Is there a term for words which are insults but not vulgar?












8















Sometimes, when I explain a new word to a friend who doesn't speak English well, I know that the word has to be used carefully, because it is not appropriate in all contexts, or can be offensive if used in the wrong way (or used at all). And I try to convey to the friend a feeling of what is dangerous about a word, so they will not use it inappropriately. Interestingly, languages (and cultures) have different reasons why a word can be dangerous, but today I am thinking of words which are insulting. For insults, I know broadly three sub-categories:





  1. Words which are OK in their primary meaning, but insulting when applied to a human.




    That cow from Accounting lost my receipt.





  2. Words which are specifically meant as an insult, but are not dirty. A conservative grandmother won't let her grandchild apply the word to another person, but won't be appalled at the child knowing the word.




    That nitwit from Accounting lost my receipt.





  3. Words which are not just insults, but also vulgar, and considered taboo in some situations.




    That bitch from accounting lost my receipt.





What I am looking for is for a term for the second category above. And it should not be just an umbrella term which also includes one or both of the two other categories, but one which makes it clear which one is meant. Just like




"Bitch" is a curse word.




makes it clear that "bitch" is not in category 1 or 2, I am asking if there is a term which could be used in the sentence




"Nitwit" is a _____ word.




would not only make it clear that nitwit is an insult, but also that it is not in category 1 or 3.



I am aware that there are many descriptive ways to express that, for example "non-curse insult", but I have a nagging feeling that I have encountered a single-word term that is specific to that exact category, and have forgotten it. After talking to some people, I am starting to doubt if this term exists, but if it does, I hope the community here will find it.



I am not sure that the term is used in a noun phrase with "word", so maybe the example should simply be "Nitwit is a ____".










share|improve this question

























  • I don’t see why you list bitch under 3 instead of 1. In its primary meaning, referring to a female dog/wolf/fox/otter, there is nothing insulting about it. I would say group 3 is by far the smallest; it’s actually hard to think of many examples. I can mainly think of vulgar terms for body parts (“That dick/cunt/arsehole from accounting”).

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    Personally I would call them derogatory words.

    – pbasdf
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I would argue that nowadays that primary meaning of "bitch" has been displaced. For example, Duolingo won't even accept "bitch" as a translation for "chienne" (it accepts both "dog" and "female dog"). I just chose it as an example so as not to litter the site with stronger curse words.

    – rumtscho
    10 hours ago













  • If there is one word for what you want, that'd be great. But there is no reason to use the word "word" when you can capture the insult part of the meaning by using a modifier and the word "insult" itself, or a synonym. Thus, I would say "'Nitwit" is a G-rated put-down."

    – remarkl
    10 hours ago








  • 1





    The word 'epithet' springs to mind.

    – Nigel J
    8 hours ago
















8















Sometimes, when I explain a new word to a friend who doesn't speak English well, I know that the word has to be used carefully, because it is not appropriate in all contexts, or can be offensive if used in the wrong way (or used at all). And I try to convey to the friend a feeling of what is dangerous about a word, so they will not use it inappropriately. Interestingly, languages (and cultures) have different reasons why a word can be dangerous, but today I am thinking of words which are insulting. For insults, I know broadly three sub-categories:





  1. Words which are OK in their primary meaning, but insulting when applied to a human.




    That cow from Accounting lost my receipt.





  2. Words which are specifically meant as an insult, but are not dirty. A conservative grandmother won't let her grandchild apply the word to another person, but won't be appalled at the child knowing the word.




    That nitwit from Accounting lost my receipt.





  3. Words which are not just insults, but also vulgar, and considered taboo in some situations.




    That bitch from accounting lost my receipt.





What I am looking for is for a term for the second category above. And it should not be just an umbrella term which also includes one or both of the two other categories, but one which makes it clear which one is meant. Just like




"Bitch" is a curse word.




makes it clear that "bitch" is not in category 1 or 2, I am asking if there is a term which could be used in the sentence




"Nitwit" is a _____ word.




would not only make it clear that nitwit is an insult, but also that it is not in category 1 or 3.



