Past tense English conjugation in a whole sentence





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite












You should have let me given you a ride home.
You should have let me give you a ride home.
Your should have let me gave you a ride home.



You should have let me driven you home.
You should have let me drive you home.

You should have let me drove you home.



I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that I'm not sure which of these are actually correct and more importantly which are definitely incorrect. Part of me feels like since I'm speaking of past tense the whole sentence should be past tense but since I've already referenced past tense maybe it's not that important? My inclination is the first sentence of each is correct but I'm not positive, or certain if the others are technically wrong. It's weird when speaking about something in past tense that didn't actually occur.










share|improve this question






















  • Reading a similar question made me realize that I think I'm asking about subjunctive conjugation but it only confused me more and makes me think that there are multiple correct answers. en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Old_English/Verbs#The_subjunctive
    – Eric
    Dec 2 at 18:04












  • The second sentence of each group is definitely the correct one, though I can't really explain why. It is nothing to do with the subjunctive.
    – Kate Bunting
    Dec 2 at 18:24



















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












You should have let me given you a ride home.
You should have let me give you a ride home.
Your should have let me gave you a ride home.



You should have let me driven you home.
You should have let me drive you home.

You should have let me drove you home.



I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that I'm not sure which of these are actually correct and more importantly which are definitely incorrect. Part of me feels like since I'm speaking of past tense the whole sentence should be past tense but since I've already referenced past tense maybe it's not that important? My inclination is the first sentence of each is correct but I'm not positive, or certain if the others are technically wrong. It's weird when speaking about something in past tense that didn't actually occur.










share|improve this question






















  • Reading a similar question made me realize that I think I'm asking about subjunctive conjugation but it only confused me more and makes me think that there are multiple correct answers. en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Old_English/Verbs#The_subjunctive
    – Eric
    Dec 2 at 18:04












  • The second sentence of each group is definitely the correct one, though I can't really explain why. It is nothing to do with the subjunctive.
    – Kate Bunting
    Dec 2 at 18:24















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











You should have let me given you a ride home.
You should have let me give you a ride home.
Your should have let me gave you a ride home.



You should have let me driven you home.
You should have let me drive you home.

You should have let me drove you home.



I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that I'm not sure which of these are actually correct and more importantly which are definitely incorrect. Part of me feels like since I'm speaking of past tense the whole sentence should be past tense but since I've already referenced past tense maybe it's not that important? My inclination is the first sentence of each is correct but I'm not positive, or certain if the others are technically wrong. It's weird when speaking about something in past tense that didn't actually occur.










share|improve this question













You should have let me given you a ride home.
You should have let me give you a ride home.
Your should have let me gave you a ride home.



You should have let me driven you home.
You should have let me drive you home.

You should have let me drove you home.



I'm kind of embarrassed to admit that I'm not sure which of these are actually correct and more importantly which are definitely incorrect. Part of me feels like since I'm speaking of past tense the whole sentence should be past tense but since I've already referenced past tense maybe it's not that important? My inclination is the first sentence of each is correct but I'm not positive, or certain if the others are technically wrong. It's weird when speaking about something in past tense that didn't actually occur.







past-tense conjugation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 2 at 17:33









Eric

6315




6315












  • Reading a similar question made me realize that I think I'm asking about subjunctive conjugation but it only confused me more and makes me think that there are multiple correct answers. en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Old_English/Verbs#The_subjunctive
    – Eric
    Dec 2 at 18:04












  • The second sentence of each group is definitely the correct one, though I can't really explain why. It is nothing to do with the subjunctive.
    – Kate Bunting
    Dec 2 at 18:24




















  • Reading a similar question made me realize that I think I'm asking about subjunctive conjugation but it only confused me more and makes me think that there are multiple correct answers. en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Old_English/Verbs#The_subjunctive
    – Eric
    Dec 2 at 18:04












  • The second sentence of each group is definitely the correct one, though I can't really explain why. It is nothing to do with the subjunctive.
    – Kate Bunting
    Dec 2 at 18:24


















Reading a similar question made me realize that I think I'm asking about subjunctive conjugation but it only confused me more and makes me think that there are multiple correct answers. en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Old_English/Verbs#The_subjunctive
– Eric
Dec 2 at 18:04






Reading a similar question made me realize that I think I'm asking about subjunctive conjugation but it only confused me more and makes me think that there are multiple correct answers. en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Old_English/Verbs#The_subjunctive
– Eric
Dec 2 at 18:04














The second sentence of each group is definitely the correct one, though I can't really explain why. It is nothing to do with the subjunctive.
– Kate Bunting
Dec 2 at 18:24






The second sentence of each group is definitely the correct one, though I can't really explain why. It is nothing to do with the subjunctive.
– Kate Bunting
Dec 2 at 18:24












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










To form a sentence in the past tense, there is no requirement that every verb be in the past tense. You've already demonstrated this. It's "You should have" not "You should had."



In both of these cases, neither the mood of the sentence, nor the tense matter. The issue with given/give/gave is different. Usually, when one verb follows another verb (and the first verb isn't part of a compound tense, e.g. "I have seen"), the second verb will be in the infinitive. For example, "I want [verb 1] to see [verb 2]."



But your examples are somewhat special. The verb let is always followed by a bare infinitive (the infinitive - to give, to drive - minus the to).



You should have let me give

You should let me give

You let me give

If you had let me give

If you will let me give



Here's a BBC article on verbs using the bare infinitive:




  let + object + infinitive


Like make, see and hear, let is followed by object + bare infinitive. It cannot be followed by verb-ing:



  Let me carry that box of papers for you. It's very heavy.
Why don't you let him walk home by himself from school now? He's eleven years old after all


Let is also frequently used in the expression let's (let us) to introduce a suggestion. Note that negative sentences with let's can be formed in two possible ways:



  Let's finish the video tomorrow, shall we? I'm tired and I want to go to bed.
Let's not be late home tonight. It's Monday tomorrow after all.
Don't let's get too stressed about this. I know the car is damaged, but it's only a piece of metal.


We do not normally use let in the passive voice.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/youmeus/learnit/learnitv214.shtml







share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475348%2fpast-tense-english-conjugation-in-a-whole-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    To form a sentence in the past tense, there is no requirement that every verb be in the past tense. You've already demonstrated this. It's "You should have" not "You should had."



    In both of these cases, neither the mood of the sentence, nor the tense matter. The issue with given/give/gave is different. Usually, when one verb follows another verb (and the first verb isn't part of a compound tense, e.g. "I have seen"), the second verb will be in the infinitive. For example, "I want [verb 1] to see [verb 2]."



    But your examples are somewhat special. The verb let is always followed by a bare infinitive (the infinitive - to give, to drive - minus the to).



    You should have let me give

    You should let me give

    You let me give

    If you had let me give

    If you will let me give



    Here's a BBC article on verbs using the bare infinitive:




      let + object + infinitive


    Like make, see and hear, let is followed by object + bare infinitive. It cannot be followed by verb-ing:



      Let me carry that box of papers for you. It's very heavy.
    Why don't you let him walk home by himself from school now? He's eleven years old after all


    Let is also frequently used in the expression let's (let us) to introduce a suggestion. Note that negative sentences with let's can be formed in two possible ways:



      Let's finish the video tomorrow, shall we? I'm tired and I want to go to bed.
    Let's not be late home tonight. It's Monday tomorrow after all.
    Don't let's get too stressed about this. I know the car is damaged, but it's only a piece of metal.


    We do not normally use let in the passive voice.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/youmeus/learnit/learnitv214.shtml







    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      To form a sentence in the past tense, there is no requirement that every verb be in the past tense. You've already demonstrated this. It's "You should have" not "You should had."



      In both of these cases, neither the mood of the sentence, nor the tense matter. The issue with given/give/gave is different. Usually, when one verb follows another verb (and the first verb isn't part of a compound tense, e.g. "I have seen"), the second verb will be in the infinitive. For example, "I want [verb 1] to see [verb 2]."



      But your examples are somewhat special. The verb let is always followed by a bare infinitive (the infinitive - to give, to drive - minus the to).



      You should have let me give

      You should let me give

      You let me give

      If you had let me give

      If you will let me give



      Here's a BBC article on verbs using the bare infinitive:




        let + object + infinitive


      Like make, see and hear, let is followed by object + bare infinitive. It cannot be followed by verb-ing:



        Let me carry that box of papers for you. It's very heavy.
      Why don't you let him walk home by himself from school now? He's eleven years old after all


      Let is also frequently used in the expression let's (let us) to introduce a suggestion. Note that negative sentences with let's can be formed in two possible ways:



        Let's finish the video tomorrow, shall we? I'm tired and I want to go to bed.
      Let's not be late home tonight. It's Monday tomorrow after all.
      Don't let's get too stressed about this. I know the car is damaged, but it's only a piece of metal.


      We do not normally use let in the passive voice.
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/youmeus/learnit/learnitv214.shtml







      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        To form a sentence in the past tense, there is no requirement that every verb be in the past tense. You've already demonstrated this. It's "You should have" not "You should had."



        In both of these cases, neither the mood of the sentence, nor the tense matter. The issue with given/give/gave is different. Usually, when one verb follows another verb (and the first verb isn't part of a compound tense, e.g. "I have seen"), the second verb will be in the infinitive. For example, "I want [verb 1] to see [verb 2]."



        But your examples are somewhat special. The verb let is always followed by a bare infinitive (the infinitive - to give, to drive - minus the to).



        You should have let me give

        You should let me give

        You let me give

        If you had let me give

        If you will let me give



        Here's a BBC article on verbs using the bare infinitive:




          let + object + infinitive


        Like make, see and hear, let is followed by object + bare infinitive. It cannot be followed by verb-ing:



          Let me carry that box of papers for you. It's very heavy.
        Why don't you let him walk home by himself from school now? He's eleven years old after all


        Let is also frequently used in the expression let's (let us) to introduce a suggestion. Note that negative sentences with let's can be formed in two possible ways:



          Let's finish the video tomorrow, shall we? I'm tired and I want to go to bed.
        Let's not be late home tonight. It's Monday tomorrow after all.
        Don't let's get too stressed about this. I know the car is damaged, but it's only a piece of metal.


        We do not normally use let in the passive voice.
        http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/youmeus/learnit/learnitv214.shtml







        share|improve this answer














        To form a sentence in the past tense, there is no requirement that every verb be in the past tense. You've already demonstrated this. It's "You should have" not "You should had."



        In both of these cases, neither the mood of the sentence, nor the tense matter. The issue with given/give/gave is different. Usually, when one verb follows another verb (and the first verb isn't part of a compound tense, e.g. "I have seen"), the second verb will be in the infinitive. For example, "I want [verb 1] to see [verb 2]."



        But your examples are somewhat special. The verb let is always followed by a bare infinitive (the infinitive - to give, to drive - minus the to).



        You should have let me give

        You should let me give

        You let me give

        If you had let me give

        If you will let me give



        Here's a BBC article on verbs using the bare infinitive:




          let + object + infinitive


        Like make, see and hear, let is followed by object + bare infinitive. It cannot be followed by verb-ing:



          Let me carry that box of papers for you. It's very heavy.
        Why don't you let him walk home by himself from school now? He's eleven years old after all


        Let is also frequently used in the expression let's (let us) to introduce a suggestion. Note that negative sentences with let's can be formed in two possible ways:



          Let's finish the video tomorrow, shall we? I'm tired and I want to go to bed.
        Let's not be late home tonight. It's Monday tomorrow after all.
        Don't let's get too stressed about this. I know the car is damaged, but it's only a piece of metal.


        We do not normally use let in the passive voice.
        http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/youmeus/learnit/learnitv214.shtml








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 2 at 19:20

























        answered Dec 2 at 19:13









        Juhasz

        3394




        3394






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475348%2fpast-tense-english-conjugation-in-a-whole-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]