Print coordinates of an NxN grid [duplicate]












3















This question already has an answer here:




  • Cartesian product of a list with itself n times

    22 answers




Question: Print out all the coordinates of a NxN grid. Preferably in C, however other languages also accepted



Input: N (integer)



Output: for N=3, a 3x3 grid:



0,0
1,0
2,0
0,1
1,1
2,1
0,2
1,2
2,2









share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by O.O.Balance, BMO, Xcali, Wît Wisarhd, Draco18s Dec 12 '18 at 17:51


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 3




    Welcome to PPCG! This is the start of a good question. I couldn't find a duplicate from a quick search, though I might be mistaken. One thing I'd suggest is to specify the input and output. I assume that the input is an integer N. Is the output a list of tuples, a list of strings, should it be printed? Does it need to be separated by a comma?
    – maxb
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:49






  • 4




    Are we allowed to return a list instead of printing them? Is any order acceptable (i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]] instead of what you have above)? Can the output have 1-indexed coordinates instead of 0-indexed?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:54






  • 1




    Can we start at (1,1) instead of (0,0) ?
    – sergiol
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:01






  • 4




    Is there a particular order they have to be in or is any order fine?
    – Wît Wisarhd
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:18






  • 2




    Can't decide whether this is a dupe of this (just hardcode $n=2$) or this (just duplicate the argument instead of taking two distinct), but probably both.
    – BMO
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:04
















3















This question already has an answer here:




  • Cartesian product of a list with itself n times

    22 answers




Question: Print out all the coordinates of a NxN grid. Preferably in C, however other languages also accepted



Input: N (integer)



Output: for N=3, a 3x3 grid:



0,0
1,0
2,0
0,1
1,1
2,1
0,2
1,2
2,2









share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by O.O.Balance, BMO, Xcali, Wît Wisarhd, Draco18s Dec 12 '18 at 17:51


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 3




    Welcome to PPCG! This is the start of a good question. I couldn't find a duplicate from a quick search, though I might be mistaken. One thing I'd suggest is to specify the input and output. I assume that the input is an integer N. Is the output a list of tuples, a list of strings, should it be printed? Does it need to be separated by a comma?
    – maxb
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:49






  • 4




    Are we allowed to return a list instead of printing them? Is any order acceptable (i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]] instead of what you have above)? Can the output have 1-indexed coordinates instead of 0-indexed?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:54






  • 1




    Can we start at (1,1) instead of (0,0) ?
    – sergiol
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:01






  • 4




    Is there a particular order they have to be in or is any order fine?
    – Wît Wisarhd
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:18






  • 2




    Can't decide whether this is a dupe of this (just hardcode $n=2$) or this (just duplicate the argument instead of taking two distinct), but probably both.
    – BMO
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:04














3












3








3








This question already has an answer here:




  • Cartesian product of a list with itself n times

    22 answers




Question: Print out all the coordinates of a NxN grid. Preferably in C, however other languages also accepted



Input: N (integer)



Output: for N=3, a 3x3 grid:



0,0
1,0
2,0
0,1
1,1
2,1
0,2
1,2
2,2









share|improve this question
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Cartesian product of a list with itself n times

    22 answers




Question: Print out all the coordinates of a NxN grid. Preferably in C, however other languages also accepted



Input: N (integer)



Output: for N=3, a 3x3 grid:



0,0
1,0
2,0
0,1
1,1
2,1
0,2
1,2
2,2




This question already has an answer here:




  • Cartesian product of a list with itself n times

    22 answers








code-golf grid






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 15:12

























asked Dec 12 '18 at 14:38









Chris Puglia

244




244




marked as duplicate by O.O.Balance, BMO, Xcali, Wît Wisarhd, Draco18s Dec 12 '18 at 17:51


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by O.O.Balance, BMO, Xcali, Wît Wisarhd, Draco18s Dec 12 '18 at 17:51


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 3




    Welcome to PPCG! This is the start of a good question. I couldn't find a duplicate from a quick search, though I might be mistaken. One thing I'd suggest is to specify the input and output. I assume that the input is an integer N. Is the output a list of tuples, a list of strings, should it be printed? Does it need to be separated by a comma?
    – maxb
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:49






  • 4




    Are we allowed to return a list instead of printing them? Is any order acceptable (i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]] instead of what you have above)? Can the output have 1-indexed coordinates instead of 0-indexed?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:54






  • 1




    Can we start at (1,1) instead of (0,0) ?
    – sergiol
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:01






  • 4




    Is there a particular order they have to be in or is any order fine?
    – Wît Wisarhd
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:18






  • 2




    Can't decide whether this is a dupe of this (just hardcode $n=2$) or this (just duplicate the argument instead of taking two distinct), but probably both.
    – BMO
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:04














  • 3




    Welcome to PPCG! This is the start of a good question. I couldn't find a duplicate from a quick search, though I might be mistaken. One thing I'd suggest is to specify the input and output. I assume that the input is an integer N. Is the output a list of tuples, a list of strings, should it be printed? Does it need to be separated by a comma?
    – maxb
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:49






  • 4




    Are we allowed to return a list instead of printing them? Is any order acceptable (i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]] instead of what you have above)? Can the output have 1-indexed coordinates instead of 0-indexed?
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:54






  • 1




    Can we start at (1,1) instead of (0,0) ?
    – sergiol
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:01






