderstood, the rope he got was $y$ feet and $x$ inches long, which can also be expressed as $12y+x$ inches.

              With some trial and error, it is not hard to find that he ordered 9 feet and 2 inches of rope at first but received 2 feet and 9 inches of rope.







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Thanks for upvoting!
                $endgroup$
                – H_D
                yesterday
















              6












              $begingroup$


              First, we know that a foot is 12 inches.

              Let the length of the rope be $x$ feet and $y$ inches.

              In other words, the rope is $12x+y$ inches long.
              Since the clerk misunderstood, the rope he got was $y$ feet and $x$ inches long, which can also be expressed as $12y+x$ inches.

              With some trial and error, it is not hard to find that he ordered 9 feet and 2 inches of rope at first but received 2 feet and 9 inches of rope.







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Thanks for upvoting!
                $endgroup$
                – H_D
                yesterday














              6












              6








              6





              $begingroup$


              First, we know that a foot is 12 inches.

              Let the length of the rope be $x$ feet and $y$ inches.

              In other words, the rope is $12x+y$ inches long.
              Since the clerk misunderstood, the rope he got was $y$ feet and $x$ inches long, which can also be expressed as $12y+x$ inches.

              With some trial and error, it is not hard to find that he ordered 9 feet and 2 inches of rope at first but received 2 feet and 9 inches of rope.







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$




              First, we know that a foot is 12 inches.

              Let the length of the rope be $x$ feet and $y$ inches.

              In other words, the rope is $12x+y$ inches long.
              Since the clerk misunderstood, the rope he got was $y$ feet and $x$ inches long, which can also be expressed as $12y+x$ inches.

              With some trial and error, it is not hard to find that he ordered 9 feet and 2 inches of rope at first but received 2 feet and 9 inches of rope.








              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered yesterday









              H_DH_D

              1148




              1148




              New contributor




              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              H_D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.












              • $begingroup$
                Thanks for upvoting!
                $endgroup$
                – H_D
                yesterday


















              • $begingroup$
                Thanks for upvoting!
                $endgroup$
                – H_D
                yesterday
















              $begingroup$
              Thanks for upvoting!
              $endgroup$
              – H_D
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              Thanks for upvoting!
              $endgroup$
              – H_D
              yesterday











              2












              $begingroup$


              $0.3 times (12x + y)$ is what he received, with the ordered length being $xtext{'}ytext{"}$, $12y + x$ is what the clerk understood. $0 leq x < 12$ and $0 leq y < 12$

              $0.3 times (12x + y) = 12y + x Rightarrow 3.6x + 0.3y = 12y + x Rightarrow 2.6x = 11.7y$
              $y$ can further be limited because $frac{11.7}{2.6}y = 4.5y < 12$, leaving us with $0 leq y < 3$. $0$ and $1$ clearly don't work, which leaves us with $2$.

              Set $y = 2 Rightarrow 2.6x = 23.4 Rightarrow x = 9$

              $0.3 times (9text{'}2text{"}) = 33text{"} = 2text{'}9text{"}$







              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$


                $0.3 times (12x + y)$ is what he received, with the ordered length being $xtext{'}ytext{"}$, $12y + x$ is what the clerk understood. $0 leq x < 12$ and $0 leq y < 12$

                $0.3 times (12x + y) = 12y + x Rightarrow 3.6x + 0.3y = 12y + x Rightarrow 2.6x = 11.7y$
                $y$ can further be limited because $frac{11.7}{2.6}y = 4.5y < 12$, leaving us with $0 leq y < 3$. $0$ and $1$ clearly don't work, which leaves us with $2$.

                Set $y = 2 Rightarrow 2.6x = 23.4 Rightarrow x = 9$

                $0.3 times (9text{'}2text{"}) = 33text{"} = 2text{'}9text{"}$







                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$


                  $0.3 times (12x + y)$ is what he received, with the ordered length being $xtext{'}ytext{"}$, $12y + x$ is what the clerk understood. $0 leq x < 12$ and $0 leq y < 12$

                  $0.3 times (12x + y) = 12y + x Rightarrow 3.6x + 0.3y = 12y + x Rightarrow 2.6x = 11.7y$
                  $y$ can further be limited because $frac{11.7}{2.6}y = 4.5y < 12$, leaving us with $0 leq y < 3$. $0$ and $1$ clearly don't work, which leaves us with $2$.

                  Set $y = 2 Rightarrow 2.6x = 23.4 Rightarrow x = 9$

                  $0.3 times (9text{'}2text{"}) = 33text{"} = 2text{'}9text{"}$







                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$




                  $0.3 times (12x + y)$ is what he received, with the ordered length being $xtext{'}ytext{"}$, $12y + x$ is what the clerk understood. $0 leq x < 12$ and $0 leq y < 12$

                  $0.3 times (12x + y) = 12y + x Rightarrow 3.6x + 0.3y = 12y + x Rightarrow 2.6x = 11.7y$
                  $y$ can further be limited because $frac{11.7}{2.6}y = 4.5y < 12$, leaving us with $0 leq y < 3$. $0$ and $1$ clearly don't work, which leaves us with $2$.

