How can I inherit parent logger when using Python's multiprocessing? Especially for paramiko












0














I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.



I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.



My code without multiprocessing:



from multiprocessing import Process
import paramiko
import logging
import sys


def sftp_read():
# log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
timeout = 60
ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
banner_timeout=timeout)
sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
lines = fp.readlines()
print ''.join(lines)
fp.close()
ssh.close()


def main():
sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing

if __name__ == '__main__':
logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
log = logging.getLogger()
log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
main()


The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:



[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
[2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)


But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):



def main():
# Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
p = Process(target=sftp_read)
try:
log.debug("About to start SSH")
p.start()
log.debug('Process started')
p.join(15)
finally:
if p.is_alive():
p.terminate()
log.debug('Terminated')
else:
log.debug("Finished normally")


Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?



I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.



So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.










share|improve this question



























    0














    I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.



    I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.



    My code without multiprocessing:



    from multiprocessing import Process
    import paramiko
    import logging
    import sys


    def sftp_read():
    # log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
    ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
    ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
    timeout = 60
    ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
    banner_timeout=timeout)
    sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
    fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
    lines = fp.readlines()
    print ''.join(lines)
    fp.close()
    ssh.close()


    def main():
    sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing

    if __name__ == '__main__':
    logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
    format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
    log = logging.getLogger()
    log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
    main()


    The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:



    [2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
    [2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
    [2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
    [2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)


    But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):



    def main():
    # Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
    p = Process(target=sftp_read)
    try:
    log.debug("About to start SSH")
    p.start()
    log.debug('Process started')
    p.join(15)
    finally:
    if p.is_alive():
    p.terminate()
    log.debug('Terminated')
    else:
    log.debug("Finished normally")


    Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?



    I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.



    So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.



      I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.



      My code without multiprocessing:



      from multiprocessing import Process
      import paramiko
      import logging
      import sys


      def sftp_read():
      # log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
      ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
      ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
      timeout = 60
      ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
      banner_timeout=timeout)
      sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
      fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
      lines = fp.readlines()
      print ''.join(lines)
      fp.close()
      ssh.close()


      def main():
      sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing

      if __name__ == '__main__':
      logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
      format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
      log = logging.getLogger()
      log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
      main()


      The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:



      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)


      But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):



      def main():
      # Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
      p = Process(target=sftp_read)
      try:
      log.debug("About to start SSH")
      p.start()
      log.debug('Process started')
      p.join(15)
      finally:
      if p.is_alive():
      p.terminate()
      log.debug('Terminated')
      else:
      log.debug("Finished normally")


      Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?



      I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.



      So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.










      share|improve this question













      I'm using Python's multiprocessing. I have set the logger in parent process, but I can't just simply inherit the parent's logging setting.



      I don't worry about mixing up the log, for I use multiprocessing not for running jobs concurrently, but for time controlling, so only one sub process is running at same time.



      My code without multiprocessing:



      from multiprocessing import Process
      import paramiko
      import logging
      import sys


      def sftp_read():
      # log.debug("Child process started") # This line will cause exception if it is run in sub process.
      ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
      ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
      timeout = 60
      ssh.connect('my_server', username='my_user', password='my_password', timeout=timeout, auth_timeout=timeout,
      banner_timeout=timeout)
      sftp = ssh.open_sftp()
      fp = sftp.file('/home/my_user/my_file.txt')
      lines = fp.readlines()
      print ''.join(lines)
      fp.close()
      ssh.close()


      def main():
      sftp_read() # Call this function without multiprocessing

      if __name__ == '__main__':
      logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stdout,
      format='[%(asctime)s] {%(filename)s:%(lineno)d} %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
      log = logging.getLogger()
      log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
      main()


      The above code work properly, paramiko prints log normally like below:



      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - starting thread (client mode): 0x3052208L
      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,051] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.4.2
      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} DEBUG - Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.6
      [2018-11-20 10:38:45,405] {transport.py:1746} INFO - Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_7.2p2)


      But when I change the main function into the following code to control the time (limit the max running time of the SFTP reading to 15 seconds):



      def main():
      # Use multiprocessing to limit the running time to at most 15 seconds.
      p = Process(target=sftp_read)
      try:
      log.debug("About to start SSH")
      p.start()
      log.debug('Process started')
      p.join(15)
      finally:
      if p.is_alive():
      p.terminate()
      log.debug('Terminated')
      else:
      log.debug("Finished normally")


      Paramiko no longer prints log. Now I want to set the logging config to as same as the parent one, how can I do it?