  • 4




    Is there a particular order they have to be in or is any order fine?
    – Wît Wisarhd
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:18






  • 2




    Can't decide whether this is a dupe of this (just hardcode $n=2$) or this (just duplicate the argument instead of taking two distinct), but probably both.
    – BMO
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:04








3




3




Welcome to PPCG! This is the start of a good question. I couldn't find a duplicate from a quick search, though I might be mistaken. One thing I'd suggest is to specify the input and output. I assume that the input is an integer N. Is the output a list of tuples, a list of strings, should it be printed? Does it need to be separated by a comma?
– maxb
Dec 12 '18 at 14:49




Welcome to PPCG! This is the start of a good question. I couldn't find a duplicate from a quick search, though I might be mistaken. One thing I'd suggest is to specify the input and output. I assume that the input is an integer N. Is the output a list of tuples, a list of strings, should it be printed? Does it need to be separated by a comma?
– maxb
Dec 12 '18 at 14:49




4




4




Are we allowed to return a list instead of printing them? Is any order acceptable (i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]] instead of what you have above)? Can the output have 1-indexed coordinates instead of 0-indexed?
– Kevin Cruijssen
Dec 12 '18 at 14:54




Are we allowed to return a list instead of printing them? Is any order acceptable (i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]] instead of what you have above)? Can the output have 1-indexed coordinates instead of 0-indexed?
– Kevin Cruijssen
Dec 12 '18 at 14:54




1




1




Can we start at (1,1) instead of (0,0) ?
– sergiol
Dec 12 '18 at 15:01




Can we start at (1,1) instead of (0,0) ?
– sergiol
Dec 12 '18 at 15:01




4




4




Is there a particular order they have to be in or is any order fine?
– Wît Wisarhd
Dec 12 '18 at 15:18




Is there a particular order they have to be in or is any order fine?
– Wît Wisarhd
Dec 12 '18 at 15:18




2




2




Can't decide whether this is a dupe of this (just hardcode $n=2$) or this (just duplicate the argument instead of taking two distinct), but probably both.
– BMO
Dec 12 '18 at 17:04




Can't decide whether this is a dupe of this (just hardcode $n=2$) or this (just duplicate the argument instead of taking two distinct), but probably both.
– BMO
Dec 12 '18 at 17:04










17 Answers
17






active

oldest

votes


















5















C (gcc), 83 51 bytes



Saved 32 bytes and fixed output order thanks to Kevin Cruijssen.





i;f(n){for(i=0;i<n*n;)printf("%d,%dn",i++%n,i/n);}


Try it online!



I'm by no means a C programmer (or C golfer), but I thought I'd give it a try. Should the main be included in the byte count?






share|improve this answer























  • 51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:00












  • Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:06










  • @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
    – maxb
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:00



















7














Japt, 3 bytes



o ï


Try it



o       :Range [0,input)
ï :Cartesian product with itself





share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
    – Oliver
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:38












  • @Oliver, mw would also work.
    – Shaggy
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:45





















5















R, 33 25 bytes





which(diag(scan())|1,T)-1


Try it online!



Thanks to Kirill L. for suggesting a 2-byte golf, which inspired me to look further :-)






share|improve this answer























  • Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
    – Sumner18
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34










  • @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
    – Giuseppe
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:38










  • 31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
    – Kirill L.
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:56










  • @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
    – Giuseppe
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58





















3















PowerShell, 48 42 bytes





param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}


Try it online!



Boring double-for loop.



Saved 6 bytes thanks to mazzy.






share|improve this answer























  • ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
    – mazzy
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:12










  • @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
    – AdmBorkBork
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:20



















3















05AB1E, 8 bytes



L<ãí',ý»


Exactly as the challenge description: prints the 0-indexed coordinates ordered by y-then-x comma- and newline-delimited to STDOUT.



Try it online.



Explanation:





L          # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
# i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
< # Decrease each by 1 to make the range [0, input)
# i.e. [1,2,3] → [0,1,2]
ã # Create each possible pair with itself
# i.e. [0,1,2] → [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
í # Reverse each pair so they're sorted by y-then-x instead of x-then-y
# i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
# → [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
',ý '# Join each pair with a space delimiter
# i.e. [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
# → ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
» # And then join everything with a newline delimiter (and output implicitly)
# i.e. ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
# → "0,0n1,0n2,0n0,1n1,1n2,1n0,2n1,2n2,2"







05AB1E, 2 bytes






Returns a list of 1-indexed coordinates ordered by x-then-y.



Try it online.



Explanation:





L     # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
# i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
ã # Create each possible pair with itself (and output implicitly)
# i.e. [1,2,3] → [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[2,1],[2,2],[2,3],[3,1],[3,2],[3,3]]





share|improve this answer























  • How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
    – maxb
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:00










  • @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:04





















3














C#, 59, 65



First time posting. Apologies if I do something wrong!



l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}



Try it online! -per Kevin Crujissen's TIO Link.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
    – DJMcMayhem
    Dec 12 '18 at 17:57






  • 1




    Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:00








  • 1




    Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
    – Kevin Cruijssen
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:01












  • Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
    – Destroigo
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:18










  • Can you provide a demo?
    – sergiol
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:32



















2















Tcl, 70 bytes



proc C {n i 0} {time {set j 0
time {puts $i,$j
incr j} $n
incr i} $n}


Try it online!






share|improve this answer























  • Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
    – sergiol
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:48



















1















Python 2, 39 bytes





lambda n:[(i%n,i/n)for i in range(n*n)]


Try it online!






share|improve this answer























  • I think the question requires variable N...
    – Felix Palmen
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:04










  • @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
    – TFeld
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:05



















1














Pyth, 4 bytes



^UQ2


Full program. Outputs list of coordinate pairs.



