What does “retention of fence” in bulding applications vernacular mean [on hold]












0















I am reading (British) planning permissions and often sees titles such as these: "Retention of fence to rear" or "Retention of fence and works to front garden including raised decking". These are full titles of planning applications, therefore the meaning of just "keeping the fence" doesn't apply. I researched the full sentence and found it mostly in planning applications, which points to a vernacular. Couldn't find any reference about it. Here is an example.










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    2 days ago
















0















I am reading (British) planning permissions and often sees titles such as these: "Retention of fence to rear" or "Retention of fence and works to front garden including raised decking". These are full titles of planning applications, therefore the meaning of just "keeping the fence" doesn't apply. I researched the full sentence and found it mostly in planning applications, which points to a vernacular. Couldn't find any reference about it. Here is an example.










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    2 days ago














0












0








0








I am reading (British) planning permissions and often sees titles such as these: "Retention of fence to rear" or "Retention of fence and works to front garden including raised decking". These are full titles of planning applications, therefore the meaning of just "keeping the fence" doesn't apply. I researched the full sentence and found it mostly in planning applications, which points to a vernacular. Couldn't find any reference about it. Here is an example.










share|improve this question
















I am reading (British) planning permissions and often sees titles such as these: "Retention of fence to rear" or "Retention of fence and works to front garden including raised decking". These are full titles of planning applications, therefore the meaning of just "keeping the fence" doesn't apply. I researched the full sentence and found it mostly in planning applications, which points to a vernacular. Couldn't find any reference about it. Here is an example.







terminology architecture






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Vladtn

















asked 2 days ago









VladtnVladtn

1,3321215




1,3321215




put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, Jim, Andrew Leach

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    2 days ago



















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    2 days ago

















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– tchrist
2 days ago





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– tchrist
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]