CSS :not() selector not working when targeting nested hierarchy [duplicate]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Multiple descendant children selector with css [duplicate]

    3 answers




I have a scenario where I want to target all tables (or any element) in the page / a container except those elements inside a special container or class (for
example .exempt-table) .



I tried it using :not() selector to target "All tables except those inside .exempt-table" as follows:



.container :not(.exempt-table) table { 

  border: 5px solid red;

}


Here is the complete example:






div {

  border: 1px solid blue;

  padding: 5px;

}



div::before {

  content: 'DIV';

}



.container :not(.exempt-table) table {

  border: 5px solid red;

}

<div class="container">

    <div>

        <h1>General Table. Table1</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>



        </table>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>Special Table. Table2</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

        </table>

    </div>

    <div>

        <h1>NESTED: General Table. Table3</h1>

        <div>



            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>



            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>NESTED: Special Table. Table4</h1>

        <div >

            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

</div>





Expectation is, border (red) should not be applied to Table2, Table4 because these tables are inside .exempt-table. But, the border applied to all tables except Table2 because Table2 is direct child if .container where as Table4 is just descendant.



27th Nov:
Updated the above example to address the issue with > table.






css css-selectors







share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Temani Afif css
Users with the  css badge can single-handedly close css questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 23 '18 at 12:16


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















  • you will need two selector for this

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:16











  • Table 4 is also in a div without a class, which is a match for :not(.exempt-table). So you should avoid situations like those. You can use :not(.exempt-table) > table here.

    – Mr Lister
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:17













  • Hi @TemaniAfif unlike the duplicated question where styles overridden, I dont the border to be applied at all for tables inside ".exempt-table' instead of applying to all and override again. Hope this make sense.

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:24













  • the duplicate explain that you cannot do this using one selector, that's why I added it as a duplicate. You can also follow the duplicate of the duplicate for more details

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 27 '18 at 8:26


















1
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Multiple descendant children selector with css [duplicate]

    3 answers




I have a scenario where I want to target all tables (or any element) in the page / a container except those elements inside a special container or class (for
example .exempt-table) .



I tried it using :not() selector to target "All tables except those inside .exempt-table" as follows:



.container :not(.exempt-table) table { 

  border: 5px solid red;

}


Here is the complete example:






div {

  border: 1px solid blue;

  padding: 5px;

}



div::before {

  content: 'DIV';

}



.container :not(.exempt-table) table {

  border: 5px solid red;

}

<div class="container">

    <div>

        <h1>General Table. Table1</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>



        </table>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>Special Table. Table2</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

        </table>

    </div>

    <div>

        <h1>NESTED: General Table. Table3</h1>

        <div>



            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>



            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>NESTED: Special Table. Table4</h1>

        <div >

            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

</div>





Expectation is, border (red) should not be applied to Table2, Table4 because these tables are inside .exempt-table. But, the border applied to all tables except Table2 because Table2 is direct child if .container where as Table4 is just descendant.



27th Nov:
Updated the above example to address the issue with > table.






css css-selectors







share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Temani Afif css
Users with the  css badge can single-handedly close css questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 23 '18 at 12:16


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















  • you will need two selector for this

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:16











  • Table 4 is also in a div without a class, which is a match for :not(.exempt-table). So you should avoid situations like those. You can use :not(.exempt-table) > table here.

    – Mr Lister
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:17













  • Hi @TemaniAfif unlike the duplicated question where styles overridden, I dont the border to be applied at all for tables inside ".exempt-table' instead of applying to all and override again. Hope this make sense.

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:24













  • the duplicate explain that you cannot do this using one selector, that's why I added it as a duplicate. You can also follow the duplicate of the duplicate for more details

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 27 '18 at 8:26














1












1








1









This question already has an answer here:




  • Multiple descendant children selector with css [duplicate]

    3 answers




I have a scenario where I want to target all tables (or any element) in the page / a container except those elements inside a special container or class (for
example .exempt-table) .