^UQ2   Implicit: Q=eval(input())
UQ [0-Q)
^ 2 Take the cartesian product of the previous result with itself





share|improve this answer





























    1















    MathGolf, 2 bytes



    r■


    Try it online!



    Explanation



    r    Range(0, n)
    ■ Cartesian product with self for lists


    For pretty-printing, you could add n to have it print one list item per line.






    share|improve this answer





























      1














      APL+WIN, 11 bytes



      (⍳n)∘.,⍳n←⎕


      Index origin = 0. Prompts for input for n and outputs the following for n=4:



      0 0  0 1  0 2  0 3
      1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
      2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3
      3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3





      share|improve this answer





























        1















        Pepe, 88 bytes



        I've never done 2D iterating in Pepe before and it doesn't seem to work pretty well due to labels being dynamic. There's quite a lot of two byte commands to avoid moving the pointer.



        REREeErEErerErEReREErEEEErreEEreeeEeEEeerEEeerreEErEEEEEreeEReererEEEEErERRREEEEEeRrEree


        Try it online!



        Warning: Do not run it with input below 1 - it will kill your browser.






        share|improve this answer





























          1















          Perl 5 -na, 35 bytes





          map{//;say"$',$_"for 0..$F[0]}0..$_


          Try it online!






          share|improve this answer





























            1














            Powershell, 43 bytes





            param($n)$i--..--$n*++$n|%{$i+=!$_;"$i,$_"}


            Explanation:



            One row 0..$n-1 repeated $n times.






            share|improve this answer





























              1














              Pure Bash (no external utilities), 35





              eval echo {0..$[$1-1]},{0..$[$1-1]}


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer





























                0















                Lua, 63 bytes





                s=io.read()-1 for i=0,s do for j=0,s do print(i..','..j)end end


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer































                  0














                  Perl5, 42 38 bytes



                  for$i(0..--$n){for(0..$n){say"$i,$_"}}


                  (The inner loop saves a few bytes by using the implicit variable "$_" as an index.)






                  share|improve this answer






























                    17 Answers
                    17






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes








                    17 Answers
                    17






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes









                    active

                    oldest

                    votes






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes









                    5















                    C (gcc), 83 51 bytes



                    Saved 32 bytes and fixed output order thanks to Kevin Cruijssen.





                    i;f(n){for(i=0;i<n*n;)printf("%d,%dn",i++%n,i/n);}


                    Try it online!



                    I'm by no means a C programmer (or C golfer), but I thought I'd give it a try. Should the main be included in the byte count?






                    share|improve this answer























                    • 51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00












                    • Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:06










                    • @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
                      – maxb
                      Dec 13 '18 at 9:00
















                    5















                    C (gcc), 83 51 bytes



                    Saved 32 bytes and fixed output order thanks to Kevin Cruijssen.





                    i;f(n){for(i=0;i<n*n;)printf("%d,%dn",i++%n,i/n);}


                    Try it online!



                    I'm by no means a C programmer (or C golfer), but I thought I'd give it a try. Should the main be included in the byte count?






                    share|improve this answer























                    • 51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00












                    • Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:06










                    • @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
                      – maxb
                      Dec 13 '18 at 9:00














                    5












                    5








                    5







                    C (gcc), 83 51 bytes



                    Saved 32 bytes and fixed output order thanks to Kevin Cruijssen.





                    i;f(n){for(i=0;i<n*n;)printf("%d,%dn",i++%n,i/n);}


                    Try it online!



                    I'm by no means a C programmer (or C golfer), but I thought I'd give it a try. Should the main be included in the byte count?






                    share|improve this answer















                    C (gcc), 83 51 bytes



                    Saved 32 bytes and fixed output order thanks to Kevin Cruijssen.





                    i;f(n){for(i=0;i<n*n;)printf("%d,%dn",i++%n,i/n);}


                    Try it online!



                    I'm by no means a C programmer (or C golfer), but I thought I'd give it a try. Should the main be included in the byte count?







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 13 '18 at 9:00

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 14:58









                    maxb

                    2,92611131




                    2,92611131












                    • 51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00












                    • Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:06










                    • @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
                      – maxb
                      Dec 13 '18 at 9:00


















                    • 51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00












                    • Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:06










                    • @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
                      – maxb
                      Dec 13 '18 at 9:00
















                    51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:00






                    51 bytes :) (And no, main method doesn't have to be included. For Java, C, C#, etc. etc. we allows functions instead of full programs, since full programs are quite verbose and doesn't add anything to the actual solution.)
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:00














                    Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:06




                    Btw, to have the exact same order for each coordinate as in the input (ordered by y-then-x instead of x-then-y), the i++/n,i%n should be i++%n,i/n. :)
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:06












                    @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
                    – maxb
                    Dec 13 '18 at 9:00




                    @KevinCruijssen Good point, updated the post!
                    – maxb
                    Dec 13 '18 at 9:00











