Tikz and Secant Line diagram
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Hi I am looking for feedback to improve an existing program PLUS advice for a desired diagram in the same direction.
Here is my minimal example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.75,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (4.5,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
foreach x/xtext in {1.5/x_{1}, 3/x_{2}}
draw[xshift=x cm] (0pt,2pt) -- (0pt,-2pt)
node[below,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$xtext$};
foreach y/ytext in {1/y_{1}=f(x_{1}), 2.125/y_{1}=f(x_{2})}
draw[yshift=y cm] (2pt,0pt) -- (-2pt,0pt)
node[left,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$ytext$};
%%%
draw[domain=.5:3.25,smooth,variable=x,red,<->,thick] plot ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
draw[thick,blue!50,shorten >=-.5cm,shorten <=-.5cm] (1.5,1)--(3,2.125)
node[midway,left] {scriptsize Secant Line};
%%%
draw[blue!50,thick,dashed] (1.5,1)--(3,1)--(3,2.125);
draw[blue!50] (3,1.1)--(2.9,1.1)--(2.9,1);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror,raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(1.5,-.250) -- node[below=6pt] {$x_{2}-x_{1}$} (3,-.250);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror, raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(3,1) -- node[right=6pt] {$f(x_{2})-f(x_{1})$} (3,2.215);
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}
end{document}
This will Output
I am trying to go here with the picture:
This is a bit beyond my programming skills I think ? PLease all suggestions welcome
tikz-pgf tikz-arrows
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Hi I am looking for feedback to improve an existing program PLUS advice for a desired diagram in the same direction.
Here is my minimal example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.75,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (4.5,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
foreach x/xtext in {1.5/x_{1}, 3/x_{2}}
draw[xshift=x cm] (0pt,2pt) -- (0pt,-2pt)
node[below,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$xtext$};
foreach y/ytext in {1/y_{1}=f(x_{1}), 2.125/y_{1}=f(x_{2})}
draw[yshift=y cm] (2pt,0pt) -- (-2pt,0pt)
node[left,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$ytext$};
%%%
draw[domain=.5:3.25,smooth,variable=x,red,<->,thick] plot ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
draw[thick,blue!50,shorten >=-.5cm,shorten <=-.5cm] (1.5,1)--(3,2.125)
node[midway,left] {scriptsize Secant Line};
%%%
draw[blue!50,thick,dashed] (1.5,1)--(3,1)--(3,2.125);
draw[blue!50] (3,1.1)--(2.9,1.1)--(2.9,1);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror,raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(1.5,-.250) -- node[below=6pt] {$x_{2}-x_{1}$} (3,-.250);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror, raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(3,1) -- node[right=6pt] {$f(x_{2})-f(x_{1})$} (3,2.215);
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}
end{document}
This will Output
I am trying to go here with the picture:
This is a bit beyond my programming skills I think ? PLease all suggestions welcome
tikz-pgf tikz-arrows
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Hi I am looking for feedback to improve an existing program PLUS advice for a desired diagram in the same direction.
Here is my minimal example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.75,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (4.5,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
foreach x/xtext in {1.5/x_{1}, 3/x_{2}}
draw[xshift=x cm] (0pt,2pt) -- (0pt,-2pt)
node[below,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$xtext$};
foreach y/ytext in {1/y_{1}=f(x_{1}), 2.125/y_{1}=f(x_{2})}
draw[yshift=y cm] (2pt,0pt) -- (-2pt,0pt)
node[left,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$ytext$};
%%%
draw[domain=.5:3.25,smooth,variable=x,red,<->,thick] plot ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
draw[thick,blue!50,shorten >=-.5cm,shorten <=-.5cm] (1.5,1)--(3,2.125)
node[midway,left] {scriptsize Secant Line};
%%%
draw[blue!50,thick,dashed] (1.5,1)--(3,1)--(3,2.125);
draw[blue!50] (3,1.1)--(2.9,1.1)--(2.9,1);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror,raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(1.5,-.250) -- node[below=6pt] {$x_{2}-x_{1}$} (3,-.250);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror, raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(3,1) -- node[right=6pt] {$f(x_{2})-f(x_{1})$} (3,2.215);
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}
end{document}
This will Output
I am trying to go here with the picture:
This is a bit beyond my programming skills I think ? PLease all suggestions welcome
tikz-pgf tikz-arrows
Hi I am looking for feedback to improve an existing program PLUS advice for a desired diagram in the same direction.
