Partitioning the grid into triangles











up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1












Goal



The goal of this challenge is to produce a function of n which computes the number of ways to partition the n X 1 grid into triangles where all of the vertices of the triangles are on grid points.



Example



For example, there are 14 ways to partition the 2 x 1 grid, so f(2) = 14 via the following partitions Partitions of 2 x 1
where the partitions have 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, and 2 distinct orientations respectively.



Scoring



This is code-golf, so shortest code wins.










share|improve this question




















  • 10




    Some additional test cases would be beneficial, so we can verify our submissions are correct.
    – AdmBorkBork
    Nov 27 at 21:19






  • 8




    You may want to specify non-degenerate triangles.
    – Arnauld
    Nov 27 at 21:24










  • I've made edits to OEIS sequence A051708 to reflect this interpretation.
    – Peter Kagey
    Nov 30 at 18:32















up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1












Goal



The goal of this challenge is to produce a function of n which computes the number of ways to partition the n X 1 grid into triangles where all of the vertices of the triangles are on grid points.



Example



For example, there are 14 ways to partition the 2 x 1 grid, so f(2) = 14 via the following partitions Partitions of 2 x 1
where the partitions have 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, and 2 distinct orientations respectively.



Scoring



This is code-golf, so shortest code wins.










share|improve this question




















  • 10




    Some additional test cases would be beneficial, so we can verify our submissions are correct.
    – AdmBorkBork
    Nov 27 at 21:19






  • 8




    You may want to specify non-degenerate triangles.
    – Arnauld
    Nov 27 at 21:24










  • I've made edits to OEIS sequence A051708 to reflect this interpretation.
    – Peter Kagey
    Nov 30 at 18:32













up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1






1





Goal



The goal of this challenge is to produce a function of n which computes the number of ways to partition the n X 1 grid into triangles where all of the vertices of the triangles are on grid points.



Example



For example, there are 14 ways to partition the 2 x 1 grid, so f(2) = 14 via the following partitions Partitions of 2 x 1
where the partitions have 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, and 2 distinct orientations respectively.



Scoring



This is code-golf, so shortest code wins.










share|improve this question















Goal



The goal of this challenge is to produce a function of n which computes the number of ways to partition the n X 1 grid into triangles where all of the vertices of the triangles are on grid points.



Example



For example, there are 14 ways to partition the 2 x 1 grid, so f(2) = 14 via the following partitions Partitions of 2 x 1
where the partitions have 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, and 2 distinct orientations respectively.



Scoring



This is code-golf, so shortest code wins.







code-golf geometry combinatorics grid






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 21:29

























asked Nov 27 at 21:10









Peter Kagey

642516




642516








  • 10




    Some additional test cases would be beneficial, so we can verify our submissions are correct.
    – AdmBorkBork
    Nov 27 at 21:19






  • 8




    You may want to specify non-degenerate triangles.
    – Arnauld
    Nov 27 at 21:24










  • I've made edits to OEIS sequence A051708 to reflect this interpretation.
    – Peter Kagey
    Nov 30 at 18:32














  • 10




    Some additional test cases would be beneficial, so we can verify our submissions are correct.
    – AdmBorkBork
    Nov 27 at 21:19






  • 8




    You may want to specify non-degenerate triangles.
    – Arnauld
    Nov 27 at 21:24










  • I've made edits to OEIS sequence A051708 to reflect this interpretation.
    – Peter Kagey
    Nov 30 at 18:32








10




10




Some additional test cases would be beneficial, so we can verify our submissions are correct.
– AdmBorkBork
Nov 27 at 21:19




Some additional test cases would be beneficial, so we can verify our submissions are correct.
– AdmBorkBork
Nov 27 at 21:19




8




8




You may want to specify non-degenerate triangles.
– Arnauld
Nov 27 at 21:24




You may want to specify non-degenerate triangles.
– Arnauld
Nov 27 at 21:24












I've made edits to OEIS sequence A051708 to reflect this interpretation.
– Peter Kagey
Nov 30 at 18:32




I've made edits to OEIS sequence A051708 to reflect this interpretation.
– Peter Kagey
Nov 30 at 18:32










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
19
down vote














Haskell, 60 55 54 52 bytes



After a drawing and programming a lot of examples, it occured to me that this is the same as the problem of the rooks:




On a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ chessboard, how many ways are there for a rook to go from $(0,0)$ to $(n,n)$ by just moving right $+(1,0)$ or up $+(0,1)$?