      I don't want an answer telling me to get a logger again, because in my production server there is a global logging setting and might be changed every now and then, I can't configure my own logging setting which is not controlled by the global setting.



      So I wonder if there is a way allowing me to configure my sub process's logging setting as the parent one.







      python logging multiprocessing paramiko






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 2:53









      Columbia Rover

      1398




      1398
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork system call. The child process created using fork is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.



          Warning: fork copies everything; but, does not copy threads. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.



          import logging
          from multiprocessing import Pool
          from os import getpid

          def runs_in_subprocess():
          logging.info(
          "I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          if __name__ == '__main__':
          logging.basicConfig(
          format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)

          logging.info(
          "I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          with Pool() as pool:
          pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)


          Output:



          GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
          GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885


          Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration



          You might get into problem of deadlocks so beware of following:




          1. Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.


          2. If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.


          3. The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
            Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.


          4. That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.


          5. The child process now waits for the lock to be released.


          6. The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().



          In python3, you could avoid this using get_context.



          from multiprocessing import get_context

          def your_func():
          with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
          # ... everything else is unchanged


          Advice:




          1. Using get_context create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.


          2. Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.







          share|improve this answer





















          • 1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
            – Columbia Rover
            Nov 20 at 4:09










          • Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
            – Pruthvi Kumar
            Nov 20 at 4:16











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385540%2fhow-can-i-inherit-parent-logger-when-using-pythons-multiprocessing-especially%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork system call. The child process created using fork is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.



          Warning: fork copies everything; but, does not copy threads. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.



          import logging
          from multiprocessing import Pool
          from os import getpid

          def runs_in_subprocess():
          logging.info(
          "I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          if __name__ == '__main__':
          logging.basicConfig(
          format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)

          logging.info(
          "I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          with Pool() as pool:
          pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)


          Output:



          GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
          GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885


          Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration



          You might get into problem of deadlocks so beware of following:




          1. Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.


          2. If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.


          3. The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
            Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.


          4. That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.


          5. The child process now waits for the lock to be released.


          6. The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().



          In python3, you could avoid this using get_context.



          from multiprocessing import get_context

          def your_func():
          with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
          # ... everything else is unchanged


          Advice:




          1. Using get_context create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.


          2. Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.







          share|improve this answer





















          • 1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
            – Columbia Rover
            Nov 20 at 4:09










          • Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
            – Pruthvi Kumar
            Nov 20 at 4:16
















          0














          In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork system call. The child process created using fork is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.



          Warning: fork copies everything; but, does not copy threads. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.



          import logging
          from multiprocessing import Pool
          from os import getpid

          def runs_in_subprocess():
          logging.info(
          "I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          if __name__ == '__main__':
          logging.basicConfig(
          format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)

          logging.info(
          "I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          with Pool() as pool:
          pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)


          Output:



          GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
          GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885


          Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration



          You might get into problem of deadlocks so beware of following:




          1. Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.


          2. If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.


          3. The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
            Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.


          4. That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.


          5. The child process now waits for the lock to be released.


          6. The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().



          In python3, you could avoid this using get_context.



          from multiprocessing import get_context

          def your_func():
          with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
          # ... everything else is unchanged


          Advice:




          1. Using get_context create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.


          2. Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.







          share|improve this answer





















          • 1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
            – Columbia Rover
            Nov 20 at 4:09










          • Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
            – Pruthvi Kumar
            Nov 20 at 4:16














          0












          0








          0






          In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork system call. The child process created using fork is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.



