Dynamic Linkage of LocatorPane and InputField












3












$begingroup$


How do I get the InputField to coordinate with the LocatorPane so that a change in each control changes the other to be in agreement? It would be nice if the function was self-contained and was dynamically linked to a second similar control where the variable is radians. The angle control is based on this (see Applications). Related links do not address or solve this particular issue; links such as this this, and this



 fDeg[Dynamic[angleDeg_]] :=   
DynamicModule[{p, angleRad, angleCalc, dtr = Degree},

angleCalc[newp_,
oldp_] := (angleRad =
angleRad + ArcCos[newp.oldp] Sign[Cross[newp].(newp - oldp)];
If[0 < angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, +2*Pi]];
If[0 > angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, -2*Pi]];
angleDeg = angleRad/dtr;
f[angleDeg];
p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]});

angleRad = angleDeg*dtr;
p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]};

LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (angleCalc @@ Normalize /@ {#, p}) &],
Dynamic@Show[
Graphics[{Circle, Arrowheads[0.15],
Arrow[Dynamic[{{0, 0}, p}]]}, ImageSize -> Tiny],
Graphics[{Dynamic[{Text[
NumberForm[angleDeg, {3, 2}], {0, 0}]}]}]],
Appearance -> None]];

aDeg = 45;

Column[{
"Degrees:",
fDeg[Dynamic[aDeg]],
"aDeg: ",
InputField[Dynamic[aDeg],
FieldSize -> 6]
}, Alignment -> Center]









share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    How do I get the InputField to coordinate with the LocatorPane so that a change in each control changes the other to be in agreement? It would be nice if the function was self-contained and was dynamically linked to a second similar control where the variable is radians. The angle control is based on this (see Applications). Related links do not address or solve this particular issue; links such as this this, and this



     fDeg[Dynamic[angleDeg_]] :=   
    DynamicModule[{p, angleRad, angleCalc, dtr = Degree},

    angleCalc[newp_,
    oldp_] := (angleRad =
    angleRad + ArcCos[newp.oldp] Sign[Cross[newp].(newp - oldp)];
    If[0 < angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, +2*Pi]];
    If[0 > angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, -2*Pi]];
    angleDeg = angleRad/dtr;
    f[angleDeg];
    p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]});

    angleRad = angleDeg*dtr;
    p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]};

    LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (angleCalc @@ Normalize /@ {#, p}) &],
    Dynamic@Show[
    Graphics[{Circle, Arrowheads[0.15],
    Arrow[Dynamic[{{0, 0}, p}]]}, ImageSize -> Tiny],
    Graphics[{Dynamic[{Text[
    NumberForm[angleDeg, {3, 2}], {0, 0}]}]}]],
    Appearance -> None]];

    aDeg = 45;

    Column[{
    "Degrees:",
    fDeg[Dynamic[aDeg]],
    "aDeg: ",
    InputField[Dynamic[aDeg],
    FieldSize -> 6]
    }, Alignment -> Center]









    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      How do I get the InputField to coordinate with the LocatorPane so that a change in each control changes the other to be in agreement? It would be nice if the function was self-contained and was dynamically linked to a second similar control where the variable is radians. The angle control is based on this (see Applications). Related links do not address or solve this particular issue; links such as this this, and this



       fDeg[Dynamic[angleDeg_]] :=   
      DynamicModule[{p, angleRad, angleCalc, dtr = Degree},

      angleCalc[newp_,
      oldp_] := (angleRad =
      angleRad + ArcCos[newp.oldp] Sign[Cross[newp].(newp - oldp)];
      If[0 < angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, +2*Pi]];
      If[0 > angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, -2*Pi]];
      angleDeg = angleRad/dtr;
      f[angleDeg];
      p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]});

      angleRad = angleDeg*dtr;
      p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]};

      LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (angleCalc @@ Normalize /@ {#, p}) &],
      Dynamic@Show[
      Graphics[{Circle, Arrowheads[0.15],
      Arrow[Dynamic[{{0, 0}, p}]]}, ImageSize -> Tiny],
      Graphics[{Dynamic[{Text[
      NumberForm[angleDeg, {3, 2}], {0, 0}]}]}]],
      Appearance -> None]];

      aDeg = 45;

      Column[{
      "Degrees:",
      fDeg[Dynamic[aDeg]],
      "aDeg: ",
      InputField[Dynamic[aDeg],
      FieldSize -> 6]
      }, Alignment -> Center]









      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      How do I get the InputField to coordinate with the LocatorPane so that a change in each control changes the other to be in agreement? It would be nice if the function was self-contained and was dynamically linked to a second similar control where the variable is radians. The angle control is based on this (see Applications). Related links do not address or solve this particular issue; links such as this this, and this



       fDeg[Dynamic[angleDeg_]] :=   
      DynamicModule[{p, angleRad, angleCalc, dtr = Degree},

      angleCalc[newp_,
      oldp_] := (angleRad =
      angleRad + ArcCos[newp.oldp] Sign[Cross[newp].(newp - oldp)];
      If[0 < angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, +2*Pi]];
      If[0 > angleRad, angleRad = Mod[angleRad, -2*Pi]];
      angleDeg = angleRad/dtr;
      f[angleDeg];
      p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]});

      angleRad = angleDeg*dtr;
      p = {Cos[angleRad], Sin[angleRad]};

      LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (angleCalc @@ Normalize /@ {#, p}) &],
      Dynamic@Show[
      Graphics[{Circle, Arrowheads[0.15],
      Arrow[Dynamic[{{0, 0}, p}]]}, ImageSize -> Tiny],
      Graphics[{Dynamic[{Text[
      NumberForm[angleDeg, {3, 2}], {0, 0}]}]}]],
      Appearance -> None]];

      aDeg = 45;

      Column[{
      "Degrees:",
      fDeg[Dynamic[aDeg]],
      "aDeg: ",
      InputField[Dynamic[aDeg],
      FieldSize -> 6]
      }, Alignment -> Center]






      dynamic gui-construction interactive






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      kmutinykmutiny

      213




      213






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Consider the following refactoring of your code



          First, the locator pane is used to set a point location constrained on a circle with unit radius (this part borrowed heavily from an example in the documentation for LocatorPane). A degree value is then calculated from the coordinates of tha tpoint.



          Secondly, the input field is used to read in a degree value, which is then used to update the position of the dynamic point pt using the second argument of Dynamic.



          DynamicModule[
          {pt = {0, 1.}},
          Column[{
          "Degrees:", Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree],
          LocatorPane[
          Dynamic[pt],
          Graphics[{
          Circle,
          PointSize[Large],
          Dynamic[Arrow[{{0, 0}, pt/Norm[pt]}]]
          }],
          Appearance -> None
          ],
          InputField[
          Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree, (pt = N@{Cos[#1 Degree], Sin[#1 Degree]}) &],
          FieldSize -> Tiny
          ]
          }, Alignment -> Center
          ]
          ]


          This keeps both fields in sync with each other:



          animation shows the locator and input field working together






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
            $endgroup$
            – kmutiny
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "387"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193000%2fdynamic-linkage-of-locatorpane-and-inputfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Consider the following refactoring of your code



          First, the locator pane is used to set a point location constrained on a circle with unit radius (this part borrowed heavily from an example in the documentation for LocatorPane). A degree value is then calculated from the coordinates of tha tpoint.



          Secondly, the input field is used to read in a degree value, which is then used to update the position of the dynamic point pt using the second argument of Dynamic.