Basically you have the top and the bottom line of the $1 times n$ grid. Now you have to fill in the non-horizontal line. Each triangle must have two non-horizontal lines. Whether one of its sides is part of the top or the bottom line corresponds to the direction and length you'd go in the rooks problem. This is OEIS A051708. As an illustration of this correspondence consider following examples. Here the top line corresponds to up-moves, while the bottom line corresponds to right-moves.





Thanks @PeterTaylor for -6 bytes and @PostLeftGarfHunter for -2 bytes!





b 0=1
b 1=2
b n=div((10*n-6)*b(n-1)-9*(n-2)*b(n-2))n


Try it online!






share|improve this answer























  • I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
    – Peter Taylor
    Nov 27 at 22:36










  • BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
    – Peter Taylor
    Nov 27 at 22:39












  • I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
    – Neil
    Nov 27 at 22:40










  • @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
    – flawr
    Nov 27 at 22:41






  • 5




    @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
    – flawr
    Nov 27 at 23:10


















up vote
8
down vote














Haskell, 42 bytes





0?0=1
a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
f n=n?n


Try it online!



A fairly direct implementation that recurses over 2 variables.



Here's how we can obtain this solution. Start with code implementing a direct recursive formula:



54 bytes





0%0=1
a%b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1]
f n=n%n


Try it online!



Using flawr's rook move interpretation ,a%b is the number of paths that get the rook from (a,b) to (0,0), using only moves the decrease a coordinate. The first move either decreases a or decreases b, keeping the other the same, hence the recursive formula.



49 bytes





a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]
0%0=1
a%b=a?b+b?a
f n=n%n


Try it online!



We can avoid the repetition in map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1] by noting that the two halves are the same with a and b swapped. The auxiliary call a?b counts the paths where the first move decreases a, and so b?a counts those where the first move decreases b. These are in general different, and they add to a%b.



The summation in a?b can also be written as a list comprehension a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]].



42 bytes





0?0=1
a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
f n=n?n


Try it online!



Finally, we get rid of % and just write the recursion in terms of ? by replacing a%i with a?i+i?a in the recursive call.



The new base case causes this ? to give outputs double that of the ? in the 49-byte version, since with 0?0=1, we would have 0%0=0?0+0?0=2. This lets use define f n=n?n without the halving that we'd other need to do.






share|improve this answer























  • Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
    – Peter Taylor
    Nov 28 at 8:57










  • I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
    – flawr
    Nov 28 at 9:14












  • The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
    – flawr
    Nov 28 at 9:14










  • @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
    – Peter Taylor
    Nov 28 at 11:12










  • @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
    – flawr
    Nov 28 at 19:24




















up vote
7
down vote













CJam (24 bytes)



{2,*e!{e`0f=:(1b2#}%1b}


Online demo



This uses Bubbler's approach of summing over permutations of n 0s and n 1s.



