Is using “and/or” recommended for formal writing, or is it frowned upon?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







12















Is using "and/or" allowed in formal writing? If not, is there general way to represent the OR binary operator with as little space as possible in written English?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Related: Alternatives to “and/or”?

    – RegDwigнt
    Apr 15 '11 at 5:45


















12















Is using "and/or" allowed in formal writing? If not, is there general way to represent the OR binary operator with as little space as possible in written English?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Related: Alternatives to “and/or”?

    – RegDwigнt
    Apr 15 '11 at 5:45














12












12








12








Is using "and/or" allowed in formal writing? If not, is there general way to represent the OR binary operator with as little space as possible in written English?










share|improve this question
















Is using "and/or" allowed in formal writing? If not, is there general way to represent the OR binary operator with as little space as possible in written English?







formality conjunctions writing-style






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 15 '11 at 5:46









RegDwigнt

83.5k31281382




83.5k31281382










asked Apr 14 '11 at 23:32









UticensisUticensis

13.3k60131231




13.3k60131231








  • 1





    Related: Alternatives to “and/or”?

    – RegDwigнt
    Apr 15 '11 at 5:45














  • 1





    Related: Alternatives to “and/or”?

    – RegDwigнt
    Apr 15 '11 at 5:45








1




1





Related: Alternatives to “and/or”?

– RegDwigнt
Apr 15 '11 at 5:45





Related: Alternatives to “and/or”?

– RegDwigнt
Apr 15 '11 at 5:45










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















8














I believe most style books advise against using and/or in formal writing. By "formal" I mean in newspapers or novels. If space is extremely limited, most writers would have no qualms about it, as in dictionary entries or footnotes.



The reason is that or can mean either "either A and not B, or B and not A" or "A or B or both" in ordinary language: 99 % of the time, readers will be able to figure out whether it is used inclusively or exclusively based on context. If ambiguity could arise, the writer should add some context to make it clear:




This test may be taken on June 5 or
July 12.




May the test be taken twice? There are several ways to clarify this, though not every way may work in any situation. Suppose the answer was yes:




This test may be taken on June 5 and
July 12 [this may still not be clear
in some cases].



This test may be taken twice, on June
5 and July 12.



This test may be taken on June 5, and
again
on July 12.



This test may be taken on June 5 or July 12, or on both dates.




Suppose the test might be taken only once:




This test may be taken on either June
5 or July 12 [this may still not be clear in
some cases].



This test may be taken once, on June 5
or July 12.



This test may be taken on June 5 or
July 12, but not on both dates.



Etc.







share|improve this answer

































    3














    In the general English usage, the conjunction 'or' mostly follows the logical meaning of 'exclusive or', that is, it is almost always used in instances where the alternatives cannot take place at the same time. So 'or', even in circumstances where the alternatives are not exclusive, seems to imply that the two alternatives, even if they can, are not to be considered at the same time.



    So if you want to express the inclusive or', the possibilities being: {one, the other, both}, you need to add in 'both' somehow. The lengthy way would be to say "A or B or both A and B" or "A or B or both", but an abbreviation is "A and/or B".



    And, no, it's not particularly formal; it most likely does not show up in newspapers. I find if you have to translate 'and/or', I find the best is "A or B or both", but I am not a writer, so I'm sure there are better alternatives.






    share|improve this answer


























    • I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

      – Simone
      Aug 25 '15 at 7:56











    • I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

      – Simone
      Aug 25 '15 at 8:24






    • 1





      @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

      – Mitch
      Aug 25 '15 at 12:15



















    2














    And/or is, in the vast majority of contexts, redundant. It's a construct that has become lexicalized and has evidently [come under intense criticism][1].



    Take the following example




    Please mail and/or FAX your reply.




    This type of construct is extremely common, but what does this sentence mean? Either I will send my reply by mail, or I will send it by FAX, but I can not do both, so why the "and"?



    I suggest using or where there are options from which you should pick only one and simply explain that multiple options are possible from a list when introducing it. As in the preceding sentence, only use and when both apply.