I am aware that there are many descriptive ways to express that, for example "non-curse insult", but I have a nagging feeling that I have encountered a single-word term that is specific to that exact category, and have forgotten it. After talking to some people, I am starting to doubt if this term exists, but if it does, I hope the community here will find it.



I am not sure that the term is used in a noun phrase with "word", so maybe the example should simply be "Nitwit is a ____".










share|improve this question

























  • I don’t see why you list bitch under 3 instead of 1. In its primary meaning, referring to a female dog/wolf/fox/otter, there is nothing insulting about it. I would say group 3 is by far the smallest; it’s actually hard to think of many examples. I can mainly think of vulgar terms for body parts (“That dick/cunt/arsehole from accounting”).

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    Personally I would call them derogatory words.

    – pbasdf
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I would argue that nowadays that primary meaning of "bitch" has been displaced. For example, Duolingo won't even accept "bitch" as a translation for "chienne" (it accepts both "dog" and "female dog"). I just chose it as an example so as not to litter the site with stronger curse words.

    – rumtscho
    10 hours ago













  • If there is one word for what you want, that'd be great. But there is no reason to use the word "word" when you can capture the insult part of the meaning by using a modifier and the word "insult" itself, or a synonym. Thus, I would say "'Nitwit" is a G-rated put-down."

    – remarkl
    10 hours ago








  • 1





    The word 'epithet' springs to mind.

    – Nigel J
    8 hours ago














8












8








8








Sometimes, when I explain a new word to a friend who doesn't speak English well, I know that the word has to be used carefully, because it is not appropriate in all contexts, or can be offensive if used in the wrong way (or used at all). And I try to convey to the friend a feeling of what is dangerous about a word, so they will not use it inappropriately. Interestingly, languages (and cultures) have different reasons why a word can be dangerous, but today I am thinking of words which are insulting. For insults, I know broadly three sub-categories:





  1. Words which are OK in their primary meaning, but insulting when applied to a human.




    That cow from Accounting lost my receipt.





  2. Words which are specifically meant as an insult, but are not dirty. A conservative grandmother won't let her grandchild apply the word to another person, but won't be appalled at the child knowing the word.




    That nitwit from Accounting lost my receipt.





  3. Words which are not just insults, but also vulgar, and considered taboo in some situations.




    That bitch from accounting lost my receipt.





What I am looking for is for a term for the second category above. And it should not be just an umbrella term which also includes one or both of the two other categories, but one which makes it clear which one is meant. Just like




"Bitch" is a curse word.




makes it clear that "bitch" is not in category 1 or 2, I am asking if there is a term which could be used in the sentence




"Nitwit" is a _____ word.




would not only make it clear that nitwit is an insult, but also that it is not in category 1 or 3.



I am aware that there are many descriptive ways to express that, for example "non-curse insult", but I have a nagging feeling that I have encountered a single-word term that is specific to that exact category, and have forgotten it. After talking to some people, I am starting to doubt if this term exists, but if it does, I hope the community here will find it.



I am not sure that the term is used in a noun phrase with "word", so maybe the example should simply be "Nitwit is a ____".










share|improve this question
















Sometimes, when I explain a new word to a friend who doesn't speak English well, I know that the word has to be used carefully, because it is not appropriate in all contexts, or can be offensive if used in the wrong way (or used at all). And I try to convey to the friend a feeling of what is dangerous about a word, so they will not use it inappropriately. Interestingly, languages (and cultures) have different reasons why a word can be dangerous, but today I am thinking of words which are insulting. For insults, I know broadly three sub-categories:





  1. Words which are OK in their primary meaning, but insulting when applied to a human.




    That cow from Accounting lost my receipt.