Dissection



{         e# Define a block
2,* e# Given input n, create an array of n 0s and n 1s
e! e# Generate all permutations of that array
{ e# Map:
e` e# Run-length encode
0f=:( e# Extract just the lengths and decrement them
1b e# Sum
2# e# Raise 2 to the power of that sum
}%
1b e# Sum the mapped values
}




Alternative approach (28 bytes)



{_1aa{_2$,f{j}@@,f{j}+1b}2j}


Online demo



Dissection



The triangles all have one horizontal edge and two edges which link the horizontal lines. Label the non-horizontal edges by a tuple of their two x-coords and sort lexicographically. Then the first edge is (0,0), the last edge is (n,n), and two consecutive edges differ in precisely one of the two positions. This makes for a simple recursion, which I've implemented using the memoised recursion operator j:



{            e# Define a block
_ e# Duplicate the argument to get n n
1aa e# Base case for recursion: 0 0 => 1
{ e# Recursive body taking args a b
_2$,f{j} e# Recurse on 0 b up to a-1 b
@@,f{j} e# Recurse on a 0 up to a b-1
+1b e# Combine and sum
}2j e# Memoised recursion with 2 args
}


Note



This is not the first time I've wanted fj to be supported in CJam. Here it would bring the score down to 24 bytes also. Perhaps I should try to write a patch...






share|improve this answer























  • Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
    – flawr
    Nov 27 at 22:32










  • @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
    – Peter Taylor
    Nov 27 at 22:34






  • 1




    Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
    – flawr
    Nov 27 at 22:47


















up vote
4
down vote














Jelly, 15 14 bytes



Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S


Try it online!



-1 byte based on Peter Taylor's comment.



Uses flawr's illustration directly, instead of the resulting formula.



How it works



Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S    Main link (monad). Input: positive integer N.
Ø.x Make an array containing N zeros and ones
Œ!Q All unique permutations
Œɠ€ Run-length encode on each permutation
’§ Decrement and sum each
2*S Raise to power of 2 and sum


Take every possible route on a square grid. The number of ways to move L units in one direction as a rook is 2**(L-1). Apply this to every route and sum the number of ways to traverse each route.






share|improve this answer























  • Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
    – Peter Taylor
    Nov 28 at 11:27


















up vote
3
down vote














Charcoal, 44 31 bytes



crossed out 44 is still regular 44



F⊕θ«≔⟦⟧ηF⊕θ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹⊞υη»I⊟⊟υ


Try it online! Explanation: Works by calculating the number of ways to partition a trapezium of opposite side lengths m,n into triangles which all lie on integer offsets. This is simply a general case of the rectangle of size n in the question. The number of partitions is given recursively as the sums of the numbers of partitions for all sides m,0..n-1 and n,0..m-1. This is equivalent to generalised problem of the rooks, OEIS A035002. The code simply calculates the number of partitions working from 0,0 up to n,n using the previously calculated values as it goes.



F⊕θ«


Loop over the rows 0..n.



≔⟦⟧η


Start with an empty row.



F⊕θ


Loop over the columns in the row 0..n.



⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹


Take the row so far and the values in the previous rows at the current column, and add the sum total to the current row. However, if there are no values at all, then substitute 1 in place of the sum.



⊞υη»


Add the finished row to the list of rows so far.



I⊟⊟υ


Output the final value calculated.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    JavaScript (ES6),  45 44  42 bytes



    Uses the recursive formula found by Peter Taylor and flawr.





    f=n=>n<2?n+1:(10-6/n)*f(--n)+9/~n*f(--n)*n


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      2
      down vote














      Pari/GP, 43 bytes



      According to OEIS, the generating function of this sequence is



      $$frac{1}{2}left(sqrt{frac{1-x}{1-9x}}+1right)$$



      n->Vec(sqrt((1-x)/(1-9*x)+O(x^n++))+1)[n]/2


      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer






























        up vote
        1
        down vote














        Python 3, 51 bytes





        lambda n:-~n*(n<2)or(10-6/n)*f(n-1)-(9-18/n)*f(n-2)


        Try it online!



        Port of flawr's answer






        share|improve this answer






























          up vote
          0
          down vote














          05AB1E, 13 bytes



          ·LÉœÙεÅγo;P}O


          Port of @Bubbler's Jelly answer.



          Very slow due to the permutations builtin.



          Try it online or verify the first four inputs.