                    7














                    Japt, 3 bytes



                    o ï


                    Try it



                    o       :Range [0,input)
                    ï :Cartesian product with itself





                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 1




                      I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
                      – Oliver
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38












                    • @Oliver, mw would also work.
                      – Shaggy
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:45


















                    7














                    Japt, 3 bytes



                    o ï


                    Try it



                    o       :Range [0,input)
                    ï :Cartesian product with itself





                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 1




                      I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
                      – Oliver
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38












                    • @Oliver, mw would also work.
                      – Shaggy
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:45
















                    7












                    7








                    7






                    Japt, 3 bytes



                    o ï


                    Try it



                    o       :Range [0,input)
                    ï :Cartesian product with itself





                    share|improve this answer














                    Japt, 3 bytes



                    o ï


                    Try it



                    o       :Range [0,input)
                    ï :Cartesian product with itself






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 13 '18 at 10:27

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:07









                    Shaggy

                    18.9k21666




                    18.9k21666








                    • 1




                      I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
                      – Oliver
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38












                    • @Oliver, mw would also work.
                      – Shaggy
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:45
















                    • 1




                      I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
                      – Oliver
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38












                    • @Oliver, mw would also work.
                      – Shaggy
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:45










                    1




                    1




                    I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
                    – Oliver
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:38






                    I had the same solution with ` ñÌ` at the end to sort it. Hopefully the OP doesn't care about the order.
                    – Oliver
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:38














                    @Oliver, mw would also work.
                    – Shaggy
                    Dec 13 '18 at 22:45






                    @Oliver, mw would also work.
                    – Shaggy
                    Dec 13 '18 at 22:45













                    5















                    R, 33 25 bytes





                    which(diag(scan())|1,T)-1


                    Try it online!



                    Thanks to Kirill L. for suggesting a 2-byte golf, which inspired me to look further :-)






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
                      – Sumner18
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:34










                    • @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38










                    • 31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
                      – Kirill L.
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:56










                    • @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:58


















                    5















                    R, 33 25 bytes





                    which(diag(scan())|1,T)-1


                    Try it online!



                    Thanks to Kirill L. for suggesting a 2-byte golf, which inspired me to look further :-)






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
                      – Sumner18
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:34










                    • @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38










                    • 31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
                      – Kirill L.
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:56










                    • @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:58
















                    5












                    5








                    5







                    R, 33 25 bytes





                    which(diag(scan())|1,T)-1


                    Try it online!



                    Thanks to Kirill L. for suggesting a 2-byte golf, which inspired me to look further :-)






                    share|improve this answer















                    R, 33 25 bytes





                    which(diag(scan())|1,T)-1


                    Try it online!



                    Thanks to Kirill L. for suggesting a 2-byte golf, which inspired me to look further :-)







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 12 '18 at 16:00

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:10









                    Giuseppe

                    16.6k31052




                    16.6k31052












                    • Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
                      – Sumner18
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:34










                    • @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38










                    • 31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
                      – Kirill L.
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:56










                    • @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:58




















                    • Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
                      – Sumner18
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:34










                    • @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:38










                    • 31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
                      – Kirill L.
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:56










                    • @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
                      – Giuseppe
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:58


















                    Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
                    – Sumner18
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34




                    Where do you hear about all of these functions in R? I've never even used arrayInd before, but I feel like it could be useful in a lot of things!
                    – Sumner18
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34












                    @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
                    – Giuseppe
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:38




                    @Sumner18 You can't be as golfy if you don't understand a big chunk of the language, so it pays to read the docs! there are a few workhorse functions like match and which. which in particular has an arr.ind argument, so looking at the documentation for which, we see a note in the Details under .dimnames about passing to the arrayInd function!
                    – Giuseppe
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:38












                    31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
                    – Kirill L.
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:56




                    31 bytes. Sadly, requires !!, as otherwise: argument to 'which' is not logical...
                    – Kirill L.
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:56












                    @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
                    – Giuseppe
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58






                    @KirillL. that's neat! It also inspired me to shave off another 2 bytes. EDIT: another 6 bytes!
                    – Giuseppe
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58













                    3















                    PowerShell, 48 42 bytes





                    param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}


                    Try it online!



                    Boring double-for loop.



                    Saved 6 bytes thanks to mazzy.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
                      – mazzy
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:12










                    • @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
                      – AdmBorkBork
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:20
















                    3















                    PowerShell, 48 42 bytes





                    param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}


                    Try it online!



                    Boring double-for loop.



                    Saved 6 bytes thanks to mazzy.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
                      – mazzy
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:12










                    • @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
                      – AdmBorkBork
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:20














                    3












                    3








                    3







                    PowerShell, 48 42 bytes





                    param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}


                    Try it online!



                    Boring double-for loop.



                    Saved 6 bytes thanks to mazzy.






                    share|improve this answer















                    PowerShell, 48 42 bytes





                    param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}


                    Try it online!



                    Boring double-for loop.