  2. Words which are specifically meant as an insult, but are not dirty. A conservative grandmother won't let her grandchild apply the word to another person, but won't be appalled at the child knowing the word.




    That nitwit from Accounting lost my receipt.





  3. Words which are not just insults, but also vulgar, and considered taboo in some situations.




    That bitch from accounting lost my receipt.





What I am looking for is for a term for the second category above. And it should not be just an umbrella term which also includes one or both of the two other categories, but one which makes it clear which one is meant. Just like




"Bitch" is a curse word.




makes it clear that "bitch" is not in category 1 or 2, I am asking if there is a term which could be used in the sentence




"Nitwit" is a _____ word.




would not only make it clear that nitwit is an insult, but also that it is not in category 1 or 3.



I am aware that there are many descriptive ways to express that, for example "non-curse insult", but I have a nagging feeling that I have encountered a single-word term that is specific to that exact category, and have forgotten it. After talking to some people, I am starting to doubt if this term exists, but if it does, I hope the community here will find it.



I am not sure that the term is used in a noun phrase with "word", so maybe the example should simply be "Nitwit is a ____".







single-word-requests pejorative-language offensive-language






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Mitch

52.1k15105217




52.1k15105217










asked 10 hours ago









rumtschorumtscho

1,13521129




1,13521129













  • I don’t see why you list bitch under 3 instead of 1. In its primary meaning, referring to a female dog/wolf/fox/otter, there is nothing insulting about it. I would say group 3 is by far the smallest; it’s actually hard to think of many examples. I can mainly think of vulgar terms for body parts (“That dick/cunt/arsehole from accounting”).

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    Personally I would call them derogatory words.

    – pbasdf
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I would argue that nowadays that primary meaning of "bitch" has been displaced. For example, Duolingo won't even accept "bitch" as a translation for "chienne" (it accepts both "dog" and "female dog"). I just chose it as an example so as not to litter the site with stronger curse words.

    – rumtscho
    10 hours ago













  • If there is one word for what you want, that'd be great. But there is no reason to use the word "word" when you can capture the insult part of the meaning by using a modifier and the word "insult" itself, or a synonym. Thus, I would say "'Nitwit" is a G-rated put-down."

    – remarkl
    10 hours ago








  • 1





    The word 'epithet' springs to mind.

    – Nigel J
    8 hours ago



















  • I don’t see why you list bitch under 3 instead of 1. In its primary meaning, referring to a female dog/wolf/fox/otter, there is nothing insulting about it. I would say group 3 is by far the smallest; it’s actually hard to think of many examples. I can mainly think of vulgar terms for body parts (“That dick/cunt/arsehole from accounting”).

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    Personally I would call them derogatory words.

    – pbasdf
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    I would argue that nowadays that primary meaning of "bitch" has been displaced. For example, Duolingo won't even accept "bitch" as a translation for "chienne" (it accepts both "dog" and "female dog"). I just chose it as an example so as not to litter the site with stronger curse words.

    – rumtscho
    10 hours ago













  • If there is one word for what you want, that'd be great. But there is no reason to use the word "word" when you can capture the insult part of the meaning by using a modifier and the word "insult" itself, or a synonym. Thus, I would say "'Nitwit" is a G-rated put-down."

    – remarkl
    10 hours ago








  • 1





    The word 'epithet' springs to mind.

    – Nigel J
    8 hours ago

















I don’t see why you list bitch under 3 instead of 1. In its primary meaning, referring to a female dog/wolf/fox/otter, there is nothing insulting about it. I would say group 3 is by far the smallest; it’s actually hard to think of many examples. I can mainly think of vulgar terms for body parts (“That dick/cunt/arsehole from accounting”).

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
10 hours ago





I don’t see why you list bitch under 3 instead of 1. In its primary meaning, referring to a female dog/wolf/fox/otter, there is nothing insulting about it. I would say group 3 is by far the smallest; it’s actually hard to think of many examples. I can mainly think of vulgar terms for body parts (“That dick/cunt/arsehole from accounting”).

