Exit film of moon landing departure












7














On Apollo 15, 16, and 17 NASA filmed the Lunar Module taking off and leaving the moon. With no-one on the moon how could the the camera move to follow it and who brought the exposed film back to Earth?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    They simply did not use a film camera to show the lunar module ascending from lunar surface, they used a TV camera with direct transmission to Earth. A film camera could be used from the ascent stage of the lunar module.
    – Uwe
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:29






  • 6




    Possible duplicate of How was the Apollo lunar liftoff video transmitted to Earth?
    – Hobbes
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:33






  • 3




    @AlexHajnal the problem is not if the questions are different, but if the answers are different. The answer there answered this question. Now we have essentially identical answers both there and here, and in general that's the kind of thing that should be avoided. Now that there are three answers here, if this question isn't closed, it might be good instead to close the other question and direct those readers to all of these answers. Directing future readers to the best answers is one of the things we should always keep in mind, along with getting the current OP to the best answers as well
    – uhoh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @uhoh I believe Kurt's answer is correct and not a dupe but I'll have to check the link to be sure. If that answer is correct it should be expanded upon. I'll check when I'm at a real computer.
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/…
    – Organic Marble
    2 days ago
















7














On Apollo 15, 16, and 17 NASA filmed the Lunar Module taking off and leaving the moon. With no-one on the moon how could the the camera move to follow it and who brought the exposed film back to Earth?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    They simply did not use a film camera to show the lunar module ascending from lunar surface, they used a TV camera with direct transmission to Earth. A film camera could be used from the ascent stage of the lunar module.
    – Uwe
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:29






  • 6




    Possible duplicate of How was the Apollo lunar liftoff video transmitted to Earth?
    – Hobbes
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:33






  • 3




    @AlexHajnal the problem is not if the questions are different, but if the answers are different. The answer there answered this question. Now we have essentially identical answers both there and here, and in general that's the kind of thing that should be avoided. Now that there are three answers here, if this question isn't closed, it might be good instead to close the other question and direct those readers to all of these answers. Directing future readers to the best answers is one of the things we should always keep in mind, along with getting the current OP to the best answers as well
    – uhoh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @uhoh I believe Kurt's answer is correct and not a dupe but I'll have to check the link to be sure. If that answer is correct it should be expanded upon. I'll check when I'm at a real computer.
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/…
    – Organic Marble
    2 days ago














7












7








7







On Apollo 15, 16, and 17 NASA filmed the Lunar Module taking off and leaving the moon. With no-one on the moon how could the the camera move to follow it and who brought the exposed film back to Earth?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











On Apollo 15, 16, and 17 NASA filmed the Lunar Module taking off and leaving the moon. With no-one on the moon how could the the camera move to follow it and who brought the exposed film back to Earth?







the-moon apollo-program lunar-landing






share|improve this question









New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Alex Hajnal

1,331318




1,331318






New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 31 '18 at 21:12









Angela Boulton

362




362




New contributor




Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Angela Boulton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 7




    They simply did not use a film camera to show the lunar module ascending from lunar surface, they used a TV camera with direct transmission to Earth. A film camera could be used from the ascent stage of the lunar module.
    – Uwe
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:29






  • 6




    Possible duplicate of How was the Apollo lunar liftoff video transmitted to Earth?
    – Hobbes
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:33






  • 3




    @AlexHajnal the problem is not if the questions are different, but if the answers are different. The answer there answered this question. Now we have essentially identical answers both there and here, and in general that's the kind of thing that should be avoided. Now that there are three answers here, if this question isn't closed, it might be good instead to close the other question and direct those readers to all of these answers. Directing future readers to the best answers is one of the things we should always keep in mind, along with getting the current OP to the best answers as well
    – uhoh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @uhoh I believe Kurt's answer is correct and not a dupe but I'll have to check the link to be sure. If that answer is correct it should be expanded upon. I'll check when I'm at a real computer.
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/…
    – Organic Marble
    2 days ago














  • 7




    They simply did not use a film camera to show the lunar module ascending from lunar surface, they used a TV camera with direct transmission to Earth. A film camera could be used from the ascent stage of the lunar module.
    – Uwe
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:29