                    Saved 6 bytes thanks to mazzy.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 12 '18 at 17:20

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 16:15









                    AdmBorkBork

                    26.3k364228




                    26.3k364228












                    • ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
                      – mazzy
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:12










                    • @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
                      – AdmBorkBork
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:20


















                    • ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
                      – mazzy
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:12










                    • @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
                      – AdmBorkBork
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:20
















                    ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
                    – mazzy
                    Dec 12 '18 at 17:12




                    ? param($n)0..--$n|%{$i=$_;0..$n|%{"$i,$_"}}
                    – mazzy
                    Dec 12 '18 at 17:12












                    @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
                    – AdmBorkBork
                    Dec 12 '18 at 17:20




                    @mazzy Of course, removing the -join. Thanks!
                    – AdmBorkBork
                    Dec 12 '18 at 17:20











                    3















                    05AB1E, 8 bytes



                    L<ãí',ý»


                    Exactly as the challenge description: prints the 0-indexed coordinates ordered by y-then-x comma- and newline-delimited to STDOUT.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L          # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    < # Decrease each by 1 to make the range [0, input)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [0,1,2]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself
                    # i.e. [0,1,2] → [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    í # Reverse each pair so they're sorted by y-then-x instead of x-then-y
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    # → [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    ',ý '# Join each pair with a space delimiter
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    # → ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    » # And then join everything with a newline delimiter (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    # → "0,0n1,0n2,0n0,1n1,1n2,1n0,2n1,2n2,2"







                    05AB1E, 2 bytes






                    Returns a list of 1-indexed coordinates ordered by x-then-y.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L     # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[2,1],[2,2],[2,3],[3,1],[3,2],[3,3]]





                    share|improve this answer























                    • How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
                      – maxb
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00










                    • @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:04


















                    3















                    05AB1E, 8 bytes



                    L<ãí',ý»


                    Exactly as the challenge description: prints the 0-indexed coordinates ordered by y-then-x comma- and newline-delimited to STDOUT.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L          # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    < # Decrease each by 1 to make the range [0, input)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [0,1,2]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself
                    # i.e. [0,1,2] → [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    í # Reverse each pair so they're sorted by y-then-x instead of x-then-y
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    # → [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    ',ý '# Join each pair with a space delimiter
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    # → ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    » # And then join everything with a newline delimiter (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    # → "0,0n1,0n2,0n0,1n1,1n2,1n0,2n1,2n2,2"







                    05AB1E, 2 bytes






                    Returns a list of 1-indexed coordinates ordered by x-then-y.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L     # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[2,1],[2,2],[2,3],[3,1],[3,2],[3,3]]





                    share|improve this answer























                    • How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
                      – maxb
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00










                    • @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:04
















                    3












                    3








                    3







                    05AB1E, 8 bytes



                    L<ãí',ý»


                    Exactly as the challenge description: prints the 0-indexed coordinates ordered by y-then-x comma- and newline-delimited to STDOUT.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L          # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    < # Decrease each by 1 to make the range [0, input)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [0,1,2]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself
                    # i.e. [0,1,2] → [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    í # Reverse each pair so they're sorted by y-then-x instead of x-then-y
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    # → [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    ',ý '# Join each pair with a space delimiter
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    # → ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    » # And then join everything with a newline delimiter (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    # → "0,0n1,0n2,0n0,1n1,1n2,1n0,2n1,2n2,2"







                    05AB1E, 2 bytes






                    Returns a list of 1-indexed coordinates ordered by x-then-y.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L     # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[2,1],[2,2],[2,3],[3,1],[3,2],[3,3]]





                    share|improve this answer















                    05AB1E, 8 bytes



                    L<ãí',ý»


                    Exactly as the challenge description: prints the 0-indexed coordinates ordered by y-then-x comma- and newline-delimited to STDOUT.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L          # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    < # Decrease each by 1 to make the range [0, input)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [0,1,2]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself
                    # i.e. [0,1,2] → [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    í # Reverse each pair so they're sorted by y-then-x instead of x-then-y
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[1,1],[1,2],[2,0],[2,1],[2,2]]
                    # → [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    ',ý '# Join each pair with a space delimiter
                    # i.e. [[0,0],[1,0],[2,0],[0,1],[1,1],[2,1],[0,2],[1,2],[2,2]]
                    # → ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    » # And then join everything with a newline delimiter (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. ["0,0","1,0","2,0","0,1","1,1","2,1","0,2","1,2","2,2"]
                    # → "0,0n1,0n2,0n0,1n1,1n2,1n0,2n1,2n2,2"







                    05AB1E, 2 bytes






                    Returns a list of 1-indexed coordinates ordered by x-then-y.



                    Try it online.



                    Explanation:





                    L     # Create a list in the range [1, (implicit) input]
                    # i.e. 3 → [1,2,3]
                    ã # Create each possible pair with itself (and output implicitly)
                    # i.e. [1,2,3] → [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[2,1],[2,2],[2,3],[3,1],[3,2],[3,3]]






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 12 '18 at 17:45

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 14:57









                    Kevin Cruijssen

                    35.6k554186




                    35.6k554186












                    • How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
                      – maxb
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00










                    • @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:04




















                    • How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
                      – maxb
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:00










                    • @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:04


















                    How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
                    – maxb
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:00




                    How comes that your 2-byter is 1-indexed?
                    – maxb
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:00












                    @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:04






                    @maxb I've added an explanation to my post now. L is a 1-indexed list in the range [1,n] (where n is the implicit input). I've made it 0-indexed in my 8-byte answer with the < (decrease by 1).
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:04













                    3














                    C#, 59, 65



                    First time posting. Apologies if I do something wrong!



                    l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}



                    Try it online! -per Kevin Crujissen's TIO Link.