Here is my minimal example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing}
begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.75,cap=round]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
draw[->] (-.5,0) -- (4.5,0) node[below] {$x$};
draw[->] (0,-.5)-- (0,3) node[left] {$y$};
foreach x/xtext in {1.5/x_{1}, 3/x_{2}}
draw[xshift=x cm] (0pt,2pt) -- (0pt,-2pt)
node[below,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$xtext$};
foreach y/ytext in {1/y_{1}=f(x_{1}), 2.125/y_{1}=f(x_{2})}
draw[yshift=y cm] (2pt,0pt) -- (-2pt,0pt)
node[left,fill=white,font=normalsize]
{$ytext$};
%%%
draw[domain=.5:3.25,smooth,variable=x,red,<->,thick] plot ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
draw[thick,blue!50,shorten >=-.5cm,shorten <=-.5cm] (1.5,1)--(3,2.125)
node[midway,left] {scriptsize Secant Line};
%%%
draw[blue!50,thick,dashed] (1.5,1)--(3,1)--(3,2.125);
draw[blue!50] (3,1.1)--(2.9,1.1)--(2.9,1);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror,raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(1.5,-.250) -- node[below=6pt] {$x_{2}-x_{1}$} (3,-.250);
draw[decoration={brace,mirror, raise=5pt},decorate,blue!50]
(3,1) -- node[right=6pt] {$f(x_{2})-f(x_{1})$} (3,2.215);
%%%
filldraw[black] (1.5,1) circle (1pt) node[above] {scriptsize $P$};
filldraw[black] (3,2.125) circle (1pt) node[left] {scriptsize $Q$};
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}
end{document}
This will Output
I am trying to go here with the picture:
This is a bit beyond my programming skills I think ? PLease all suggestions welcome
tikz-pgf tikz-arrows
tikz-pgf tikz-arrows
asked 2 days ago
MathScholar
3428
3428
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
With decorations.markings
you can mark coordinates along the path, which then allow you to draw tangents. Note that drawing tangents has already been discussed at length in this nice answer, and I am implicitly using the same approach. However, my code is an attempt to have a unified treatment of both of your requests, i.e. tangent and secants, so at first sight it looks quite different.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing,decorations.markings,calc,arrows.meta,bending}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5,cap=round,mark pos/.style args={#1/#2}{%
postaction={decorate,decoration={markings,%
mark=at position #1 with {
coordinate (#2);}}}}]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
%%%
pgfmathsetmacro{posP}{0.38}
draw[red,{Latex[bend]}-{Latex[bend]},thick,mark
pos/.list={posP-0.005/p-0,posP/P,posP+0.005/p-2,0.5/q-4,0.62/q-3,0.74/q-2,0.86/q-1}] plot[domain=.5:3.25,samples=101,variable=x] ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
draw[red] let p1=($(p-2)-(p-0)$),n1={(y1/x1)*(1cm/1pt)}
in ($(P)-1*(1,n1)$) -- ($(P)+2*(1,n1)$) node[right,anchor=north