          Explanation:





          ·                # Double the (implicit) input
          L # Create a list in the range [1, doubled_input]
          É # Check for each if they're odd (1 if truthy, 0 is falsey)
          # We now have a list of n 0s and n 1s (n being the input)
          œ # Get all permutations of that list
          Ù # Only leave the unique permutations
          ε } # Map each permutation to:
          Åγ # Run-length encode the current value (short for `γ€g`)
          o # Take 2 to the power for each
          ; # Halve each
          P # Take the product of the mapped permutation
          O # Sum all mapped values together (and output implicitly)





          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "200"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176646%2fpartitioning-the-grid-into-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            9 Answers
            9






            active

            oldest

            votes








            9 Answers
            9






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            19
            down vote














            Haskell, 60 55 54 52 bytes



            After a drawing and programming a lot of examples, it occured to me that this is the same as the problem of the rooks:




            On a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ chessboard, how many ways are there for a rook to go from $(0,0)$ to $(n,n)$ by just moving right $+(1,0)$ or up $+(0,1)$?




            Basically you have the top and the bottom line of the $1 times n$ grid. Now you have to fill in the non-horizontal line. Each triangle must have two non-horizontal lines. Whether one of its sides is part of the top or the bottom line corresponds to the direction and length you'd go in the rooks problem. This is OEIS A051708. As an illustration of this correspondence consider following examples. Here the top line corresponds to up-moves, while the bottom line corresponds to right-moves.





            Thanks @PeterTaylor for -6 bytes and @PostLeftGarfHunter for -2 bytes!





            b 0=1
            b 1=2
            b n=div((10*n-6)*b(n-1)-9*(n-2)*b(n-2))n


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer























            • I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:36










            • BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:39












            • I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
              – Neil
              Nov 27 at 22:40










            • @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:41






            • 5




              @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 23:10















            up vote
            19
            down vote














            Haskell, 60 55 54 52 bytes



            After a drawing and programming a lot of examples, it occured to me that this is the same as the problem of the rooks:




            On a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ chessboard, how many ways are there for a rook to go from $(0,0)$ to $(n,n)$ by just moving right $+(1,0)$ or up $+(0,1)$?




            Basically you have the top and the bottom line of the $1 times n$ grid. Now you have to fill in the non-horizontal line. Each triangle must have two non-horizontal lines. Whether one of its sides is part of the top or the bottom line corresponds to the direction and length you'd go in the rooks problem. This is OEIS A051708. As an illustration of this correspondence consider following examples. Here the top line corresponds to up-moves, while the bottom line corresponds to right-moves.





            Thanks @PeterTaylor for -6 bytes and @PostLeftGarfHunter for -2 bytes!





            b 0=1
            b 1=2
            b n=div((10*n-6)*b(n-1)-9*(n-2)*b(n-2))n


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer























            • I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:36










            • BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:39












            • I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
              – Neil
              Nov 27 at 22:40










            • @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:41






            • 5




              @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 23:10













            up vote
            19
            down vote










            up vote
            19
            down vote










            Haskell, 60 55 54 52 bytes



            After a drawing and programming a lot of examples, it occured to me that this is the same as the problem of the rooks:




            On a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ chessboard, how many ways are there for a rook to go from $(0,0)$ to $(n,n)$ by just moving right $+(1,0)$ or up $+(0,1)$?




            Basically you have the top and the bottom line of the $1 times n$ grid. Now you have to fill in the non-horizontal line. Each triangle must have two non-horizontal lines. Whether one of its sides is part of the top or the bottom line corresponds to the direction and length you'd go in the rooks problem. This is OEIS A051708. As an illustration of this correspondence consider following examples. Here the top line corresponds to up-moves, while the bottom line corresponds to right-moves.





            Thanks @PeterTaylor for -6 bytes and @PostLeftGarfHunter for -2 bytes!





            b 0=1
            b 1=2
            b n=div((10*n-6)*b(n-1)-9*(n-2)*b(n-2))n


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer















            Haskell, 60 55 54 52 bytes



            After a drawing and programming a lot of examples, it occured to me that this is the same as the problem of the rooks:




            On a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ chessboard, how many ways are there for a rook to go from $(0,0)$ to $(n,n)$ by just moving right $+(1,0)$ or up $+(0,1)$?




