Solubility of a tribasic weak acid
$begingroup$
I have a question that reads:
$ce{H3A}$ is a tribasic acid. The three deprotonations can be written as
$ce{H3A <=>[pKa1 = 2.9] H2A- <=>[pKa2 = 4.2] HA^{2-} <=>[pKa3 = 5.2] A^{3-}}$
What is the predominant species in a 0.10M solution of $ce{H3A}$ at pH 5?
a) $ce{H3A}$
b) $ce{H2A-}$
c) $ce{HA^{2-}}$
d) $ce{A^{3-}}$
I worked this out as
$ce{Ka1 = frac{[H+][H2A-]}{[H3A]}}, ce{Ka2 = frac{[H+][HA^{2-}]}{[H2A-]}}, ce{Ka3 = frac{[H+][A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]}}$
At pH 5, $ce{[H+] = 10^{-5}M}$
So,
$ce{[H+] = 10^{-5} = Ka1frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{-2.9} frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]}}ce{implies frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{2.1} }$
and similarly,
$ce{frac{[HA2-]}{[H2A-]} = 10^{0.8}}$
$ce{frac{[A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]} = 10^{-0.2}}$
Since $ce{[HA^{2-}] > [H3A], [HA^{2-}]>[H2A-] and [A^{3-}]<[HA^{2-}]}$, the predominant species is $ce{HA^{2-}}$, so c).
This is the correct answer according to the solutions, but I'm not sure if my logic is correct, or if there's an easier way to arrive at the same conclusion (it's significant working out for a MCQ).
solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question that reads:
$ce{H3A}$ is a tribasic acid. The three deprotonations can be written as
$ce{H3A <=>[pKa1 = 2.9] H2A- <=>[pKa2 = 4.2] HA^{2-} <=>[pKa3 = 5.2] A^{3-}}$
What is the predominant species in a 0.10M solution of $ce{H3A}$ at pH 5?
a) $ce{H3A}$
b) $ce{H2A-}$
c) $ce{HA^{2-}}$
d) $ce{A^{3-}}$
I worked this out as
$ce{Ka1 = frac{[H+][H2A-]}{[H3A]}}, ce{Ka2 = frac{[H+][HA^{2-}]}{[H2A-]}}, ce{Ka3 = frac{[H+][A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]}}$
At pH 5, $ce{[H+] = 10^{-5}M}$
So,
$ce{[H+] = 10^{-5} = Ka1frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{-2.9} frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]}}ce{implies frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{2.1} }$
and similarly,
$ce{frac{[HA2-]}{[H2A-]} = 10^{0.8}}$
$ce{frac{[A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]} = 10^{-0.2}}$
Since $ce{[HA^{2-}] > [H3A], [HA^{2-}]>[H2A-] and [A^{3-}]<[HA^{2-}]}$, the predominant species is $ce{HA^{2-}}$, so c).
This is the correct answer according to the solutions, but I'm not sure if my logic is correct, or if there's an easier way to arrive at the same conclusion (it's significant working out for a MCQ).
solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question that reads:
$ce{H3A}$ is a tribasic acid. The three deprotonations can be written as
$ce{H3A <=>[pKa1 = 2.9] H2A- <=>[pKa2 = 4.2] HA^{2-} <=>[pKa3 = 5.2] A^{3-}}$
What is the predominant species in a 0.10M solution of $ce{H3A}$ at pH 5?
a) $ce{H3A}$
b) $ce{H2A-}$
c) $ce{HA^{2-}}$
d) $ce{A^{3-}}$
I worked this out as
$ce{Ka1 = frac{[H+][H2A-]}{[H3A]}}, ce{Ka2 = frac{[H+][HA^{2-}]}{[H2A-]}}, ce{Ka3 = frac{[H+][A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]}}$
At pH 5, $ce{[H+] = 10^{-5}M}$
So,
$ce{[H+] = 10^{-5} = Ka1frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{-2.9} frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]}}ce{implies frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{2.1} }$
and similarly,
$ce{frac{[HA2-]}{[H2A-]} = 10^{0.8}}$
$ce{frac{[A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]} = 10^{-0.2}}$
Since $ce{[HA^{2-}] > [H3A], [HA^{2-}]>[H2A-] and [A^{3-}]<[HA^{2-}]}$, the predominant species is $ce{HA^{2-}}$, so c).