                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 1




                      Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
                      – DJMcMayhem
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:57






                    • 1




                      Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:00








                    • 1




                      Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:01












                    • Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
                      – Destroigo
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:18










                    • Can you provide a demo?
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:32
















                    3














                    C#, 59, 65



                    First time posting. Apologies if I do something wrong!



                    l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}



                    Try it online! -per Kevin Crujissen's TIO Link.






                    share|improve this answer



















                    • 1




                      Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
                      – DJMcMayhem
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:57






                    • 1




                      Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:00








                    • 1




                      Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:01












                    • Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
                      – Destroigo
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:18










                    • Can you provide a demo?
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:32














                    3












                    3








                    3






                    C#, 59, 65



                    First time posting. Apologies if I do something wrong!



                    l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}



                    Try it online! -per Kevin Crujissen's TIO Link.






                    share|improve this answer














                    C#, 59, 65



                    First time posting. Apologies if I do something wrong!



                    l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}



                    Try it online! -per Kevin Crujissen's TIO Link.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 13 '18 at 15:58

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 17:42









                    Destroigo

                    312




                    312








                    • 1




                      Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
                      – DJMcMayhem
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:57






                    • 1




                      Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:00








                    • 1




                      Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:01












                    • Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
                      – Destroigo
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:18










                    • Can you provide a demo?
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:32














                    • 1




                      Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
                      – DJMcMayhem
                      Dec 12 '18 at 17:57






                    • 1




                      Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:00








                    • 1




                      Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:01












                    • Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
                      – Destroigo
                      Dec 12 '18 at 18:18










                    • Can you provide a demo?
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:32








                    1




                    1




                    Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
                    – DJMcMayhem
                    Dec 12 '18 at 17:57




                    Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, assuming input is in a predefined variable is not a standard form of input. You could add a console.readline() or however that's supposed to work (I'm not too familiar with C#) or submit a function instead.
                    – DJMcMayhem
                    Dec 12 '18 at 17:57




                    1




                    1




                    Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:00






                    Hi, welcome to PPCG! We allow either functions or full programs as answers (yours is currently more like a snippet), and all imports add to the byte-count. Which means your current answer should be l=>{for(var j=0;j<l*l;j++)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{(int)j/l}n");} instead (71 bytes). However, you can golf 6 bytes by changing (int)j/l to j++/l and remove the j++ like this: l=>{for(int j=0;j<l*l;)System.Console.Write($"{j%l},{j++/l}n");}. Try it online.
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:00






                    1




                    1




                    Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:01






                    Also, if you haven't seen it yet, tips for golfing in C# and tips for golfing in <all languages> might be interesting to read through. Apart from some ruling, your first answer looks fine, so +1 from me. Again welcome, and enjoy your stay! :)
                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:01














                    Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
                    – Destroigo
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:18




                    Thanks guys! Sorry about the function error. Appreciate the for increment golf!
                    – Destroigo
                    Dec 12 '18 at 18:18












                    Can you provide a demo?
                    – sergiol
                    Dec 12 '18 at 19:32




                    Can you provide a demo?
                    – sergiol
                    Dec 12 '18 at 19:32











                    2















                    Tcl, 70 bytes



                    proc C {n i 0} {time {set j 0
                    time {puts $i,$j
                    incr j} $n
                    incr i} $n}


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:48
















                    2















                    Tcl, 70 bytes



                    proc C {n i 0} {time {set j 0
                    time {puts $i,$j
                    incr j} $n
                    incr i} $n}


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:48














                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Tcl, 70 bytes



                    proc C {n i 0} {time {set j 0
                    time {puts $i,$j
                    incr j} $n
                    incr i} $n}


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer















                    Tcl, 70 bytes



                    proc C {n i 0} {time {set j 0
                    time {puts $i,$j
                    incr j} $n
                    incr i} $n}


                    Try it online!







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 12 '18 at 15:27

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:20









                    sergiol

                    2,4901925




                    2,4901925












                    • Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:48


















                    • Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
                      – sergiol
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:48
















                    Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
                    – sergiol
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:48




                    Failed outgolf: tio.run/##K0nO@f@/oCg/…
                    – sergiol
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:48











                    1















                    Python 2, 39 bytes





                    lambda n:[(i%n,i/n)for i in range(n*n)]


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer























                    • I think the question requires variable N...
                      – Felix Palmen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:04










                    • @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
                      – TFeld
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:05
















                    1















                    Python 2, 39 bytes





                    lambda n:[(i%n,i/n)for i in range(n*n)]


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer























                    • I think the question requires variable N...
                      – Felix Palmen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:04










                    • @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
                      – TFeld
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:05














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Python 2, 39 bytes





                    lambda n:[(i%n,i/n)for i in range(n*n)]


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer















                    Python 2, 39 bytes





                    lambda n:[(i%n,i/n)for i in range(n*n)]


                    Try it online!







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 12 '18 at 15:05

























                    answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:00









                    TFeld

                    14.2k21240




                    14.2k21240












                    • I think the question requires variable N...
                      – Felix Palmen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:04










                    • @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
                      – TFeld
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:05


















                    • I think the question requires variable N...
                      – Felix Palmen
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:04










                    • @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
                      – TFeld
                      Dec 12 '18 at 15:05
















                    I think the question requires variable N...
                    – Felix Palmen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:04




                    I think the question requires variable N...
                    – Felix Palmen
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:04












                    @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
                    – TFeld
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:05




                    @FelixPalmen Doh.. Fixed :)
                    – TFeld
                    Dec 12 '18 at 15:05











                    1














                    Pyth, 4 bytes



                    ^UQ2


                    Full program. Outputs list of coordinate pairs.