          DynamicModule[
          {pt = {0, 1.}},
          Column[{
          "Degrees:", Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree],
          LocatorPane[
          Dynamic[pt],
          Graphics[{
          Circle,
          PointSize[Large],
          Dynamic[Arrow[{{0, 0}, pt/Norm[pt]}]]
          }],
          Appearance -> None
          ],
          InputField[
          Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree, (pt = N@{Cos[#1 Degree], Sin[#1 Degree]}) &],
          FieldSize -> Tiny
          ]
          }, Alignment -> Center
          ]
          ]


          This keeps both fields in sync with each other:



          animation shows the locator and input field working together






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
            $endgroup$
            – kmutiny
            2 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Consider the following refactoring of your code



          First, the locator pane is used to set a point location constrained on a circle with unit radius (this part borrowed heavily from an example in the documentation for LocatorPane). A degree value is then calculated from the coordinates of tha tpoint.



          Secondly, the input field is used to read in a degree value, which is then used to update the position of the dynamic point pt using the second argument of Dynamic.



          DynamicModule[
          {pt = {0, 1.}},
          Column[{
          "Degrees:", Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree],
          LocatorPane[
          Dynamic[pt],
          Graphics[{
          Circle,
          PointSize[Large],
          Dynamic[Arrow[{{0, 0}, pt/Norm[pt]}]]
          }],
          Appearance -> None
          ],
          InputField[
          Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree, (pt = N@{Cos[#1 Degree], Sin[#1 Degree]}) &],
          FieldSize -> Tiny
          ]
          }, Alignment -> Center
          ]
          ]


          This keeps both fields in sync with each other:



          animation shows the locator and input field working together






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
            $endgroup$
            – kmutiny
            2 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Consider the following refactoring of your code



          First, the locator pane is used to set a point location constrained on a circle with unit radius (this part borrowed heavily from an example in the documentation for LocatorPane). A degree value is then calculated from the coordinates of tha tpoint.



          Secondly, the input field is used to read in a degree value, which is then used to update the position of the dynamic point pt using the second argument of Dynamic.



          DynamicModule[
          {pt = {0, 1.}},
          Column[{
          "Degrees:", Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree],
          LocatorPane[
          Dynamic[pt],
          Graphics[{
          Circle,
          PointSize[Large],
          Dynamic[Arrow[{{0, 0}, pt/Norm[pt]}]]
          }],
          Appearance -> None
          ],
          InputField[
          Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree, (pt = N@{Cos[#1 Degree], Sin[#1 Degree]}) &],
          FieldSize -> Tiny
          ]
          }, Alignment -> Center
          ]
          ]


          This keeps both fields in sync with each other:



          animation shows the locator and input field working together






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Consider the following refactoring of your code



          First, the locator pane is used to set a point location constrained on a circle with unit radius (this part borrowed heavily from an example in the documentation for LocatorPane). A degree value is then calculated from the coordinates of tha tpoint.



          Secondly, the input field is used to read in a degree value, which is then used to update the position of the dynamic point pt using the second argument of Dynamic.



          DynamicModule[
          {pt = {0, 1.}},
          Column[{
          "Degrees:", Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree],
          LocatorPane[
          Dynamic[pt],
          Graphics[{
          Circle,
          PointSize[Large],
          Dynamic[Arrow[{{0, 0}, pt/Norm[pt]}]]
          }],
          Appearance -> None
          ],
          InputField[
          Dynamic[(ArcTan @@ pt)/Degree, (pt = N@{Cos[#1 Degree], Sin[#1 Degree]}) &],
          FieldSize -> Tiny
          ]
          }, Alignment -> Center
          ]
          ]


          This keeps both fields in sync with each other:



          animation shows the locator and input field working together







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          MarcoBMarcoB

          37.4k556113




          37.4k556113












          • $begingroup$
            MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
            $endgroup$
            – kmutiny
            2 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
            $endgroup$
            – kmutiny
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
          $endgroup$
          – kmutiny
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          MarcoB. This is nice. But I was hoping for a self-contained function where only aDeg is passed. One reason for this is to allow aDeg to be altered elsewhere by some process such as a simulation of an automated flight control system. The controls (LocatorPane and InputField) would change accordingly. But the simulation could be interrupted by the user by means of the controls, and a new value input by the field or the dial. Any thoughts?
          $endgroup$
          – kmutiny
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193000%2fdynamic-linkage-of-locatorpane-and-inputfield%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Alcedinidae

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]