west,font=scriptsize,text width=1cm]{slope $m$ $=$ instaneous rate dots};
fill (P) circle (1pt) node[above,font=scriptsize] {$P$};
foreach X in {1,...,4}
{fill (q-X) circle (1pt) node[below right,font=scriptsize] {$Q_X$};
path (P) -- (q-X) coordinate[pos=-0.5] (L-X) coordinate[pos={1.2+X*0.3}] (R-X);
draw[cyan,dashed] (L-X) -- (R-X) node[right,font=scriptsize] (mX) {slope $m_X$}; }
draw[line width=2mm,-{Latex[bend]},red!20] ($(m1)+(0.5,0.1)$)
to[out=-90,in=65] ++ (-0.2,-1.2);
%%%
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
2
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
I refactored the yesterday answer and added some new features.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add,pst-eucl}
deff(#1){((#1+3)/3+sin(#1+3))}
deffp(#1){Derive(1,f(#1))}
psset{unit=2}
begin{document}
multido{r=2.0+-.1}{19}{%
begin{pspicture}[algebraic](-1.6,-.6)(4.4,3.4)
psaxes[ticks=none,labels=none]{->}(0,0)(-1.6,-.6)(4.1,3.1)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
psplot[linecolor=red,linewidth=2pt]{-1}{3.9}{f(x)}
%
psplotTangent[linecolor=blue]{1.6}{1}{f(x)}
psplotTangent[linecolor=cyan,Derive={-1/fp(x)}]{1.6}{.5}{f(x)}
%
pstGeonode[PosAngle={135,90}]
(*1.6 {f(x)}){A}
(*{1.6 rspace add} {f(x)}){B}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={-120,-60},PointName={x_1,x_2},PointNameSep=8pt]
(A|0,0){x1}
(B|0,0){x2}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={210,150},PointName={f(x_1),f(x_2)},PointNameSep=20pt]
(0,0|A){fx1}
(0,0|B){fx2}
pcline[nodesep=-.5,linecolor=green](A)(B)
%
psset{linestyle=dashed}
psCoordinates(A)
psCoordinates(B)
%
psset{linecolor=gray,linestyle=dashed,labelsep=4pt,arrows=|*-|*,offset=-16pt}
pcline(x1)(x2)
nbput{$x_2-x_1$}
pcline(fx2)(fx1)
nbput{$f(x_2)-f(x_1)$}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
Secant, tangent, and normal lines are given free of charge!
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I see that @marmot has already given you the solution. This is just another way of doing it. Just an attempt to do it without using any extra libraries.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={func(y) = 0.1*(y-5)*(y-5)+1;}]
draw[domain=2:15,smooth,variable=x,thick] plot ({x},{func(x)});
draw[fill] (6.4,{func(6.4)})node[below]{p}circle (2pt)coordinate(p);
foreach[count=i] x in {8.0,9.6,...,14.4}{
draw[fill] (x,{0.1*(x-5)*(x-5)+1})node[below]{Q$_i$} circle (2pt)coordinate(Qi);
draw[thick,blue!80,dashed,shorten >=-2cm,shorten <=-2cm] (p) -- (Qi)node[right=0.7cm](mi){slope m$_i$};
}
draw[thick,red!70,shorten >=-9cm,shorten <=-4cm] (p) -- (6.401,{func(6.401)});
draw[-latex,line width=4mm,red!20] (m4.south east) to[out=-100, in=25] (m2.south east)node[below,anchor=north west,red]{slope $m=ldots$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. withto[out=...,in=...]
