Does AWK have similar ability as SED to find line ranges based on text in line rather than line number?












3















Resolution: the files were saved with CR rather than LF line breaks.
Mosvy pointed this out, but only posted as a comment, rather than an answer, so I am unable to officially thank him for helping me to find the cause and solve the problem.



Thanks mosvy, if you come back please post as an answer so I can give you a thumbs up.



SED seems to have:



sed '3,10d;/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


(delete line 3-10, then delete from line containing "<ACROSS>" to end of file; then write out output.)



Even when I try with only:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


but for some reason neither seems to work on my Mac.



Not sure what else to try.



I am hoping there is something very similar with AWK.



Update:



when I enter:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


it does not delete lines 3 - 10; it just spits back the entire file to output.txt;



when I try:



sed '/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


output.txt is blank



Also, I'm on 10.9.4



** Update 2:



Thank you to mosvy!! I wish I could upvote your comment. It was the problem solver.



It turns out the file was saved with CR rather than LF line breaks



When I converted it, that cured everything.



Thanks to everyone who contributed.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    What does "not work" mean here? Do you get some form of error message?

    – Kusalananda
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:43






  • 1





    your question is unclear, but if you're wondering if you can mix patterns and line numbers in awk ranges: yes, you can. awk 'NR==2,/rex/' will print all lines from the 2nd up to (and including) the one matching /rex/

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:54








  • 1





    and awk '/rex/,0' will print all lines from the line matching /rex/ up to end-of-file.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:02






  • 1





    maybe your file isn't using n/LF/ascii 10 line terminators? those commands should work, even on very ancient sed implementations.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06






  • 1





    @mosvy you can post that as an answer.

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23
















3















Resolution: the files were saved with CR rather than LF line breaks.
Mosvy pointed this out, but only posted as a comment, rather than an answer, so I am unable to officially thank him for helping me to find the cause and solve the problem.



Thanks mosvy, if you come back please post as an answer so I can give you a thumbs up.



SED seems to have:



sed '3,10d;/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


(delete line 3-10, then delete from line containing "<ACROSS>" to end of file; then write out output.)



Even when I try with only:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


but for some reason neither seems to work on my Mac.



Not sure what else to try.



I am hoping there is something very similar with AWK.



Update:



when I enter:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


it does not delete lines 3 - 10; it just spits back the entire file to output.txt;



when I try:



sed '/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


output.txt is blank



Also, I'm on 10.9.4



** Update 2:



Thank you to mosvy!! I wish I could upvote your comment. It was the problem solver.



It turns out the file was saved with CR rather than LF line breaks



When I converted it, that cured everything.



Thanks to everyone who contributed.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    What does "not work" mean here? Do you get some form of error message?

    – Kusalananda
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:43






  • 1





    your question is unclear, but if you're wondering if you can mix patterns and line numbers in awk ranges: yes, you can. awk 'NR==2,/rex/' will print all lines from the 2nd up to (and including) the one matching /rex/

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:54








  • 1





    and awk '/rex/,0' will print all lines from the line matching /rex/ up to end-of-file.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:02






  • 1





    maybe your file isn't using n/LF/ascii 10 line terminators? those commands should work, even on very ancient sed implementations.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06






  • 1





    @mosvy you can post that as an answer.

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23














3












3








3








Resolution: the files were saved with CR rather than LF line breaks.
Mosvy pointed this out, but only posted as a comment, rather than an answer, so I am unable to officially thank him for helping me to find the cause and solve the problem.



Thanks mosvy, if you come back please post as an answer so I can give you a thumbs up.



SED seems to have:



sed '3,10d;/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


(delete line 3-10, then delete from line containing "<ACROSS>" to end of file; then write out output.)



Even when I try with only:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


but for some reason neither seems to work on my Mac.



Not sure what else to try.



I am hoping there is something very similar with AWK.