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
10 hours ago




1




1





Personally I would call them derogatory words.

– pbasdf
10 hours ago





Personally I would call them derogatory words.

– pbasdf
10 hours ago




1




1





I would argue that nowadays that primary meaning of "bitch" has been displaced. For example, Duolingo won't even accept "bitch" as a translation for "chienne" (it accepts both "dog" and "female dog"). I just chose it as an example so as not to litter the site with stronger curse words.

– rumtscho
10 hours ago







I would argue that nowadays that primary meaning of "bitch" has been displaced. For example, Duolingo won't even accept "bitch" as a translation for "chienne" (it accepts both "dog" and "female dog"). I just chose it as an example so as not to litter the site with stronger curse words.

– rumtscho
10 hours ago















If there is one word for what you want, that'd be great. But there is no reason to use the word "word" when you can capture the insult part of the meaning by using a modifier and the word "insult" itself, or a synonym. Thus, I would say "'Nitwit" is a G-rated put-down."

– remarkl
10 hours ago







If there is one word for what you want, that'd be great. But there is no reason to use the word "word" when you can capture the insult part of the meaning by using a modifier and the word "insult" itself, or a synonym. Thus, I would say "'Nitwit" is a G-rated put-down."

– remarkl
10 hours ago






1




1





The word 'epithet' springs to mind.

– Nigel J
8 hours ago





The word 'epithet' springs to mind.

– Nigel J
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














Would you consider "belittling" or "disparaging" sufficiently exclusive of the vulgar category? I suggest these.



https://www.thefreedictionary.com/belittle



https://www.thefreedictionary.com/disparage






share|improve this answer































    0














    I think “pejorative” works for your use case. For instance, nitwit is a pejorative (word). Ending with “word” is optional in the vernacular.



    From Merriam-Webster:



    pejorative



    : a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle.






    share|improve this answer































      0














      Consider the following:




      You have a small brain.




      None of the words used in that sentence are vulgar, pejorative, offensive, or derogatory in any way at all. Every one of them is value-neutral.




      [Wikipedia]



      Value-neutral is a related adjective suggesting independence from a value system. The object itself is considered value-neutral when it is neither good nor bad, neither useful nor useless, neither significant nor trite, until placed in some social context.




      Yet, despite that, the overall meaning of the sentence as a whole has it act as an insult because of the context in which each word exists.





      As to nitwit. Most people would probably agree that the word itself is not vulgar. (I can't imagine it being normally used as a curse word.)



      According to Merriam-Webster, it means:




      : a scatterbrained or stupid person




      Scatterbrained seems only mildly offensive to me—or, possibly, even a value-neutral term that is meant as a literal description of somebody's state of mind and behaviour. Scatterbrained doesn't have to be taken as an insult, but it certainly could be. And calling somebody stupid is less open to a charitable interpretation.



      At the very least, I would think that the word nitwit would be suggestive of an insult.



      However, I can imagine a spouse laughing, kissing their partner, and affectionately saying, "Oh, you're such a nitwit!" In that particular context, some people might find it to be an endearment rather than an insult.



      But like value-neutral words that end up being used as insults, I think that context has to matter. And context is also something that is open to interpretation.



      At best, I think all you can really say about nitwit is that it's not vulgar.





      But if, as you say, it's meant as an insult, then I'd say it's being used as a derogatory word.




      [Merriam-Webster]



      1 : expressive of a low opinion : DISPARAGING

      // derogatory remarks

      // a derogatory term
      2 : detracting from the character or standing of something

      —often used with to, towards, or of

      . . . abstained from saying a word derogatory to his new friend's religion . . .

      — Anthony Trollope




      There is nothing wrong with using belittling to describe the word nitwit when it's used in a negative fashion, but if it's meant as an explicit insult, rather than an offhand remark or put down, I think that derogatory has a more forceful quality to it.



