My coworker and I were trying to solve a problem — we both tried two different things at once that only...
Each solution to the problem we were trying to solve would have independently failed. We were each trying many different solutions at the same time. We each happened to try a solution that worked, but only because the other had tried a complimentary solution.
Is there a word, phrase, idiom, or analogy that describes such a solution?
An example: It's like if we had a whole bunch of light switches and were flipping each of them on and off to see if it controlled the light we were trying to turn on. Unbeknownst to us, the light needed two specific switches to be turned on. Had we been trying independently, we'd have flipped one on, seen no reaction, then flipped it off. However, we happened to each flip one of the two correct switches at the same time, causing the light to turn on. We then each thought we had found the correct one switch, but in further experimentation we realized that the light had needed both of us to switch on the two switches at the same time.
It was an interesting (and probably very lucky) event. I've been trying to come up with a word or phrase to describe it, but I am only getting generalizations like it was 'serendipitous' or it was like we had built two halves of a bridge.
single-word-requests expressions idioms phrase-requests
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
add a comment |
Each solution to the problem we were trying to solve would have independently failed. We were each trying many different solutions at the same time. We each happened to try a solution that worked, but only because the other had tried a complimentary solution.
Is there a word, phrase, idiom, or analogy that describes such a solution?
An example: It's like if we had a whole bunch of light switches and were flipping each of them on and off to see if it controlled the light we were trying to turn on. Unbeknownst to us, the light needed two specific switches to be turned on. Had we been trying independently, we'd have flipped one on, seen no reaction, then flipped it off. However, we happened to each flip one of the two correct switches at the same time, causing the light to turn on. We then each thought we had found the correct one switch, but in further experimentation we realized that the light had needed both of us to switch on the two switches at the same time.
It was an interesting (and probably very lucky) event. I've been trying to come up with a word or phrase to describe it, but I am only getting generalizations like it was 'serendipitous' or it was like we had built two halves of a bridge.
single-word-requests expressions idioms phrase-requests
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
Consider "symbiosis" in its figurative sense of any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons.
– Graffito
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
1
A symbiotic relationship wouldn't have the light switch problem but a synergistic one could.
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:43
1
Complementary
– deadrat
Apr 23 '16 at 0:55
4
Just synergy - no more, no less.
– Drew
Apr 23 '16 at 1:39
1
You clearly need a portmanteau of serendipity and synergy. How about synergipity?
– Peter Shor
Apr 23 '16 at 12:54
add a comment |
Each solution to the problem we were trying to solve would have independently failed. We were each trying many different solutions at the same time. We each happened to try a solution that worked, but only because the other had tried a complimentary solution.
Is there a word, phrase, idiom, or analogy that describes such a solution?
An example: It's like if we had a whole bunch of light switches and were flipping each of them on and off to see if it controlled the light we were trying to turn on. Unbeknownst to us, the light needed two specific switches to be turned on. Had we been trying independently, we'd have flipped one on, seen no reaction, then flipped it off. However, we happened to each flip one of the two correct switches at the same time, causing the light to turn on. We then each thought we had found the correct one switch, but in further experimentation we realized that the light had needed both of us to switch on the two switches at the same time.
It was an interesting (and probably very lucky) event. I've been trying to come up with a word or phrase to describe it, but I am only getting generalizations like it was 'serendipitous' or it was like we had built two halves of a bridge.
single-word-requests expressions idioms phrase-requests
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
Each solution to the problem we were trying to solve would have independently failed. We were each trying many different solutions at the same time. We each happened to try a solution that worked, but only because the other had tried a complimentary solution.
Is there a word, phrase, idiom, or analogy that describes such a solution?
An example: It's like if we had a whole bunch of light switches and were flipping each of them on and off to see if it controlled the light we were trying to turn on. Unbeknownst to us, the light needed two specific switches to be turned on. Had we been trying independently, we'd have flipped one on, seen no reaction, then flipped it off. However, we happened to each flip one of the two correct switches at the same time, causing the light to turn on. We then each thought we had found the correct one switch, but in further experimentation we realized that the light had needed both of us to switch on the two switches at the same time.
It was an interesting (and probably very lucky) event. I've been trying to come up with a word or phrase to describe it, but I am only getting generalizations like it was 'serendipitous' or it was like we had built two halves of a bridge.
single-word-requests expressions idioms phrase-requests
single-word-requests expressions idioms phrase-requests
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
asked Apr 23 '16 at 0:12
Mike ManfrinMike Manfrin
1875
1875
Consider "symbiosis" in its figurative sense of any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons.
– Graffito
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
1
A symbiotic relationship wouldn't have the light switch problem but a synergistic one could.
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:43
1
Complementary
– deadrat
Apr 23 '16 at 0:55
4
Just synergy - no more, no less.