I tried it using :not() selector to target "All tables except those inside .exempt-table" as follows:



.container :not(.exempt-table) table { 

  border: 5px solid red;

}


Here is the complete example:






div {

  border: 1px solid blue;

  padding: 5px;

}



div::before {

  content: 'DIV';

}



.container :not(.exempt-table) table {

  border: 5px solid red;

}

<div class="container">

    <div>

        <h1>General Table. Table1</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>



        </table>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>Special Table. Table2</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

        </table>

    </div>

    <div>

        <h1>NESTED: General Table. Table3</h1>

        <div>



            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>



            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>NESTED: Special Table. Table4</h1>

        <div >

            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

</div>





Expectation is, border (red) should not be applied to Table2, Table4 because these tables are inside .exempt-table. But, the border applied to all tables except Table2 because Table2 is direct child if .container where as Table4 is just descendant.



27th Nov:
Updated the above example to address the issue with > table.






css css-selectors







share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:




  • Multiple descendant children selector with css [duplicate]

    3 answers




I have a scenario where I want to target all tables (or any element) in the page / a container except those elements inside a special container or class (for
example .exempt-table) .



I tried it using :not() selector to target "All tables except those inside .exempt-table" as follows:



.container :not(.exempt-table) table { 

  border: 5px solid red;

}


Here is the complete example:






div {

  border: 1px solid blue;

  padding: 5px;

}



div::before {

  content: 'DIV';

}



.container :not(.exempt-table) table {

  border: 5px solid red;

}

<div class="container">

    <div>

        <h1>General Table. Table1</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>



        </table>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>Special Table. Table2</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

        </table>

    </div>

    <div>

        <h1>NESTED: General Table. Table3</h1>

        <div>



            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>



            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>NESTED: Special Table. Table4</h1>

        <div >

            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

</div>





Expectation is, border (red) should not be applied to Table2, Table4 because these tables are inside .exempt-table. But, the border applied to all tables except Table2 because Table2 is direct child if .container where as Table4 is just descendant.



27th Nov:
Updated the above example to address the issue with > table.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Multiple descendant children selector with css [duplicate]

    3 answers







div {

  border: 1px solid blue;

  padding: 5px;

}



div::before {

  content: 'DIV';

}



.container :not(.exempt-table) table {

  border: 5px solid red;

}

<div class="container">

    <div>

        <h1>General Table. Table1</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>



        </table>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>Special Table. Table2</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

        </table>

    </div>

    <div>

        <h1>NESTED: General Table. Table3</h1>

        <div>



            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>



            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>NESTED: Special Table. Table4</h1>

        <div >

            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

</div>





div {

  border: 1px solid blue;

  padding: 5px;

}



div::before {

  content: 'DIV';

}



.container :not(.exempt-table) table {

  border: 5px solid red;

}

<div class="container">

    <div>

        <h1>General Table. Table1</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>



        </table>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>Special Table. Table2</h1>

        <table>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

            <tr>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td>COl1</td>

                <td></td>

            </tr>

        </table>

    </div>

    <div>

        <h1>NESTED: General Table. Table3</h1>

        <div>



            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>



            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

    <div class="exempt-table">

        <h1>NESTED: Special Table. Table4</h1>

        <div >

            <table>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

                <tr>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td>COl1</td>

                    <td></td>

                </tr>

            </table>

        </div>

    </div>

</div>





css css-selectors




css css-selectors






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 27 '18 at 6:20







Prasanna Kumar

















asked Nov 23 '18 at 11:26









Prasanna KumarPrasanna Kumar

394819




394819




marked as duplicate by Temani Afif css
Users with the  css badge can single-handedly close css questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 23 '18 at 12:16


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Temani Afif css
Users with the  css badge can single-handedly close css questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 23 '18 at 12:16


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • you will need two selector for this

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:16











  • Table 4 is also in a div without a class, which is a match for :not(.exempt-table). So you should avoid situations like those. You can use :not(.exempt-table) > table here.

    – Mr Lister
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:17













  • Hi @TemaniAfif unlike the duplicated question where styles overridden, I dont the border to be applied at all for tables inside ".exempt-table' instead of applying to all and override again. Hope this make sense.

