False conditionals?












0















I would like to ask, what kind of grammatical constructions do we have in sentences below. I can't figure out how these sentences works.



The first one:




If you think you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




It looks like Present Unreal Conditional or perhaps mix of Present Real and Unreal Conditionals, but as far as I understand conditionals it should look like this:




If you thought you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




The second one is:




If you would have just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




I totally do not understand why after "if" we have "would". I understand that "would" represents the future from the perspective of the past. But doesn't it mean that there shouldn't be future in time clauses?



The whole sentence looks like Past Unreal Conditional, but it should probably look like:




If you had just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




Thank you very much in advance for your help.










share|improve this question























  • The first sentence is a so-called mixed conditional. There is a discussion of a similar construction here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/403146/… . The second sentence has would in both clauses. See here for a discussion: english.stackexchange.com/questions/427103/…

    – Shoe
    21 hours ago
















0















I would like to ask, what kind of grammatical constructions do we have in sentences below. I can't figure out how these sentences works.



The first one:




If you think you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




It looks like Present Unreal Conditional or perhaps mix of Present Real and Unreal Conditionals, but as far as I understand conditionals it should look like this:




If you thought you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




The second one is:




If you would have just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




I totally do not understand why after "if" we have "would". I understand that "would" represents the future from the perspective of the past. But doesn't it mean that there shouldn't be future in time clauses?



The whole sentence looks like Past Unreal Conditional, but it should probably look like:




If you had just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




Thank you very much in advance for your help.










share|improve this question























  • The first sentence is a so-called mixed conditional. There is a discussion of a similar construction here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/403146/… . The second sentence has would in both clauses. See here for a discussion: english.stackexchange.com/questions/427103/…

    – Shoe
    21 hours ago














0












0








0








I would like to ask, what kind of grammatical constructions do we have in sentences below. I can't figure out how these sentences works.



The first one:




If you think you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




It looks like Present Unreal Conditional or perhaps mix of Present Real and Unreal Conditionals, but as far as I understand conditionals it should look like this:




If you thought you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




The second one is:




If you would have just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




I totally do not understand why after "if" we have "would". I understand that "would" represents the future from the perspective of the past. But doesn't it mean that there shouldn't be future in time clauses?



The whole sentence looks like Past Unreal Conditional, but it should probably look like:




If you had just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




Thank you very much in advance for your help.










share|improve this question














I would like to ask, what kind of grammatical constructions do we have in sentences below. I can't figure out how these sentences works.



The first one:




If you think you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




It looks like Present Unreal Conditional or perhaps mix of Present Real and Unreal Conditionals, but as far as I understand conditionals it should look like this:




If you thought you can kill me, I would like to see you try.




The second one is:




If you would have just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




I totally do not understand why after "if" we have "would". I understand that "would" represents the future from the perspective of the past. But doesn't it mean that there shouldn't be future in time clauses?



The whole sentence looks like Past Unreal Conditional, but it should probably look like:




If you had just left this one behind, you would have possibly
been able
to make it to the weapons room and put up a struggle against
us.




Thank you very much in advance for your help.







grammar conditionals






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









RichardRichard

92




92













  • The first sentence is a so-called mixed conditional. There is a discussion of a similar construction here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/403146/… . The second sentence has would in both clauses. See here for a discussion: english.stackexchange.com/questions/427103/…

    – Shoe
    21 hours ago



















  • The first sentence is a so-called mixed conditional. There is a discussion of a similar construction here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/403146/… . The second sentence has would in both clauses. See here for a discussion: english.stackexchange.com/questions/427103/…

    – Shoe
    21 hours ago

















The first sentence is a so-called mixed conditional. There is a discussion of a similar construction here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/403146/… . The second sentence has would in both clauses. See here for a discussion: english.stackexchange.com/questions/427103/…

– Shoe
21 hours ago





The first sentence is a so-called mixed conditional. There is a discussion of a similar construction here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/403146/… . The second sentence has would in both clauses. See here for a discussion: english.stackexchange.com/questions/427103/…

– Shoe
21 hours ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484174%2ffalse-conditionals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484174%2ffalse-conditionals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]