Update:



when I enter:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


it does not delete lines 3 - 10; it just spits back the entire file to output.txt;



when I try:



sed '/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


output.txt is blank



Also, I'm on 10.9.4



** Update 2:



Thank you to mosvy!! I wish I could upvote your comment. It was the problem solver.



It turns out the file was saved with CR rather than LF line breaks



When I converted it, that cured everything.



Thanks to everyone who contributed.










share|improve this question
















Resolution: the files were saved with CR rather than LF line breaks.
Mosvy pointed this out, but only posted as a comment, rather than an answer, so I am unable to officially thank him for helping me to find the cause and solve the problem.



Thanks mosvy, if you come back please post as an answer so I can give you a thumbs up.



SED seems to have:



sed '3,10d;/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


(delete line 3-10, then delete from line containing "<ACROSS>" to end of file; then write out output.)



Even when I try with only:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


but for some reason neither seems to work on my Mac.



Not sure what else to try.



I am hoping there is something very similar with AWK.



Update:



when I enter:



sed '3,10d' input.txt > output.txt


it does not delete lines 3 - 10; it just spits back the entire file to output.txt;



when I try:



sed '/<ACROSS>/,$d' input.txt > output.txt


output.txt is blank



Also, I'm on 10.9.4



** Update 2:



Thank you to mosvy!! I wish I could upvote your comment. It was the problem solver.



It turns out the file was saved with CR rather than LF line breaks



When I converted it, that cured everything.



Thanks to everyone who contributed.







awk sed command-line macintosh






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '18 at 9:57







verbatim

















asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:00









verbatimverbatim

184




184








  • 3





    What does "not work" mean here? Do you get some form of error message?

    – Kusalananda
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:43






  • 1





    your question is unclear, but if you're wondering if you can mix patterns and line numbers in awk ranges: yes, you can. awk 'NR==2,/rex/' will print all lines from the 2nd up to (and including) the one matching /rex/

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:54








  • 1





    and awk '/rex/,0' will print all lines from the line matching /rex/ up to end-of-file.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:02






  • 1





    maybe your file isn't using n/LF/ascii 10 line terminators? those commands should work, even on very ancient sed implementations.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06






  • 1





    @mosvy you can post that as an answer.

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23














  • 3





    What does "not work" mean here? Do you get some form of error message?

    – Kusalananda
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:43






  • 1





    your question is unclear, but if you're wondering if you can mix patterns and line numbers in awk ranges: yes, you can. awk 'NR==2,/rex/' will print all lines from the 2nd up to (and including) the one matching /rex/

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:54








  • 1





    and awk '/rex/,0' will print all lines from the line matching /rex/ up to end-of-file.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:02






  • 1





    maybe your file isn't using n/LF/ascii 10 line terminators? those commands should work, even on very ancient sed implementations.

    – mosvy
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06






  • 1





    @mosvy you can post that as an answer.

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23








3




3





What does "not work" mean here? Do you get some form of error message?

– Kusalananda
Dec 18 '18 at 6:43





What does "not work" mean here? Do you get some form of error message?

– Kusalananda
Dec 18 '18 at 6:43




1




1





your question is unclear, but if you're wondering if you can mix patterns and line numbers in awk ranges: yes, you can. awk 'NR==2,/rex/' will print all lines from the 2nd up to (and including) the one matching /rex/

– mosvy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:54







your question is unclear, but if you're wondering if you can mix patterns and line numbers in awk ranges: yes, you can. awk 'NR==2,/rex/' will print all lines from the 2nd up to (and including) the one matching /rex/

– mosvy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:54






1




1





and awk '/rex/,0' will print all lines from the line matching /rex/ up to end-of-file.

– mosvy
Dec 18 '18 at 7:02





and awk '/rex/,0' will print all lines from the line matching /rex/ up to end-of-file.

– mosvy
Dec 18 '18 at 7:02




1




1





maybe your file isn't using n/LF/ascii 10 line terminators? those commands should work, even on very ancient sed implementations.

