The meaning of “presumptive” in the mentioned context?












-1















Non-reductionists regard testimony a knowledge source on par with
perception and memory; reductionists regard it a secondary source
derivative of perception and memory. Both agree that when a hearer
possesses defeaters, she does not have a presumptive epistemic
right to trust the speaker. They disagree whether a hearer has such a
right, derivable perhaps from higher epistemic principles, to believe
a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust
him. Non-reductionists say she does, like the presumptive right
she allegedly has to trust her senses; reductionists say she does not. (Source)




The closest sense for "presumptive" in the above context seems to me to be this:




Cambridge Dictionary



believed to be something, or likely to be
true, based on the information that you have. Exp: presumptive signs
of pregnancy




But, then, since it is an adjective for "right" in my text, it sounds like related to law. That is what confuses me. What is for a right to be presumptive?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    It doesn’t sound like it’s related to law. The text doesn’t seem to be talking about legal rights. But the whole paragraph is gibberish to me, so I can’t really comment on what exactly presumptive is supposed to mean. Normally it means ‘which is/can be presumed’, which makes as much sense here as anything else I can come up with.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 days ago






  • 1




    The author defines the term in the next sentence: the right to believe a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust him. A right, in the legal sense, to presume an attitude of trust toward the speaker. Then the author mentions a similar concept: the right to trust one's own senses.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled So, presumptive right = right to trust when there is no reason to the contrary?
    – Sasan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I would say 'presumptive right' means the right to presume some position. Under a given philosophy or set of logical rules, is allowed to presume something, like whether one's senses should be trusted or whether the testimony of another person should be trusted.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled It would be a good idea to give your comments as an answer, so I can accept it as the best answer.
    – Sasan
    2 days ago
















-1















Non-reductionists regard testimony a knowledge source on par with
perception and memory; reductionists regard it a secondary source
derivative of perception and memory. Both agree that when a hearer
possesses defeaters, she does not have a presumptive epistemic
right to trust the speaker. They disagree whether a hearer has such a
right, derivable perhaps from higher epistemic principles, to believe
a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust
him. Non-reductionists say she does, like the presumptive right
she allegedly has to trust her senses; reductionists say she does not. (Source)




The closest sense for "presumptive" in the above context seems to me to be this:




Cambridge Dictionary



believed to be something, or likely to be
true, based on the information that you have. Exp: presumptive signs
of pregnancy




But, then, since it is an adjective for "right" in my text, it sounds like related to law. That is what confuses me. What is for a right to be presumptive?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    It doesn’t sound like it’s related to law. The text doesn’t seem to be talking about legal rights. But the whole paragraph is gibberish to me, so I can’t really comment on what exactly presumptive is supposed to mean. Normally it means ‘which is/can be presumed’, which makes as much sense here as anything else I can come up with.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 days ago






  • 1




    The author defines the term in the next sentence: the right to believe a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust him. A right, in the legal sense, to presume an attitude of trust toward the speaker. Then the author mentions a similar concept: the right to trust one's own senses.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled So, presumptive right = right to trust when there is no reason to the contrary?
    – Sasan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I would say 'presumptive right' means the right to presume some position. Under a given philosophy or set of logical rules, is allowed to presume something, like whether one's senses should be trusted or whether the testimony of another person should be trusted.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled It would be a good idea to give your comments as an answer, so I can accept it as the best answer.
    – Sasan
    2 days ago














-1












-1








-1








Non-reductionists regard testimony a knowledge source on par with
perception and memory; reductionists regard it a secondary source
derivative of perception and memory. Both agree that when a hearer
possesses defeaters, she does not have a presumptive epistemic
right to trust the speaker. They disagree whether a hearer has such a
right, derivable perhaps from higher epistemic principles, to believe
a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust
him. Non-reductionists say she does, like the presumptive right
she allegedly has to trust her senses; reductionists say she does not. (Source)




The closest sense for "presumptive" in the above context seems to me to be this:




Cambridge Dictionary



believed to be something, or likely to be
true, based on the information that you have. Exp: presumptive signs
of pregnancy




But, then, since it is an adjective for "right" in my text, it sounds like related to law. That is what confuses me. What is for a right to be presumptive?










share|improve this question














Non-reductionists regard testimony a knowledge source on par with
perception and memory; reductionists regard it a secondary source
derivative of perception and memory. Both agree that when a hearer
possesses defeaters, she does not have a presumptive epistemic
right to trust the speaker. They disagree whether a hearer has such a
right, derivable perhaps from higher epistemic principles, to believe
a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust
him. Non-reductionists say she does, like the presumptive right
she allegedly has to trust her senses; reductionists say she does not. (Source)