– Drew
Apr 23 '16 at 1:39
1
You clearly need a portmanteau of serendipity and synergy. How about synergipity?
– Peter Shor
Apr 23 '16 at 12:54
add a comment |
Consider "symbiosis" in its figurative sense of any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons.
– Graffito
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
1
A symbiotic relationship wouldn't have the light switch problem but a synergistic one could.
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:43
1
Complementary
– deadrat
Apr 23 '16 at 0:55
4
Just synergy - no more, no less.
– Drew
Apr 23 '16 at 1:39
1
You clearly need a portmanteau of serendipity and synergy. How about synergipity?
– Peter Shor
Apr 23 '16 at 12:54
Consider "symbiosis" in its figurative sense of any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons.
– Graffito
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
Consider "symbiosis" in its figurative sense of any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons.
– Graffito
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
1
1
A symbiotic relationship wouldn't have the light switch problem but a synergistic one could.
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:43
A symbiotic relationship wouldn't have the light switch problem but a synergistic one could.
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:43
1
1
Complementary
– deadrat
Apr 23 '16 at 0:55
Complementary
– deadrat
Apr 23 '16 at 0:55
4
4
Just synergy - no more, no less.
– Drew
Apr 23 '16 at 1:39
Just synergy - no more, no less.
– Drew
Apr 23 '16 at 1:39
1
1
You clearly need a portmanteau of serendipity and synergy. How about synergipity?
– Peter Shor
Apr 23 '16 at 12:54
You clearly need a portmanteau of serendipity and synergy. How about synergipity?
– Peter Shor
Apr 23 '16 at 12:54
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Synergistic inadvertent catalytic relationship.
synergy, noun:
the interaction or cooperation of two or more organizations, substances, or other agents to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects.
inadvertent, adjective:
not resulting from or achieved through deliberate planning.
catalyst, noun
a person or thing that precipitates an event.
All sources are from Google and the phrase appears verbatim in a book (note however, therein Synergistic is a column header).
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
add a comment |
You could broadly call this teamwork:
cooperative or coordinated effort on the part of a group of persons
acting together as a team or in the interests of a common cause.
but a word that you used in the question (albeit misspelled)
provides a more specific description of what happened:
the other person's actions complemented yours:
complement:
noun
1. something that completes or makes perfect
verb (transitive)
12. to complete; form a complement to
or your actions and the other person's were complementary:
1. Forming or serving as a complement; completing
2. Offsetting mutual deficiencies or enhancing mutual strengths
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
add a comment |
"Many hands make light work." may be used to mean that doing a task is easier if more people do it together (e.g. you and your coworker) than if one person does it alone.
"Two heads are better than one." may be used to mean that, if there's a task to be done, having two people work on it together is better than one person working on it alone. (The saying has more scope -- e.g. it may be used to advise someone to get advice or an opinion from a second person.)
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
1
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
1
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f321068%2fmy-coworker-and-i-were-trying-to-solve-a-problem-we-both-tried-two-different%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Synergistic inadvertent catalytic relationship.
synergy, noun:
the interaction or cooperation of two or more organizations, substances, or other agents to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects.
inadvertent, adjective:
not resulting from or achieved through deliberate planning.
catalyst, noun
a person or thing that precipitates an event.
All sources are from Google and the phrase appears verbatim in a book (note however, therein Synergistic is a column header).
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
add a comment |
Synergistic inadvertent catalytic relationship.
synergy, noun:
the interaction or cooperation of two or more organizations, substances, or other agents to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects.
inadvertent, adjective:
not resulting from or achieved through deliberate planning.
catalyst, noun
a person or thing that precipitates an event.
All sources are from Google and the phrase appears verbatim in a book (note however, therein Synergistic is a column header).
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
add a comment |
Synergistic inadvertent catalytic relationship.
synergy, noun:
the interaction or cooperation of two or more organizations, substances, or other agents to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects.
inadvertent, adjective:
not resulting from or achieved through deliberate planning.
catalyst, noun
a person or thing that precipitates an event.
All sources are from Google and the phrase appears verbatim in a book (note however, therein Synergistic is a column header).
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
Synergistic inadvertent catalytic relationship.
synergy, noun:
the interaction or cooperation of two or more organizations, substances, or other agents to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects.
inadvertent, adjective:
not resulting from or achieved through deliberate planning.
catalyst, noun
a person or thing that precipitates an event.
All sources are from Google and the phrase appears verbatim in a book (note however, therein Synergistic is a column header).
