Jena Model converts my RDF type explicit declaration to implicit and messes with the format












1















I have the following code that creates an RDF resource with some set properties and prints it on console.



    String uri = "http://krweb/";
String name = "Giorgos Georgiou";
String phone = "6976067554";
String age = "27";
String department = "ceid";
String teaches = "java";

Model model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
model.setNsPrefix("krweb", uri);

Resource giorgosgeorgiou = model.createResource(uri+name.toLowerCase().replace(" ", ""), model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));

Property has_name = model.createProperty(uri+"has_name");
Property has_phone = model.createProperty(uri+"has_phone");
Property has_age = model.createProperty(uri+"has_age");
Property member_of = model.createProperty(uri+"member_of");
Property teach = model.createProperty(uri+"teaches");

giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(teach, model.createResource(uri+teaches));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(member_of, model.createResource(uri+department));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_age,age);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_phone,phone);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_name,name);
//giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(RDF.type, model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));
model.write(System.out,"RDF/XML");


I want the model printed in this format:



<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://krweb/Professor"/>
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java" />
</rdf:Description>


Instead I get this:



  <krweb:Professor rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java"/>
</krweb:Professor>


Somehow, the rdf type property gets converted to some implicit declaration and is presented in what I suppose is a "pretty" format. Is there a way to bypass this?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    All formats and how to use them are described in the docs

    – AKSW
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:34
















1















I have the following code that creates an RDF resource with some set properties and prints it on console.



    String uri = "http://krweb/";
String name = "Giorgos Georgiou";
String phone = "6976067554";
String age = "27";
String department = "ceid";
String teaches = "java";

Model model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
model.setNsPrefix("krweb", uri);

Resource giorgosgeorgiou = model.createResource(uri+name.toLowerCase().replace(" ", ""), model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));

Property has_name = model.createProperty(uri+"has_name");
Property has_phone = model.createProperty(uri+"has_phone");
Property has_age = model.createProperty(uri+"has_age");
Property member_of = model.createProperty(uri+"member_of");
Property teach = model.createProperty(uri+"teaches");

giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(teach, model.createResource(uri+teaches));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(member_of, model.createResource(uri+department));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_age,age);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_phone,phone);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_name,name);
//giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(RDF.type, model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));
model.write(System.out,"RDF/XML");


I want the model printed in this format:



<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://krweb/Professor"/>
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java" />
</rdf:Description>


Instead I get this:



  <krweb:Professor rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java"/>
</krweb:Professor>


Somehow, the rdf type property gets converted to some implicit declaration and is presented in what I suppose is a "pretty" format. Is there a way to bypass this?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    All formats and how to use them are described in the docs

    – AKSW
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:34














1












1








1








I have the following code that creates an RDF resource with some set properties and prints it on console.



    String uri = "http://krweb/";
String name = "Giorgos Georgiou";
String phone = "6976067554";
String age = "27";
String department = "ceid";
String teaches = "java";

Model model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
model.setNsPrefix("krweb", uri);

Resource giorgosgeorgiou = model.createResource(uri+name.toLowerCase().replace(" ", ""), model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));

Property has_name = model.createProperty(uri+"has_name");
Property has_phone = model.createProperty(uri+"has_phone");
Property has_age = model.createProperty(uri+"has_age");
Property member_of = model.createProperty(uri+"member_of");
Property teach = model.createProperty(uri+"teaches");

giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(teach, model.createResource(uri+teaches));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(member_of, model.createResource(uri+department));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_age,age);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_phone,phone);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_name,name);
//giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(RDF.type, model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));
model.write(System.out,"RDF/XML");


I want the model printed in this format:



<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://krweb/Professor"/>
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java" />
</rdf:Description>


Instead I get this:



  <krweb:Professor rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java"/>
</krweb:Professor>


Somehow, the rdf type property gets converted to some implicit declaration and is presented in what I suppose is a "pretty" format. Is there a way to bypass this?










share|improve this question














I have the following code that creates an RDF resource with some set properties and prints it on console.