The closest sense for "presumptive" in the above context seems to me to be this:




Cambridge Dictionary



believed to be something, or likely to be
true, based on the information that you have. Exp: presumptive signs
of pregnancy




But, then, since it is an adjective for "right" in my text, it sounds like related to law. That is what confuses me. What is for a right to be presumptive?







meaning meaning-in-context






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









Sasan

571934




571934








  • 1




    It doesn’t sound like it’s related to law. The text doesn’t seem to be talking about legal rights. But the whole paragraph is gibberish to me, so I can’t really comment on what exactly presumptive is supposed to mean. Normally it means ‘which is/can be presumed’, which makes as much sense here as anything else I can come up with.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 days ago






  • 1




    The author defines the term in the next sentence: the right to believe a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust him. A right, in the legal sense, to presume an attitude of trust toward the speaker. Then the author mentions a similar concept: the right to trust one's own senses.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled So, presumptive right = right to trust when there is no reason to the contrary?
    – Sasan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I would say 'presumptive right' means the right to presume some position. Under a given philosophy or set of logical rules, is allowed to presume something, like whether one's senses should be trusted or whether the testimony of another person should be trusted.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled It would be a good idea to give your comments as an answer, so I can accept it as the best answer.
    – Sasan
    2 days ago














  • 1




    It doesn’t sound like it’s related to law. The text doesn’t seem to be talking about legal rights. But the whole paragraph is gibberish to me, so I can’t really comment on what exactly presumptive is supposed to mean. Normally it means ‘which is/can be presumed’, which makes as much sense here as anything else I can come up with.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 days ago






  • 1




    The author defines the term in the next sentence: the right to believe a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust him. A right, in the legal sense, to presume an attitude of trust toward the speaker. Then the author mentions a similar concept: the right to trust one's own senses.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled So, presumptive right = right to trust when there is no reason to the contrary?
    – Sasan
    2 days ago






  • 1




    I would say 'presumptive right' means the right to presume some position. Under a given philosophy or set of logical rules, is allowed to presume something, like whether one's senses should be trusted or whether the testimony of another person should be trusted.
    – already puzzled
    2 days ago










  • @alreadypuzzled It would be a good idea to give your comments as an answer, so I can accept it as the best answer.
    – Sasan
    2 days ago








1




1




It doesn’t sound like it’s related to law. The text doesn’t seem to be talking about legal rights. But the whole paragraph is gibberish to me, so I can’t really comment on what exactly presumptive is supposed to mean. Normally it means ‘which is/can be presumed’, which makes as much sense here as anything else I can come up with.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 days ago




It doesn’t sound like it’s related to law. The text doesn’t seem to be talking about legal rights. But the whole paragraph is gibberish to me, so I can’t really comment on what exactly presumptive is supposed to mean. Normally it means ‘which is/can be presumed’, which makes as much sense here as anything else I can come up with.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 days ago




1




1




The author defines the term in the next sentence: the right to believe a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust him. A right, in the legal sense, to presume an attitude of trust toward the speaker. Then the author mentions a similar concept: the right to trust one's own senses.
– already puzzled
2 days ago




The author defines the term in the next sentence: the right to believe a speaker when the hearer has no positive or negative reasons to trust him. A right, in the legal sense, to presume an attitude of trust toward the speaker. Then the author mentions a similar concept: the right to trust one's own senses.
– already puzzled
2 days ago












@alreadypuzzled So, presumptive right = right to trust when there is no reason to the contrary?
– Sasan
2 days ago




@alreadypuzzled So, presumptive right = right to trust when there is no reason to the contrary?
– Sasan
2 days ago




1




1




I would say 'presumptive right' means the right to presume some position. Under a given philosophy or set of logical rules, is allowed to presume something, like whether one's senses should be trusted or whether the testimony of another person should be trusted.
– already puzzled
2 days ago




I would say 'presumptive right' means the right to presume some position. Under a given philosophy or set of logical rules, is allowed to presume something, like whether one's senses should be trusted or whether the testimony of another person should be trusted.
– already puzzled
2 days ago












@alreadypuzzled It would be a good idea to give your comments as an answer, so I can accept it as the best answer.
– Sasan
2 days ago




@alreadypuzzled It would be a good idea to give your comments as an answer, so I can accept it as the best answer.
– Sasan
2 days ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478843%2fthe-meaning-of-presumptive-in-the-mentioned-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478843%2fthe-meaning-of-presumptive-in-the-mentioned-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]