            Basically you have the top and the bottom line of the $1 times n$ grid. Now you have to fill in the non-horizontal line. Each triangle must have two non-horizontal lines. Whether one of its sides is part of the top or the bottom line corresponds to the direction and length you'd go in the rooks problem. This is OEIS A051708. As an illustration of this correspondence consider following examples. Here the top line corresponds to up-moves, while the bottom line corresponds to right-moves.





            Thanks @PeterTaylor for -6 bytes and @PostLeftGarfHunter for -2 bytes!





            b 0=1
            b 1=2
            b n=div((10*n-6)*b(n-1)-9*(n-2)*b(n-2))n


            Try it online!







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 28 at 20:22

























            answered Nov 27 at 22:30









            flawr

            26.4k662185




            26.4k662185












            • I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:36










            • BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:39












            • I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
              – Neil
              Nov 27 at 22:40










            • @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:41






            • 5




              @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 23:10


















            • I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:36










            • BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:39












            • I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
              – Neil
              Nov 27 at 22:40










            • @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:41






            • 5




              @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 23:10
















            I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 27 at 22:36




            I found the OEIS sequence by searching with the first few values. Nice explanation for why it matches. Do you want to edit it to add a comment about this alternative combinatorial interpretation? If not, I might.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 27 at 22:36












            BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 27 at 22:39






            BTW you need to adjust the indexing, because the correct answer here is A051708(n+1). So I posted the first correct answer :-P
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 27 at 22:39














            I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
            – Neil
            Nov 27 at 22:40




            I take it the rook moves map to triangles by making triangles with top and bottom edges correspond to up or right moves?
            – Neil
            Nov 27 at 22:40












            @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 22:41




            @PeterTaylor Damn, thanks for pointing out my mistake :)
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 22:41




            5




            5




            @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 23:10




            @Neil I added a graphical explanation.
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 23:10










            up vote
            8
            down vote














            Haskell, 42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            A fairly direct implementation that recurses over 2 variables.



            Here's how we can obtain this solution. Start with code implementing a direct recursive formula:



            54 bytes





            0%0=1
            a%b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1]
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            Using flawr's rook move interpretation ,a%b is the number of paths that get the rook from (a,b) to (0,0), using only moves the decrease a coordinate. The first move either decreases a or decreases b, keeping the other the same, hence the recursive formula.



            49 bytes





            a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]
            0%0=1
            a%b=a?b+b?a
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            We can avoid the repetition in map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1] by noting that the two halves are the same with a and b swapped. The auxiliary call a?b counts the paths where the first move decreases a, and so b?a counts those where the first move decreases b. These are in general different, and they add to a%b.



            The summation in a?b can also be written as a list comprehension a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]].



            42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            Finally, we get rid of % and just write the recursion in terms of ? by replacing a%i with a?i+i?a in the recursive call.



            The new base case causes this ? to give outputs double that of the ? in the 49-byte version, since with 0?0=1, we would have 0%0=0?0+0?0=2. This lets use define f n=n?n without the halving that we'd other need to do.






            share|improve this answer























            • Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 8:57










            • I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14












            • The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14










            • @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:12










            • @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 19:24

















            up vote
            8
            down vote














            Haskell, 42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            A fairly direct implementation that recurses over 2 variables.



            Here's how we can obtain this solution. Start with code implementing a direct recursive formula:



            54 bytes





            0%0=1
            a%b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1]
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            Using flawr's rook move interpretation ,a%b is the number of paths that get the rook from (a,b) to (0,0), using only moves the decrease a coordinate. The first move either decreases a or decreases b, keeping the other the same, hence the recursive formula.