                  Set $y = 2 Rightarrow 2.6x = 23.4 Rightarrow x = 9$

                  $0.3 times (9text{'}2text{"}) = 33text{"} = 2text{'}9text{"}$








                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited yesterday









                  w l

                  3,8361229




                  3,8361229






                  New contributor




                  malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  maltegmalteg

                  211




                  211




                  New contributor




                  malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  malteg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      If you do not place a restriction on inches, there are an infinite number of answers. If you place the restriction that it must be less than 12, but can be any real number > 0, I believe there are still an infinite number of solutions. If it must be an integer, then I would think there is only a finite number of solution in this case.



                      Either way, below outlines my process for deriving this solution:




                      12i+f = 0.3(12f+i) -> Left side is swapped inches and feet, right side is 30% of expected amount of rope

                      12i+f = 0.3i+3.6f -> Reduction

                      11.7i = 2.6f -> Reduction

                      f=4.5i => i = 2/9f -> This is a relationship between the value for inches and feet that will satisfy the requirements of this problem.

                      Arbitrarily pick a value for f => 27

                      i = 2/9*27 = 6

                      Verify solution: 12*6+27 = 0.3(12*27+6) -> True


                      This will be valid for any pick for f or i.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$









                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Timbo
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Baldrickk
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon Dixon
                        11 hours ago
















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      If you do not place a restriction on inches, there are an infinite number of answers. If you place the restriction that it must be less than 12, but can be any real number > 0, I believe there are still an infinite number of solutions. If it must be an integer, then I would think there is only a finite number of solution in this case.



                      Either way, below outlines my process for deriving this solution:




                      12i+f = 0.3(12f+i) -> Left side is swapped inches and feet, right side is 30% of expected amount of rope

                      12i+f = 0.3i+3.6f -> Reduction

                      11.7i = 2.6f -> Reduction

                      f=4.5i => i = 2/9f -> This is a relationship between the value for inches and feet that will satisfy the requirements of this problem.

                      Arbitrarily pick a value for f => 27

                      i = 2/9*27 = 6

                      Verify solution: 12*6+27 = 0.3(12*27+6) -> True


                      This will be valid for any pick for f or i.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$









                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Timbo
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Baldrickk
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon Dixon
                        11 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      If you do not place a restriction on inches, there are an infinite number of answers. If you place the restriction that it must be less than 12, but can be any real number > 0, I believe there are still an infinite number of solutions. If it must be an integer, then I would think there is only a finite number of solution in this case.



                      Either way, below outlines my process for deriving this solution:




                      12i+f = 0.3(12f+i) -> Left side is swapped inches and feet, right side is 30% of expected amount of rope

                      12i+f = 0.3i+3.6f -> Reduction

                      11.7i = 2.6f -> Reduction

                      f=4.5i => i = 2/9f -> This is a relationship between the value for inches and feet that will satisfy the requirements of this problem.

                      Arbitrarily pick a value for f => 27

                      i = 2/9*27 = 6

                      Verify solution: 12*6+27 = 0.3(12*27+6) -> True


                      This will be valid for any pick for f or i.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$



                      If you do not place a restriction on inches, there are an infinite number of answers. If you place the restriction that it must be less than 12, but can be any real number > 0, I believe there are still an infinite number of solutions. If it must be an integer, then I would think there is only a finite number of solution in this case.



                      Either way, below outlines my process for deriving this solution:




                      12i+f = 0.3(12f+i) -> Left side is swapped inches and feet, right side is 30% of expected amount of rope

                      12i+f = 0.3i+3.6f -> Reduction

                      11.7i = 2.6f -> Reduction

                      f=4.5i => i = 2/9f -> This is a relationship between the value for inches and feet that will satisfy the requirements of this problem.

                      Arbitrarily pick a value for f => 27

                      i = 2/9*27 = 6

                      Verify solution: 12*6+27 = 0.3(12*27+6) -> True


                      This will be valid for any pick for f or i.








                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered yesterday









                      Brandon DixonBrandon Dixon

                      1222




                      1222




                      New contributor




                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      Brandon Dixon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Timbo
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Baldrickk
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon Dixon
                        11 hours ago














                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Timbo
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Baldrickk
                        yesterday






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
                        $endgroup$
                        – blakeoft
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon Dixon
                        11 hours ago








                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Timbo
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      I don't think 27 feet and 6 inches can be confused with 6 feet and 27 inches. Nobody would use 6 feet and 27 inches. Same with 3 feet and 0.66 inches: Nobody would use 0.66 feet and 3 inches.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Timbo
                      yesterday












                      $begingroup$
                      @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
                      $endgroup$
                      – blakeoft
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      @Timbo 0.66 feet + 3 inches isn't that strange. Suppose you know that you have a fixed length of 0.66 feet, and for this particular project, you need to go 3 inches farther.
                      $endgroup$
                      – blakeoft
                      yesterday




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Baldrickk
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      @blakeoft wouldn't you just specify 11" in that case?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Baldrickk
                      yesterday




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
                      $endgroup$
                      – blakeoft
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      @Baldrickk You certainly could, and most probably would. Still, they are two perfectly fine ways to represent the same measurement. Although, I'd almost definitely say 11 inches if I were asking someone to make a cut for me rather than doing it myself.
                      $endgroup$
                      – blakeoft
                      yesterday












                      $begingroup$
                      @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Brandon Dixon
                      11 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @Timbo, sure, but the question did not place such a restriction.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Brandon Dixon
                      11 hours ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]