or.. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
With decorations.markings
you can mark coordinates along the path, which then allow you to draw tangents. Note that drawing tangents has already been discussed at length in this nice answer, and I am implicitly using the same approach. However, my code is an attempt to have a unified treatment of both of your requests, i.e. tangent and secants, so at first sight it looks quite different.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing,decorations.markings,calc,arrows.meta,bending}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5,cap=round,mark pos/.style args={#1/#2}{%
postaction={decorate,decoration={markings,%
mark=at position #1 with {
coordinate (#2);}}}}]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
%%%
pgfmathsetmacro{posP}{0.38}
draw[red,{Latex[bend]}-{Latex[bend]},thick,mark
pos/.list={posP-0.005/p-0,posP/P,posP+0.005/p-2,0.5/q-4,0.62/q-3,0.74/q-2,0.86/q-1}] plot[domain=.5:3.25,samples=101,variable=x] ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
draw[red] let p1=($(p-2)-(p-0)$),n1={(y1/x1)*(1cm/1pt)}
in ($(P)-1*(1,n1)$) -- ($(P)+2*(1,n1)$) node[right,anchor=north
west,font=scriptsize,text width=1cm]{slope $m$ $=$ instaneous rate dots};
fill (P) circle (1pt) node[above,font=scriptsize] {$P$};
foreach X in {1,...,4}
{fill (q-X) circle (1pt) node[below right,font=scriptsize] {$Q_X$};
path (P) -- (q-X) coordinate[pos=-0.5] (L-X) coordinate[pos={1.2+X*0.3}] (R-X);
draw[cyan,dashed] (L-X) -- (R-X) node[right,font=scriptsize] (mX) {slope $m_X$}; }
draw[line width=2mm,-{Latex[bend]},red!20] ($(m1)+(0.5,0.1)$)
to[out=-90,in=65] ++ (-0.2,-1.2);
%%%
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
2
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
With decorations.markings
you can mark coordinates along the path, which then allow you to draw tangents. Note that drawing tangents has already been discussed at length in this nice answer, and I am implicitly using the same approach. However, my code is an attempt to have a unified treatment of both of your requests, i.e. tangent and secants, so at first sight it looks quite different.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing,decorations.markings,calc,arrows.meta,bending}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5,cap=round,mark pos/.style args={#1/#2}{%
postaction={decorate,decoration={markings,%
mark=at position #1 with {
coordinate (#2);}}}}]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
%%%
pgfmathsetmacro{posP}{0.38}
draw[red,{Latex[bend]}-{Latex[bend]},thick,mark
pos/.list={posP-0.005/p-0,posP/P,posP+0.005/p-2,0.5/q-4,0.62/q-3,0.74/q-2,0.86/q-1}] plot[domain=.5:3.25,samples=101,variable=x] ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
draw[red] let p1=($(p-2)-(p-0)$),n1={(y1/x1)*(1cm/1pt)}
in ($(P)-1*(1,n1)$) -- ($(P)+2*(1,n1)$) node[right,anchor=north
west,font=scriptsize,text width=1cm]{slope $m$ $=$ instaneous rate dots};
fill (P) circle (1pt) node[above,font=scriptsize] {$P$};
foreach X in {1,...,4}
{fill (q-X) circle (1pt) node[below right,font=scriptsize] {$Q_X$};
path (P) -- (q-X) coordinate[pos=-0.5] (L-X) coordinate[pos={1.2+X*0.3}] (R-X);
draw[cyan,dashed] (L-X) -- (R-X) node[right,font=scriptsize] (mX) {slope $m_X$}; }
draw[line width=2mm,-{Latex[bend]},red!20] ($(m1)+(0.5,0.1)$)
to[out=-90,in=65] ++ (-0.2,-1.2);
%%%
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
2
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
With decorations.markings
you can mark coordinates along the path, which then allow you to draw tangents. Note that drawing tangents has already been discussed at length in this nice answer, and I am implicitly using the same approach. However, my code is an attempt to have a unified treatment of both of your requests, i.e. tangent and secants, so at first sight it looks quite different.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing,decorations.markings,calc,arrows.meta,bending}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5,cap=round,mark pos/.style args={#1/#2}{%