      To me, an insult has more conviction, and intent to harm, behind it than just a negative comment:




      [Merriam-Webster]



      : to treat with insolence, indignity, or contempt : AFFRONT
      also : to affect offensively or damagingly







      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "97"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487485%2fis-there-a-term-for-words-which-are-insults-but-not-vulgar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        0














        Would you consider "belittling" or "disparaging" sufficiently exclusive of the vulgar category? I suggest these.



        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/belittle



        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/disparage






        share|improve this answer




























          0














          Would you consider "belittling" or "disparaging" sufficiently exclusive of the vulgar category? I suggest these.



          https://www.thefreedictionary.com/belittle



          https://www.thefreedictionary.com/disparage






          share|improve this answer


























            0












            0








            0







            Would you consider "belittling" or "disparaging" sufficiently exclusive of the vulgar category? I suggest these.



            https://www.thefreedictionary.com/belittle



            https://www.thefreedictionary.com/disparage






            share|improve this answer













            Would you consider "belittling" or "disparaging" sufficiently exclusive of the vulgar category? I suggest these.



            https://www.thefreedictionary.com/belittle



            https://www.thefreedictionary.com/disparage







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            user22542user22542

            2,51539




            2,51539

























                0














                I think “pejorative” works for your use case. For instance, nitwit is a pejorative (word). Ending with “word” is optional in the vernacular.



                From Merriam-Webster:



                pejorative



                : a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle.






                share|improve this answer




























                  0














                  I think “pejorative” works for your use case. For instance, nitwit is a pejorative (word). Ending with “word” is optional in the vernacular.



                  From Merriam-Webster:



                  pejorative



                  : a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle.






                  share|improve this answer


























                    0












                    0








                    0







                    I think “pejorative” works for your use case. For instance, nitwit is a pejorative (word). Ending with “word” is optional in the vernacular.



                    From Merriam-Webster:



                    pejorative



                    : a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle.






                    share|improve this answer













                    I think “pejorative” works for your use case. For instance, nitwit is a pejorative (word). Ending with “word” is optional in the vernacular.



                    From Merriam-Webster:



                    pejorative



                    : a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 4 hours ago









                    GlitchCGlitchC

                    1793




                    1793























                        0














                        Consider the following:




                        You have a small brain.




                        None of the words used in that sentence are vulgar, pejorative, offensive, or derogatory in any way at all. Every one of them is value-neutral.




                        [Wikipedia]



                        Value-neutral is a related adjective suggesting independence from a value system. The object itself is considered value-neutral when it is neither good nor bad, neither useful nor useless, neither significant nor trite, until placed in some social context.




                        Yet, despite that, the overall meaning of the sentence as a whole has it act as an insult because of the context in which each word exists.





                        As to nitwit. Most people would probably agree that the word itself is not vulgar. (I can't imagine it being normally used as a curse word.)



                        According to Merriam-Webster, it means:




                        : a scatterbrained or stupid person




                        Scatterbrained seems only mildly offensive to me—or, possibly, even a value-neutral term that is meant as a literal description of somebody's state of mind and behaviour. Scatterbrained doesn't have to be taken as an insult, but it certainly could be. And calling somebody stupid is less open to a charitable interpretation.



                        At the very least, I would think that the word nitwit would be suggestive of an insult.



                        However, I can imagine a spouse laughing, kissing their partner, and affectionately saying, "Oh, you're such a nitwit!" In that particular context, some people might find it to be an endearment rather than an insult.



                        But like value-neutral words that end up being used as insults, I think that context has to matter. And context is also something that is open to interpretation.



                        At best, I think all you can really say about nitwit is that it's not vulgar.





                        But if, as you say, it's meant as an insult, then I'd say it's being used as a derogatory word.




