Microsoft Access Database is in an inconsistent state












-2















We have a client that uses our MS Acccess based software, they are up to
20 users working on the front end at the same time.
Each user has its own .mde front end and the backend database is a .accdb...
My question is why only this clients database keeps getting corrupted or in an "inconsistent state". None of our other clients expierence this problem.



Any tips or advice?










share|improve this question

























  • It might be, that one or more workstations are connected via WiFi.

    – Gustav
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:24











  • Because you ask for a tip also: I suppose you already know this, but in this scenario you should really switch to a SQL Server as backend, especially since the Express version is free after all. Furthermore, I have seen anti-virus software, which monitor network traffic, do the craziest effects already.

    – Unhandled Exception
    Nov 23 '18 at 8:56













  • This has nothing to do with VBA or coding - the question is off-topic on Stack Overflow and should be asked in another venue, such as Super User.

    – Cindy Meister
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:29











  • I would also check the table structure for any memo fields. Those typically cause corruption. I found a recent article that related some corruption to certain builds of Windows 10 as well. Check to see that you don't use mde with Office 365, as that can cause a problem, and eliminate as many memo fields as possible.

    – Destin Consulting
    Feb 2 at 5:52
















-2















We have a client that uses our MS Acccess based software, they are up to
20 users working on the front end at the same time.
Each user has its own .mde front end and the backend database is a .accdb...
My question is why only this clients database keeps getting corrupted or in an "inconsistent state". None of our other clients expierence this problem.



Any tips or advice?










share|improve this question

























  • It might be, that one or more workstations are connected via WiFi.

    – Gustav
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:24











  • Because you ask for a tip also: I suppose you already know this, but in this scenario you should really switch to a SQL Server as backend, especially since the Express version is free after all. Furthermore, I have seen anti-virus software, which monitor network traffic, do the craziest effects already.

    – Unhandled Exception
    Nov 23 '18 at 8:56













  • This has nothing to do with VBA or coding - the question is off-topic on Stack Overflow and should be asked in another venue, such as Super User.

    – Cindy Meister
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:29











  • I would also check the table structure for any memo fields. Those typically cause corruption. I found a recent article that related some corruption to certain builds of Windows 10 as well. Check to see that you don't use mde with Office 365, as that can cause a problem, and eliminate as many memo fields as possible.

    – Destin Consulting
    Feb 2 at 5:52














-2












-2








-2








We have a client that uses our MS Acccess based software, they are up to
20 users working on the front end at the same time.
Each user has its own .mde front end and the backend database is a .accdb...
My question is why only this clients database keeps getting corrupted or in an "inconsistent state". None of our other clients expierence this problem.



Any tips or advice?










share|improve this question
















We have a client that uses our MS Acccess based software, they are up to
20 users working on the front end at the same time.
Each user has its own .mde front end and the backend database is a .accdb...
My question is why only this clients database keeps getting corrupted or in an "inconsistent state". None of our other clients expierence this problem.



Any tips or advice?







ms-access






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 23 '18 at 11:29









Cindy Meister

15.8k102437




15.8k102437










asked Nov 23 '18 at 6:53









Festiis007Festiis007

1




1













  • It might be, that one or more workstations are connected via WiFi.

    – Gustav
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:24











  • Because you ask for a tip also: I suppose you already know this, but in this scenario you should really switch to a SQL Server as backend, especially since the Express version is free after all. Furthermore, I have seen anti-virus software, which monitor network traffic, do the craziest effects already.

    – Unhandled Exception
    Nov 23 '18 at 8:56













  • This has nothing to do with VBA or coding - the question is off-topic on Stack Overflow and should be asked in another venue, such as Super User.

    – Cindy Meister
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:29











  • I would also check the table structure for any memo fields. Those typically cause corruption. I found a recent article that related some corruption to certain builds of Windows 10 as well. Check to see that you don't use mde with Office 365, as that can cause a problem, and eliminate as many memo fields as possible.

    – Destin Consulting
    Feb 2 at 5:52



















  • It might be, that one or more workstations are connected via WiFi.

    – Gustav
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:24











  • Because you ask for a tip also: I suppose you already know this, but in this scenario you should really switch to a SQL Server as backend, especially since the Express version is free after all. Furthermore, I have seen anti-virus software, which monitor network traffic, do the craziest effects already.

    – Unhandled Exception
    Nov 23 '18 at 8:56













  • This has nothing to do with VBA or coding - the question is off-topic on Stack Overflow and should be asked in another venue, such as Super User.