postaction={decorate,decoration={markings,%
mark=at position #1 with {
coordinate (#2);}}}}]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
%%%
pgfmathsetmacro{posP}{0.38}
draw[red,{Latex[bend]}-{Latex[bend]},thick,mark
pos/.list={posP-0.005/p-0,posP/P,posP+0.005/p-2,0.5/q-4,0.62/q-3,0.74/q-2,0.86/q-1}] plot[domain=.5:3.25,samples=101,variable=x] ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
draw[red] let p1=($(p-2)-(p-0)$),n1={(y1/x1)*(1cm/1pt)}
in ($(P)-1*(1,n1)$) -- ($(P)+2*(1,n1)$) node[right,anchor=north
west,font=scriptsize,text width=1cm]{slope $m$ $=$ instaneous rate dots};
fill (P) circle (1pt) node[above,font=scriptsize] {$P$};
foreach X in {1,...,4}
{fill (q-X) circle (1pt) node[below right,font=scriptsize] {$Q_X$};
path (P) -- (q-X) coordinate[pos=-0.5] (L-X) coordinate[pos={1.2+X*0.3}] (R-X);
draw[cyan,dashed] (L-X) -- (R-X) node[right,font=scriptsize] (mX) {slope $m_X$}; }
draw[line width=2mm,-{Latex[bend]},red!20] ($(m1)+(0.5,0.1)$)
to[out=-90,in=65] ++ (-0.2,-1.2);
%%%
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
With decorations.markings
you can mark coordinates along the path, which then allow you to draw tangents. Note that drawing tangents has already been discussed at length in this nice answer, and I am implicitly using the same approach. However, my code is an attempt to have a unified treatment of both of your requests, i.e. tangent and secants, so at first sight it looks quite different.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing,decorations.markings,calc,arrows.meta,bending}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5,cap=round,mark pos/.style args={#1/#2}{%
postaction={decorate,decoration={markings,%
mark=at position #1 with {
coordinate (#2);}}}}]
tikzset{axes/.style={}}
%draw[style=help lines,step=1cm, dotted] (-5.25,-5.25) grid (5.25,5.25);
% The graphic
begin{scope}[style=axes]
%%%
pgfmathsetmacro{posP}{0.38}
draw[red,{Latex[bend]}-{Latex[bend]},thick,mark
pos/.list={posP-0.005/p-0,posP/P,posP+0.005/p-2,0.5/q-4,0.62/q-3,0.74/q-2,0.86/q-1}] plot[domain=.5:3.25,samples=101,variable=x] ({x},{.5*(x-1.5)*(x-1.5)+1});
draw[red] let p1=($(p-2)-(p-0)$),n1={(y1/x1)*(1cm/1pt)}
in ($(P)-1*(1,n1)$) -- ($(P)+2*(1,n1)$) node[right,anchor=north
west,font=scriptsize,text width=1cm]{slope $m$ $=$ instaneous rate dots};
fill (P) circle (1pt) node[above,font=scriptsize] {$P$};
foreach X in {1,...,4}
{fill (q-X) circle (1pt) node[below right,font=scriptsize] {$Q_X$};
path (P) -- (q-X) coordinate[pos=-0.5] (L-X) coordinate[pos={1.2+X*0.3}] (R-X);
draw[cyan,dashed] (L-X) -- (R-X) node[right,font=scriptsize] (mX) {slope $m_X$}; }
draw[line width=2mm,-{Latex[bend]},red!20] ($(m1)+(0.5,0.1)$)
to[out=-90,in=65] ++ (-0.2,-1.2);
%%%
%%%
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
marmot
76.6k487161
76.6k487161
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
2
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
2
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
No Marmot, you can take them out. I am reviewing the out put . It is hard to read since the points are cluttered but feel free to change these. There is no hurry. I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
In short, make as many changes to the original as you require
– MathScholar
2 days ago
2
2
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
@MathScholar Well, I could do that, but this would require me knowing what the target output is. Plus I do not know what " I also would not know how to make the red arrow indicating the secants approach the tangent" means. (Remember, I am just a simple marmot. ;-)
– marmot
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
the target output is exactly the image(picture) above. I just provided a minimal example which I thought could lead there. Your welcome to change as much as you need I appreciate you contribution.
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
@MathScholar Is that closer now?