– mosvy
Dec 18 '18 at 7:06





maybe your file isn't using n/LF/ascii 10 line terminators? those commands should work, even on very ancient sed implementations.

– mosvy
Dec 18 '18 at 7:06




1




1





@mosvy you can post that as an answer.

– muru
Dec 18 '18 at 7:23





@mosvy you can post that as an answer.

– muru
Dec 18 '18 at 7:23










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














The OP's problem was caused by file file using CR (r / ascii 13) instead of LF (n / ascii 10) as line terminators as expected by sed. Using CR was the convention used in classic MacOS; as a non Mac user, the only use of it I've met with in the wild in the last two decades was in PDF files, where it greatly complicates any naive PDF parser written in perl (unlike RS in mawk and gawk, $/ in perl cannot be a regex).





As to the question from the title, yes, awk supports range patterns, and you can freely mix regexps and line number predicates (or any expression) in them. For example:



NR==1,/rex/   # all lines from the 1rst up to (and including)
# the one matching /rex/

/rex/,0 # from the line matching /rex/ up to the end-of-file.


awk's ranges are different from sed's, because in awk the end predicate could also match the line which started the range. sed's behavior could be emulated with:



s=/start/, !s && /last/ { s = 0; print }


However, ranges in awk are still quite limited because they're not real expression (they cannot be negated, made part of other expressions, used in if(...), etc). Also, there is no magic: if you want to express something like a range with "context" (eg. /start/-4,/end/+4) you'll have to roll your own circular buffer and extra logic.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

    – verbatim
    Dec 19 '18 at 6:28



















6














/usr/bin/sed '3,10d' works perfectly fine on my Mac (Mojave). Even so, with awk:



awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1'


... which skips lines if the line number is between 3 and 10, and simply exits when it reaches a line with <ACROSS> (and prints everything else).






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

    – verbatim
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06








  • 1





    @verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11



















5














Your sed works fine.
Even so, in Awk there is , -- the "between" operator. Following some examples (default action = print)



Print the lines between "start" and "stop"



awk '/start/,/stop/'


Lines between line 3 and 10



awk 'NR==3, NR==10'


lines between <ACROSS> and end



awk '/<ACROSS>/, 0'


(0 is false, so it never ends)






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:14













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489617%2fdoes-awk-have-similar-ability-as-sed-to-find-line-ranges-based-on-text-in-line-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














The OP's problem was caused by file file using CR (r / ascii 13) instead of LF (n / ascii 10) as line terminators as expected by sed. Using CR was the convention used in classic MacOS; as a non Mac user, the only use of it I've met with in the wild in the last two decades was in PDF files, where it greatly complicates any naive PDF parser written in perl (unlike RS in mawk and gawk, $/ in perl cannot be a regex).





As to the question from the title, yes, awk supports range patterns, and you can freely mix regexps and line number predicates (or any expression) in them. For example:



NR==1,/rex/   # all lines from the 1rst up to (and including)
# the one matching /rex/

/rex/,0 # from the line matching /rex/ up to the end-of-file.


awk's ranges are different from sed's, because in awk the end predicate could also match the line which started the range. sed's behavior could be emulated with:



s=/start/, !s && /last/ { s = 0; print }


However, ranges in awk are still quite limited because they're not real expression (they cannot be negated, made part of other expressions, used in if(...), etc). Also, there is no magic: if you want to express something like a range with "context" (eg. /start/-4,/end/+4) you'll have to roll your own circular buffer and extra logic.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

    – verbatim
    Dec 19 '18 at 6:28
















3














The OP's problem was caused by file file using CR (r / ascii 13) instead of LF (n / ascii 10) as line terminators as expected by sed. Using CR was the convention used in classic MacOS; as a non Mac user, the only use of it I've met with in the wild in the last two decades was in PDF files, where it greatly complicates any naive PDF parser written in perl (unlike RS in mawk and gawk, $/ in perl cannot be a regex).