    Regarding your specification of "formal writing": if you are writing for a specific audience or body, consult their style manual and employ it as gospel regardless or your (or my) preferences.






    share|improve this answer
























    • "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

      – Kosmonaut
      Apr 15 '11 at 0:28













    • @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

      – msanford
      Apr 15 '11 at 0:33








    • 1





      That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

      – Kosmonaut
      Apr 15 '11 at 0:48





















    1














    I personally use and/or when it is logically true. In some cases it is important to stress that BOTH options can be done, or a single option can be done (either or both can be done). Although it is often misused in cases where OR is sufficient. Otherwise, the use of OR may exclude BOTH options, when exclusion isn't the intent (that would be an XOR).



    'Formal writing' I don't really buy into much. I am always writing formally, unless I'm SMS texting someone maybe. Even if in a research paper, it is fine, unless you have an anal retentive English teacher. In the real world it is accepted and appropriate, I believe. It is clearer than the longer expansion "A or B, or both".






    share|improve this answer































      0














      Not sure what your context is, but I was working with:




      All templates have a spot for your site title and/or logo on every page.




      Users could have a title, could have a logo, or could have both. I ended up going with:




      All templates have a spot for your site title, logo, or both on every page.







      share|improve this answer

































        0














        Higher rated publications like JMIR and SAGE won't accept and/or. It has to be one or the other...



        Lower rated publications don't care.






        share|improve this answer
























          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21115%2fis-using-and-or-recommended-for-formal-writing-or-is-it-frowned-upon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          I believe most style books advise against using and/or in formal writing. By "formal" I mean in newspapers or novels. If space is extremely limited, most writers would have no qualms about it, as in dictionary entries or footnotes.



          The reason is that or can mean either "either A and not B, or B and not A" or "A or B or both" in ordinary language: 99 % of the time, readers will be able to figure out whether it is used inclusively or exclusively based on context. If ambiguity could arise, the writer should add some context to make it clear:




          This test may be taken on June 5 or
          July 12.




          May the test be taken twice? There are several ways to clarify this, though not every way may work in any situation. Suppose the answer was yes:




          This test may be taken on June 5 and
          July 12 [this may still not be clear
          in some cases].



          This test may be taken twice, on June
          5 and July 12.



          This test may be taken on June 5, and
          again
          on July 12.



          This test may be taken on June 5 or July 12, or on both dates.




          Suppose the test might be taken only once:




          This test may be taken on either June
          5 or July 12 [this may still not be clear in
          some cases].



          This test may be taken once, on June 5
          or July 12.



          This test may be taken on June 5 or
          July 12, but not on both dates.



          Etc.







          share|improve this answer






























            8














            I believe most style books advise against using and/or in formal writing. By "formal" I mean in newspapers or novels. If space is extremely limited, most writers would have no qualms about it, as in dictionary entries or footnotes.



            The reason is that or can mean either "either A and not B, or B and not A" or "A or B or both" in ordinary language: 99 % of the time, readers will be able to figure out whether it is used inclusively or exclusively based on context. If ambiguity could arise, the writer should add some context to make it clear:




            This test may be taken on June 5 or
            July 12.




            May the test be taken twice? There are several ways to clarify this, though not every way may work in any situation. Suppose the answer was yes:




            This test may be taken on June 5 and
            July 12 [this may still not be clear
            in some cases].



            This test may be taken twice, on June
            5 and July 12.



            This test may be taken on June 5, and
            again
            on July 12.



            This test may be taken on June 5 or July 12, or on both dates.




            Suppose the test might be taken only once:




            This test may be taken on either June
            5 or July 12 [this may still not be clear in
            some cases].



            This test may be taken once, on June 5
            or July 12.



            This test may be taken on June 5 or
            July 12, but not on both dates.



            Etc.







            share|improve this answer




























              8












              8








              8







              I believe most style books advise against using and/or in formal writing. By "formal" I mean in newspapers or novels. If space is extremely limited, most writers would have no qualms about it, as in dictionary entries or footnotes.



