Why Can L'Hôpital's Rule Not be Applied to the Sum or Difference of Limits?











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Consider $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xtoinfty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as
$$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
Why is this incorrect?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Limit operator is not a linear transformation, that is why.
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Nov 29 at 0:20








  • 1




    I think it only goes wrong when you will end up with something of the form $+infty - infty$. So, if you avoid these cases you can apply it if I am correct.
    – Stan Tendijck
    Nov 29 at 0:54















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Consider $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xtoinfty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as
$$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
Why is this incorrect?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Limit operator is not a linear transformation, that is why.
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Nov 29 at 0:20








  • 1




    I think it only goes wrong when you will end up with something of the form $+infty - infty$. So, if you avoid these cases you can apply it if I am correct.
    – Stan Tendijck
    Nov 29 at 0:54













up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











Consider $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xtoinfty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as
$$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
Why is this incorrect?










share|cite|improve this question















Consider $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xtoinfty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as
$$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$
Why is this incorrect?







calculus limits






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 4:27









snorepion

31




31










asked Nov 29 at 0:16









Danielle

1819




1819








  • 1




    Limit operator is not a linear transformation, that is why.
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Nov 29 at 0:20








  • 1




    I think it only goes wrong when you will end up with something of the form $+infty - infty$. So, if you avoid these cases you can apply it if I am correct.
    – Stan Tendijck
    Nov 29 at 0:54














  • 1




    Limit operator is not a linear transformation, that is why.
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Nov 29 at 0:20








  • 1




    I think it only goes wrong when you will end up with something of the form $+infty - infty$. So, if you avoid these cases you can apply it if I am correct.
    – Stan Tendijck
    Nov 29 at 0:54








1




1




Limit operator is not a linear transformation, that is why.
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 at 0:20






Limit operator is not a linear transformation, that is why.
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 at 0:20






1




1




I think it only goes wrong when you will end up with something of the form $+infty - infty$. So, if you avoid these cases you can apply it if I am correct.
– Stan Tendijck
Nov 29 at 0:54




I think it only goes wrong when you will end up with something of the form $+infty - infty$. So, if you avoid these cases you can apply it if I am correct.
– Stan Tendijck
Nov 29 at 0:54










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote



accepted











I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as ...




This has nothing to do with the L'Hôpital's rule itself.



The rule that you cannot use is:




$limlimits_{xto...}f(x)+limlimits_{xto...}g(x)=limlimits_{xto...}(f(x)+g(x))$




And you can see from JDMan4444's answer that there are situations where this rule does not work.



However, if you are sure that $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xto...}g(x)$ exist (and are not $pminfty$), you can apply that rule. (And of course you can apply L'Hôpital's rule to the sum in this case.)



This is important because in some cases it is possible to prove that both limits exist but calculating the limits directly is very difficult or even impossible. In such cases calculating the limit of the sum may be easier.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
    – gimusi
    Nov 29 at 7:42




















up vote
10
down vote













Consider the following example:



$$
lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{-x^2}{x} = infty - infty quad text{(which is undefined)}
$$

$$
lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0
$$






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
    – gimusi
    Nov 29 at 7:44






  • 1




    Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
    – user21820
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
    – user3445853
    2 days ago












  • @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
    – gimusi
    2 days ago










  • @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
    – user21820
    2 days ago


















up vote
3
down vote













The following identity



$$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xto infty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$



doesn't hold in general and to solve the LHS limit by l'Hopital, if necessary, we need to put it in the form



$$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)i(x)+h(x)g(x)}{g(x)i(x)} $$



the reason is that the case you are referring to is not among the cases considered by l'Hopital theorem.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It seems to me you got some bad, or incomplete, advice. It's not incorrect if both of those limits exist and are finite. This doesn't have much to do with L'Hopital. The $infty - infty$ or $-infty + infty$ cases are problematic whether you're contemplating L'Hopital or not.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:41










    • @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
      – zhw.
      2 days ago










    • My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
      – gimusi
      2 days ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017962%2fwhy-can-lh%25c3%25b4pitals-rule-not-be-applied-to-the-sum-or-difference-of-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted











    I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as ...




    This has nothing to do with the L'Hôpital's rule itself.



    The rule that you cannot use is:




    $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)+limlimits_{xto...}g(x)=limlimits_{xto...}(f(x)+g(x))$




    And you can see from JDMan4444's answer that there are situations where this rule does not work.



    However, if you are sure that $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xto...}g(x)$ exist (and are not $pminfty$), you can apply that rule. (And of course you can apply L'Hôpital's rule to the sum in this case.)