    – Cindy Meister
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:29











  • I would also check the table structure for any memo fields. Those typically cause corruption. I found a recent article that related some corruption to certain builds of Windows 10 as well. Check to see that you don't use mde with Office 365, as that can cause a problem, and eliminate as many memo fields as possible.

    – Destin Consulting
    Feb 2 at 5:52

















It might be, that one or more workstations are connected via WiFi.

– Gustav
Nov 23 '18 at 7:24





It might be, that one or more workstations are connected via WiFi.

– Gustav
Nov 23 '18 at 7:24













Because you ask for a tip also: I suppose you already know this, but in this scenario you should really switch to a SQL Server as backend, especially since the Express version is free after all. Furthermore, I have seen anti-virus software, which monitor network traffic, do the craziest effects already.

– Unhandled Exception
Nov 23 '18 at 8:56







Because you ask for a tip also: I suppose you already know this, but in this scenario you should really switch to a SQL Server as backend, especially since the Express version is free after all. Furthermore, I have seen anti-virus software, which monitor network traffic, do the craziest effects already.

– Unhandled Exception
Nov 23 '18 at 8:56















This has nothing to do with VBA or coding - the question is off-topic on Stack Overflow and should be asked in another venue, such as Super User.

– Cindy Meister
Nov 23 '18 at 11:29





This has nothing to do with VBA or coding - the question is off-topic on Stack Overflow and should be asked in another venue, such as Super User.

– Cindy Meister
Nov 23 '18 at 11:29













I would also check the table structure for any memo fields. Those typically cause corruption. I found a recent article that related some corruption to certain builds of Windows 10 as well. Check to see that you don't use mde with Office 365, as that can cause a problem, and eliminate as many memo fields as possible.

– Destin Consulting
Feb 2 at 5:52





I would also check the table structure for any memo fields. Those typically cause corruption. I found a recent article that related some corruption to certain builds of Windows 10 as well. Check to see that you don't use mde with Office 365, as that can cause a problem, and eliminate as many memo fields as possible.

– Destin Consulting
Feb 2 at 5:52












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Depending on the version of the OS and the version of Access being used the mde file may not run properly. If they have a 64-bit version of access, and the mde was compiled in a 32-bit version, it may not be recognized correctly, but a accdb file would work fine, and you could lock it out as well.



Also, if your using an accdb back end, and need to use a compiled front-end, switch to using accde front-ends instead, as those are the modern compiled versions and mde should only be used in versions of Access prior to 2007.



My only question for you is to find out if the users are running from a network location or a local folder - as running any Access DB front-end from a network location can cause issues. Have the accde file (or the front end) copied to their desktop first, then run from there.



Also, after download, you can run a file size verification to confirm the whole file was downloaded, as I have seen wifi connections lose part of the file during download, and then that causes corruption too. If possible, split the interface into multiple, smaller files, to make the download more reliable.






share|improve this answer































    0














    It is also possible that this 1 client uses your app differently than you expect. Users are after all the ultimate debuggers.



    Any table that has a primary key that is not an autonumber - is a candidate to be the cause in a multi user application should it be possible that multiple persons initiate a new record without entering the primary key value immediately....or even a single user that initiates a new record but does not complete the act entirely and leaves the PK field blank.



    Other: although one can copy a back end file during use without affecting it - there may be some well-intended server functions that auto duplicate/copy/exchange files that may be the cause.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53441907%2fmicrosoft-access-database-is-in-an-inconsistent-state%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      Depending on the version of the OS and the version of Access being used the mde file may not run properly. If they have a 64-bit version of access, and the mde was compiled in a 32-bit version, it may not be recognized correctly, but a accdb file would work fine, and you could lock it out as well.



      Also, if your using an accdb back end, and need to use a compiled front-end, switch to using accde front-ends instead, as those are the modern compiled versions and mde should only be used in versions of Access prior to 2007.



      My only question for you is to find out if the users are running from a network location or a local folder - as running any Access DB front-end from a network location can cause issues. Have the accde file (or the front end) copied to their desktop first, then run from there.



      Also, after download, you can run a file size verification to confirm the whole file was downloaded, as I have seen wifi connections lose part of the file during download, and then that causes corruption too. If possible, split the interface into multiple, smaller files, to make the download more reliable.






      share|improve this answer




























        0














        Depending on the version of the OS and the version of Access being used the mde file may not run properly. If they have a 64-bit version of access, and the mde was compiled in a 32-bit version, it may not be recognized correctly, but a accdb file would work fine, and you could lock it out as well.



