Can “taken” be used without an auxiliary verb? “When taken to this extreme…”












0















Is it correct to use "taken" without an auxiliary (helping) verb?
For example:




In some cases, a more powerful racial group justifies the domination and, horribly, even the complete destruction of ethnic or racial minorities they consider to be inferior. When taken to this extreme, genocides such as the European Holocaust and the massacre in Sudan have threatened to wipe out entire peoples. (source)











share|improve this question









New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • I think "when" should begin with a capital letter. "Taken" is not part of a passive or perfect construction, so no auxiliary verb is required. "Taken" is head of the non-finite clause "taken to the extreme", which functions as complement of "when".

    – BillJ
    Feb 27 at 12:39


















0















Is it correct to use "taken" without an auxiliary (helping) verb?
For example:




In some cases, a more powerful racial group justifies the domination and, horribly, even the complete destruction of ethnic or racial minorities they consider to be inferior. When taken to this extreme, genocides such as the European Holocaust and the massacre in Sudan have threatened to wipe out entire peoples. (source)











share|improve this question









New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • I think "when" should begin with a capital letter. "Taken" is not part of a passive or perfect construction, so no auxiliary verb is required. "Taken" is head of the non-finite clause "taken to the extreme", which functions as complement of "when".

    – BillJ
    Feb 27 at 12:39
















0












0








0


1






Is it correct to use "taken" without an auxiliary (helping) verb?
For example:




In some cases, a more powerful racial group justifies the domination and, horribly, even the complete destruction of ethnic or racial minorities they consider to be inferior. When taken to this extreme, genocides such as the European Holocaust and the massacre in Sudan have threatened to wipe out entire peoples. (source)











share|improve this question









New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Is it correct to use "taken" without an auxiliary (helping) verb?
For example:




In some cases, a more powerful racial group justifies the domination and, horribly, even the complete destruction of ethnic or racial minorities they consider to be inferior. When taken to this extreme, genocides such as the European Holocaust and the massacre in Sudan have threatened to wipe out entire peoples. (source)








grammaticality verbs past-participle auxiliary-verbs






share|improve this question









New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Laurel

33k664117




33k664117






New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Feb 27 at 11:31









user338036user338036

1




1




New contributor




user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user338036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • I think "when" should begin with a capital letter. "Taken" is not part of a passive or perfect construction, so no auxiliary verb is required. "Taken" is head of the non-finite clause "taken to the extreme", which functions as complement of "when".

    – BillJ
    Feb 27 at 12:39





















  • I think "when" should begin with a capital letter. "Taken" is not part of a passive or perfect construction, so no auxiliary verb is required. "Taken" is head of the non-finite clause "taken to the extreme", which functions as complement of "when".

    – BillJ
    Feb 27 at 12:39



















I think "when" should begin with a capital letter. "Taken" is not part of a passive or perfect construction, so no auxiliary verb is required. "Taken" is head of the non-finite clause "taken to the extreme", which functions as complement of "when".

– BillJ
Feb 27 at 12:39







I think "when" should begin with a capital letter. "Taken" is not part of a passive or perfect construction, so no auxiliary verb is required. "Taken" is head of the non-finite clause "taken to the extreme", which functions as complement of "when".

– BillJ
Feb 27 at 12:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Compare the following, where the past-participle of the transitive verb to truck is used in a non-finite clause:




Tomatoes can rot when trucked long distances , so they are picked unripe.



When trucked long distances tomatoes can rot, so they are picked unripe.




The past participle of the transitive verb to take is used in your sentence
in the same way. In the collocation "to take {something} to an extreme", something which has degree, broadly construed, is brought (by an absent someone) to an extreme degree.




The economic principle of free competition, when taken to an extreme, can result in great income disparities.







share|improve this answer


























  • why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

    – user338036
    8 hours ago











  • Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

    – TRomano
    7 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






user338036 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487429%2fcan-taken-be-used-without-an-auxiliary-verb-when-taken-to-this-extreme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Compare the following, where the past-participle of the transitive verb to truck is used in a non-finite clause:




Tomatoes can rot when trucked long distances , so they are picked unripe.



When trucked long distances tomatoes can rot, so they are picked unripe.




The past participle of the transitive verb to take is used in your sentence
in the same way. In the collocation "to take {something} to an extreme", something which has degree, broadly construed, is brought (by an absent someone) to an extreme degree.




The economic principle of free competition, when taken to an extreme, can result in great income disparities.







share|improve this answer


























  • why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

    – user338036
    8 hours ago











  • Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

    – TRomano
    7 hours ago
















0














Compare the following, where the past-participle of the transitive verb to truck is used in a non-finite clause:




Tomatoes can rot when trucked long distances , so they are picked unripe.



When trucked long distances tomatoes can rot, so they are picked unripe.




The past participle of the transitive verb to take is used in your sentence
in the same way. In the collocation "to take {something} to an extreme", something which has degree, broadly construed, is brought (by an absent someone) to an extreme degree.




The economic principle of free competition, when taken to an extreme, can result in great income disparities.







share|improve this answer


























  • why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

    – user338036
    8 hours ago











  • Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

    – TRomano
    7 hours ago














0












0








0







Compare the following, where the past-participle of the transitive verb to truck is used in a non-finite clause:




Tomatoes can rot when trucked long distances , so they are picked unripe.



When trucked long distances tomatoes can rot, so they are picked unripe.




The past participle of the transitive verb to take is used in your sentence
in the same way. In the collocation "to take {something} to an extreme", something which has degree, broadly construed, is brought (by an absent someone) to an extreme degree.




The economic principle of free competition, when taken to an extreme, can result in great income disparities.







share|improve this answer















Compare the following, where the past-participle of the transitive verb to truck is used in a non-finite clause:




Tomatoes can rot when trucked long distances , so they are picked unripe.



When trucked long distances tomatoes can rot, so they are picked unripe.




The past participle of the transitive verb to take is used in your sentence
in the same way. In the collocation "to take {something} to an extreme", something which has degree, broadly construed, is brought (by an absent someone) to an extreme degree.




The economic principle of free competition, when taken to an extreme, can result in great income disparities.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered Feb 27 at 13:23









TRomanoTRomano

16.7k21946




16.7k21946













  • why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

    – user338036
    8 hours ago











  • Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

    – TRomano
    7 hours ago



















  • why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

    – user338036
    8 hours ago











  • Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

    – TRomano
    7 hours ago

















why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

– user338036
8 hours ago





why we use past-participle of the transitive verb?

– user338036
8 hours ago













Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

– TRomano
7 hours ago





Because tomatoes cannot locomote.

– TRomano
7 hours ago










user338036 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















user338036 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













user338036 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user338036 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487429%2fcan-taken-be-used-without-an-auxiliary-verb-when-taken-to-this-extreme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]