As to the question from the title, yes, awk supports range patterns, and you can freely mix regexps and line number predicates (or any expression) in them. For example:



NR==1,/rex/   # all lines from the 1rst up to (and including)
# the one matching /rex/

/rex/,0 # from the line matching /rex/ up to the end-of-file.


awk's ranges are different from sed's, because in awk the end predicate could also match the line which started the range. sed's behavior could be emulated with:



s=/start/, !s && /last/ { s = 0; print }


However, ranges in awk are still quite limited because they're not real expression (they cannot be negated, made part of other expressions, used in if(...), etc). Also, there is no magic: if you want to express something like a range with "context" (eg. /start/-4,/end/+4) you'll have to roll your own circular buffer and extra logic.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

    – verbatim
    Dec 19 '18 at 6:28














3












3








3







The OP's problem was caused by file file using CR (r / ascii 13) instead of LF (n / ascii 10) as line terminators as expected by sed. Using CR was the convention used in classic MacOS; as a non Mac user, the only use of it I've met with in the wild in the last two decades was in PDF files, where it greatly complicates any naive PDF parser written in perl (unlike RS in mawk and gawk, $/ in perl cannot be a regex).





As to the question from the title, yes, awk supports range patterns, and you can freely mix regexps and line number predicates (or any expression) in them. For example:



NR==1,/rex/   # all lines from the 1rst up to (and including)
# the one matching /rex/

/rex/,0 # from the line matching /rex/ up to the end-of-file.


awk's ranges are different from sed's, because in awk the end predicate could also match the line which started the range. sed's behavior could be emulated with:



s=/start/, !s && /last/ { s = 0; print }


However, ranges in awk are still quite limited because they're not real expression (they cannot be negated, made part of other expressions, used in if(...), etc). Also, there is no magic: if you want to express something like a range with "context" (eg. /start/-4,/end/+4) you'll have to roll your own circular buffer and extra logic.






share|improve this answer















The OP's problem was caused by file file using CR (r / ascii 13) instead of LF (n / ascii 10) as line terminators as expected by sed. Using CR was the convention used in classic MacOS; as a non Mac user, the only use of it I've met with in the wild in the last two decades was in PDF files, where it greatly complicates any naive PDF parser written in perl (unlike RS in mawk and gawk, $/ in perl cannot be a regex).





As to the question from the title, yes, awk supports range patterns, and you can freely mix regexps and line number predicates (or any expression) in them. For example:



NR==1,/rex/   # all lines from the 1rst up to (and including)
# the one matching /rex/

/rex/,0 # from the line matching /rex/ up to the end-of-file.


awk's ranges are different from sed's, because in awk the end predicate could also match the line which started the range. sed's behavior could be emulated with:



s=/start/, !s && /last/ { s = 0; print }


However, ranges in awk are still quite limited because they're not real expression (they cannot be negated, made part of other expressions, used in if(...), etc). Also, there is no magic: if you want to express something like a range with "context" (eg. /start/-4,/end/+4) you'll have to roll your own circular buffer and extra logic.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 19 '18 at 5:34

























answered Dec 19 '18 at 5:20









mosvymosvy

6,2261425




6,2261425













  • Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

    – verbatim
    Dec 19 '18 at 6:28



















  • Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

    – verbatim
    Dec 19 '18 at 6:28

















Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

– verbatim
Dec 19 '18 at 6:28





Thank you, sir for helping me solve the problem. It's a problem one doesn't usually think to check first. I was tearing my hair out. I was forced to backtrack and experiment with basic textbook example, and even that was not working before your comment. I kept thinking I must be missing something about the code as I am not an expert using command line, and that it shouldn't be this hard just to do a few basic substitutions.

– verbatim
Dec 19 '18 at 6:28













6














/usr/bin/sed '3,10d' works perfectly fine on my Mac (Mojave). Even so, with awk:



awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1'


... which skips lines if the line number is between 3 and 10, and simply exits when it reaches a line with <ACROSS> (and prints everything else).