        Also, if your using an accdb back end, and need to use a compiled front-end, switch to using accde front-ends instead, as those are the modern compiled versions and mde should only be used in versions of Access prior to 2007.



        My only question for you is to find out if the users are running from a network location or a local folder - as running any Access DB front-end from a network location can cause issues. Have the accde file (or the front end) copied to their desktop first, then run from there.



        Also, after download, you can run a file size verification to confirm the whole file was downloaded, as I have seen wifi connections lose part of the file during download, and then that causes corruption too. If possible, split the interface into multiple, smaller files, to make the download more reliable.






        share|improve this answer


























          0












          0








          0







          Depending on the version of the OS and the version of Access being used the mde file may not run properly. If they have a 64-bit version of access, and the mde was compiled in a 32-bit version, it may not be recognized correctly, but a accdb file would work fine, and you could lock it out as well.



          Also, if your using an accdb back end, and need to use a compiled front-end, switch to using accde front-ends instead, as those are the modern compiled versions and mde should only be used in versions of Access prior to 2007.



          My only question for you is to find out if the users are running from a network location or a local folder - as running any Access DB front-end from a network location can cause issues. Have the accde file (or the front end) copied to their desktop first, then run from there.



          Also, after download, you can run a file size verification to confirm the whole file was downloaded, as I have seen wifi connections lose part of the file during download, and then that causes corruption too. If possible, split the interface into multiple, smaller files, to make the download more reliable.






          share|improve this answer













          Depending on the version of the OS and the version of Access being used the mde file may not run properly. If they have a 64-bit version of access, and the mde was compiled in a 32-bit version, it may not be recognized correctly, but a accdb file would work fine, and you could lock it out as well.



          Also, if your using an accdb back end, and need to use a compiled front-end, switch to using accde front-ends instead, as those are the modern compiled versions and mde should only be used in versions of Access prior to 2007.



          My only question for you is to find out if the users are running from a network location or a local folder - as running any Access DB front-end from a network location can cause issues. Have the accde file (or the front end) copied to their desktop first, then run from there.



          Also, after download, you can run a file size verification to confirm the whole file was downloaded, as I have seen wifi connections lose part of the file during download, and then that causes corruption too. If possible, split the interface into multiple, smaller files, to make the download more reliable.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 23 '18 at 14:55









          Destin ConsultingDestin Consulting

          765




          765

























              0














              It is also possible that this 1 client uses your app differently than you expect. Users are after all the ultimate debuggers.



              Any table that has a primary key that is not an autonumber - is a candidate to be the cause in a multi user application should it be possible that multiple persons initiate a new record without entering the primary key value immediately....or even a single user that initiates a new record but does not complete the act entirely and leaves the PK field blank.



              Other: although one can copy a back end file during use without affecting it - there may be some well-intended server functions that auto duplicate/copy/exchange files that may be the cause.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                It is also possible that this 1 client uses your app differently than you expect. Users are after all the ultimate debuggers.



                Any table that has a primary key that is not an autonumber - is a candidate to be the cause in a multi user application should it be possible that multiple persons initiate a new record without entering the primary key value immediately....or even a single user that initiates a new record but does not complete the act entirely and leaves the PK field blank.



                Other: although one can copy a back end file during use without affecting it - there may be some well-intended server functions that auto duplicate/copy/exchange files that may be the cause.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  It is also possible that this 1 client uses your app differently than you expect. Users are after all the ultimate debuggers.



                  Any table that has a primary key that is not an autonumber - is a candidate to be the cause in a multi user application should it be possible that multiple persons initiate a new record without entering the primary key value immediately....or even a single user that initiates a new record but does not complete the act entirely and leaves the PK field blank.



                  Other: although one can copy a back end file during use without affecting it - there may be some well-intended server functions that auto duplicate/copy/exchange files that may be the cause.






                  share|improve this answer













                  It is also possible that this 1 client uses your app differently than you expect. Users are after all the ultimate debuggers.



                  Any table that has a primary key that is not an autonumber - is a candidate to be the cause in a multi user application should it be possible that multiple persons initiate a new record without entering the primary key value immediately....or even a single user that initiates a new record but does not complete the act entirely and leaves the PK field blank.



                  Other: although one can copy a back end file during use without affecting it - there may be some well-intended server functions that auto duplicate/copy/exchange files that may be the cause.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 1 '18 at 19:18









                  Cahaba DataCahaba Data

                  308123




                  308123






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53441907%2fmicrosoft-access-database-is-in-an-inconsistent-state%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]