Rectangles in a chess board












7












$begingroup$


How many rectangles can be made from the individual spaces of a chess board?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it's a duplicate of that, because it's asking about rectangles and not just squares. I'll be quite surprised if the rectangle question isn't already on PSE, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I think I'm surprised: I don't see any sign that this question has been asked here before. It's a bit of a maths-homework question, but I guess just about enough not so that I'm not about to close it.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan, the question was originally about squares, but changed after I flagged it (see the edit). But yes, rectangles are different so I'll retract my flag
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, OK. Hadn't noticed that the question had changed.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dicul, in the future, if you change your puzzle after it's been flagged, let the flagger know. I would have retracted the flag earlier
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$


How many rectangles can be made from the individual spaces of a chess board?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it's a duplicate of that, because it's asking about rectangles and not just squares. I'll be quite surprised if the rectangle question isn't already on PSE, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I think I'm surprised: I don't see any sign that this question has been asked here before. It's a bit of a maths-homework question, but I guess just about enough not so that I'm not about to close it.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan, the question was originally about squares, but changed after I flagged it (see the edit). But yes, rectangles are different so I'll retract my flag
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, OK. Hadn't noticed that the question had changed.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dicul, in the future, if you change your puzzle after it's been flagged, let the flagger know. I would have retracted the flag earlier
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago














7












7








7


4



$begingroup$


How many rectangles can be made from the individual spaces of a chess board?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




How many rectangles can be made from the individual spaces of a chess board?



enter image description here







mathematics combinatorics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago









Glorfindel

13.8k35084




13.8k35084










asked 14 hours ago









Dicul SmerdDicul Smerd

4119




4119












  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it's a duplicate of that, because it's asking about rectangles and not just squares. I'll be quite surprised if the rectangle question isn't already on PSE, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I think I'm surprised: I don't see any sign that this question has been asked here before. It's a bit of a maths-homework question, but I guess just about enough not so that I'm not about to close it.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan, the question was originally about squares, but changed after I flagged it (see the edit). But yes, rectangles are different so I'll retract my flag
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, OK. Hadn't noticed that the question had changed.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dicul, in the future, if you change your puzzle after it's been flagged, let the flagger know. I would have retracted the flag earlier
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it's a duplicate of that, because it's asking about rectangles and not just squares. I'll be quite surprised if the rectangle question isn't already on PSE, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I think I'm surprised: I don't see any sign that this question has been asked here before. It's a bit of a maths-homework question, but I guess just about enough not so that I'm not about to close it.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan, the question was originally about squares, but changed after I flagged it (see the edit). But yes, rectangles are different so I'll retract my flag
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, OK. Hadn't noticed that the question had changed.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dicul, in the future, if you change your puzzle after it's been flagged, let the flagger know. I would have retracted the flag earlier
    $endgroup$
    – Greg
    13 hours ago
















$begingroup$
I don't think it's a duplicate of that, because it's asking about rectangles and not just squares. I'll be quite surprised if the rectangle question isn't already on PSE, though.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don't think it's a duplicate of that, because it's asking about rectangles and not just squares. I'll be quite surprised if the rectangle question isn't already on PSE, though.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
OK, I think I'm surprised: I don't see any sign that this question has been asked here before. It's a bit of a maths-homework question, but I guess just about enough not so that I'm not about to close it.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
OK, I think I'm surprised: I don't see any sign that this question has been asked here before. It's a bit of a maths-homework question, but I guess just about enough not so that I'm not about to close it.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
13 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan, the question was originally about squares, but changed after I flagged it (see the edit). But yes, rectangles are different so I'll retract my flag
$endgroup$
– Greg
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan, the question was originally about squares, but changed after I flagged it (see the edit). But yes, rectangles are different so I'll retract my flag
$endgroup$
– Greg
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
Ah, OK. Hadn't noticed that the question had changed.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Ah, OK. Hadn't noticed that the question had changed.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
Dicul, in the future, if you change your puzzle after it's been flagged, let the flagger know. I would have retracted the flag earlier
$endgroup$
– Greg
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Dicul, in the future, if you change your puzzle after it's been flagged, let the flagger know. I would have retracted the flag earlier
$endgroup$
– Greg
13 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

To specify a rectangle




it suffices to say where its left and right boundaries are, and where its top and bottom boundaries are. There are $binom92$ choices for each pair of boundaries and therefore $binom92^2$ rectangles. That is to say, 1296 rectangles.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brilliand
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    6 hours ago



















9












$begingroup$

Of course @Gareth_McCaughan got this well-known puzzle immediately. But for people who aren't up on their combinatorics, here's the same calculation in a way that seems easier (at least to me).




  1. There are 9x9 = 81 corners.

  2. For each of these there are 8x8 = 64 corners that are not in the same row or column.

  3. Each pair of these makes a rectangle.

  4. But then each rectangle has been counted four times (you can have top-left and bottom-right or top-right and bottom-left and both of those can be done two ways)

  5. So the final answer is 81 x 64/4 = 1296






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are physicist right?
    $endgroup$
    – Dicul Smerd
    13 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79653%2frectangles-in-a-chess-board%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13












$begingroup$

To specify a rectangle




it suffices to say where its left and right boundaries are, and where its top and bottom boundaries are. There are $binom92$ choices for each pair of boundaries and therefore $binom92^2$ rectangles. That is to say, 1296 rectangles.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brilliand
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    6 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$

To specify a rectangle




it suffices to say where its left and right boundaries are, and where its top and bottom boundaries are. There are $binom92$ choices for each pair of boundaries and therefore $binom92^2$ rectangles. That is to say, 1296 rectangles.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brilliand
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    6 hours ago














13












13








13





$begingroup$

To specify a rectangle




it suffices to say where its left and right boundaries are, and where its top and bottom boundaries are. There are $binom92$ choices for each pair of boundaries and therefore $binom92^2$ rectangles. That is to say, 1296 rectangles.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



To specify a rectangle




it suffices to say where its left and right boundaries are, and where its top and bottom boundaries are. There are $binom92$ choices for each pair of boundaries and therefore $binom92^2$ rectangles. That is to say, 1296 rectangles.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 13 hours ago









Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

62.2k3160242




62.2k3160242












  • $begingroup$
    It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brilliand
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    6 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brilliand
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    6 hours ago
















$begingroup$
It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
$endgroup$
– Dr Xorile
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is amazing that this hasn't been done already on PSE!
$endgroup$
– Dr Xorile
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are we only counting rectangles whose edges are made from the lines on the board? Because if you were to count all the rectangles possible by connecting corners between the squares, there's a lot more of them...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
@DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
$endgroup$
– Brilliand
7 hours ago






$begingroup$
@DarrelHoffman As per the question these rectangles must be formed from "spaces". Hence I would expect at minimum that no rectangle cuts through one of the spaces used to define it. (The question of how many rectangles can be formed from an arbitrary group of points is perhaps more interesting than this one, though.)
$endgroup$
– Brilliand
7 hours ago














$begingroup$
Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes, the question becomes quite different (and I think much harder -- I suspect there is then no "elegant" solution) if you allow non-aligned rectangles. @Brilliand The question didn't always include the wording about "spaces" and may not have done when Darrel Hoffman wrote his comment.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
6 hours ago











9












$begingroup$

Of course @Gareth_McCaughan got this well-known puzzle immediately. But for people who aren't up on their combinatorics, here's the same calculation in a way that seems easier (at least to me).




  1. There are 9x9 = 81 corners.

  2. For each of these there are 8x8 = 64 corners that are not in the same row or column.

  3. Each pair of these makes a rectangle.

  4. But then each rectangle has been counted four times (you can have top-left and bottom-right or top-right and bottom-left and both of those can be done two ways)

  5. So the final answer is 81 x 64/4 = 1296






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are physicist right?
    $endgroup$
    – Dicul Smerd
    13 hours ago
















9












$begingroup$

Of course @Gareth_McCaughan got this well-known puzzle immediately. But for people who aren't up on their combinatorics, here's the same calculation in a way that seems easier (at least to me).




  1. There are 9x9 = 81 corners.

  2. For each of these there are 8x8 = 64 corners that are not in the same row or column.

  3. Each pair of these makes a rectangle.

  4. But then each rectangle has been counted four times (you can have top-left and bottom-right or top-right and bottom-left and both of those can be done two ways)

  5. So the final answer is 81 x 64/4 = 1296






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are physicist right?
    $endgroup$
    – Dicul Smerd
    13 hours ago














9












9








9





$begingroup$

Of course @Gareth_McCaughan got this well-known puzzle immediately. But for people who aren't up on their combinatorics, here's the same calculation in a way that seems easier (at least to me).




  1. There are 9x9 = 81 corners.

  2. For each of these there are 8x8 = 64 corners that are not in the same row or column.

  3. Each pair of these makes a rectangle.

  4. But then each rectangle has been counted four times (you can have top-left and bottom-right or top-right and bottom-left and both of those can be done two ways)

  5. So the final answer is 81 x 64/4 = 1296






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Of course @Gareth_McCaughan got this well-known puzzle immediately. But for people who aren't up on their combinatorics, here's the same calculation in a way that seems easier (at least to me).




  1. There are 9x9 = 81 corners.

  2. For each of these there are 8x8 = 64 corners that are not in the same row or column.

  3. Each pair of these makes a rectangle.

  4. But then each rectangle has been counted four times (you can have top-left and bottom-right or top-right and bottom-left and both of those can be done two ways)

  5. So the final answer is 81 x 64/4 = 1296







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 13 hours ago









Dr XorileDr Xorile

12.3k22568




12.3k22568








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are physicist right?
    $endgroup$
    – Dicul Smerd
    13 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are physicist right?
    $endgroup$
    – Dicul Smerd
    13 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
You are physicist right?
$endgroup$
– Dicul Smerd
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
You are physicist right?
$endgroup$
– Dicul Smerd
13 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79653%2frectangles-in-a-chess-board%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]