  • 6




    Possible duplicate of How was the Apollo lunar liftoff video transmitted to Earth?
    – Hobbes
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:33






  • 3




    @AlexHajnal the problem is not if the questions are different, but if the answers are different. The answer there answered this question. Now we have essentially identical answers both there and here, and in general that's the kind of thing that should be avoided. Now that there are three answers here, if this question isn't closed, it might be good instead to close the other question and direct those readers to all of these answers. Directing future readers to the best answers is one of the things we should always keep in mind, along with getting the current OP to the best answers as well
    – uhoh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @uhoh I believe Kurt's answer is correct and not a dupe but I'll have to check the link to be sure. If that answer is correct it should be expanded upon. I'll check when I'm at a real computer.
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/…
    – Organic Marble
    2 days ago








7




7




They simply did not use a film camera to show the lunar module ascending from lunar surface, they used a TV camera with direct transmission to Earth. A film camera could be used from the ascent stage of the lunar module.
– Uwe
Dec 31 '18 at 21:29




They simply did not use a film camera to show the lunar module ascending from lunar surface, they used a TV camera with direct transmission to Earth. A film camera could be used from the ascent stage of the lunar module.
– Uwe
Dec 31 '18 at 21:29




6




6




Possible duplicate of How was the Apollo lunar liftoff video transmitted to Earth?
– Hobbes
Dec 31 '18 at 21:33




Possible duplicate of How was the Apollo lunar liftoff video transmitted to Earth?
– Hobbes
Dec 31 '18 at 21:33




3




3




@AlexHajnal the problem is not if the questions are different, but if the answers are different. The answer there answered this question. Now we have essentially identical answers both there and here, and in general that's the kind of thing that should be avoided. Now that there are three answers here, if this question isn't closed, it might be good instead to close the other question and direct those readers to all of these answers. Directing future readers to the best answers is one of the things we should always keep in mind, along with getting the current OP to the best answers as well
– uhoh
2 days ago




@AlexHajnal the problem is not if the questions are different, but if the answers are different. The answer there answered this question. Now we have essentially identical answers both there and here, and in general that's the kind of thing that should be avoided. Now that there are three answers here, if this question isn't closed, it might be good instead to close the other question and direct those readers to all of these answers. Directing future readers to the best answers is one of the things we should always keep in mind, along with getting the current OP to the best answers as well
– uhoh
2 days ago




1




1




@uhoh I believe Kurt's answer is correct and not a dupe but I'll have to check the link to be sure. If that answer is correct it should be expanded upon. I'll check when I'm at a real computer.
– Alex Hajnal
2 days ago




@uhoh I believe Kurt's answer is correct and not a dupe but I'll have to check the link to be sure. If that answer is correct it should be expanded upon. I'll check when I'm at a real computer.
– Alex Hajnal
2 days ago




2




2




Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/…
– Organic Marble
2 days ago




Related: space.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/…
– Organic Marble
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















14














They didn't use film for this. A video camera was installed on the Lunar Rover Vehicle. This camera could be controlled from Mission Control and it could send its video directly to Earth.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
    – Mazura
    2 days ago










  • @Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
    – uhoh
    2 days ago



















9














It depends on which "film" and mission you are referring to. (The original question referred to "the first moon landing". Later edits refer to the last 3 landings.)



For the first moon landing, Apollo 11, the lift off was filmed with a motion picture camera inside of lunar module looking out the window. Obviously they carried that camera home with them and develop the film after returning to Earth. (The landing was filmed the same way: camera pointing through the window.)



Apollo 11 lift off from the Moon filmed from inside the lunar module
Above screen capture of Apollo 11 lift-off from this video, filmed from inside the lunar module



For the last three missions, Apollo 15, 16, and 17, those were recorded from the TV camera on the lunar rover and used video transmission. No film and no processing was involved.