– marmot
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
I refactored the yesterday answer and added some new features.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add,pst-eucl}
deff(#1){((#1+3)/3+sin(#1+3))}
deffp(#1){Derive(1,f(#1))}
psset{unit=2}
begin{document}
multido{r=2.0+-.1}{19}{%
begin{pspicture}[algebraic](-1.6,-.6)(4.4,3.4)
psaxes[ticks=none,labels=none]{->}(0,0)(-1.6,-.6)(4.1,3.1)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
psplot[linecolor=red,linewidth=2pt]{-1}{3.9}{f(x)}
%
psplotTangent[linecolor=blue]{1.6}{1}{f(x)}
psplotTangent[linecolor=cyan,Derive={-1/fp(x)}]{1.6}{.5}{f(x)}
%
pstGeonode[PosAngle={135,90}]
(*1.6 {f(x)}){A}
(*{1.6 rspace add} {f(x)}){B}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={-120,-60},PointName={x_1,x_2},PointNameSep=8pt]
(A|0,0){x1}
(B|0,0){x2}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={210,150},PointName={f(x_1),f(x_2)},PointNameSep=20pt]
(0,0|A){fx1}
(0,0|B){fx2}
pcline[nodesep=-.5,linecolor=green](A)(B)
%
psset{linestyle=dashed}
psCoordinates(A)
psCoordinates(B)
%
psset{linecolor=gray,linestyle=dashed,labelsep=4pt,arrows=|*-|*,offset=-16pt}
pcline(x1)(x2)
nbput{$x_2-x_1$}
pcline(fx2)(fx1)
nbput{$f(x_2)-f(x_1)$}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
Secant, tangent, and normal lines are given free of charge!
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
I refactored the yesterday answer and added some new features.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add,pst-eucl}
deff(#1){((#1+3)/3+sin(#1+3))}
deffp(#1){Derive(1,f(#1))}
psset{unit=2}
begin{document}
multido{r=2.0+-.1}{19}{%
begin{pspicture}[algebraic](-1.6,-.6)(4.4,3.4)
psaxes[ticks=none,labels=none]{->}(0,0)(-1.6,-.6)(4.1,3.1)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
psplot[linecolor=red,linewidth=2pt]{-1}{3.9}{f(x)}
%
psplotTangent[linecolor=blue]{1.6}{1}{f(x)}
psplotTangent[linecolor=cyan,Derive={-1/fp(x)}]{1.6}{.5}{f(x)}
%
pstGeonode[PosAngle={135,90}]
(*1.6 {f(x)}){A}
(*{1.6 rspace add} {f(x)}){B}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={-120,-60},PointName={x_1,x_2},PointNameSep=8pt]
(A|0,0){x1}
(B|0,0){x2}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={210,150},PointName={f(x_1),f(x_2)},PointNameSep=20pt]
(0,0|A){fx1}
(0,0|B){fx2}
pcline[nodesep=-.5,linecolor=green](A)(B)
%
psset{linestyle=dashed}
psCoordinates(A)
psCoordinates(B)
%
psset{linecolor=gray,linestyle=dashed,labelsep=4pt,arrows=|*-|*,offset=-16pt}
pcline(x1)(x2)
nbput{$x_2-x_1$}
pcline(fx2)(fx1)
nbput{$f(x_2)-f(x_1)$}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
Secant, tangent, and normal lines are given free of charge!