                        [Merriam-Webster]



                        1 : expressive of a low opinion : DISPARAGING

                        // derogatory remarks

                        // a derogatory term
                        2 : detracting from the character or standing of something

                        —often used with to, towards, or of

                        . . . abstained from saying a word derogatory to his new friend's religion . . .

                        — Anthony Trollope




                        There is nothing wrong with using belittling to describe the word nitwit when it's used in a negative fashion, but if it's meant as an explicit insult, rather than an offhand remark or put down, I think that derogatory has a more forceful quality to it.



                        To me, an insult has more conviction, and intent to harm, behind it than just a negative comment:




                        [Merriam-Webster]



                        : to treat with insolence, indignity, or contempt : AFFRONT
                        also : to affect offensively or damagingly







                        share|improve this answer




























                          0














                          Consider the following:




                          You have a small brain.




                          None of the words used in that sentence are vulgar, pejorative, offensive, or derogatory in any way at all. Every one of them is value-neutral.




                          [Wikipedia]



                          Value-neutral is a related adjective suggesting independence from a value system. The object itself is considered value-neutral when it is neither good nor bad, neither useful nor useless, neither significant nor trite, until placed in some social context.




                          Yet, despite that, the overall meaning of the sentence as a whole has it act as an insult because of the context in which each word exists.





                          As to nitwit. Most people would probably agree that the word itself is not vulgar. (I can't imagine it being normally used as a curse word.)



                          According to Merriam-Webster, it means:




                          : a scatterbrained or stupid person




                          Scatterbrained seems only mildly offensive to me—or, possibly, even a value-neutral term that is meant as a literal description of somebody's state of mind and behaviour. Scatterbrained doesn't have to be taken as an insult, but it certainly could be. And calling somebody stupid is less open to a charitable interpretation.



                          At the very least, I would think that the word nitwit would be suggestive of an insult.



                          However, I can imagine a spouse laughing, kissing their partner, and affectionately saying, "Oh, you're such a nitwit!" In that particular context, some people might find it to be an endearment rather than an insult.



                          But like value-neutral words that end up being used as insults, I think that context has to matter. And context is also something that is open to interpretation.



                          At best, I think all you can really say about nitwit is that it's not vulgar.





                          But if, as you say, it's meant as an insult, then I'd say it's being used as a derogatory word.




                          [Merriam-Webster]



                          1 : expressive of a low opinion : DISPARAGING

                          // derogatory remarks

                          // a derogatory term
                          2 : detracting from the character or standing of something

                          —often used with to, towards, or of

                          . . . abstained from saying a word derogatory to his new friend's religion . . .

                          — Anthony Trollope




                          There is nothing wrong with using belittling to describe the word nitwit when it's used in a negative fashion, but if it's meant as an explicit insult, rather than an offhand remark or put down, I think that derogatory has a more forceful quality to it.



                          To me, an insult has more conviction, and intent to harm, behind it than just a negative comment:




                          [Merriam-Webster]



                          : to treat with insolence, indignity, or contempt : AFFRONT
                          also : to affect offensively or damagingly







                          share|improve this answer


























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Consider the following:




                            You have a small brain.




                            None of the words used in that sentence are vulgar, pejorative, offensive, or derogatory in any way at all. Every one of them is value-neutral.




                            [Wikipedia]



                            Value-neutral is a related adjective suggesting independence from a value system. The object itself is considered value-neutral when it is neither good nor bad, neither useful nor useless, neither significant nor trite, until placed in some social context.




                            Yet, despite that, the overall meaning of the sentence as a whole has it act as an insult because of the context in which each word exists.





                            As to nitwit. Most people would probably agree that the word itself is not vulgar. (I can't imagine it being normally used as a curse word.)



                            According to Merriam-Webster, it means:




                            : a scatterbrained or stupid person




                            Scatterbrained seems only mildly offensive to me—or, possibly, even a value-neutral term that is meant as a literal description of somebody's state of mind and behaviour. Scatterbrained doesn't have to be taken as an insult, but it certainly could be. And calling somebody stupid is less open to a charitable interpretation.