                    ^UQ2   Implicit: Q=eval(input())
                    UQ [0-Q)
                    ^ 2 Take the cartesian product of the previous result with itself





                    share|improve this answer


























                      1














                      Pyth, 4 bytes



                      ^UQ2


                      Full program. Outputs list of coordinate pairs.



                      ^UQ2   Implicit: Q=eval(input())
                      UQ [0-Q)
                      ^ 2 Take the cartesian product of the previous result with itself





                      share|improve this answer
























                        1












                        1








                        1






                        Pyth, 4 bytes



                        ^UQ2


                        Full program. Outputs list of coordinate pairs.



                        ^UQ2   Implicit: Q=eval(input())
                        UQ [0-Q)
                        ^ 2 Take the cartesian product of the previous result with itself





                        share|improve this answer












                        Pyth, 4 bytes



                        ^UQ2


                        Full program. Outputs list of coordinate pairs.



                        ^UQ2   Implicit: Q=eval(input())
                        UQ [0-Q)
                        ^ 2 Take the cartesian product of the previous result with itself






                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:06









                        Sok

                        3,537722




                        3,537722























                            1















                            MathGolf, 2 bytes



                            r■


                            Try it online!



                            Explanation



                            r    Range(0, n)
                            ■ Cartesian product with self for lists


                            For pretty-printing, you could add n to have it print one list item per line.






                            share|improve this answer


























                              1















                              MathGolf, 2 bytes



                              r■


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation



                              r    Range(0, n)
                              ■ Cartesian product with self for lists


                              For pretty-printing, you could add n to have it print one list item per line.






                              share|improve this answer
























                                1












                                1








                                1







                                MathGolf, 2 bytes



                                r■


                                Try it online!



                                Explanation



                                r    Range(0, n)
                                ■ Cartesian product with self for lists


                                For pretty-printing, you could add n to have it print one list item per line.






                                share|improve this answer













                                MathGolf, 2 bytes



                                r■


                                Try it online!



                                Explanation



                                r    Range(0, n)
                                ■ Cartesian product with self for lists


                                For pretty-printing, you could add n to have it print one list item per line.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:09









                                maxb

                                2,92611131




                                2,92611131























                                    1














                                    APL+WIN, 11 bytes



                                    (⍳n)∘.,⍳n←⎕


                                    Index origin = 0. Prompts for input for n and outputs the following for n=4:



                                    0 0  0 1  0 2  0 3
                                    1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
                                    2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3
                                    3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3





                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      1














                                      APL+WIN, 11 bytes



                                      (⍳n)∘.,⍳n←⎕


                                      Index origin = 0. Prompts for input for n and outputs the following for n=4:



                                      0 0  0 1  0 2  0 3
                                      1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
                                      2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3
                                      3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3





                                      share|improve this answer
























                                        1












                                        1








                                        1






                                        APL+WIN, 11 bytes



                                        (⍳n)∘.,⍳n←⎕


                                        Index origin = 0. Prompts for input for n and outputs the following for n=4:



                                        0 0  0 1  0 2  0 3
                                        1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
                                        2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3
                                        3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3





                                        share|improve this answer












                                        APL+WIN, 11 bytes



                                        (⍳n)∘.,⍳n←⎕


                                        Index origin = 0. Prompts for input for n and outputs the following for n=4:



                                        0 0  0 1  0 2  0 3
                                        1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
                                        2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3
                                        3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3






                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:17









                                        Graham

                                        2,25678




                                        2,25678























                                            1















                                            Pepe, 88 bytes



                                            I've never done 2D iterating in Pepe before and it doesn't seem to work pretty well due to labels being dynamic. There's quite a lot of two byte commands to avoid moving the pointer.



                                            REREeErEErerErEReREErEEEErreEEreeeEeEEeerEEeerreEErEEEEEreeEReererEEEEErERRREEEEEeRrEree


                                            Try it online!



                                            Warning: Do not run it with input below 1 - it will kill your browser.






                                            share|improve this answer


























                                              1















                                              Pepe, 88 bytes



                                              I've never done 2D iterating in Pepe before and it doesn't seem to work pretty well due to labels being dynamic. There's quite a lot of two byte commands to avoid moving the pointer.



                                              REREeErEErerErEReREErEEEErreEEreeeEeEEeerEEeerreEErEEEEEreeEReererEEEEErERRREEEEEeRrEree


                                              Try it online!



                                              Warning: Do not run it with input below 1 - it will kill your browser.






                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                1












                                                1








                                                1







                                                Pepe, 88 bytes



                                                I've never done 2D iterating in Pepe before and it doesn't seem to work pretty well due to labels being dynamic. There's quite a lot of two byte commands to avoid moving the pointer.



                                                REREeErEErerErEReREErEEEErreEEreeeEeEEeerEEeerreEErEEEEEreeEReererEEEEErERRREEEEEeRrEree


                                                Try it online!



                                                Warning: Do not run it with input below 1 - it will kill your browser.






                                                share|improve this answer













                                                Pepe, 88 bytes



                                                I've never done 2D iterating in Pepe before and it doesn't seem to work pretty well due to labels being dynamic. There's quite a lot of two byte commands to avoid moving the pointer.