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
I refactored the yesterday answer and added some new features.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add,pst-eucl}
deff(#1){((#1+3)/3+sin(#1+3))}
deffp(#1){Derive(1,f(#1))}
psset{unit=2}
begin{document}
multido{r=2.0+-.1}{19}{%
begin{pspicture}[algebraic](-1.6,-.6)(4.4,3.4)
psaxes[ticks=none,labels=none]{->}(0,0)(-1.6,-.6)(4.1,3.1)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
psplot[linecolor=red,linewidth=2pt]{-1}{3.9}{f(x)}
%
psplotTangent[linecolor=blue]{1.6}{1}{f(x)}
psplotTangent[linecolor=cyan,Derive={-1/fp(x)}]{1.6}{.5}{f(x)}
%
pstGeonode[PosAngle={135,90}]
(*1.6 {f(x)}){A}
(*{1.6 rspace add} {f(x)}){B}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={-120,-60},PointName={x_1,x_2},PointNameSep=8pt]
(A|0,0){x1}
(B|0,0){x2}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={210,150},PointName={f(x_1),f(x_2)},PointNameSep=20pt]
(0,0|A){fx1}
(0,0|B){fx2}
pcline[nodesep=-.5,linecolor=green](A)(B)
%
psset{linestyle=dashed}
psCoordinates(A)
psCoordinates(B)
%
psset{linecolor=gray,linestyle=dashed,labelsep=4pt,arrows=|*-|*,offset=-16pt}
pcline(x1)(x2)
nbput{$x_2-x_1$}
pcline(fx2)(fx1)
nbput{$f(x_2)-f(x_1)$}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
Secant, tangent, and normal lines are given free of charge!
I refactored the yesterday answer and added some new features.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{pstricks-add,pst-eucl}
deff(#1){((#1+3)/3+sin(#1+3))}
deffp(#1){Derive(1,f(#1))}
psset{unit=2}
begin{document}
multido{r=2.0+-.1}{19}{%
begin{pspicture}[algebraic](-1.6,-.6)(4.4,3.4)
psaxes[ticks=none,labels=none]{->}(0,0)(-1.6,-.6)(4.1,3.1)[$x$,0][$y$,90]
psplot[linecolor=red,linewidth=2pt]{-1}{3.9}{f(x)}
%
psplotTangent[linecolor=blue]{1.6}{1}{f(x)}
psplotTangent[linecolor=cyan,Derive={-1/fp(x)}]{1.6}{.5}{f(x)}
%
pstGeonode[PosAngle={135,90}]
(*1.6 {f(x)}){A}
(*{1.6 rspace add} {f(x)}){B}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={-120,-60},PointName={x_1,x_2},PointNameSep=8pt]
(A|0,0){x1}
(B|0,0){x2}
pstGeonode[PosAngle={210,150},PointName={f(x_1),f(x_2)},PointNameSep=20pt]
(0,0|A){fx1}
(0,0|B){fx2}
pcline[nodesep=-.5,linecolor=green](A)(B)
%
psset{linestyle=dashed}
psCoordinates(A)
psCoordinates(B)
%
psset{linecolor=gray,linestyle=dashed,labelsep=4pt,arrows=|*-|*,offset=-16pt}
pcline(x1)(x2)
nbput{$x_2-x_1$}
pcline(fx2)(fx1)
nbput{$f(x_2)-f(x_1)$}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
Secant, tangent, and normal lines are given free of charge!
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,5291832
4,5291832
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Hey I like it but need the program in Tikz. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
I can show the tangent but this space is too narrow to contain.
– Artificial Stupidity
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
You can change the original program to allow for your space. Any response is appreciated
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
Nice animation (+1)
– marmot
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
I really like this animation and will try this tomorrow with TiKz
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I see that @marmot has already given you the solution. This is just another way of doing it. Just an attempt to do it without using any extra libraries.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={func(y) = 0.1*(y-5)*(y-5)+1;}]
draw[domain=2:15,smooth,variable=x,thick] plot ({x},{func(x)});
draw[fill] (6.4,{func(6.4)})node[below]{p}circle (2pt)coordinate(p);
foreach[count=i] x in {8.0,9.6,...,14.4}{
draw[fill] (x,{0.1*(x-5)*(x-5)+1})node[below]{Q$_i$} circle (2pt)coordinate(Qi);
draw[thick,blue!80,dashed,shorten >=-2cm,shorten <=-2cm] (p) -- (Qi)node[right=0.7cm](mi){slope m$_i$};
}
draw[thick,red!70,shorten >=-9cm,shorten <=-4cm] (p) -- (6.401,{func(6.401)});
draw[-latex,line width=4mm,red!20] (m4.south east) to[out=-100, in=25] (m2.south east)node[below,anchor=north west,red]{slope $m=ldots$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. withto[out=...,in=...]
