How can I inherit parent logger when using Python's multiprocessing? Especially for paramiko
I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.
I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.
My code without multiprocessing:
from multiprocessing import Process
import paramiko
import logging
import sys
def sftp_read():
# log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
timeout = 60
ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
banner_timeout=timeout)
sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
lines = fp.readlines()
print ''.join(lines)
fp.close()
ssh.close()
def main():
sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
log = logging.getLogger()
log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
main()
The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)
But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):
def main():
# Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
p = Process(target=sftp_read)
try:
log.debug("About to start SSH")
p.start()
log.debug('Process started')
p.join(15)
finally:
if p.is_alive():
p.terminate()
log.debug('Terminated')
else:
log.debug("Finished normally")
Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?
I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.
So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.
python logging multiprocessing paramiko
add a comment |
I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.
I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.
My code without multiprocessing:
from multiprocessing import Process
import paramiko
import logging
import sys
def sftp_read():
# log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
timeout = 60
ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
banner_timeout=timeout)
sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
lines = fp.readlines()
print ''.join(lines)
fp.close()
ssh.close()
def main():
sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
log = logging.getLogger()
log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
main()
The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)
But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):
def main():
# Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
p = Process(target=sftp_read)
try:
log.debug("About to start SSH")
p.start()
log.debug('Process started')
p.join(15)
finally:
if p.is_alive():
p.terminate()
log.debug('Terminated')
else:
log.debug("Finished normally")
Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?
I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.
So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.
python logging multiprocessing paramiko
add a comment |
I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.
I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.
My code without multiprocessing:
from multiprocessing import Process
import paramiko
import logging
import sys
def sftp_read():
# log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
timeout = 60
ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
banner_timeout=timeout)
sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
lines = fp.readlines()
print ''.join(lines)
fp.close()
ssh.close()
def main():
sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
log = logging.getLogger()
log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
main()
The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)
But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):
def main():
# Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
p = Process(target=sftp_read)
try:
log.debug("About to start SSH")
p.start()
log.debug('Process started')
p.join(15)
finally:
if p.is_alive():
p.terminate()
log.debug('Terminated')
else:
log.debug("Finished normally")
Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?
I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.
So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.
python logging multiprocessing paramiko
I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.
I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.
My code without multiprocessing:
from multiprocessing import Process
import paramiko
import logging
import sys
def sftp_read():
# log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
timeout = 60
ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
banner_timeout=timeout)
sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
lines = fp.readlines()
print ''.join(lines)
fp.close()
ssh.close()
def main():
sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
log = logging.getLogger()
log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
main()
The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)
But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):
def main():
# Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
p = Process(target=sftp_read)
try:
log.debug("About to start SSH")
p.start()
log.debug('Process started')
p.join(15)
finally:
if p.is_alive():
p.terminate()
log.debug('Terminated')
else:
log.debug("Finished normally")
Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?
I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.
So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.
python logging multiprocessing paramiko
python logging multiprocessing paramiko
asked Nov 20 at 2:53
Columbia Rover
1398
1398
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork
system call. The child process created using fork
is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.
Warning: fork
copies everything; but, does not copy threads
. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.
import logging
from multiprocessing import Pool
from os import getpid
def runs_in_subprocess():
logging.info(
"I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(
format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)
logging.info(
"I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
with Pool() as pool:
pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)
Output:
GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885
Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration
You might get into problem of deadlocks
so beware of following:
Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.
If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.
The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.
The child process now waits for the lock to be released.
The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().
In python3, you could avoid this using get_context
.
from multiprocessing import get_context
def your_func():
with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
# ... everything else is unchanged
Advice:
Using
get_context
create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
Windows doesn't havefork
. So,multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to knowlog
, move yourlog
config to yoursftp_read
function.
– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385540%2fhow-can-i-inherit-parent-logger-when-using-pythons-multiprocessing-especially%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork
system call. The child process created using fork
is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.
Warning: fork
copies everything; but, does not copy threads
. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.
import logging
from multiprocessing import Pool
from os import getpid
def runs_in_subprocess():
logging.info(
"I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(
format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)
logging.info(
"I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
with Pool() as pool:
pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)
Output:
GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885
Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration
You might get into problem of deadlocks
so beware of following:
Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.
If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.
The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.
The child process now waits for the lock to be released.
The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().
In python3, you could avoid this using get_context
.
from multiprocessing import get_context
def your_func():
with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
# ... everything else is unchanged
Advice:
Using
get_context
create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
Windows doesn't havefork
. So,multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to knowlog
, move yourlog
config to yoursftp_read
function.
– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
add a comment |
In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork
system call. The child process created using fork
is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.
Warning: fork
copies everything; but, does not copy threads
. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.
import logging
from multiprocessing import Pool
from os import getpid
def runs_in_subprocess():
logging.info(
"I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(
format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)
logging.info(
"I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
with Pool() as pool:
pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)
Output:
GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885
Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration
You might get into problem of deadlocks
so beware of following:
Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.
If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.
The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.
The child process now waits for the lock to be released.
The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().
In python3, you could avoid this using get_context
.
from multiprocessing import get_context
def your_func():
with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
# ... everything else is unchanged
Advice:
Using
get_context
create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
Windows doesn't havefork
. So,multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to knowlog
, move yourlog
config to yoursftp_read
function.
– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
add a comment |
In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork
system call. The child process created using fork
is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.
Warning: fork
copies everything; but, does not copy threads
. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.
import logging
from multiprocessing import Pool
from os import getpid
def runs_in_subprocess():
logging.info(
"I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(
format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)
logging.info(
"I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
with Pool() as pool:
pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)
Output:
GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885
Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration
You might get into problem of deadlocks
so beware of following:
Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.
If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.
The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.
The child process now waits for the lock to be released.
The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().
In python3, you could avoid this using get_context
.
from multiprocessing import get_context
def your_func():
with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
# ... everything else is unchanged
Advice:
Using
get_context
create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.
In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork
system call. The child process created using fork
is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.
Warning: fork
copies everything; but, does not copy threads
. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.
import logging
from multiprocessing import Pool
from os import getpid
def runs_in_subprocess():
logging.info(
"I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(
format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)
logging.info(
"I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))
with Pool() as pool:
pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)
Output:
GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885
Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration
You might get into problem of deadlocks
so beware of following:
Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.
If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.
The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.
The child process now waits for the lock to be released.
The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().
In python3, you could avoid this using get_context
.
from multiprocessing import get_context
def your_func():
with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
# ... everything else is unchanged
Advice:
Using
get_context
create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.
answered Nov 20 at 3:28
Pruthvi Kumar
58719
58719
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
Windows doesn't havefork
. So,multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to knowlog
, move yourlog
config to yoursftp_read
function.
– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
add a comment |
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
Windows doesn't havefork
. So,multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to knowlog
, move yourlog
config to yoursftp_read
function.
– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
– Columbia Rover
Nov 20 at 4:09
Windows doesn't have
fork
. So, multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log
, move your log
config to your sftp_read
function.– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
Windows doesn't have
fork
. So, multiprocessing
module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log
, move your log
config to your sftp_read
function.– Pruthvi Kumar
Nov 20 at 4:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385540%2fhow-can-i-inherit-parent-logger-when-using-pythons-multiprocessing-especially%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown