A lot of warnings when compiling date library












-1














The date library is very useful but you can see a lot of warnings after compiling a simple example that uses date library.
for example:



#include "date.h"

int main() {

    using namespace date;

    std::cout << weekday{July/4/2001} << 'n';

}


compiled with:



g++ -c -Waggregate-return main.cpp



warning: function call has aggregate value [-Waggregate-return]...





c++ date







share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Can you show us the warnings?
    – mch
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • What is your question?
    – VTT
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • yes, compile without errors but with a lot of warnings.
    – sadig
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:01






  • 1




    stackoverflow.com/questions/14016993/…
    – The Unknown
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:09






  • 3




    and what is the reason you compile with -Waggregate-return? it is a pretty obscure (and useless) flag that triggers warnings for a valid C++ code.
    – bolov
    Nov 20 '18 at 10:10


















-1














The date library is very useful but you can see a lot of warnings after compiling a simple example that uses date library.
for example:



#include "date.h"

int main() {

    using namespace date;

    std::cout << weekday{July/4/2001} << 'n';

}


compiled with:



g++ -c -Waggregate-return main.cpp



warning: function call has aggregate value [-Waggregate-return]...





c++ date







share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Can you show us the warnings?
    – mch
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • What is your question?
    – VTT
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • yes, compile without errors but with a lot of warnings.
    – sadig
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:01






  • 1




    stackoverflow.com/questions/14016993/…
    – The Unknown
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:09






  • 3




    and what is the reason you compile with -Waggregate-return? it is a pretty obscure (and useless) flag that triggers warnings for a valid C++ code.
    – bolov
    Nov 20 '18 at 10:10
















-1












-1








-1







The date library is very useful but you can see a lot of warnings after compiling a simple example that uses date library.
for example:



#include "date.h"

int main() {

    using namespace date;

    std::cout << weekday{July/4/2001} << 'n';

}


compiled with:



g++ -c -Waggregate-return main.cpp



warning: function call has aggregate value [-Waggregate-return]...





c++ date







share|improve this question















The date library is very useful but you can see a lot of warnings after compiling a simple example that uses date library.
for example:



#include "date.h"

int main() {

    using namespace date;

    std::cout << weekday{July/4/2001} << 'n';

}


compiled with:



g++ -c -Waggregate-return main.cpp



warning: function call has aggregate value [-Waggregate-return]...





c++ date




c++ date






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 10:56









M.K

359219




359219










asked Nov 20 '18 at 8:56









sadig

265




265








  • 1




    Can you show us the warnings?
    – mch
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • What is your question?
    – VTT
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • yes, compile without errors but with a lot of warnings.
    – sadig
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:01






  • 1




    stackoverflow.com/questions/14016993/…
    – The Unknown
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:09






  • 3




    and what is the reason you compile with -Waggregate-return? it is a pretty obscure (and useless) flag that triggers warnings for a valid C++ code.
    – bolov
    Nov 20 '18 at 10:10
















  • 1




    Can you show us the warnings?
    – mch
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • What is your question?
    – VTT
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:00










  • yes, compile without errors but with a lot of warnings.
    – sadig
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:01






  • 1




    stackoverflow.com/questions/14016993/…
    – The Unknown
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:09






  • 3




    and what is the reason you compile with -Waggregate-return? it is a pretty obscure (and useless) flag that triggers warnings for a valid C++ code.
    – bolov
    Nov 20 '18 at 10:10










1




1




Can you show us the warnings?
– mch
Nov 20 '18 at 9:00




Can you show us the warnings?
– mch
Nov 20 '18 at 9:00












What is your question?
– VTT
Nov 20 '18 at 9:00




What is your question?
– VTT
Nov 20 '18 at 9:00












yes, compile without errors but with a lot of warnings.
– sadig
Nov 20 '18 at 9:01




yes, compile without errors but with a lot of warnings.
– sadig
Nov 20 '18 at 9:01




1




1




stackoverflow.com/questions/14016993/…
– The Unknown
Nov 20 '18 at 9:09




stackoverflow.com/questions/14016993/…
– The Unknown
Nov 20 '18 at 9:09




3




3




and what is the reason you compile with -Waggregate-return? it is a pretty obscure (and useless) flag that triggers warnings for a valid C++ code.
– bolov
Nov 20 '18 at 10:10






and what is the reason you compile with -Waggregate-return? it is a pretty obscure (and useless) flag that triggers warnings for a valid C++ code.
– bolov
Nov 20 '18 at 10:10














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Depending on the version of your compiler, C++11 (or later) mode might not be active, so try adding -std=gnu++0x at least. Also you code needs #include <iostream> added.






share|improve this answer





























    1














    To fix these warnings you should remove the flag -Waggregate-return from your compile string. This flag causes warnings for valid code.



    Note that you also need #include <iostream>, and for older versions of g++ , -std=c++14 or a similar flag.






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53389377%2fa-lot-of-warnings-when-compiling-date-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Depending on the version of your compiler, C++11 (or later) mode might not be active, so try adding -std=gnu++0x at least. Also you code needs #include <iostream> added.






      share|improve this answer


























        1














        Depending on the version of your compiler, C++11 (or later) mode might not be active, so try adding -std=gnu++0x at least. Also you code needs #include <iostream> added.






        share|improve this answer
























          1












          1








          1






          Depending on the version of your compiler, C++11 (or later) mode might not be active, so try adding -std=gnu++0x at least. Also you code needs #include <iostream> added.






          share|improve this answer












          Depending on the version of your compiler, C++11 (or later) mode might not be active, so try adding -std=gnu++0x at least. Also you code needs #include <iostream> added.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:04









          Bo R

          616110




          616110

























              1














              To fix these warnings you should remove the flag -Waggregate-return from your compile string. This flag causes warnings for valid code.



              Note that you also need #include <iostream>, and for older versions of g++ , -std=c++14 or a similar flag.






              share|improve this answer


























                1














                To fix these warnings you should remove the flag -Waggregate-return from your compile string. This flag causes warnings for valid code.



                Note that you also need #include <iostream>, and for older versions of g++ , -std=c++14 or a similar flag.






                share|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  To fix these warnings you should remove the flag -Waggregate-return from your compile string. This flag causes warnings for valid code.



                  Note that you also need #include <iostream>, and for older versions of g++ , -std=c++14 or a similar flag.






                  share|improve this answer












                  To fix these warnings you should remove the flag -Waggregate-return from your compile string. This flag causes warnings for valid code.



                  Note that you also need #include <iostream>, and for older versions of g++ , -std=c++14 or a similar flag.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:19









                  M.M

                  104k11113234




                  104k11113234






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53389377%2fa-lot-of-warnings-when-compiling-date-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Image
                      5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
                      Read more

                      Alcedinidae

                      Image
                      Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
                      Read more

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

                      Image
                      9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
                      Read more