              The reason is that or can mean either "either A and not B, or B and not A" or "A or B or both" in ordinary language: 99 % of the time, readers will be able to figure out whether it is used inclusively or exclusively based on context. If ambiguity could arise, the writer should add some context to make it clear:




              This test may be taken on June 5 or
              July 12.




              May the test be taken twice? There are several ways to clarify this, though not every way may work in any situation. Suppose the answer was yes:




              This test may be taken on June 5 and
              July 12 [this may still not be clear
              in some cases].



              This test may be taken twice, on June
              5 and July 12.



              This test may be taken on June 5, and
              again
              on July 12.



              This test may be taken on June 5 or July 12, or on both dates.




              Suppose the test might be taken only once:




              This test may be taken on either June
              5 or July 12 [this may still not be clear in
              some cases].



              This test may be taken once, on June 5
              or July 12.



              This test may be taken on June 5 or
              July 12, but not on both dates.



              Etc.







              share|improve this answer















              I believe most style books advise against using and/or in formal writing. By "formal" I mean in newspapers or novels. If space is extremely limited, most writers would have no qualms about it, as in dictionary entries or footnotes.



              The reason is that or can mean either "either A and not B, or B and not A" or "A or B or both" in ordinary language: 99 % of the time, readers will be able to figure out whether it is used inclusively or exclusively based on context. If ambiguity could arise, the writer should add some context to make it clear:




              This test may be taken on June 5 or
              July 12.




              May the test be taken twice? There are several ways to clarify this, though not every way may work in any situation. Suppose the answer was yes:




              This test may be taken on June 5 and
              July 12 [this may still not be clear
              in some cases].



              This test may be taken twice, on June
              5 and July 12.



              This test may be taken on June 5, and
              again
              on July 12.



              This test may be taken on June 5 or July 12, or on both dates.




              Suppose the test might be taken only once:




              This test may be taken on either June
              5 or July 12 [this may still not be clear in
              some cases].



              This test may be taken once, on June 5
              or July 12.



              This test may be taken on June 5 or
              July 12, but not on both dates.



              Etc.








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 15 '11 at 23:32

























              answered Apr 15 '11 at 14:40









              CerberusCerberus

              54.3k2121208




              54.3k2121208

























                  3














                  In the general English usage, the conjunction 'or' mostly follows the logical meaning of 'exclusive or', that is, it is almost always used in instances where the alternatives cannot take place at the same time. So 'or', even in circumstances where the alternatives are not exclusive, seems to imply that the two alternatives, even if they can, are not to be considered at the same time.



                  So if you want to express the inclusive or', the possibilities being: {one, the other, both}, you need to add in 'both' somehow. The lengthy way would be to say "A or B or both A and B" or "A or B or both", but an abbreviation is "A and/or B".



                  And, no, it's not particularly formal; it most likely does not show up in newspapers. I find if you have to translate 'and/or', I find the best is "A or B or both", but I am not a writer, so I'm sure there are better alternatives.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 7:56











                  • I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 8:24






                  • 1





                    @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

                    – Mitch
                    Aug 25 '15 at 12:15
















                  3














                  In the general English usage, the conjunction 'or' mostly follows the logical meaning of 'exclusive or', that is, it is almost always used in instances where the alternatives cannot take place at the same time. So 'or', even in circumstances where the alternatives are not exclusive, seems to imply that the two alternatives, even if they can, are not to be considered at the same time.



                  So if you want to express the inclusive or', the possibilities being: {one, the other, both}, you need to add in 'both' somehow. The lengthy way would be to say "A or B or both A and B" or "A or B or both", but an abbreviation is "A and/or B".



                  And, no, it's not particularly formal; it most likely does not show up in newspapers. I find if you have to translate 'and/or', I find the best is "A or B or both", but I am not a writer, so I'm sure there are better alternatives.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 7:56











                  • I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 8:24






                  • 1





                    @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

                    – Mitch
                    Aug 25 '15 at 12:15














                  3












                  3








                  3







                  In the general English usage, the conjunction 'or' mostly follows the logical meaning of 'exclusive or', that is, it is almost always used in instances where the alternatives cannot take place at the same time. So 'or', even in circumstances where the alternatives are not exclusive, seems to imply that the two alternatives, even if they can, are not to be considered at the same time.



                  So if you want to express the inclusive or', the possibilities being: {one, the other, both}, you need to add in 'both' somehow. The lengthy way would be to say "A or B or both A and B" or "A or B or both", but an abbreviation is "A and/or B".



                  And, no, it's not particularly formal; it most likely does not show up in newspapers. I find if you have to translate 'and/or', I find the best is "A or B or both", but I am not a writer, so I'm sure there are better alternatives.






                  share|improve this answer















                  In the general English usage, the conjunction 'or' mostly follows the logical meaning of 'exclusive or', that is, it is almost always used in instances where the alternatives cannot take place at the same time. So 'or', even in circumstances where the alternatives are not exclusive, seems to imply that the two alternatives, even if they can, are not to be considered at the same time.



                  So if you want to express the inclusive or', the possibilities being: {one, the other, both}, you need to add in 'both' somehow. The lengthy way would be to say "A or B or both A and B" or "A or B or both", but an abbreviation is "A and/or B".



                  And, no, it's not particularly formal; it most likely does not show up in newspapers. I find if you have to translate 'and/or', I find the best is "A or B or both", but I am not a writer, so I'm sure there are better alternatives.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 15 '11 at 1:08

























                  answered Apr 15 '11 at 0:26









                  MitchMitch

                  52.5k15105220




                  52.5k15105220













                  • I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 7:56











                  • I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 8:24






                  • 1





                    @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

                    – Mitch
                    Aug 25 '15 at 12:15



















                  • I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 7:56











                  • I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

                    – Simone
                    Aug 25 '15 at 8:24






                  • 1





                    @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

                    – Mitch
                    Aug 25 '15 at 12:15

















                  I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

                  – Simone
                  Aug 25 '15 at 7:56





                  I thought that in English "or" follows the meaning of inclusive or. Am I wrong?

                  – Simone
                  Aug 25 '15 at 7:56













                  I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

                  – Simone
                  Aug 25 '15 at 8:24





                  I mean, I think I would specify it is an exclusive or if I use either X or Y

                  – Simone
                  Aug 25 '15 at 8:24




                  1




                  1





                  @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

                  – Mitch
                  Aug 25 '15 at 12:15





                  @Simone In computers/logic, 'or' is inclusive: 'if X is true or Y is true, do Z', it is certainly allowable for both X and Y to be true in order to execute Z. But people usually speak about real world events, 'Can I get you coffee or tea?', means you'll get a single cup of one or the other (or nothing if you don't want it) but people normally don't get two cups or mix them up. So in normal English speech, 'or' is almost always exclusive. One sometimes hears a question 'Can you do X or Y?' and the correct answer is 'both' but it is unexpected.

                  – Mitch
                  Aug 25 '15 at 12:15











                  2














                  And/or is, in the vast majority of contexts, redundant. It's a construct that has become lexicalized and has evidently [come under intense criticism][1].



                  Take the following example




                  Please mail and/or FAX your reply.




                  This type of construct is extremely common, but what does this sentence mean? Either I will send my reply by mail, or I will send it by FAX, but I can not do both, so why the "and"?



                  I suggest using or where there are options from which you should pick only one and simply explain that multiple options are possible from a list when introducing it. As in the preceding sentence, only use and when both apply.



                  Regarding your specification of "formal writing": if you are writing for a specific audience or body, consult their style manual and employ it as gospel regardless or your (or my) preferences.






                  share|improve this answer
























                  • "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:28













                  • @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

                    – msanford
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:33








                  • 1





                    That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:48


















                  2














                  And/or is, in the vast majority of contexts, redundant. It's a construct that has become lexicalized and has evidently [come under intense criticism][1].