                            At the very least, I would think that the word nitwit would be suggestive of an insult.



                            However, I can imagine a spouse laughing, kissing their partner, and affectionately saying, "Oh, you're such a nitwit!" In that particular context, some people might find it to be an endearment rather than an insult.



                            But like value-neutral words that end up being used as insults, I think that context has to matter. And context is also something that is open to interpretation.



                            At best, I think all you can really say about nitwit is that it's not vulgar.





                            But if, as you say, it's meant as an insult, then I'd say it's being used as a derogatory word.




                            [Merriam-Webster]



                            1 : expressive of a low opinion : DISPARAGING

                            // derogatory remarks

                            // a derogatory term
                            2 : detracting from the character or standing of something

                            —often used with to, towards, or of

                            . . . abstained from saying a word derogatory to his new friend's religion . . .

                            — Anthony Trollope




                            There is nothing wrong with using belittling to describe the word nitwit when it's used in a negative fashion, but if it's meant as an explicit insult, rather than an offhand remark or put down, I think that derogatory has a more forceful quality to it.



                            To me, an insult has more conviction, and intent to harm, behind it than just a negative comment:




                            [Merriam-Webster]



                            : to treat with insolence, indignity, or contempt : AFFRONT
                            also : to affect offensively or damagingly







                            share|improve this answer













                            Consider the following:




                            You have a small brain.




                            None of the words used in that sentence are vulgar, pejorative, offensive, or derogatory in any way at all. Every one of them is value-neutral.




                            [Wikipedia]



                            Value-neutral is a related adjective suggesting independence from a value system. The object itself is considered value-neutral when it is neither good nor bad, neither useful nor useless, neither significant nor trite, until placed in some social context.




                            Yet, despite that, the overall meaning of the sentence as a whole has it act as an insult because of the context in which each word exists.





                            As to nitwit. Most people would probably agree that the word itself is not vulgar. (I can't imagine it being normally used as a curse word.)



                            According to Merriam-Webster, it means:




                            : a scatterbrained or stupid person




                            Scatterbrained seems only mildly offensive to me—or, possibly, even a value-neutral term that is meant as a literal description of somebody's state of mind and behaviour. Scatterbrained doesn't have to be taken as an insult, but it certainly could be. And calling somebody stupid is less open to a charitable interpretation.



                            At the very least, I would think that the word nitwit would be suggestive of an insult.



                            However, I can imagine a spouse laughing, kissing their partner, and affectionately saying, "Oh, you're such a nitwit!" In that particular context, some people might find it to be an endearment rather than an insult.



                            But like value-neutral words that end up being used as insults, I think that context has to matter. And context is also something that is open to interpretation.



                            At best, I think all you can really say about nitwit is that it's not vulgar.





                            But if, as you say, it's meant as an insult, then I'd say it's being used as a derogatory word.




                            [Merriam-Webster]



                            1 : expressive of a low opinion : DISPARAGING

                            // derogatory remarks

                            // a derogatory term
                            2 : detracting from the character or standing of something

                            —often used with to, towards, or of

                            . . . abstained from saying a word derogatory to his new friend's religion . . .

                            — Anthony Trollope




                            There is nothing wrong with using belittling to describe the word nitwit when it's used in a negative fashion, but if it's meant as an explicit insult, rather than an offhand remark or put down, I think that derogatory has a more forceful quality to it.



                            To me, an insult has more conviction, and intent to harm, behind it than just a negative comment:




                            [Merriam-Webster]



                            : to treat with insolence, indignity, or contempt : AFFRONT
                            also : to affect offensively or damagingly








                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            Jason BassfordJason Bassford

                            17.8k32143




                            17.8k32143






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487485%2fis-there-a-term-for-words-which-are-insults-but-not-vulgar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Alcedinidae

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]