Apollo 17 lift off from the Moon recorded from the rover
Above screen capture of Apollo 17 lift-off from this video, recorded from the rover by remote control






share|improve this answer























  • If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
    – Uwe
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
    – JCRM
    2 hours ago



















4














Elizabeth Howell — Universe Today
12/16/14 11:20am https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-captured-this-iconic-footage-of-apollo-17-leav-1671650186 provided the explanation also supplied by Uwe, above. It was a live TV/video feed from the LRV (lunar rover). Repeated on several missions.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago










  • Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
    – Kurt W. Wagner
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Angela Boulton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33227%2fexit-film-of-moon-landing-departure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









14














They didn't use film for this. A video camera was installed on the Lunar Rover Vehicle. This camera could be controlled from Mission Control and it could send its video directly to Earth.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
    – Mazura
    2 days ago










  • @Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
    – uhoh
    2 days ago
















14














They didn't use film for this. A video camera was installed on the Lunar Rover Vehicle. This camera could be controlled from Mission Control and it could send its video directly to Earth.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
    – Mazura
    2 days ago










  • @Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
    – uhoh
    2 days ago














14












14








14






They didn't use film for this. A video camera was installed on the Lunar Rover Vehicle. This camera could be controlled from Mission Control and it could send its video directly to Earth.






share|improve this answer












They didn't use film for this. A video camera was installed on the Lunar Rover Vehicle. This camera could be controlled from Mission Control and it could send its video directly to Earth.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:42









Hobbes

86.5k2246392




86.5k2246392








  • 4




    Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
    – Mazura
    2 days ago










  • @Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
    – uhoh
    2 days ago














  • 4




    Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
    – Mazura
    2 days ago










  • @Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
    – uhoh
    2 days ago








4




4




Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
– Mazura
2 days ago




Nor computers. It was some poor schmuck's job to sit in a chair at MC and tell a video camera to point into the empty sky and track, the entire time, along where it will be in about four and half seconds (signal delay).
– Mazura
2 days ago












@Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
– uhoh
2 days ago




@Mazura tell me more! How (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track the LM ascent stage?
– uhoh
2 days ago











9














It depends on which "film" and mission you are referring to. (The original question referred to "the first moon landing". Later edits refer to the last 3 landings.)



For the first moon landing, Apollo 11, the lift off was filmed with a motion picture camera inside of lunar module looking out the window. Obviously they carried that camera home with them and develop the film after returning to Earth. (The landing was filmed the same way: camera pointing through the window.)



Apollo 11 lift off from the Moon filmed from inside the lunar module
Above screen capture of Apollo 11 lift-off from this video, filmed from inside the lunar module



For the last three missions, Apollo 15, 16, and 17, those were recorded from the TV camera on the lunar rover and used video transmission. No film and no processing was involved.



Apollo 17 lift off from the Moon recorded from the rover
Above screen capture of Apollo 17 lift-off from this video, recorded from the rover by remote control






share|improve this answer























  • If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
    – Uwe
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
    – JCRM
    2 hours ago
















9














It depends on which "film" and mission you are referring to. (The original question referred to "the first moon landing". Later edits refer to the last 3 landings.)



For the first moon landing, Apollo 11, the lift off was filmed with a motion picture camera inside of lunar module looking out the window. Obviously they carried that camera home with them and develop the film after returning to Earth. (The landing was filmed the same way: camera pointing through the window.)



Apollo 11 lift off from the Moon filmed from inside the lunar module
Above screen capture of Apollo 11 lift-off from this video, filmed from inside the lunar module



For the last three missions, Apollo 15, 16, and 17, those were recorded from the TV camera on the lunar rover and used video transmission. No film and no processing was involved.



Apollo 17 lift off from the Moon recorded from the rover
Above screen capture of Apollo 17 lift-off from this video, recorded from the rover by remote control






share|improve this answer























  • If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
    – Uwe
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
    – JCRM
    2 hours ago














9












9








9






It depends on which "film" and mission you are referring to. (The original question referred to "the first moon landing". Later edits refer to the last 3 landings.)



For the first moon landing, Apollo 11, the lift off was filmed with a motion picture camera inside of lunar module looking out the window. Obviously they carried that camera home with them and develop the film after returning to Earth. (The landing was filmed the same way: camera pointing through the window.)



Apollo 11 lift off from the Moon filmed from inside the lunar module
Above screen capture of Apollo 11 lift-off from this video, filmed from inside the lunar module



For the last three missions, Apollo 15, 16, and 17, those were recorded from the TV camera on the lunar rover and used video transmission. No film and no processing was involved.