                                                REREeErEErerErEReREErEEEErreEEreeeEeEEeerEEeerreEErEEEEEreeEReererEEEEErERRREEEEEeRrEree


                                                Try it online!



                                                Warning: Do not run it with input below 1 - it will kill your browser.







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered Dec 12 '18 at 17:07









                                                RedClover

                                                572523




                                                572523























                                                    1















                                                    Perl 5 -na, 35 bytes





                                                    map{//;say"$',$_"for 0..$F[0]}0..$_


                                                    Try it online!






                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                      1















                                                      Perl 5 -na, 35 bytes





                                                      map{//;say"$',$_"for 0..$F[0]}0..$_


                                                      Try it online!






                                                      share|improve this answer
























                                                        1












                                                        1








                                                        1







                                                        Perl 5 -na, 35 bytes





                                                        map{//;say"$',$_"for 0..$F[0]}0..$_


                                                        Try it online!






                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                        Perl 5 -na, 35 bytes





                                                        map{//;say"$',$_"for 0..$F[0]}0..$_


                                                        Try it online!







                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                        answered Dec 12 '18 at 17:16









                                                        Xcali

                                                        5,168520




                                                        5,168520























                                                            1














                                                            Powershell, 43 bytes





                                                            param($n)$i--..--$n*++$n|%{$i+=!$_;"$i,$_"}


                                                            Explanation:



                                                            One row 0..$n-1 repeated $n times.






                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                              1














                                                              Powershell, 43 bytes





                                                              param($n)$i--..--$n*++$n|%{$i+=!$_;"$i,$_"}


                                                              Explanation:



                                                              One row 0..$n-1 repeated $n times.






                                                              share|improve this answer
























                                                                1












                                                                1








                                                                1






                                                                Powershell, 43 bytes





                                                                param($n)$i--..--$n*++$n|%{$i+=!$_;"$i,$_"}


                                                                Explanation:



                                                                One row 0..$n-1 repeated $n times.






                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                Powershell, 43 bytes





                                                                param($n)$i--..--$n*++$n|%{$i+=!$_;"$i,$_"}


                                                                Explanation:



                                                                One row 0..$n-1 repeated $n times.







                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                answered Dec 12 '18 at 17:20









                                                                mazzy

                                                                2,1251315




                                                                2,1251315























                                                                    1














                                                                    Pure Bash (no external utilities), 35





                                                                    eval echo {0..$[$1-1]},{0..$[$1-1]}


                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                                      1














                                                                      Pure Bash (no external utilities), 35





                                                                      eval echo {0..$[$1-1]},{0..$[$1-1]}


                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                      share|improve this answer
























                                                                        1












                                                                        1








                                                                        1






                                                                        Pure Bash (no external utilities), 35





                                                                        eval echo {0..$[$1-1]},{0..$[$1-1]}


                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                        Pure Bash (no external utilities), 35





                                                                        eval echo {0..$[$1-1]},{0..$[$1-1]}


                                                                        Try it online!







                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                        answered Dec 12 '18 at 17:39









                                                                        Digital Trauma

                                                                        58.6k787221




                                                                        58.6k787221























                                                                            0















                                                                            Lua, 63 bytes





                                                                            s=io.read()-1 for i=0,s do for j=0,s do print(i..','..j)end end


                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                            share|improve this answer




























                                                                              0















                                                                              Lua, 63 bytes





                                                                              s=io.read()-1 for i=0,s do for j=0,s do print(i..','..j)end end


                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                                                0












                                                                                0








                                                                                0







                                                                                Lua, 63 bytes





                                                                                s=io.read()-1 for i=0,s do for j=0,s do print(i..','..j)end end


                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                                Lua, 63 bytes





                                                                                s=io.read()-1 for i=0,s do for j=0,s do print(i..','..j)end end


                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                edited Dec 12 '18 at 16:24

























                                                                                answered Dec 12 '18 at 16:15









                                                                                ouflak

                                                                                1931311




                                                                                1931311























                                                                                    0














                                                                                    Perl5, 42 38 bytes



                                                                                    for$i(0..--$n){for(0..$n){say"$i,$_"}}


                                                                                    (The inner loop saves a few bytes by using the implicit variable "$_" as an index.)






                                                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                                                      0














                                                                                      Perl5, 42 38 bytes



                                                                                      for$i(0..--$n){for(0..$n){say"$i,$_"}}


                                                                                      (The inner loop saves a few bytes by using the implicit variable "$_" as an index.)






                                                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                                                        0












                                                                                        0








                                                                                        0






                                                                                        Perl5, 42 38 bytes



                                                                                        for$i(0..--$n){for(0..$n){say"$i,$_"}}


                                                                                        (The inner loop saves a few bytes by using the implicit variable "$_" as an index.)






                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                        Perl5, 42 38 bytes



                                                                                        for$i(0..--$n){for(0..$n){say"$i,$_"}}


                                                                                        (The inner loop saves a few bytes by using the implicit variable "$_" as an index.)







                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                        edited Dec 12 '18 at 17:57









                                                                                        Wît Wisarhd

                                                                                        34k10156365




                                                                                        34k10156365










                                                                                        answered Dec 12 '18 at 17:30









                                                                                        Tom Williams

                                                                                        93




                                                                                        93















                                                                                            Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                                                                            Alcedinidae

                                                                                            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]