Custom comparison for integer strings












1














For the input 3 30 34 5 9, the expected largest number output is: 9534330



Any inputs why the sorted is returning the same result as input: 3303459?



import functools



def compare(item1, item2):

    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)



inputList = input().split()

sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))

max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])

print(max)





python python-3.x







share|improve this question




















  • 4




    Because sorted returns a new list.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 20 at 7:56


















1














For the input 3 30 34 5 9, the expected largest number output is: 9534330



Any inputs why the sorted is returning the same result as input: 3303459?



import functools



def compare(item1, item2):

    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)



inputList = input().split()

sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))

max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])

print(max)





python python-3.x







share|improve this question




















  • 4




    Because sorted returns a new list.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 20 at 7:56
















1












1








1







For the input 3 30 34 5 9, the expected largest number output is: 9534330



Any inputs why the sorted is returning the same result as input: 3303459?



import functools



def compare(item1, item2):

    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)



inputList = input().split()

sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))

max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])

print(max)





python python-3.x







share|improve this question















For the input 3 30 34 5 9, the expected largest number output is: 9534330



Any inputs why the sorted is returning the same result as input: 3303459?



import functools



def compare(item1, item2):

    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)



inputList = input().split()

sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))

max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])

print(max)





python python-3.x




python python-3.x






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 at 8:00









jonrsharpe

76.7k11101208




76.7k11101208










asked Nov 20 at 7:54









Rock

8117




8117








  • 4




    Because sorted returns a new list.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 20 at 7:56
















  • 4




    Because sorted returns a new list.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 20 at 7:56










4




4




Because sorted returns a new list.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 20 at 7:56






Because sorted returns a new list.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 20 at 7:56














3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














The reason is either because you are sorting the list in the wrong order and you did not use the sorted list. Currently, you are sorting the list in an ascending order by the first digit. In addition to that, sorted() function returns a new list, so you need to save that in a variable.



You can fix that by either using the reverse() on the sorted list



import functools



def compare(item1, item2):

    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)



inputList = input().split()

inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))

inputList.reverse()

max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])

print(max)


Or switch operation in the compare() function



import functools



def compare(item1, item2):

    return int(item2 + item1) - int(item1 + item2)



inputList = input().split()

inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))

max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])

print(max)





share|improve this answer





























    1














    For exhaustiveness, you can also set the order argument in the sorted() function:
    import functools



    def compare(item1, item2):
    
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
    

    
input_list = input().split(",")
    
custom_sorted_list = sorted(input_list, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare), reverse=True)
    
max = "".join([ x for x in custom_sorted_list])
    
print(max)





    share|improve this answer





























      0














      The sorted function returns the list in ascending order.



      But, as you only want the largest number, it is even easier:



      import itertools
      

      
input_list = [3, 30, 34, 5, 9]
      

      
answer = max(map("".join, itertools.permutations(map(str, input_list))))
      

      
print(answer)





      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        });
        });
        }, "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53388492%2fcustom-comparison-for-integer-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1














        The reason is either because you are sorting the list in the wrong order and you did not use the sorted list. Currently, you are sorting the list in an ascending order by the first digit. In addition to that, sorted() function returns a new list, so you need to save that in a variable.



        You can fix that by either using the reverse() on the sorted list



        import functools
        

        
def compare(item1, item2):
        
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
        

        
inputList = input().split()
        
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
        
inputList.reverse()
        
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
        
print(max)


        Or switch operation in the compare() function



        import functools
        

        
def compare(item1, item2):
        
    return int(item2 + item1) - int(item1 + item2)
        

        
inputList = input().split()
        
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
        
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
        
print(max)





        share|improve this answer


























          1














          The reason is either because you are sorting the list in the wrong order and you did not use the sorted list. Currently, you are sorting the list in an ascending order by the first digit. In addition to that, sorted() function returns a new list, so you need to save that in a variable.



          You can fix that by either using the reverse() on the sorted list



          import functools
          

          
def compare(item1, item2):
          
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
          

          
inputList = input().split()
          
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
          
inputList.reverse()
          
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
          
print(max)


          Or switch operation in the compare() function



          import functools
          

          
def compare(item1, item2):
          
    return int(item2 + item1) - int(item1 + item2)
          

          
inputList = input().split()
          
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
          
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
          
print(max)





          share|improve this answer
























            1












            1








            1






            The reason is either because you are sorting the list in the wrong order and you did not use the sorted list. Currently, you are sorting the list in an ascending order by the first digit. In addition to that, sorted() function returns a new list, so you need to save that in a variable.