This is the correct answer according to the solutions, but I'm not sure if my logic is correct, or if there's an easier way to arrive at the same conclusion (it's significant working out for a MCQ).
solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have a question that reads:
$ce{H3A}$ is a tribasic acid. The three deprotonations can be written as
$ce{H3A <=>[pKa1 = 2.9] H2A- <=>[pKa2 = 4.2] HA^{2-} <=>[pKa3 = 5.2] A^{3-}}$
What is the predominant species in a 0.10M solution of $ce{H3A}$ at pH 5?
a) $ce{H3A}$
b) $ce{H2A-}$
c) $ce{HA^{2-}}$
d) $ce{A^{3-}}$
I worked this out as
$ce{Ka1 = frac{[H+][H2A-]}{[H3A]}}, ce{Ka2 = frac{[H+][HA^{2-}]}{[H2A-]}}, ce{Ka3 = frac{[H+][A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]}}$
At pH 5, $ce{[H+] = 10^{-5}M}$
So,
$ce{[H+] = 10^{-5} = Ka1frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{-2.9} frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]}}ce{implies frac{[H2A-]}{[H3A]} = 10^{2.1} }$
and similarly,
$ce{frac{[HA2-]}{[H2A-]} = 10^{0.8}}$
$ce{frac{[A^{3-}]}{[HA^{2-}]} = 10^{-0.2}}$
Since $ce{[HA^{2-}] > [H3A], [HA^{2-}]>[H2A-] and [A^{3-}]<[HA^{2-}]}$, the predominant species is $ce{HA^{2-}}$, so c).
This is the correct answer according to the solutions, but I'm not sure if my logic is correct, or if there's an easier way to arrive at the same conclusion (it's significant working out for a MCQ).
solubility
solubility
New contributor
New contributor
edited 12 hours ago
Gremlin
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
GremlinGremlin
1236
1236
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can also use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:
$$mathrm{pH} = mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} + log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
rearranges to:
$$mathrm{pH} - mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} = log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} > 0$ for conjugate base dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} < 0$ for acid dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} = 0$ if they're present in the same concentrations.
The equilibrium of interest is the third dissociation.
Here, the LHS equaluates to $-0.2$ indicating that the acid in that equation ($ce{HA^{2-}}$) dominates over the conjugate base ($ce{A^{3-}}$). You should be able to extend this for each equilibrium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Gremlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110253%2fsolubility-of-a-tribasic-weak-acid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can also use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:
$$mathrm{pH} = mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} + log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
rearranges to:
$$mathrm{pH} - mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} = log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} > 0$ for conjugate base dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} < 0$ for acid dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} = 0$ if they're present in the same concentrations.
The equilibrium of interest is the third dissociation.
Here, the LHS equaluates to $-0.2$ indicating that the acid in that equation ($ce{HA^{2-}}$) dominates over the conjugate base ($ce{A^{3-}}$). You should be able to extend this for each equilibrium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:
$$mathrm{pH} = mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} + log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
rearranges to:
$$mathrm{pH} - mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} = log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} > 0$ for conjugate base dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} < 0$ for acid dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} = 0$ if they're present in the same concentrations.
The equilibrium of interest is the third dissociation.
Here, the LHS equaluates to $-0.2$ indicating that the acid in that equation ($ce{HA^{2-}}$) dominates over the conjugate base ($ce{A^{3-}}$). You should be able to extend this for each equilibrium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:
$$mathrm{pH} = mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} + log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
rearranges to:
$$mathrm{pH} - mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} = log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} > 0$ for conjugate base dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} < 0$ for acid dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} = 0$ if they're present in the same concentrations.
The equilibrium of interest is the third dissociation.
Here, the LHS equaluates to $-0.2$ indicating that the acid in that equation ($ce{HA^{2-}}$) dominates over the conjugate base ($ce{A^{3-}}$). You should be able to extend this for each equilibrium.
$endgroup$
You can also use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:
$$mathrm{pH} = mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} + log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
rearranges to:
$$mathrm{pH} - mathrm{p}K_{mathrm{a}} = log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}}$$
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} > 0$ for conjugate base dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} < 0$ for acid dominating.
$log frac{ce{[A-]}}{ce{[HA]}} = 0$ if they're present in the same concentrations.
The equilibrium of interest is the third dissociation.
Here, the LHS equaluates to $-0.2$ indicating that the acid in that equation ($ce{HA^{2-}}$) dominates over the conjugate base ($ce{A^{3-}}$). You should be able to extend this for each equilibrium.
answered 13 hours ago
ZheZhe
12.7k12550
12.7k12550
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gremlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gremlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gremlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gremlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110253%2fsolubility-of-a-tribasic-weak-acid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown