What is a word for a war said to be fought for one reason, but really for another?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















I need a word for a war which is fought for one purpose, say coal reserves, but where each side knows that the war is about more than just coal. Say, for example, political power.



Each side, for example, might gain or lose the support of followers because of this battle for coal. Or, maybe the war is being fought by two larger governments, and it's pretty much a war between them but played off as a battle over coal.



An example usage might be, "Party A and Party B are fighting a [insert word here] over taxes. It's really about party power!"



Thanks in advance!










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If I were a neologist, I'd call it a "dummy war", but sadly I'm not.

    – Lordology
    Apr 4 at 20:36








  • 1





    Downvoter(s) care to explain?

    – Redwolf Programs
    Apr 4 at 20:43






  • 2





    You could say, "Party A and Party B are fighting a war ostensibly over taxes- It's really about party power.

    – Jim
    Apr 4 at 20:50






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure it's called "war". I would struggle to find, anywhere in history, an example of a war which was actually fought for the claimed justification.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 4 at 21:09








  • 1





    @ hotlicks - If they were sic, they'd use a stet o-scope.

    – Phil Sweet
    Apr 5 at 10:23


















0















I need a word for a war which is fought for one purpose, say coal reserves, but where each side knows that the war is about more than just coal. Say, for example, political power.



Each side, for example, might gain or lose the support of followers because of this battle for coal. Or, maybe the war is being fought by two larger governments, and it's pretty much a war between them but played off as a battle over coal.



An example usage might be, "Party A and Party B are fighting a [insert word here] over taxes. It's really about party power!"



Thanks in advance!










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If I were a neologist, I'd call it a "dummy war", but sadly I'm not.

    – Lordology
    Apr 4 at 20:36








  • 1





    Downvoter(s) care to explain?

    – Redwolf Programs
    Apr 4 at 20:43






  • 2





    You could say, "Party A and Party B are fighting a war ostensibly over taxes- It's really about party power.

    – Jim
    Apr 4 at 20:50






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure it's called "war". I would struggle to find, anywhere in history, an example of a war which was actually fought for the claimed justification.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 4 at 21:09








  • 1





    @ hotlicks - If they were sic, they'd use a stet o-scope.

    – Phil Sweet
    Apr 5 at 10:23














0












0








0








I need a word for a war which is fought for one purpose, say coal reserves, but where each side knows that the war is about more than just coal. Say, for example, political power.



Each side, for example, might gain or lose the support of followers because of this battle for coal. Or, maybe the war is being fought by two larger governments, and it's pretty much a war between them but played off as a battle over coal.



An example usage might be, "Party A and Party B are fighting a [insert word here] over taxes. It's really about party power!"



Thanks in advance!










share|improve this question














I need a word for a war which is fought for one purpose, say coal reserves, but where each side knows that the war is about more than just coal. Say, for example, political power.



Each side, for example, might gain or lose the support of followers because of this battle for coal. Or, maybe the war is being fought by two larger governments, and it's pretty much a war between them but played off as a battle over coal.



An example usage might be, "Party A and Party B are fighting a [insert word here] over taxes. It's really about party power!"



Thanks in advance!







single-word-requests






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 4 at 20:33









Redwolf ProgramsRedwolf Programs

1071




1071








  • 1





    If I were a neologist, I'd call it a "dummy war", but sadly I'm not.

    – Lordology
    Apr 4 at 20:36








  • 1





    Downvoter(s) care to explain?

    – Redwolf Programs
    Apr 4 at 20:43






  • 2





    You could say, "Party A and Party B are fighting a war ostensibly over taxes- It's really about party power.

    – Jim
    Apr 4 at 20:50






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure it's called "war". I would struggle to find, anywhere in history, an example of a war which was actually fought for the claimed justification.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 4 at 21:09








  • 1





    @ hotlicks - If they were sic, they'd use a stet o-scope.

    – Phil Sweet
    Apr 5 at 10:23














  • 1





    If I were a neologist, I'd call it a "dummy war", but sadly I'm not.

    – Lordology
    Apr 4 at 20:36








  • 1





    Downvoter(s) care to explain?

    – Redwolf Programs
    Apr 4 at 20:43






  • 2





    You could say, "Party A and Party B are fighting a war ostensibly over taxes- It's really about party power.

    – Jim
    Apr 4 at 20:50






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure it's called "war". I would struggle to find, anywhere in history, an example of a war which was actually fought for the claimed justification.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 4 at 21:09








  • 1





    @ hotlicks - If they were sic, they'd use a stet o-scope.

    – Phil Sweet
    Apr 5 at 10:23








1




1





If I were a neologist, I'd call it a "dummy war", but sadly I'm not.

– Lordology
Apr 4 at 20:36







If I were a neologist, I'd call it a "dummy war", but sadly I'm not.

– Lordology
Apr 4 at 20:36






1




1





Downvoter(s) care to explain?

– Redwolf Programs
Apr 4 at 20:43





Downvoter(s) care to explain?

– Redwolf Programs
Apr 4 at 20:43




2




2





You could say, "Party A and Party B are fighting a war ostensibly over taxes- It's really about party power.

– Jim
Apr 4 at 20:50





You could say, "Party A and Party B are fighting a war ostensibly over taxes- It's really about party power.

– Jim
Apr 4 at 20:50




3




3





I'm pretty sure it's called "war". I would struggle to find, anywhere in history, an example of a war which was actually fought for the claimed justification.

– Hot Licks
Apr 4 at 21:09







I'm pretty sure it's called "war". I would struggle to find, anywhere in history, an example of a war which was actually fought for the claimed justification.

– Hot Licks
Apr 4 at 21:09






1




1





@ hotlicks - If they were sic, they'd use a stet o-scope.

– Phil Sweet
Apr 5 at 10:23





@ hotlicks - If they were sic, they'd use a stet o-scope.

– Phil Sweet
Apr 5 at 10:23










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492653%2fwhat-is-a-word-for-a-war-said-to-be-fought-for-one-reason-but-really-for-anothe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492653%2fwhat-is-a-word-for-a-war-said-to-be-fought-for-one-reason-but-really-for-anothe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]