          Warning: fork copies everything; but, does not copy threads. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.



          import logging
          from multiprocessing import Pool
          from os import getpid

          def runs_in_subprocess():
          logging.info(
          "I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          if __name__ == '__main__':
          logging.basicConfig(
          format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)

          logging.info(
          "I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          with Pool() as pool:
          pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)


          Output:



          GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
          GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885


          Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration



          You might get into problem of deadlocks so beware of following:




          1. Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.


          2. If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.


          3. The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
            Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.


          4. That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.


          5. The child process now waits for the lock to be released.


          6. The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().



          In python3, you could avoid this using get_context.



          from multiprocessing import get_context

          def your_func():
          with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
          # ... everything else is unchanged


          Advice:




          1. Using get_context create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.


          2. Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.







          share|improve this answer












          In Python, subprocesses are started on POSIX standard. SubProcesses in POSIX standard are created using fork system call. The child process created using fork is essentially a copy of everything in the parent process' memory. In your case, child process will have access to logger from parent.



          Warning: fork copies everything; but, does not copy threads. Any threads running in parent process do not exist in child process.



          import logging
          from multiprocessing import Pool
          from os import getpid

          def runs_in_subprocess():
          logging.info(
          "I am the child, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          if __name__ == '__main__':
          logging.basicConfig(
          format='GADZOOKS %(message)s', level=logging.DEBUG)

          logging.info(
          "I am the parent, with PID {}".format(getpid()))

          with Pool() as pool:
          pool.apply(runs_in_subprocess)


          Output:



          GADZOOKS I am the parent, with PID 3884
          GADZOOKS I am the child, with PID 3885


          Notice how child processes in your pool inherit the parent process’ logging configuration



          You might get into problem of deadlocks so beware of following:




          1. Whenever the thread in the parent process writes a log messages, it adds it to a Queue. That involves acquiring a lock.


          2. If the fork() happens at the wrong time, the lock is copied in an acquired state.


          3. The child process copies the parent’s logging configuration—including the queue.
            Whenever the child process writes a log message, it tries to write it to the queue.


          4. That means acquiring the lock, but the lock is already acquired.


          5. The child process now waits for the lock to be released.


          6. The lock will never be released, because the thread that would release it wasn’t copied over by the fork().



          In python3, you could avoid this using get_context.



          from multiprocessing import get_context

          def your_func():
          with get_context("spawn").Pool() as pool:
          # ... everything else is unchanged


          Advice:




          1. Using get_context create a new Pool and use process' within this pool to do the job for you.


          2. Every process from the pool will have access to the parent process' log config.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 at 3:28









          Pruthvi Kumar

          58719




          58719












          • 1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
            – Columbia Rover
            Nov 20 at 4:09










          • Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
            – Pruthvi Kumar
            Nov 20 at 4:16


















          • 1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
            – Columbia Rover
            Nov 20 at 4:09










          • Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
            – Pruthvi Kumar
            Nov 20 at 4:16
















          1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
          – Columbia Rover
          Nov 20 at 4:09




          1. Your code doesn't work. It reports: line 18, in <module> with Pool() as pool: AttributeError: exit 2. I'm running on Windows server which is not POSIX. My production server is Windows, too.
          – Columbia Rover
          Nov 20 at 4:09












          Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
          – Pruthvi Kumar
          Nov 20 at 4:16




          Windows doesn't have fork. So, multiprocessing module needs to do a lot more to make the child-spawning process work. On windows, all new process' run the entire module from 'scratch'. each process, On windows, only main will know your current logger definition. Child process will not know this. If you want child process to know log, move your log config to your sftp_read function.
          – Pruthvi Kumar
          Nov 20 at 4:16


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385540%2fhow-can-i-inherit-parent-logger-when-using-pythons-multiprocessing-especially%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?