                  Take the following example




                  Please mail and/or FAX your reply.




                  This type of construct is extremely common, but what does this sentence mean? Either I will send my reply by mail, or I will send it by FAX, but I can not do both, so why the "and"?



                  I suggest using or where there are options from which you should pick only one and simply explain that multiple options are possible from a list when introducing it. As in the preceding sentence, only use and when both apply.



                  Regarding your specification of "formal writing": if you are writing for a specific audience or body, consult their style manual and employ it as gospel regardless or your (or my) preferences.






                  share|improve this answer
























                  • "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:28













                  • @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

                    – msanford
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:33








                  • 1





                    That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:48
















                  2












                  2








                  2







                  And/or is, in the vast majority of contexts, redundant. It's a construct that has become lexicalized and has evidently [come under intense criticism][1].



                  Take the following example




                  Please mail and/or FAX your reply.




                  This type of construct is extremely common, but what does this sentence mean? Either I will send my reply by mail, or I will send it by FAX, but I can not do both, so why the "and"?



                  I suggest using or where there are options from which you should pick only one and simply explain that multiple options are possible from a list when introducing it. As in the preceding sentence, only use and when both apply.



                  Regarding your specification of "formal writing": if you are writing for a specific audience or body, consult their style manual and employ it as gospel regardless or your (or my) preferences.






                  share|improve this answer













                  And/or is, in the vast majority of contexts, redundant. It's a construct that has become lexicalized and has evidently [come under intense criticism][1].



                  Take the following example




                  Please mail and/or FAX your reply.




                  This type of construct is extremely common, but what does this sentence mean? Either I will send my reply by mail, or I will send it by FAX, but I can not do both, so why the "and"?



                  I suggest using or where there are options from which you should pick only one and simply explain that multiple options are possible from a list when introducing it. As in the preceding sentence, only use and when both apply.



                  Regarding your specification of "formal writing": if you are writing for a specific audience or body, consult their style manual and employ it as gospel regardless or your (or my) preferences.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 15 '11 at 0:17









                  msanfordmsanford

                  1,07911015




                  1,07911015













                  • "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:28













                  • @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

                    – msanford
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:33








                  • 1





                    That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:48





















                  • "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:28













                  • @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

                    – msanford
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:33








                  • 1





                    That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

                    – Kosmonaut
                    Apr 15 '11 at 0:48



















                  "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

                  – Kosmonaut
                  Apr 15 '11 at 0:28







                  "And/or" in your example would specifically mean that you can "mail", "fax", or "mail and fax". Why would you not be able to do both? "And/or" specifically means "or (not exclusive or)" — it has a meaning that is distinct from simply "or" (formality level notwithstanding).

                  – Kosmonaut
                  Apr 15 '11 at 0:28















                  @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

                  – msanford
                  Apr 15 '11 at 0:33







                  @Kosmonaut Indeed, you are correct that it's physically possible to do all three. But that's precisely my point: The implied meaning of and/or is almost never ¬XOR. The writer of the instructions in my example means XOR.

                  – msanford
                  Apr 15 '11 at 0:33






                  1




                  1





                  That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

                  – Kosmonaut
                  Apr 15 '11 at 0:48







                  That is strange; I've never seen "and/or" used to mean XOR before.

                  – Kosmonaut
                  Apr 15 '11 at 0:48













                  1














                  I personally use and/or when it is logically true. In some cases it is important to stress that BOTH options can be done, or a single option can be done (either or both can be done). Although it is often misused in cases where OR is sufficient. Otherwise, the use of OR may exclude BOTH options, when exclusion isn't the intent (that would be an XOR).