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
answered Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
MazuraMazura
8,07932149
8,07932149
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
add a comment |
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
add a comment |
You could broadly call this teamwork:
cooperative or coordinated effort on the part of a group of persons
acting together as a team or in the interests of a common cause.
but a word that you used in the question (albeit misspelled)
provides a more specific description of what happened:
the other person's actions complemented yours:
complement:
noun
1. something that completes or makes perfect
verb (transitive)
12. to complete; form a complement to
or your actions and the other person's were complementary:
1. Forming or serving as a complement; completing
2. Offsetting mutual deficiencies or enhancing mutual strengths
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
add a comment |
You could broadly call this teamwork:
cooperative or coordinated effort on the part of a group of persons
acting together as a team or in the interests of a common cause.
but a word that you used in the question (albeit misspelled)
provides a more specific description of what happened:
the other person's actions complemented yours:
complement:
noun
1. something that completes or makes perfect
verb (transitive)
12. to complete; form a complement to
or your actions and the other person's were complementary:
1. Forming or serving as a complement; completing
2. Offsetting mutual deficiencies or enhancing mutual strengths
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
add a comment |
You could broadly call this teamwork:
cooperative or coordinated effort on the part of a group of persons
acting together as a team or in the interests of a common cause.
but a word that you used in the question (albeit misspelled)
provides a more specific description of what happened:
the other person's actions complemented yours:
complement:
noun
1. something that completes or makes perfect
verb (transitive)
12. to complete; form a complement to
or your actions and the other person's were complementary:
1. Forming or serving as a complement; completing
2. Offsetting mutual deficiencies or enhancing mutual strengths
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
You could broadly call this teamwork:
cooperative or coordinated effort on the part of a group of persons
acting together as a team or in the interests of a common cause.
but a word that you used in the question (albeit misspelled)
provides a more specific description of what happened:
the other person's actions complemented yours:
complement:
noun
1. something that completes or makes perfect
verb (transitive)
12. to complete; form a complement to
or your actions and the other person's were complementary:
1. Forming or serving as a complement; completing
2. Offsetting mutual deficiencies or enhancing mutual strengths
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
answered Apr 23 '16 at 9:01
ScottScott
6,61282850
6,61282850
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
add a comment |
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
Yes, the complementary we should be using here is with an E.
– Feralthinker
Apr 24 '16 at 19:35
add a comment |
"Many hands make light work." may be used to mean that doing a task is easier if more people do it together (e.g. you and your coworker) than if one person does it alone.
"Two heads are better than one." may be used to mean that, if there's a task to be done, having two people work on it together is better than one person working on it alone. (The saying has more scope -- e.g. it may be used to advise someone to get advice or an opinion from a second person.)
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
1
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
1
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
add a comment |
"Many hands make light work." may be used to mean that doing a task is easier if more people do it together (e.g. you and your coworker) than if one person does it alone.
"Two heads are better than one." may be used to mean that, if there's a task to be done, having two people work on it together is better than one person working on it alone. (The saying has more scope -- e.g. it may be used to advise someone to get advice or an opinion from a second person.)
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
1
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
1
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
add a comment |
"Many hands make light work." may be used to mean that doing a task is easier if more people do it together (e.g. you and your coworker) than if one person does it alone.
"Two heads are better than one." may be used to mean that, if there's a task to be done, having two people work on it together is better than one person working on it alone. (The saying has more scope -- e.g. it may be used to advise someone to get advice or an opinion from a second person.)
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
"Many hands make light work." may be used to mean that doing a task is easier if more people do it together (e.g. you and your coworker) than if one person does it alone.
"Two heads are better than one." may be used to mean that, if there's a task to be done, having two people work on it together is better than one person working on it alone. (The saying has more scope -- e.g. it may be used to advise someone to get advice or an opinion from a second person.)
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
answered 2 days ago
Rosie FRosie F
60726
60726
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
1
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
1
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
add a comment |
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
1
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
1
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
This does not get at what the OP is asking about
– Jim
2 days ago
1
1
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
In fairness, Many hands make light work is pretty funny, though.
– tmgr
2 days ago
1
1
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
As a reminder, Stack Exchange answers should explain, not merely suggest. How are these expressions used, and how do they fit the need expressed in the question? Can you find examples? Without such elements, for someone learning English or simply unfamiliar with the expressions, the answer is hard to distinguish from personal opinion or conjecture.
– choster
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f321068%2fmy-coworker-and-i-were-trying-to-solve-a-problem-we-both-tried-two-different%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Consider "symbiosis" in its figurative sense of any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons.
– Graffito
Apr 23 '16 at 0:37
1
A symbiotic relationship wouldn't have the light switch problem but a synergistic one could.
– Mazura
Apr 23 '16 at 0:43
1
Complementary
– deadrat
Apr 23 '16 at 0:55
4
Just synergy - no more, no less.
– Drew
Apr 23 '16 at 1:39
1
You clearly need a portmanteau of serendipity and synergy. How about synergipity?
– Peter Shor
Apr 23 '16 at 12:54