Is this statement correct? If yes, why? [on hold]












0















It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago


















0















It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago
















0












0








0








It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.










share|improve this question














It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.







grammaticality






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









gerol2000gerol2000

816




816




put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago





















  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago



















Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago







Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago















Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

– gerol2000
2 days ago





Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

– gerol2000
2 days ago













I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago







I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago















I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

– gerol2000
2 days ago





I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

– gerol2000
2 days ago













@gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

– Peter Shor
2 days ago







@gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

– Peter Shor
2 days ago












0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]