            You can fix that by either using the reverse() on the sorted list



            import functools
            

            
def compare(item1, item2):
            
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
            

            
inputList = input().split()
            
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
            
inputList.reverse()
            
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
            
print(max)


            Or switch operation in the compare() function



            import functools
            

            
def compare(item1, item2):
            
    return int(item2 + item1) - int(item1 + item2)
            

            
inputList = input().split()
            
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
            
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
            
print(max)





            share|improve this answer












            The reason is either because you are sorting the list in the wrong order and you did not use the sorted list. Currently, you are sorting the list in an ascending order by the first digit. In addition to that, sorted() function returns a new list, so you need to save that in a variable.



            You can fix that by either using the reverse() on the sorted list



            import functools
            

            
def compare(item1, item2):
            
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
            

            
inputList = input().split()
            
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
            
inputList.reverse()
            
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
            
print(max)


            Or switch operation in the compare() function



            import functools
            

            
def compare(item1, item2):
            
    return int(item2 + item1) - int(item1 + item2)
            

            
inputList = input().split()
            
inputList = sorted(inputList, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare))
            
max = "".join([ x for x in inputList])
            
print(max)






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 at 8:07









            Andreas

            1,7961618




            1,7961618

























                1














                For exhaustiveness, you can also set the order argument in the sorted() function:
                import functools



                def compare(item1, item2):
                
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
                

                
input_list = input().split(",")
                
custom_sorted_list = sorted(input_list, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare), reverse=True)
                
max = "".join([ x for x in custom_sorted_list])
                
print(max)





                share|improve this answer


























                  1














                  For exhaustiveness, you can also set the order argument in the sorted() function:
                  import functools



                  def compare(item1, item2):
                  
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
                  

                  
input_list = input().split(",")
                  
custom_sorted_list = sorted(input_list, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare), reverse=True)
                  
max = "".join([ x for x in custom_sorted_list])
                  
print(max)





                  share|improve this answer
























                    1












                    1








                    1






                    For exhaustiveness, you can also set the order argument in the sorted() function:
                    import functools



                    def compare(item1, item2):
                    
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
                    

                    
input_list = input().split(",")
                    
custom_sorted_list = sorted(input_list, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare), reverse=True)
                    
max = "".join([ x for x in custom_sorted_list])
                    
print(max)





                    share|improve this answer












                    For exhaustiveness, you can also set the order argument in the sorted() function:
                    import functools



                    def compare(item1, item2):
                    
    return int(item1 + item2) - int(item2 + item1)
                    

                    
input_list = input().split(",")
                    
custom_sorted_list = sorted(input_list, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare), reverse=True)
                    
max = "".join([ x for x in custom_sorted_list])
                    
print(max)






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 20 at 8:11









                    leoburgy

                    1086




                    1086























                        0














                        The sorted function returns the list in ascending order.



                        But, as you only want the largest number, it is even easier:



                        import itertools
                        

                        
input_list = [3, 30, 34, 5, 9]
                        

                        
answer = max(map("".join, itertools.permutations(map(str, input_list))))
                        

                        
print(answer)





                        share|improve this answer


























                          0














                          The sorted function returns the list in ascending order.



                          But, as you only want the largest number, it is even easier:



                          import itertools
                          

                          
input_list = [3, 30, 34, 5, 9]
                          

                          
answer = max(map("".join, itertools.permutations(map(str, input_list))))
                          

                          
print(answer)





                          share|improve this answer
























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            The sorted function returns the list in ascending order.



                            But, as you only want the largest number, it is even easier:



                            import itertools
                            

                            
input_list = [3, 30, 34, 5, 9]
                            

                            
answer = max(map("".join, itertools.permutations(map(str, input_list))))
                            

                            
print(answer)





                            share|improve this answer












                            The sorted function returns the list in ascending order.



                            But, as you only want the largest number, it is even easier:



                            import itertools
                            

                            
input_list = [3, 30, 34, 5, 9]
                            

                            
answer = max(map("".join, itertools.permutations(map(str, input_list))))
                            

                            
print(answer)






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 20 at 8:12









                            Vitor SRG

                            1763




                            1763






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53388492%2fcustom-comparison-for-integer-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                -

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Image
                                5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
                                Read more

                                Alcedinidae

                                Image
                                Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
                                Read more

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

                                Image
                                9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
                                Read more