Apollo 17 lift off from the Moon recorded from the rover
Above screen capture of Apollo 17 lift-off from this video, recorded from the rover by remote control






share|improve this answer














It depends on which "film" and mission you are referring to. (The original question referred to "the first moon landing". Later edits refer to the last 3 landings.)



For the first moon landing, Apollo 11, the lift off was filmed with a motion picture camera inside of lunar module looking out the window. Obviously they carried that camera home with them and develop the film after returning to Earth. (The landing was filmed the same way: camera pointing through the window.)



Apollo 11 lift off from the Moon filmed from inside the lunar module
Above screen capture of Apollo 11 lift-off from this video, filmed from inside the lunar module



For the last three missions, Apollo 15, 16, and 17, those were recorded from the TV camera on the lunar rover and used video transmission. No film and no processing was involved.



Apollo 17 lift off from the Moon recorded from the rover
Above screen capture of Apollo 17 lift-off from this video, recorded from the rover by remote control







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered Dec 31 '18 at 22:13









JohnHoltz

228126




228126












  • If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
    – Uwe
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
    – JCRM
    2 hours ago


















  • If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
    – Uwe
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
    – JCRM
    2 hours ago
















If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
– Uwe
4 hours ago




If no film was used, I would prever to avoid the word 'filmed'. There should be other words for the use of a video camera.
– Uwe
4 hours ago




1




1




While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
– JCRM
2 hours ago




While it may be preferred that the term be avoided @Uwe, unfortunately filming is the common term to describe what one does with a a moving picture camera. Videoing is already used to describe recording a broadcast, as opposed to filming with a video camera (and that wouldn't be generic either). Perhaps you could get some suggestions on the English language stack?
– JCRM
2 hours ago











4














Elizabeth Howell — Universe Today
12/16/14 11:20am https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-captured-this-iconic-footage-of-apollo-17-leav-1671650186 provided the explanation also supplied by Uwe, above. It was a live TV/video feed from the LRV (lunar rover). Repeated on several missions.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago










  • Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
    – Kurt W. Wagner
    2 days ago
















4














Elizabeth Howell — Universe Today
12/16/14 11:20am https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-captured-this-iconic-footage-of-apollo-17-leav-1671650186 provided the explanation also supplied by Uwe, above. It was a live TV/video feed from the LRV (lunar rover). Repeated on several missions.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago










  • Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
    – Kurt W. Wagner
    2 days ago














4












4








4






Elizabeth Howell — Universe Today
12/16/14 11:20am https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-captured-this-iconic-footage-of-apollo-17-leav-1671650186 provided the explanation also supplied by Uwe, above. It was a live TV/video feed from the LRV (lunar rover). Repeated on several missions.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Elizabeth Howell — Universe Today
12/16/14 11:20am https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-captured-this-iconic-footage-of-apollo-17-leav-1671650186 provided the explanation also supplied by Uwe, above. It was a live TV/video feed from the LRV (lunar rover). Repeated on several missions.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:32









Kurt W. Wagner

411




411




New contributor




Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Kurt W. Wagner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago










  • Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
    – Kurt W. Wagner
    2 days ago


















  • Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
    – Alex Hajnal
    2 days ago










  • Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
    – Kurt W. Wagner
    2 days ago
















Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
– Alex Hajnal
2 days ago




Hi Kurt. This is a good start on an answer. Like the text you linked to suggests, there was a bit more to than just a remote camera feed. The best source (also linked to from that article) is probably this oral history transcript (last 2 paras of p. 60 and first of p. 61) describes briefly of how it was done. Could you could expand your answer a bit to explain how it was done (i.e. what Edward Fendell and Harley Weyer did), perhaps with a quote or two from that doc? Thanks for your answer and welcome!
– Alex Hajnal
2 days ago












Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
– Kurt W. Wagner
2 days ago




Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Alex. There are amazing researchers here. As an academic librarian, I know a literate response when I see one!
– Kurt W. Wagner
2 days ago










Angela Boulton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Angela Boulton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Angela Boulton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Angela Boulton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33227%2fexit-film-of-moon-landing-departure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]