We, Jim and I, went to the shop. OR We - Jim and I - went to the shop [on hold]












-2















Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality







share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago
















-2















Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality







share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago














-2












-2








-2








Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality







share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality




grammaticality






share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









NigelNigel

1




1




New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago














  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago








2




2





Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

– AndyT
2 days ago





Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

– AndyT
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















-1














The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









-1














The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday
















-1














The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday














-1












-1








-1







The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 days ago









Paul MathewPaul Mathew

11




11




New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday



















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday

















Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

– Chappo
yesterday





Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

– Chappo
yesterday



-

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Image
5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

Image
9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
Read more