Four week supply or four-week supply [on hold]
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Should four week supply be hyphenated as four-week supply?
Thanks!
hyphenation
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster Dec 13 at 4:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Should four week supply be hyphenated as four-week supply?
Thanks!
hyphenation
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster Dec 13 at 4:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Yes, hyphenated (although non-hyphenated is increasingly common). As "four week" acts as an adjective (which is why week is singular even though preceded by a plural number), it should be hyphenated to avoid any ambiguity on how to parse "week". An alternative construction would be four weeks' supply, where no hyphen should be used.
– Chappo
Dec 12 at 22:10
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Should four week supply be hyphenated as four-week supply?
Thanks!
hyphenation
New contributor
Should four week supply be hyphenated as four-week supply?
Thanks!
hyphenation
hyphenation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Dec 12 at 20:16
Paul Stevens
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster Dec 13 at 4:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster Dec 13 at 4:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – jimm101, J. Taylor, Phil Sweet, Robusto, choster
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Yes, hyphenated (although non-hyphenated is increasingly common). As "four week" acts as an adjective (which is why week is singular even though preceded by a plural number), it should be hyphenated to avoid any ambiguity on how to parse "week". An alternative construction would be four weeks' supply, where no hyphen should be used.
– Chappo
Dec 12 at 22:10
add a comment |
Yes, hyphenated (although non-hyphenated is increasingly common). As "four week" acts as an adjective (which is why week is singular even though preceded by a plural number), it should be hyphenated to avoid any ambiguity on how to parse "week". An alternative construction would be four weeks' supply, where no hyphen should be used.
– Chappo
Dec 12 at 22:10
Yes, hyphenated (although non-hyphenated is increasingly common). As "four week" acts as an adjective (which is why week is singular even though preceded by a plural number), it should be hyphenated to avoid any ambiguity on how to parse "week". An alternative construction would be four weeks' supply, where no hyphen should be used.
– Chappo
Dec 12 at 22:10
Yes, hyphenated (although non-hyphenated is increasingly common). As "four week" acts as an adjective (which is why week is singular even though preceded by a plural number), it should be hyphenated to avoid any ambiguity on how to parse "week". An alternative construction would be four weeks' supply, where no hyphen should be used.
– Chappo
Dec 12 at 22:10
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
A four-week supply. We may express quantities, sizes, etc, with a compound adjective, consisting of a quantity and a unit of measurement (in singular form), before a noun. It is hyphenated: a five-mile walk, a ten-ton truck, a three-hour wait. If the quantity has more than one word, all are hyphenated too, thus a two-thousand-page book, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar prize.
Hyphens
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Or perhaps you may say "Four weeks' worth of supply" Bypassing the need for hyphens but I doubt this is what you wanted.
New contributor
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
A four-week supply. We may express quantities, sizes, etc, with a compound adjective, consisting of a quantity and a unit of measurement (in singular form), before a noun. It is hyphenated: a five-mile walk, a ten-ton truck, a three-hour wait. If the quantity has more than one word, all are hyphenated too, thus a two-thousand-page book, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar prize.
Hyphens
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
A four-week supply. We may express quantities, sizes, etc, with a compound adjective, consisting of a quantity and a unit of measurement (in singular form), before a noun. It is hyphenated: a five-mile walk, a ten-ton truck, a three-hour wait. If the quantity has more than one word, all are hyphenated too, thus a two-thousand-page book, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar prize.
Hyphens
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
A four-week supply. We may express quantities, sizes, etc, with a compound adjective, consisting of a quantity and a unit of measurement (in singular form), before a noun. It is hyphenated: a five-mile walk, a ten-ton truck, a three-hour wait. If the quantity has more than one word, all are hyphenated too, thus a two-thousand-page book, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar prize.
Hyphens
A four-week supply. We may express quantities, sizes, etc, with a compound adjective, consisting of a quantity and a unit of measurement (in singular form), before a noun. It is hyphenated: a five-mile walk, a ten-ton truck, a three-hour wait. If the quantity has more than one word, all are hyphenated too, thus a two-thousand-page book, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar prize.
Hyphens
edited Dec 12 at 22:39
answered Dec 12 at 20:28
Michael Harvey
5,39011019
5,39011019
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Or perhaps you may say "Four weeks' worth of supply" Bypassing the need for hyphens but I doubt this is what you wanted.
New contributor
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Or perhaps you may say "Four weeks' worth of supply" Bypassing the need for hyphens but I doubt this is what you wanted.
New contributor
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Or perhaps you may say "Four weeks' worth of supply" Bypassing the need for hyphens but I doubt this is what you wanted.
New contributor
Or perhaps you may say "Four weeks' worth of supply" Bypassing the need for hyphens but I doubt this is what you wanted.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Dec 12 at 20:45
sichun zhang
92
92
New contributor
New contributor
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
add a comment |
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
It should be supplies, not supply, in your version.
– Jason Bassford
Dec 13 at 5:20
add a comment |
Yes, hyphenated (although non-hyphenated is increasingly common). As "four week" acts as an adjective (which is why week is singular even though preceded by a plural number), it should be hyphenated to avoid any ambiguity on how to parse "week". An alternative construction would be four weeks' supply, where no hyphen should be used.
– Chappo
Dec 12 at 22:10