    This is important because in some cases it is possible to prove that both limits exist but calculating the limits directly is very difficult or even impossible. In such cases calculating the limit of the sum may be easier.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:42

















    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted











    I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as ...




    This has nothing to do with the L'Hôpital's rule itself.



    The rule that you cannot use is:




    $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)+limlimits_{xto...}g(x)=limlimits_{xto...}(f(x)+g(x))$




    And you can see from JDMan4444's answer that there are situations where this rule does not work.



    However, if you are sure that $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xto...}g(x)$ exist (and are not $pminfty$), you can apply that rule. (And of course you can apply L'Hôpital's rule to the sum in this case.)



    This is important because in some cases it is possible to prove that both limits exist but calculating the limits directly is very difficult or even impossible. In such cases calculating the limit of the sum may be easier.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:42















    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted







    I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as ...




    This has nothing to do with the L'Hôpital's rule itself.



    The rule that you cannot use is:




    $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)+limlimits_{xto...}g(x)=limlimits_{xto...}(f(x)+g(x))$




    And you can see from JDMan4444's answer that there are situations where this rule does not work.



    However, if you are sure that $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xto...}g(x)$ exist (and are not $pminfty$), you can apply that rule. (And of course you can apply L'Hôpital's rule to the sum in this case.)



    This is important because in some cases it is possible to prove that both limits exist but calculating the limits directly is very difficult or even impossible. In such cases calculating the limit of the sum may be easier.






    share|cite|improve this answer













    I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits as ...




    This has nothing to do with the L'Hôpital's rule itself.



    The rule that you cannot use is:




    $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)+limlimits_{xto...}g(x)=limlimits_{xto...}(f(x)+g(x))$




    And you can see from JDMan4444's answer that there are situations where this rule does not work.



    However, if you are sure that $limlimits_{xto...}f(x)$ and $limlimits_{xto...}g(x)$ exist (and are not $pminfty$), you can apply that rule. (And of course you can apply L'Hôpital's rule to the sum in this case.)



    This is important because in some cases it is possible to prove that both limits exist but calculating the limits directly is very difficult or even impossible. In such cases calculating the limit of the sum may be easier.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 29 at 7:09









    Martin Rosenau

    1,062128




    1,062128












    • The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:42




















    • The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:42


















    The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
    – gimusi
    Nov 29 at 7:42






    The OP is related to THAT and the main doubt is on the application of HR.
    – gimusi
    Nov 29 at 7:42












    up vote
    10
    down vote













    Consider the following example:



    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{-x^2}{x} = infty - infty quad text{(which is undefined)}
    $$

    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:44






    • 1




      Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
      – user21820
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
      – user3445853
      2 days ago












    • @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
      – gimusi
      2 days ago










    • @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
      – user21820
      2 days ago















    up vote
    10
    down vote













    Consider the following example:



    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{-x^2}{x} = infty - infty quad text{(which is undefined)}
    $$

    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:44






    • 1




      Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
      – user21820
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
      – user3445853
      2 days ago












    • @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
      – gimusi
      2 days ago










    • @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
      – user21820
      2 days ago













    up vote
    10
    down vote










    up vote
    10
    down vote









    Consider the following example:



    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{-x^2}{x} = infty - infty quad text{(which is undefined)}
    $$

    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    Consider the following example:



    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{-x^2}{x} = infty - infty quad text{(which is undefined)}
    $$

    $$
    lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0
    $$







    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 29 at 5:08









    Tanner Swett

    3,9561638




    3,9561638






    New contributor




    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Nov 29 at 0:18









    JDMan4444

    25514




    25514




    New contributor




    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    JDMan4444 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:44






    • 1




      Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
      – user21820
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
      – user3445853
      2 days ago












    • @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
      – gimusi
      2 days ago










    • @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
      – user21820
      2 days ago


















    • Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
      – gimusi
      Nov 29 at 7:44






    • 1




      Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
      – user21820
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
      – user3445853
      2 days ago












    • @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
      – gimusi
      2 days ago










    • @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
      – user21820
      2 days ago
















    Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
    – gimusi
    Nov 29 at 7:44




    Ypu example is fine and correct but note that the main doubt was in the application of l'HR and is related to this other OP.
    – gimusi
    Nov 29 at 7:44




    1




    1




    Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
    – user21820
    2 days ago




    Your second line "$lim_{xrightarrowinfty}frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x} = 0$" is wrong. Addition has lower precedence than the limit operator, by convention.
    – user21820
    2 days ago




    1




    1




    @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
    – user3445853
    2 days ago






    @user21820 indeed; round brackets are needed around both fractions together, otherwise it's +∞ because the limit applies only to the left fraction, the right remains -x^2/x. But that was obvious from the context. More importantly, this applies to the original question as much as here, so comment should be there.
    – user3445853
    2 days ago