or.. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I see that @marmot has already given you the solution. This is just another way of doing it. Just an attempt to do it without using any extra libraries.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={func(y) = 0.1*(y-5)*(y-5)+1;}]
draw[domain=2:15,smooth,variable=x,thick] plot ({x},{func(x)});
draw[fill] (6.4,{func(6.4)})node[below]{p}circle (2pt)coordinate(p);
foreach[count=i] x in {8.0,9.6,...,14.4}{
draw[fill] (x,{0.1*(x-5)*(x-5)+1})node[below]{Q$_i$} circle (2pt)coordinate(Qi);
draw[thick,blue!80,dashed,shorten >=-2cm,shorten <=-2cm] (p) -- (Qi)node[right=0.7cm](mi){slope m$_i$};
}
draw[thick,red!70,shorten >=-9cm,shorten <=-4cm] (p) -- (6.401,{func(6.401)});
draw[-latex,line width=4mm,red!20] (m4.south east) to[out=-100, in=25] (m2.south east)node[below,anchor=north west,red]{slope $m=ldots$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. withto[out=...,in=...]
or.. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I see that @marmot has already given you the solution. This is just another way of doing it. Just an attempt to do it without using any extra libraries.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={func(y) = 0.1*(y-5)*(y-5)+1;}]
draw[domain=2:15,smooth,variable=x,thick] plot ({x},{func(x)});
draw[fill] (6.4,{func(6.4)})node[below]{p}circle (2pt)coordinate(p);
foreach[count=i] x in {8.0,9.6,...,14.4}{
draw[fill] (x,{0.1*(x-5)*(x-5)+1})node[below]{Q$_i$} circle (2pt)coordinate(Qi);
draw[thick,blue!80,dashed,shorten >=-2cm,shorten <=-2cm] (p) -- (Qi)node[right=0.7cm](mi){slope m$_i$};
}
draw[thick,red!70,shorten >=-9cm,shorten <=-4cm] (p) -- (6.401,{func(6.401)});
draw[-latex,line width=4mm,red!20] (m4.south east) to[out=-100, in=25] (m2.south east)node[below,anchor=north west,red]{slope $m=ldots$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I see that @marmot has already given you the solution. This is just another way of doing it. Just an attempt to do it without using any extra libraries.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={func(y) = 0.1*(y-5)*(y-5)+1;}]
draw[domain=2:15,smooth,variable=x,thick] plot ({x},{func(x)});
draw[fill] (6.4,{func(6.4)})node[below]{p}circle (2pt)coordinate(p);
foreach[count=i] x in {8.0,9.6,...,14.4}{
draw[fill] (x,{0.1*(x-5)*(x-5)+1})node[below]{Q$_i$} circle (2pt)coordinate(Qi);
draw[thick,blue!80,dashed,shorten >=-2cm,shorten <=-2cm] (p) -- (Qi)node[right=0.7cm](mi){slope m$_i$};
}
draw[thick,red!70,shorten >=-9cm,shorten <=-4cm] (p) -- (6.401,{func(6.401)});
draw[-latex,line width=4mm,red!20] (m4.south east) to[out=-100, in=25] (m2.south east)node[below,anchor=north west,red]{slope $m=ldots$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
nidhin
1,450820
1,450820
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. withto[out=...,in=...]
or.. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. withto[out=...,in=...]
or.. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. with
to[out=...,in=...]
or .. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)– marmot
2 days ago
Yes, this looks very good to me! (One reason why I did not go that way is that one may not necessarily plot a known function, but just draw some curve by other means, e.g. with
to[out=...,in=...]
or .. (...) and (...) ..
. But as long as you do not go that way, this a very nice and compact way of achieving this.)– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
Thanks @marmot . I got your point.
– nidhin
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
@nidhin Thank you for this. The program has its own merits as well. Thanks for sharing
– MathScholar
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460632%2ftikz-and-secant-line-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown