global sections of locally free sheaf on projective space
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcal{E}$ be a locally free sheaf on $mathbb{P}^n_A=mathbb{P}^ntimes_{Spec k} Spec A$, where $A$ is a finitely generated algebra over a field $k$. By a well known theorem (see e.g. Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Thm 5.19) $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a finitely generated $A$- module.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a projective module?
Let $B$ be a finitely generated $k$-algebra, $f: Spec B to Spec A$ a morphism and $f^*mathcal{E}$ the pullback of $mathcal{E}$ to $Spec B$.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})otimes _A B= H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B, f^*mathcal{E})$ ?
1 and 2 above are true when $mathcal {E}$ is a direct sum of line bundles of the form $mathcal O(n)$. I was wondering if they are true for general $mathcal{E}$.
ag.algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcal{E}$ be a locally free sheaf on $mathbb{P}^n_A=mathbb{P}^ntimes_{Spec k} Spec A$, where $A$ is a finitely generated algebra over a field $k$. By a well known theorem (see e.g. Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Thm 5.19) $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a finitely generated $A$- module.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a projective module?
Let $B$ be a finitely generated $k$-algebra, $f: Spec B to Spec A$ a morphism and $f^*mathcal{E}$ the pullback of $mathcal{E}$ to $Spec B$.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})otimes _A B= H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B, f^*mathcal{E})$ ?
1 and 2 above are true when $mathcal {E}$ is a direct sum of line bundles of the form $mathcal O(n)$. I was wondering if they are true for general $mathcal{E}$.
ag.algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
1
Have a look at Base change for quasi-coherent sheaves.
– abx
Nov 27 at 5:27
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $mathcal{E}$ be a locally free sheaf on $mathbb{P}^n_A=mathbb{P}^ntimes_{Spec k} Spec A$, where $A$ is a finitely generated algebra over a field $k$. By a well known theorem (see e.g. Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Thm 5.19) $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a finitely generated $A$- module.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a projective module?
Let $B$ be a finitely generated $k$-algebra, $f: Spec B to Spec A$ a morphism and $f^*mathcal{E}$ the pullback of $mathcal{E}$ to $Spec B$.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})otimes _A B= H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B, f^*mathcal{E})$ ?
1 and 2 above are true when $mathcal {E}$ is a direct sum of line bundles of the form $mathcal O(n)$. I was wondering if they are true for general $mathcal{E}$.
ag.algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
Let $mathcal{E}$ be a locally free sheaf on $mathbb{P}^n_A=mathbb{P}^ntimes_{Spec k} Spec A$, where $A$ is a finitely generated algebra over a field $k$. By a well known theorem (see e.g. Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Thm 5.19) $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a finitely generated $A$- module.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})$ is a projective module?
Let $B$ be a finitely generated $k$-algebra, $f: Spec B to Spec A$ a morphism and $f^*mathcal{E}$ the pullback of $mathcal{E}$ to $Spec B$.
- Is it true that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A, mathcal{E})otimes _A B= H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B, f^*mathcal{E})$ ?
1 and 2 above are true when $mathcal {E}$ is a direct sum of line bundles of the form $mathcal O(n)$. I was wondering if they are true for general $mathcal{E}$.
ag.algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
ag.algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
edited Nov 26 at 22:30
asked Nov 26 at 22:23
mike
263
263
1
Have a look at Base change for quasi-coherent sheaves.
– abx
Nov 27 at 5:27
add a comment |
1
Have a look at Base change for quasi-coherent sheaves.
– abx
Nov 27 at 5:27
1
1
Have a look at Base change for quasi-coherent sheaves.
– abx
Nov 27 at 5:27
Have a look at Base change for quasi-coherent sheaves.
– abx
Nov 27 at 5:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The answer to both questions is negative, see counterexamples below.
1) Let $A = k[x,y,z]$, $n = 1$. Note that
$$
H^1(mathbb{P}^n_A,O(-2)) cong A.
$$
Consider the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z)$. Then the cohomolopgy exact sequence
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z)}to A
$$
shows that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E)$ is reflexive but not locally free (hence not projective). In fact, this is the simplest example of a reflexive non-locally free sheaf.
2) Take $A = k[x,y,z,w]$ and define $E$ as the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z,w)$. Let $B = k$ with the morphism $A to B$ defined by $x,y,z,w mapsto 0$. Then $f^*E cong O(-2) oplus O oplus O oplus O oplus O$, hence
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B,f^*E) = B oplus B oplus B oplus B.
$$
On the other hand, tensoring
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z,w)}to A to B to 0
$$
by $B$ (over $A$), we deduce
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) otimes_A B cong Tor_2^A(B,B) cong B^{oplus 6}.
$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The answer to both questions is negative, see counterexamples below.
1) Let $A = k[x,y,z]$, $n = 1$. Note that
$$
H^1(mathbb{P}^n_A,O(-2)) cong A.
$$
Consider the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z)$. Then the cohomolopgy exact sequence
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z)}to A
$$
shows that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E)$ is reflexive but not locally free (hence not projective). In fact, this is the simplest example of a reflexive non-locally free sheaf.
2) Take $A = k[x,y,z,w]$ and define $E$ as the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z,w)$. Let $B = k$ with the morphism $A to B$ defined by $x,y,z,w mapsto 0$. Then $f^*E cong O(-2) oplus O oplus O oplus O oplus O$, hence
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B,f^*E) = B oplus B oplus B oplus B.
$$
On the other hand, tensoring
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z,w)}to A to B to 0
$$
by $B$ (over $A$), we deduce
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) otimes_A B cong Tor_2^A(B,B) cong B^{oplus 6}.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The answer to both questions is negative, see counterexamples below.
1) Let $A = k[x,y,z]$, $n = 1$. Note that
$$
H^1(mathbb{P}^n_A,O(-2)) cong A.
$$
Consider the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z)$. Then the cohomolopgy exact sequence
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z)}to A
$$
shows that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E)$ is reflexive but not locally free (hence not projective). In fact, this is the simplest example of a reflexive non-locally free sheaf.
2) Take $A = k[x,y,z,w]$ and define $E$ as the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z,w)$. Let $B = k$ with the morphism $A to B$ defined by $x,y,z,w mapsto 0$. Then $f^*E cong O(-2) oplus O oplus O oplus O oplus O$, hence
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B,f^*E) = B oplus B oplus B oplus B.
$$
On the other hand, tensoring
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z,w)}to A to B to 0
$$
by $B$ (over $A$), we deduce
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) otimes_A B cong Tor_2^A(B,B) cong B^{oplus 6}.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
The answer to both questions is negative, see counterexamples below.
1) Let $A = k[x,y,z]$, $n = 1$. Note that
$$
H^1(mathbb{P}^n_A,O(-2)) cong A.
$$
Consider the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z)$. Then the cohomolopgy exact sequence
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z)}to A
$$
shows that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E)$ is reflexive but not locally free (hence not projective). In fact, this is the simplest example of a reflexive non-locally free sheaf.
2) Take $A = k[x,y,z,w]$ and define $E$ as the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z,w)$. Let $B = k$ with the morphism $A to B$ defined by $x,y,z,w mapsto 0$. Then $f^*E cong O(-2) oplus O oplus O oplus O oplus O$, hence
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B,f^*E) = B oplus B oplus B oplus B.
$$
On the other hand, tensoring
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z,w)}to A to B to 0
$$
by $B$ (over $A$), we deduce
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) otimes_A B cong Tor_2^A(B,B) cong B^{oplus 6}.
$$
The answer to both questions is negative, see counterexamples below.
1) Let $A = k[x,y,z]$, $n = 1$. Note that
$$
H^1(mathbb{P}^n_A,O(-2)) cong A.
$$
Consider the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z)$. Then the cohomolopgy exact sequence
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z)}to A
$$
shows that $H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E)$ is reflexive but not locally free (hence not projective). In fact, this is the simplest example of a reflexive non-locally free sheaf.
2) Take $A = k[x,y,z,w]$ and define $E$ as the extension
$$
0 to O(-2) to E to O oplus O oplus O oplus O to 0
$$
whose extension class is $(x,y,z,w)$. Let $B = k$ with the morphism $A to B$ defined by $x,y,z,w mapsto 0$. Then $f^*E cong O(-2) oplus O oplus O oplus O oplus O$, hence
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_B,f^*E) = B oplus B oplus B oplus B.
$$
On the other hand, tensoring
$$
0 to H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) to A oplus A oplus A oplus A stackrel{(x,y,z,w)}to A to B to 0
$$
by $B$ (over $A$), we deduce
$$
H^0(mathbb{P}^n_A,E) otimes_A B cong Tor_2^A(B,B) cong B^{oplus 6}.
$$
answered Nov 27 at 0:01
Sasha
19.9k22652
19.9k22652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316285%2fglobal-sections-of-locally-free-sheaf-on-projective-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Have a look at Base change for quasi-coherent sheaves.
– abx
Nov 27 at 5:27