JIS and ISO square taper












3















I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 15:53











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 17:58






  • 3





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 18:35











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 20:31
















3















I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 15:53











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 17:58






  • 3





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 18:35











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 20:31














3












3








3








I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?










share|improve this question














I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.



If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.



The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?







crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 21 at 15:05









TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo

1845




1845








  • 1





    It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 15:53











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 17:58






  • 3





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 18:35











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 20:31














  • 1





    It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 15:53











  • @ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 17:58






  • 3





    I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

    – ojs
    Mar 21 at 18:35











  • I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    Mar 21 at 20:31








1




1





It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53





It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?

– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53













@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58





@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58




3




3





I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35





I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.

– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35













I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31





I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4















Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




Executive summary:



NO!



Longer answer:



Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "126"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59880%2fjis-and-iso-square-taper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4















    Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




    Executive summary:



    NO!



    Longer answer:



    Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



    Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



    Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



    But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



    Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






    share|improve this answer




























      4















      Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




      Executive summary:



      NO!



      Longer answer:



      Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



      Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



      Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



      But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



      Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4








        Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




        Executive summary:



        NO!



        Longer answer:



        Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



        Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



        Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



        But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



        Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.






        share|improve this answer














        Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?




        Executive summary:



        NO!



        Longer answer:



        Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html



        Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.



        Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.



        But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.



        Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 21 at 16:12









        Andrew HenleAndrew Henle

        2,618814




        2,618814






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59880%2fjis-and-iso-square-taper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]