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:24













  • the duplicate explain that you cannot do this using one selector, that's why I added it as a duplicate. You can also follow the duplicate of the duplicate for more details

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 27 '18 at 8:26



















  • you will need two selector for this

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:16











  • Table 4 is also in a div without a class, which is a match for :not(.exempt-table). So you should avoid situations like those. You can use :not(.exempt-table) > table here.

    – Mr Lister
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:17













  • Hi @TemaniAfif unlike the duplicated question where styles overridden, I dont the border to be applied at all for tables inside ".exempt-table' instead of applying to all and override again. Hope this make sense.

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 27 '18 at 3:24













  • the duplicate explain that you cannot do this using one selector, that's why I added it as a duplicate. You can also follow the duplicate of the duplicate for more details

    – Temani Afif
    Nov 27 '18 at 8:26

















you will need two selector for this

– Temani Afif
Nov 23 '18 at 12:16





you will need two selector for this

– Temani Afif
Nov 23 '18 at 12:16













Table 4 is also in a div without a class, which is a match for :not(.exempt-table). So you should avoid situations like those. You can use :not(.exempt-table) > table here.

– Mr Lister
Nov 23 '18 at 12:17







Table 4 is also in a div without a class, which is a match for :not(.exempt-table). So you should avoid situations like those. You can use :not(.exempt-table) > table here.

– Mr Lister
Nov 23 '18 at 12:17















Hi @TemaniAfif unlike the duplicated question where styles overridden, I dont the border to be applied at all for tables inside ".exempt-table' instead of applying to all and override again. Hope this make sense.

– Prasanna Kumar
Nov 27 '18 at 3:24







Hi @TemaniAfif unlike the duplicated question where styles overridden, I dont the border to be applied at all for tables inside ".exempt-table' instead of applying to all and override again. Hope this make sense.

– Prasanna Kumar
Nov 27 '18 at 3:24















the duplicate explain that you cannot do this using one selector, that's why I added it as a duplicate. You can also follow the duplicate of the duplicate for more details

– Temani Afif
Nov 27 '18 at 8:26





the duplicate explain that you cannot do this using one selector, that's why I added it as a duplicate. You can also follow the duplicate of the duplicate for more details

– Temani Afif
Nov 27 '18 at 8:26












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















-1














please try this style



<style>

      .container :not(.exempt-table) > table {

        border: 5px solid red;

      }

    </style>





share|improve this answer
























  • Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:42













  • @PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

    – AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:46











  • this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:31




















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









-1














please try this style



<style>

      .container :not(.exempt-table) > table {

        border: 5px solid red;

      }

    </style>





share|improve this answer
























  • Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:42













  • @PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

    – AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:46











  • this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:31


















-1














please try this style



<style>

      .container :not(.exempt-table) > table {

        border: 5px solid red;

      }

    </style>





share|improve this answer
























  • Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:42













  • @PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

    – AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:46











  • this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:31
















-1












-1








-1







please try this style



<style>

      .container :not(.exempt-table) > table {

        border: 5px solid red;

      }

    </style>





share|improve this answer













please try this style



<style>

      .container :not(.exempt-table) > table {

        border: 5px solid red;

      }

    </style>






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 23 '18 at 11:36









AddWeb Solution Pvt LtdAddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd

13.4k11439




13.4k11439













  • Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:42













  • @PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

    – AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:46











  • this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:31





















  • Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:42













  • @PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

    – AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:46











  • this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

    – Prasanna Kumar
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:31



















Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

– Prasanna Kumar
Nov 23 '18 at 11:42







Hi, I tried this working, but, this needs table to be immediate child of .exempt-table which may not be guaranteed in my case

– Prasanna Kumar
Nov 23 '18 at 11:42















@PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

– AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
Nov 23 '18 at 11:46





@PrasannaKumar: This CSS code also work for more table please check

– AddWeb Solution Pvt Ltd
Nov 23 '18 at 11:46













this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

– Prasanna Kumar
Nov 26 '18 at 9:31







this is not working in case of <div class="exempt-table"> <div> <table> because table is not direct child of ".exempt-table"

– Prasanna Kumar
Nov 26 '18 at 9:31







-

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Image
5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

Image
9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
Read more