Origin Policy violation on google.by pages











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Starting from today I'm constantly getting this error when trying to search something at google.by:




Well, well, well. What do we have here? An Origin Policy violation.



And what do we not have? A page!



You're trying to go to:
https://www.google.by/search?q=thymeleaf+is+0+or+zero&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
The policy applies to: https://www.google.by




I tried other domains (google.com, google.ru, google.de) and they are working fine. The issue is reproducible in incognito mode (with plugins disabled). In Chrome only (Firefox and Edge have no such problem) and it started recently, so it may be related to the recent Chrome update. Now I use Chrome Version 71 (Beta).




  1. What does it mean?

  2. I didn't change something in my connection settings. Who is in charge? Google? ISP?










share|improve this question
























  • Does this happen if you do it immediately at the start a new Chrome session? Just close all windows of Chrome, start it again and issue the query.
    – harrymc
    7 hours ago










  • @harrymc No, the problem is gone after restart. I still don't know the cause of it. Chrome update and Tampermonkey plugin update are the main suspects.
    – naXa
    5 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Starting from today I'm constantly getting this error when trying to search something at google.by:




Well, well, well. What do we have here? An Origin Policy violation.



And what do we not have? A page!



You're trying to go to:
https://www.google.by/search?q=thymeleaf+is+0+or+zero&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
The policy applies to: https://www.google.by




I tried other domains (google.com, google.ru, google.de) and they are working fine. The issue is reproducible in incognito mode (with plugins disabled). In Chrome only (Firefox and Edge have no such problem) and it started recently, so it may be related to the recent Chrome update. Now I use Chrome Version 71 (Beta).




  1. What does it mean?

  2. I didn't change something in my connection settings. Who is in charge? Google? ISP?










share|improve this question
























  • Does this happen if you do it immediately at the start a new Chrome session? Just close all windows of Chrome, start it again and issue the query.
    – harrymc
    7 hours ago










  • @harrymc No, the problem is gone after restart. I still don't know the cause of it. Chrome update and Tampermonkey plugin update are the main suspects.
    – naXa
    5 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Starting from today I'm constantly getting this error when trying to search something at google.by:




Well, well, well. What do we have here? An Origin Policy violation.



And what do we not have? A page!



You're trying to go to:
https://www.google.by/search?q=thymeleaf+is+0+or+zero&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
The policy applies to: https://www.google.by




I tried other domains (google.com, google.ru, google.de) and they are working fine. The issue is reproducible in incognito mode (with plugins disabled). In Chrome only (Firefox and Edge have no such problem) and it started recently, so it may be related to the recent Chrome update. Now I use Chrome Version 71 (Beta).




  1. What does it mean?

  2. I didn't change something in my connection settings. Who is in charge? Google? ISP?










share|improve this question















Starting from today I'm constantly getting this error when trying to search something at google.by:




Well, well, well. What do we have here? An Origin Policy violation.



And what do we not have? A page!



You're trying to go to:
https://www.google.by/search?q=thymeleaf+is+0+or+zero&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
The policy applies to: https://www.google.by




I tried other domains (google.com, google.ru, google.de) and they are working fine. The issue is reproducible in incognito mode (with plugins disabled). In Chrome only (Firefox and Edge have no such problem) and it started recently, so it may be related to the recent Chrome update. Now I use Chrome Version 71 (Beta).




  1. What does it mean?

  2. I didn't change something in my connection settings. Who is in charge? Google? ISP?







google-search security-policy






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago

























asked 7 hours ago









naXa

1106




1106












  • Does this happen if you do it immediately at the start a new Chrome session? Just close all windows of Chrome, start it again and issue the query.
    – harrymc
    7 hours ago










  • @harrymc No, the problem is gone after restart. I still don't know the cause of it. Chrome update and Tampermonkey plugin update are the main suspects.
    – naXa
    5 hours ago


















  • Does this happen if you do it immediately at the start a new Chrome session? Just close all windows of Chrome, start it again and issue the query.
    – harrymc
    7 hours ago










  • @harrymc No, the problem is gone after restart. I still don't know the cause of it. Chrome update and Tampermonkey plugin update are the main suspects.
    – naXa
    5 hours ago
















Does this happen if you do it immediately at the start a new Chrome session? Just close all windows of Chrome, start it again and issue the query.
– harrymc
7 hours ago




Does this happen if you do it immediately at the start a new Chrome session? Just close all windows of Chrome, start it again and issue the query.
– harrymc
7 hours ago












@harrymc No, the problem is gone after restart. I still don't know the cause of it. Chrome update and Tampermonkey plugin update are the main suspects.
– naXa
5 hours ago




@harrymc No, the problem is gone after restart. I still don't know the cause of it. Chrome update and Tampermonkey plugin update are the main suspects.
– naXa
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










The reason for such a problem that the answer returned by google.by
tried to access data which was stored by a previous website request.



Wikipedia Same-origin policy
explains well the problem:




The following example illustrates a potential security risk that could arise without the same-origin policy. Assume that a user is visiting a banking website and doesn't log out. Then, the user goes to another site that has some malicious JavaScript code running in the background that requests data from the banking site. Because the user is still logged in on the banking site, the malicious code could do anything the user could do on the banking site. For example, it could get a list of the user's last transactions, create a new transaction, etc. This is because the browser can send and receive session cookies to the banking site based on the domain of the banking site.




I have no real idea why issuing a query on google.by would cause a
reference that would trigger a same-origin policy block, but it is clear
that this has prevented an inappropriate access to your data.



Google is one of the most-used avenues for malware, so it's possible that its
ads system brought you a shady reference.



If this happens again, do the same thing: Restart Chrome.
The chances are that the same ad won't be served again.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1375982%2forigin-policy-violation-on-google-by-pages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The reason for such a problem that the answer returned by google.by
    tried to access data which was stored by a previous website request.



    Wikipedia Same-origin policy
    explains well the problem:




    The following example illustrates a potential security risk that could arise without the same-origin policy. Assume that a user is visiting a banking website and doesn't log out. Then, the user goes to another site that has some malicious JavaScript code running in the background that requests data from the banking site. Because the user is still logged in on the banking site, the malicious code could do anything the user could do on the banking site. For example, it could get a list of the user's last transactions, create a new transaction, etc. This is because the browser can send and receive session cookies to the banking site based on the domain of the banking site.




    I have no real idea why issuing a query on google.by would cause a
    reference that would trigger a same-origin policy block, but it is clear
    that this has prevented an inappropriate access to your data.



    Google is one of the most-used avenues for malware, so it's possible that its
    ads system brought you a shady reference.



    If this happens again, do the same thing: Restart Chrome.
    The chances are that the same ad won't be served again.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      The reason for such a problem that the answer returned by google.by
      tried to access data which was stored by a previous website request.



      Wikipedia Same-origin policy
      explains well the problem:




      The following example illustrates a potential security risk that could arise without the same-origin policy. Assume that a user is visiting a banking website and doesn't log out. Then, the user goes to another site that has some malicious JavaScript code running in the background that requests data from the banking site. Because the user is still logged in on the banking site, the malicious code could do anything the user could do on the banking site. For example, it could get a list of the user's last transactions, create a new transaction, etc. This is because the browser can send and receive session cookies to the banking site based on the domain of the banking site.




      I have no real idea why issuing a query on google.by would cause a
      reference that would trigger a same-origin policy block, but it is clear
      that this has prevented an inappropriate access to your data.



      Google is one of the most-used avenues for malware, so it's possible that its
      ads system brought you a shady reference.



      If this happens again, do the same thing: Restart Chrome.
      The chances are that the same ad won't be served again.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        The reason for such a problem that the answer returned by google.by
        tried to access data which was stored by a previous website request.



        Wikipedia Same-origin policy
        explains well the problem:




        The following example illustrates a potential security risk that could arise without the same-origin policy. Assume that a user is visiting a banking website and doesn't log out. Then, the user goes to another site that has some malicious JavaScript code running in the background that requests data from the banking site. Because the user is still logged in on the banking site, the malicious code could do anything the user could do on the banking site. For example, it could get a list of the user's last transactions, create a new transaction, etc. This is because the browser can send and receive session cookies to the banking site based on the domain of the banking site.




        I have no real idea why issuing a query on google.by would cause a
        reference that would trigger a same-origin policy block, but it is clear
        that this has prevented an inappropriate access to your data.



        Google is one of the most-used avenues for malware, so it's possible that its
        ads system brought you a shady reference.



        If this happens again, do the same thing: Restart Chrome.
        The chances are that the same ad won't be served again.






        share|improve this answer












        The reason for such a problem that the answer returned by google.by
        tried to access data which was stored by a previous website request.



        Wikipedia Same-origin policy
        explains well the problem:




        The following example illustrates a potential security risk that could arise without the same-origin policy. Assume that a user is visiting a banking website and doesn't log out. Then, the user goes to another site that has some malicious JavaScript code running in the background that requests data from the banking site. Because the user is still logged in on the banking site, the malicious code could do anything the user could do on the banking site. For example, it could get a list of the user's last transactions, create a new transaction, etc. This is because the browser can send and receive session cookies to the banking site based on the domain of the banking site.




        I have no real idea why issuing a query on google.by would cause a
        reference that would trigger a same-origin policy block, but it is clear
        that this has prevented an inappropriate access to your data.



        Google is one of the most-used avenues for malware, so it's possible that its
        ads system brought you a shady reference.



        If this happens again, do the same thing: Restart Chrome.
        The chances are that the same ad won't be served again.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        harrymc

        247k10255542




        247k10255542






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1375982%2forigin-policy-violation-on-google-by-pages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]