Dose galera cluster perform read load balancing?
Hi Now I'm doing benchmark test with several type mariadb replication with sysbench.
1 Master - 2 Slave MariaDB on kubernetes with ceph stroage.
3 Master with Galera Cluster on kubernetes with ceph storage.
sysbench attach directly each master without LB. I expect that Master-Slave and Galera Cluster's Read performance similarly. Because I know that galera dosen't perform read load balaning, only depending LB in front of Galera Cluster. But Galera-Cluster read performance is much better. below is command to run sysbench with 1 Thread.
-- 1 Master - 2 Slave --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.4.251 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 4135 (13.78 per sec.)`
-- 3 Master Galera Cluster --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.25.60 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 17548 (58.49 per sec.)
Maria Options such as innodb_autoinc_lock_mode, innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit, innodb_buffer_pool_size is the same.
Could i get some advice or opinion?? Thanks.
mysql mariadb
migrated from superuser.com Jan 3 at 8:21
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
add a comment |
Hi Now I'm doing benchmark test with several type mariadb replication with sysbench.
1 Master - 2 Slave MariaDB on kubernetes with ceph stroage.
3 Master with Galera Cluster on kubernetes with ceph storage.
sysbench attach directly each master without LB. I expect that Master-Slave and Galera Cluster's Read performance similarly. Because I know that galera dosen't perform read load balaning, only depending LB in front of Galera Cluster. But Galera-Cluster read performance is much better. below is command to run sysbench with 1 Thread.
-- 1 Master - 2 Slave --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.4.251 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 4135 (13.78 per sec.)`
-- 3 Master Galera Cluster --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.25.60 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 17548 (58.49 per sec.)
Maria Options such as innodb_autoinc_lock_mode, innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit, innodb_buffer_pool_size is the same.
Could i get some advice or opinion?? Thanks.
mysql mariadb
migrated from superuser.com Jan 3 at 8:21
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
1
I'm lost -- Were you running 3 sysbenches in each test? Were any writes going on? Was there a load-balancer in use in either configuration? Were the times an average across the nodes?
– Rick James
Jan 3 at 16:40
add a comment |
Hi Now I'm doing benchmark test with several type mariadb replication with sysbench.
1 Master - 2 Slave MariaDB on kubernetes with ceph stroage.
3 Master with Galera Cluster on kubernetes with ceph storage.
sysbench attach directly each master without LB. I expect that Master-Slave and Galera Cluster's Read performance similarly. Because I know that galera dosen't perform read load balaning, only depending LB in front of Galera Cluster. But Galera-Cluster read performance is much better. below is command to run sysbench with 1 Thread.
-- 1 Master - 2 Slave --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.4.251 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 4135 (13.78 per sec.)`
-- 3 Master Galera Cluster --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.25.60 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 17548 (58.49 per sec.)
Maria Options such as innodb_autoinc_lock_mode, innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit, innodb_buffer_pool_size is the same.
Could i get some advice or opinion?? Thanks.
mysql mariadb
Hi Now I'm doing benchmark test with several type mariadb replication with sysbench.
1 Master - 2 Slave MariaDB on kubernetes with ceph stroage.
3 Master with Galera Cluster on kubernetes with ceph storage.
sysbench attach directly each master without LB. I expect that Master-Slave and Galera Cluster's Read performance similarly. Because I know that galera dosen't perform read load balaning, only depending LB in front of Galera Cluster. But Galera-Cluster read performance is much better. below is command to run sysbench with 1 Thread.
-- 1 Master - 2 Slave --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.4.251 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 4135 (13.78 per sec.)`
-- 3 Master Galera Cluster --
# sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=10.233.25.60 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=root --mysql-db=bmt --range_size=10000 --table_size=100000 --tables=2 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=300 --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
transactions: 17548 (58.49 per sec.)
Maria Options such as innodb_autoinc_lock_mode, innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit, innodb_buffer_pool_size is the same.
Could i get some advice or opinion?? Thanks.
mysql mariadb
mysql mariadb
asked Jan 3 at 1:54
Supsupi
migrated from superuser.com Jan 3 at 8:21
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
migrated from superuser.com Jan 3 at 8:21
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
1
I'm lost -- Were you running 3 sysbenches in each test? Were any writes going on? Was there a load-balancer in use in either configuration? Were the times an average across the nodes?
– Rick James
Jan 3 at 16:40
add a comment |
1
I'm lost -- Were you running 3 sysbenches in each test? Were any writes going on? Was there a load-balancer in use in either configuration? Were the times an average across the nodes?
– Rick James
Jan 3 at 16:40
1
1
I'm lost -- Were you running 3 sysbenches in each test? Were any writes going on? Was there a load-balancer in use in either configuration? Were the times an average across the nodes?
– Rick James
Jan 3 at 16:40
I'm lost -- Were you running 3 sysbenches in each test? Were any writes going on? Was there a load-balancer in use in either configuration? Were the times an average across the nodes?
– Rick James
Jan 3 at 16:40
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226233%2fdose-galera-cluster-perform-read-load-balancing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226233%2fdose-galera-cluster-perform-read-load-balancing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I'm lost -- Were you running 3 sysbenches in each test? Were any writes going on? Was there a load-balancer in use in either configuration? Were the times an average across the nodes?
– Rick James
Jan 3 at 16:40