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

    – verbatim
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06








  • 1





    @verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11
















6














/usr/bin/sed '3,10d' works perfectly fine on my Mac (Mojave). Even so, with awk:



awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1'


... which skips lines if the line number is between 3 and 10, and simply exits when it reaches a line with <ACROSS> (and prints everything else).






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

    – verbatim
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06








  • 1





    @verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11














6












6








6







/usr/bin/sed '3,10d' works perfectly fine on my Mac (Mojave). Even so, with awk:



awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1'


... which skips lines if the line number is between 3 and 10, and simply exits when it reaches a line with <ACROSS> (and prints everything else).






share|improve this answer













/usr/bin/sed '3,10d' works perfectly fine on my Mac (Mojave). Even so, with awk:



awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1'


... which skips lines if the line number is between 3 and 10, and simply exits when it reaches a line with <ACROSS> (and prints everything else).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 18 '18 at 6:19









murumuru

1




1













  • Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

    – verbatim
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06








  • 1





    @verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11



















  • Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

    – verbatim
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:06








  • 1





    @verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

    – muru
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11

















Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

– verbatim
Dec 18 '18 at 7:06







Thanks for the input, but this did not seem to work either.: awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' input.txt > output.txt

– verbatim
Dec 18 '18 at 7:06






1




1





@verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

– muru
Dec 18 '18 at 7:11





@verbatim what Kusalananda said: what does "not work" mean? Have you tested with other files? What does (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 5) | awk '(NR >= 3) && (NR <= 10) {next} /<ACROSS>/{exit} 1' output? What about (seq 10; echo '<ACROSS>'; seq 1 5) | sed '3,10d; /<ACROSS>/,$d'?

– muru
Dec 18 '18 at 7:11











5














Your sed works fine.
Even so, in Awk there is , -- the "between" operator. Following some examples (default action = print)



Print the lines between "start" and "stop"



awk '/start/,/stop/'


Lines between line 3 and 10



awk 'NR==3, NR==10'


lines between <ACROSS> and end



awk '/<ACROSS>/, 0'


(0 is false, so it never ends)






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:14


















5














Your sed works fine.
Even so, in Awk there is , -- the "between" operator. Following some examples (default action = print)



Print the lines between "start" and "stop"



awk '/start/,/stop/'


Lines between line 3 and 10



awk 'NR==3, NR==10'


lines between <ACROSS> and end



awk '/<ACROSS>/, 0'


(0 is false, so it never ends)






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:14
















5












5








5







Your sed works fine.
Even so, in Awk there is , -- the "between" operator. Following some examples (default action = print)



Print the lines between "start" and "stop"



awk '/start/,/stop/'


Lines between line 3 and 10



awk 'NR==3, NR==10'


lines between <ACROSS> and end



awk '/<ACROSS>/, 0'


(0 is false, so it never ends)






share|improve this answer















Your sed works fine.
Even so, in Awk there is , -- the "between" operator. Following some examples (default action = print)



Print the lines between "start" and "stop"



awk '/start/,/stop/'


Lines between line 3 and 10



awk 'NR==3, NR==10'


lines between <ACROSS> and end



awk '/<ACROSS>/, 0'


(0 is false, so it never ends)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 18 '18 at 11:00

























answered Dec 18 '18 at 10:54









JJoaoJJoao

7,1591928




7,1591928








  • 2





    Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:14
















  • 2





    Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Dec 18 '18 at 11:14










2




2





Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 18 '18 at 11:14







Would be worth noting that awk's one is better than sed's in that a record can match both ends: sed '1,/foo/' to match everything up to the first occurrence of foo only works if that first occurrence is not on the first line (GNU sed supports a 0 virtual address to work around that specific case), while awk 'NR==1, /foo/' works OK in awk. awk's FNR also allows to have line-number-based ranges per file (GNU sed has a -s for that).

– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 18 '18 at 11:14




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489617%2fdoes-awk-have-similar-ability-as-sed-to-find-line-ranges-based-on-text-in-line-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?