In cases like the one mentioned, can good/nice be interchangeable





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
2
down vote

favorite












He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.



He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.



In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.



    He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.



    In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.



      He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.



      In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?










      share|improve this question













      He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.



      He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.



      In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?







      word-usage word-choice usage






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      Soumya Ghosh

      231716




      231716






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.




          She has a lot of really nice things in her house.




          The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:




          Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.







          share|improve this answer





















          • I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
            – RubioRic
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago












          • I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
            – Flater
            2 days ago












          • "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago




















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").



          Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.



          Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be




          He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.







          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186654%2fin-cases-like-the-one-mentioned-can-good-nice-be-interchangeable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.




            She has a lot of really nice things in her house.




            The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:




            Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.







            share|improve this answer





















            • I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
              – RubioRic
              2 days ago






            • 1




              @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago












            • I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
              – Flater
              2 days ago












            • "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago

















            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.




            She has a lot of really nice things in her house.




            The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:




            Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.







            share|improve this answer





















            • I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
              – RubioRic
              2 days ago






            • 1




              @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago












            • I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
              – Flater
              2 days ago












            • "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago















            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted






            In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.




            She has a lot of really nice things in her house.




            The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:




            Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.







            share|improve this answer












            In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.




            She has a lot of really nice things in her house.




            The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:




            Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            Tᴚoɯɐuo

            104k677168




            104k677168












            • I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
              – RubioRic
              2 days ago






            • 1




              @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago












            • I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
              – Flater
              2 days ago












            • "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago




















            • I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
              – RubioRic
              2 days ago






            • 1




              @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago












            • I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
              – Flater
              2 days ago












            • "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
              – Tᴚoɯɐuo
              2 days ago


















            I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
            – RubioRic
            2 days ago




            I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
            – RubioRic
            2 days ago




            1




            1




            @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago






            @Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago














            I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
            – Flater
            2 days ago






            I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
            – Flater
            2 days ago














            "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago






            "Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
            – Tᴚoɯɐuo
            2 days ago














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").



            Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.



            Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be




            He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.







            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").



              Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.



              Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be




              He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.







              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").



                Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.



                Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be




                He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.







                share|improve this answer












                In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").



                Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.



                Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be




                He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                neotryte

                63646




                63646






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186654%2fin-cases-like-the-one-mentioned-can-good-nice-be-interchangeable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                    Alcedinidae

                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]