    String uri = "http://krweb/";
String name = "Giorgos Georgiou";
String phone = "6976067554";
String age = "27";
String department = "ceid";
String teaches = "java";

Model model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
model.setNsPrefix("krweb", uri);

Resource giorgosgeorgiou = model.createResource(uri+name.toLowerCase().replace(" ", ""), model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));

Property has_name = model.createProperty(uri+"has_name");
Property has_phone = model.createProperty(uri+"has_phone");
Property has_age = model.createProperty(uri+"has_age");
Property member_of = model.createProperty(uri+"member_of");
Property teach = model.createProperty(uri+"teaches");

giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(teach, model.createResource(uri+teaches));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(member_of, model.createResource(uri+department));
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_age,age);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_phone,phone);
giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(has_name,name);
//giorgosgeorgiou.addProperty(RDF.type, model.createResource(uri+"Professor"));
model.write(System.out,"RDF/XML");


I want the model printed in this format:



<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://krweb/Professor"/>
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java" />
</rdf:Description>


Instead I get this:



  <krweb:Professor rdf:about="http://krweb/giorgosgeorgiou">
<krweb:has_name>Giorgos Georgiou</krweb:has_name>
<krweb:has_phone>6976067554</krweb:has_phone>
<krweb:has_age>27</krweb:has_age>
<krweb:member_of rdf:resource="http://krweb/ceid"/>
<krweb:teaches rdf:resource="http://krweb/java"/>
</krweb:Professor>


Somehow, the rdf type property gets converted to some implicit declaration and is presented in what I suppose is a "pretty" format. Is there a way to bypass this?







java rdf jena rdfs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 23 '18 at 2:06









JimSJimS

112112




112112








  • 1





    All formats and how to use them are described in the docs

    – AKSW
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:34














  • 1





    All formats and how to use them are described in the docs

    – AKSW
    Nov 23 '18 at 7:34








1




1





All formats and how to use them are described in the docs

– AKSW
Nov 23 '18 at 7:34





All formats and how to use them are described in the docs

– AKSW
Nov 23 '18 at 7:34












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Internally the RDF data is held as triples - no knowledge of how they were formatted on input is stored.



The default output is pretty RDF/XML.



To get the plain, flat format use RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN



RDFDataMgr.write(System.out, model, RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN);





share|improve this answer
























  • I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

    – JimS
    Nov 24 '18 at 20:28













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53439861%2fjena-model-converts-my-rdf-type-explicit-declaration-to-implicit-and-messes-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Internally the RDF data is held as triples - no knowledge of how they were formatted on input is stored.



The default output is pretty RDF/XML.



To get the plain, flat format use RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN



RDFDataMgr.write(System.out, model, RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN);





share|improve this answer
























  • I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

    – JimS
    Nov 24 '18 at 20:28


















2














Internally the RDF data is held as triples - no knowledge of how they were formatted on input is stored.



The default output is pretty RDF/XML.



To get the plain, flat format use RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN



RDFDataMgr.write(System.out, model, RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN);





share|improve this answer
























  • I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

    – JimS
    Nov 24 '18 at 20:28
















2












2








2







Internally the RDF data is held as triples - no knowledge of how they were formatted on input is stored.



The default output is pretty RDF/XML.



To get the plain, flat format use RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN



RDFDataMgr.write(System.out, model, RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN);





share|improve this answer













Internally the RDF data is held as triples - no knowledge of how they were formatted on input is stored.



The default output is pretty RDF/XML.



To get the plain, flat format use RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN



RDFDataMgr.write(System.out, model, RDFFormat.RDFXML_PLAIN);






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 23 '18 at 16:13









AndySAndyS

12.9k1118




12.9k1118













  • I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

    – JimS
    Nov 24 '18 at 20:28





















  • I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

    – JimS
    Nov 24 '18 at 20:28



















I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

– JimS
Nov 24 '18 at 20:28







I searched a lot about the formats but I didn't find anything about this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much.

– JimS
Nov 24 '18 at 20:28






















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53439861%2fjena-model-converts-my-rdf-type-explicit-declaration-to-implicit-and-messes-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]