    @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
    – gimusi
    2 days ago




    @user21820 It could be convention but since the expression $frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}$ is identically equal to zero for all $xneq 0$ I think that it is a noce assumption read that as $$lim_{xrightarrowinfty} left(frac{x^2}{x}+frac{-x^2}{x}right) =lim_{xrightarrowinfty} 0= 0$$
    – gimusi
    2 days ago












    @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
    – user21820
    2 days ago




    @user3445853: No. Teachers making errors are one big reason why students don't learn. I've nothing more to say here.
    – user21820
    2 days ago










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    The following identity



    $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xto infty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$



    doesn't hold in general and to solve the LHS limit by l'Hopital, if necessary, we need to put it in the form



    $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)i(x)+h(x)g(x)}{g(x)i(x)} $$



    the reason is that the case you are referring to is not among the cases considered by l'Hopital theorem.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      The following identity



      $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xto infty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$



      doesn't hold in general and to solve the LHS limit by l'Hopital, if necessary, we need to put it in the form



      $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)i(x)+h(x)g(x)}{g(x)i(x)} $$



      the reason is that the case you are referring to is not among the cases considered by l'Hopital theorem.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        The following identity



        $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xto infty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$



        doesn't hold in general and to solve the LHS limit by l'Hopital, if necessary, we need to put it in the form



        $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)i(x)+h(x)g(x)}{g(x)i(x)} $$



        the reason is that the case you are referring to is not among the cases considered by l'Hopital theorem.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The following identity



        $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)}{g(x)} + lim_{xto infty}frac{h(x)}{i(x)}$$



        doesn't hold in general and to solve the LHS limit by l'Hopital, if necessary, we need to put it in the form



        $$lim_{xto infty}left(frac{f(x)}{g(x)} +frac{h(x)}{i(x)}right)=lim_{xto infty}frac{f(x)i(x)+h(x)g(x)}{g(x)i(x)} $$



        the reason is that the case you are referring to is not among the cases considered by l'Hopital theorem.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 29 at 0:23









        gimusi

        88.8k74394




        88.8k74394






















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It seems to me you got some bad, or incomplete, advice. It's not incorrect if both of those limits exist and are finite. This doesn't have much to do with L'Hopital. The $infty - infty$ or $-infty + infty$ cases are problematic whether you're contemplating L'Hopital or not.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
              – gimusi
              Nov 29 at 7:41










            • @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
              – zhw.
              2 days ago










            • My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
              – gimusi
              2 days ago















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It seems to me you got some bad, or incomplete, advice. It's not incorrect if both of those limits exist and are finite. This doesn't have much to do with L'Hopital. The $infty - infty$ or $-infty + infty$ cases are problematic whether you're contemplating L'Hopital or not.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
              – gimusi
              Nov 29 at 7:41










            • @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
              – zhw.
              2 days ago










            • My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
              – gimusi
              2 days ago













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            It seems to me you got some bad, or incomplete, advice. It's not incorrect if both of those limits exist and are finite. This doesn't have much to do with L'Hopital. The $infty - infty$ or $-infty + infty$ cases are problematic whether you're contemplating L'Hopital or not.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            It seems to me you got some bad, or incomplete, advice. It's not incorrect if both of those limits exist and are finite. This doesn't have much to do with L'Hopital. The $infty - infty$ or $-infty + infty$ cases are problematic whether you're contemplating L'Hopital or not.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 29 at 7:28









            zhw.

            70.6k43075




            70.6k43075












            • The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
              – gimusi
              Nov 29 at 7:41










            • @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
              – zhw.
              2 days ago










            • My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
              – gimusi
              2 days ago


















            • The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
              – gimusi
              Nov 29 at 7:41










            • @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
              – zhw.
              2 days ago










            • My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
              – gimusi
              2 days ago
















            The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
            – gimusi
            Nov 29 at 7:41




            The advice was given HERE for that specific example and it was a completely different case to the one you are referring to.
            – gimusi
            Nov 29 at 7:41












            @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
            – zhw.
            2 days ago




            @gimusi I responded to the OP's question here. She wrote "I was told that I cannot apply L'Hôpital's rule to each individual limit and then join the limits" and then asked why this is incorrect. I answered that. Why are you sending me to some other question?
            – zhw.
            2 days ago












            My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
            – gimusi
            2 days ago




            My aim was solely give you a better context for the question posed.
            – gimusi
            2 days ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017962%2fwhy-can-lh%25c3%25b4pitals-rule-not-be-applied-to-the-sum-or-difference-of-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]