Is “How to achieve…” vs “Why achieve…” grammatical? [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality







share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52


















-1















I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality







share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52














-1












-1








-1








I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality







share|improve this question














I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality




grammaticality






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 27 at 12:04









nadreohnadreoh

1




1




put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52



















  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52

















2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

– Bella Swan
Mar 27 at 12:52





2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

– Bella Swan
Mar 27 at 12:52










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

-

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Image
5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

Image
9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
Read more