                  'Formal writing' I don't really buy into much. I am always writing formally, unless I'm SMS texting someone maybe. Even if in a research paper, it is fine, unless you have an anal retentive English teacher. In the real world it is accepted and appropriate, I believe. It is clearer than the longer expansion "A or B, or both".






                  share|improve this answer




























                    1














                    I personally use and/or when it is logically true. In some cases it is important to stress that BOTH options can be done, or a single option can be done (either or both can be done). Although it is often misused in cases where OR is sufficient. Otherwise, the use of OR may exclude BOTH options, when exclusion isn't the intent (that would be an XOR).



                    'Formal writing' I don't really buy into much. I am always writing formally, unless I'm SMS texting someone maybe. Even if in a research paper, it is fine, unless you have an anal retentive English teacher. In the real world it is accepted and appropriate, I believe. It is clearer than the longer expansion "A or B, or both".






                    share|improve this answer


























                      1












                      1








                      1







                      I personally use and/or when it is logically true. In some cases it is important to stress that BOTH options can be done, or a single option can be done (either or both can be done). Although it is often misused in cases where OR is sufficient. Otherwise, the use of OR may exclude BOTH options, when exclusion isn't the intent (that would be an XOR).



                      'Formal writing' I don't really buy into much. I am always writing formally, unless I'm SMS texting someone maybe. Even if in a research paper, it is fine, unless you have an anal retentive English teacher. In the real world it is accepted and appropriate, I believe. It is clearer than the longer expansion "A or B, or both".






                      share|improve this answer













                      I personally use and/or when it is logically true. In some cases it is important to stress that BOTH options can be done, or a single option can be done (either or both can be done). Although it is often misused in cases where OR is sufficient. Otherwise, the use of OR may exclude BOTH options, when exclusion isn't the intent (that would be an XOR).



                      'Formal writing' I don't really buy into much. I am always writing formally, unless I'm SMS texting someone maybe. Even if in a research paper, it is fine, unless you have an anal retentive English teacher. In the real world it is accepted and appropriate, I believe. It is clearer than the longer expansion "A or B, or both".







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 15 '11 at 8:30









                      dyastadyasta

                      1112




                      1112























                          0














                          Not sure what your context is, but I was working with:




                          All templates have a spot for your site title and/or logo on every page.




                          Users could have a title, could have a logo, or could have both. I ended up going with:




                          All templates have a spot for your site title, logo, or both on every page.







                          share|improve this answer






























                            0














                            Not sure what your context is, but I was working with:




                            All templates have a spot for your site title and/or logo on every page.




                            Users could have a title, could have a logo, or could have both. I ended up going with:




                            All templates have a spot for your site title, logo, or both on every page.







                            share|improve this answer




























                              0












                              0








                              0







                              Not sure what your context is, but I was working with:




                              All templates have a spot for your site title and/or logo on every page.




                              Users could have a title, could have a logo, or could have both. I ended up going with:




                              All templates have a spot for your site title, logo, or both on every page.







                              share|improve this answer















                              Not sure what your context is, but I was working with:




                              All templates have a spot for your site title and/or logo on every page.




                              Users could have a title, could have a logo, or could have both. I ended up going with:




                              All templates have a spot for your site title, logo, or both on every page.








                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Dec 26 '15 at 23:11









                              macraf

                              2,24892034




                              2,24892034










                              answered Mar 14 '15 at 15:00









                              KelseyKelsey

                              1




                              1























                                  0














                                  Higher rated publications like JMIR and SAGE won't accept and/or. It has to be one or the other...



                                  Lower rated publications don't care.






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    0














                                    Higher rated publications like JMIR and SAGE won't accept and/or. It has to be one or the other...



                                    Lower rated publications don't care.






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      Higher rated publications like JMIR and SAGE won't accept and/or. It has to be one or the other...



                                      Lower rated publications don't care.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      Higher rated publications like JMIR and SAGE won't accept and/or. It has to be one or the other...



                                      Lower rated publications don't care.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Mar 27 at 17:54









                                      user341804user341804

                                      1




                                      1






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21115%2fis-using-and-or-recommended-for-formal-writing-or-is-it-frowned-upon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                          Alcedinidae

                                          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]