            49 bytes





            a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]
            0%0=1
            a%b=a?b+b?a
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            We can avoid the repetition in map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1] by noting that the two halves are the same with a and b swapped. The auxiliary call a?b counts the paths where the first move decreases a, and so b?a counts those where the first move decreases b. These are in general different, and they add to a%b.



            The summation in a?b can also be written as a list comprehension a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]].



            42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            Finally, we get rid of % and just write the recursion in terms of ? by replacing a%i with a?i+i?a in the recursive call.



            The new base case causes this ? to give outputs double that of the ? in the 49-byte version, since with 0?0=1, we would have 0%0=0?0+0?0=2. This lets use define f n=n?n without the halving that we'd other need to do.






            share|improve this answer























            • Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 8:57










            • I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14












            • The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14










            • @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:12










            • @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 19:24















            up vote
            8
            down vote










            up vote
            8
            down vote










            Haskell, 42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            A fairly direct implementation that recurses over 2 variables.



            Here's how we can obtain this solution. Start with code implementing a direct recursive formula:



            54 bytes





            0%0=1
            a%b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1]
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            Using flawr's rook move interpretation ,a%b is the number of paths that get the rook from (a,b) to (0,0), using only moves the decrease a coordinate. The first move either decreases a or decreases b, keeping the other the same, hence the recursive formula.



            49 bytes





            a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]
            0%0=1
            a%b=a?b+b?a
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            We can avoid the repetition in map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1] by noting that the two halves are the same with a and b swapped. The auxiliary call a?b counts the paths where the first move decreases a, and so b?a counts those where the first move decreases b. These are in general different, and they add to a%b.



            The summation in a?b can also be written as a list comprehension a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]].



            42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            Finally, we get rid of % and just write the recursion in terms of ? by replacing a%i with a?i+i?a in the recursive call.



            The new base case causes this ? to give outputs double that of the ? in the 49-byte version, since with 0?0=1, we would have 0%0=0?0+0?0=2. This lets use define f n=n?n without the halving that we'd other need to do.






            share|improve this answer















            Haskell, 42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            A fairly direct implementation that recurses over 2 variables.



            Here's how we can obtain this solution. Start with code implementing a direct recursive formula:



            54 bytes





            0%0=1
            a%b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1]
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            Using flawr's rook move interpretation ,a%b is the number of paths that get the rook from (a,b) to (0,0), using only moves the decrease a coordinate. The first move either decreases a or decreases b, keeping the other the same, hence the recursive formula.



            49 bytes





            a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1]
            0%0=1
            a%b=a?b+b?a
            f n=n%n


            Try it online!



            We can avoid the repetition in map(a%)[0..b-1]++map(b%)[0..a-1] by noting that the two halves are the same with a and b swapped. The auxiliary call a?b counts the paths where the first move decreases a, and so b?a counts those where the first move decreases b. These are in general different, and they add to a%b.



            The summation in a?b can also be written as a list comprehension a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]].



            42 bytes





            0?0=1
            a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            f n=n?n


            Try it online!



            Finally, we get rid of % and just write the recursion in terms of ? by replacing a%i with a?i+i?a in the recursive call.



            The new base case causes this ? to give outputs double that of the ? in the 49-byte version, since with 0?0=1, we would have 0%0=0?0+0?0=2. This lets use define f n=n?n without the halving that we'd other need to do.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 30 at 1:12

























            answered Nov 28 at 0:10









            xnor

            89.3k18184437




            89.3k18184437












            • Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 8:57










            • I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14












            • The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14










            • @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:12










            • @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 19:24




















            • Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 8:57










            • I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14












            • The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 9:14










            • @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:12










            • @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
              – flawr
              Nov 28 at 19:24


















            Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 28 at 8:57




            Your 49-byte solution uses the same recursion as my answer, but I haven't yet figured out the 42-byte one. An explanation would be nice.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 28 at 8:57












            I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
            – flawr
            Nov 28 at 9:14






            I think I used the same approach in one of my earlier programs: The idea is generating (or counting) all partitions by generating the non-horizontal lines from right to left. You start out with the vertical line. Then you can recurse: Take one of the end nodes of the previous line and connect it to a node on the opposite horizontal line that is farther to the left of all previous nodes on this line.
            – flawr
            Nov 28 at 9:14














            The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
            – flawr
            Nov 28 at 9:14




            The operator a%b counts the number of partitions using the nodes 0,1,...,a on the top line, and the nods 0,1,..,b on the bottom line. The operator a?b counts the number of ways you can add a new line from the top node a if the bottom node b is already in use. (You can connect a to all of the nodes [0,1,...,b-1], but you then have to recurse for each of those.)
            – flawr
            Nov 28 at 9:14












            @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 28 at 11:12




            @flawr, that's the 49-byte one, which I understand. It's the ? of the 42-byte one which I don't, and what's particularly curious is that it's not symmetric.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 28 at 11:12












            @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            – flawr
            Nov 28 at 19:24






            @PeterTaylor Sorry for the confusion, I somehow mixed up the two solutions. I think we can quite easily transform the two solutions into eachother: In the first step we can replace map... with a list comprehension, in the second step we just plug in the definition of %: a?b=sum$map(a%)[0..b-1], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a%i|i<-[0..b-1]], a%b=a?b+b?a $ iff $ a?b=sum[a?i+i?a|i<-[0..b-1]]
            – flawr
            Nov 28 at 19:24












            up vote
            7
            down vote













            CJam (24 bytes)



            {2,*e!{e`0f=:(1b2#}%1b}


            Online demo



            This uses Bubbler's approach of summing over permutations of n 0s and n 1s.



            Dissection



            {         e# Define a block
            2,* e# Given input n, create an array of n 0s and n 1s
            e! e# Generate all permutations of that array
            { e# Map:
            e` e# Run-length encode
            0f=:( e# Extract just the lengths and decrement them
            1b e# Sum
            2# e# Raise 2 to the power of that sum
            }%
            1b e# Sum the mapped values
            }




            Alternative approach (28 bytes)



            {_1aa{_2$,f{j}@@,f{j}+1b}2j}


            Online demo



            Dissection



            The triangles all have one horizontal edge and two edges which link the horizontal lines. Label the non-horizontal edges by a tuple of their two x-coords and sort lexicographically. Then the first edge is (0,0), the last edge is (n,n), and two consecutive edges differ in precisely one of the two positions. This makes for a simple recursion, which I've implemented using the memoised recursion operator j:



            {            e# Define a block
            _ e# Duplicate the argument to get n n
            1aa e# Base case for recursion: 0 0 => 1
            { e# Recursive body taking args a b
            _2$,f{j} e# Recurse on 0 b up to a-1 b
            @@,f{j} e# Recurse on a 0 up to a b-1
            +1b e# Combine and sum
            }2j e# Memoised recursion with 2 args
            }


            Note



            This is not the first time I've wanted fj to be supported in CJam. Here it would bring the score down to 24 bytes also. Perhaps I should try to write a patch...






            share|improve this answer























            • Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:32










            • @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:34






            • 1




              Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:47















            up vote
            7
            down vote













            CJam (24 bytes)



            {2,*e!{e`0f=:(1b2#}%1b}


            Online demo



            This uses Bubbler's approach of summing over permutations of n 0s and n 1s.



            Dissection



            {         e# Define a block
            2,* e# Given input n, create an array of n 0s and n 1s
            e! e# Generate all permutations of that array
            { e# Map:
            e` e# Run-length encode
            0f=:( e# Extract just the lengths and decrement them
            1b e# Sum
            2# e# Raise 2 to the power of that sum
            }%
            1b e# Sum the mapped values
            }




            Alternative approach (28 bytes)



            {_1aa{_2$,f{j}@@,f{j}+1b}2j}


            Online demo



            Dissection



            The triangles all have one horizontal edge and two edges which link the horizontal lines. Label the non-horizontal edges by a tuple of their two x-coords and sort lexicographically. Then the first edge is (0,0), the last edge is (n,n), and two consecutive edges differ in precisely one of the two positions. This makes for a simple recursion, which I've implemented using the memoised recursion operator j:



            {            e# Define a block
            _ e# Duplicate the argument to get n n
            1aa e# Base case for recursion: 0 0 => 1
            { e# Recursive body taking args a b
            _2$,f{j} e# Recurse on 0 b up to a-1 b
            @@,f{j} e# Recurse on a 0 up to a b-1
            +1b e# Combine and sum
            }2j e# Memoised recursion with 2 args
            }


            Note



            This is not the first time I've wanted fj to be supported in CJam. Here it would bring the score down to 24 bytes also. Perhaps I should try to write a patch...






            share|improve this answer























            • Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:32










            • @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:34






            • 1




              Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:47













            up vote
            7
            down vote










            up vote
            7
            down vote









            CJam (24 bytes)



            {2,*e!{e`0f=:(1b2#}%1b}


            Online demo



            This uses Bubbler's approach of summing over permutations of n 0s and n 1s.



            Dissection



            {         e# Define a block
            2,* e# Given input n, create an array of n 0s and n 1s
            e! e# Generate all permutations of that array
            { e# Map:
            e` e# Run-length encode
            0f=:( e# Extract just the lengths and decrement them
            1b e# Sum
            2# e# Raise 2 to the power of that sum
            }%
            1b e# Sum the mapped values
            }




            Alternative approach (28 bytes)



            {_1aa{_2$,f{j}@@,f{j}+1b}2j}


            Online demo



            Dissection



            The triangles all have one horizontal edge and two edges which link the horizontal lines. Label the non-horizontal edges by a tuple of their two x-coords and sort lexicographically. Then the first edge is (0,0), the last edge is (n,n), and two consecutive edges differ in precisely one of the two positions. This makes for a simple recursion, which I've implemented using the memoised recursion operator j:



            {            e# Define a block
            _ e# Duplicate the argument to get n n
            1aa e# Base case for recursion: 0 0 => 1
            { e# Recursive body taking args a b
            _2$,f{j} e# Recurse on 0 b up to a-1 b
            @@,f{j} e# Recurse on a 0 up to a b-1
            +1b e# Combine and sum
            }2j e# Memoised recursion with 2 args
            }


            Note



            This is not the first time I've wanted fj to be supported in CJam. Here it would bring the score down to 24 bytes also. Perhaps I should try to write a patch...






            share|improve this answer














            CJam (24 bytes)



            {2,*e!{e`0f=:(1b2#}%1b}


            Online demo



            This uses Bubbler's approach of summing over permutations of n 0s and n 1s.



            Dissection



            {         e# Define a block
            2,* e# Given input n, create an array of n 0s and n 1s
            e! e# Generate all permutations of that array
            { e# Map:
            e` e# Run-length encode
            0f=:( e# Extract just the lengths and decrement them
            1b e# Sum
            2# e# Raise 2 to the power of that sum
            }%
            1b e# Sum the mapped values
            }




            Alternative approach (28 bytes)



            {_1aa{_2$,f{j}@@,f{j}+1b}2j}


            Online demo



            Dissection



            The triangles all have one horizontal edge and two edges which link the horizontal lines. Label the non-horizontal edges by a tuple of their two x-coords and sort lexicographically. Then the first edge is (0,0), the last edge is (n,n), and two consecutive edges differ in precisely one of the two positions. This makes for a simple recursion, which I've implemented using the memoised recursion operator j:



            {            e# Define a block
            _ e# Duplicate the argument to get n n
            1aa e# Base case for recursion: 0 0 => 1
            { e# Recursive body taking args a b
            _2$,f{j} e# Recurse on 0 b up to a-1 b
            @@,f{j} e# Recurse on a 0 up to a b-1
            +1b e# Combine and sum
            }2j e# Memoised recursion with 2 args
            }


            Note



            This is not the first time I've wanted fj to be supported in CJam. Here it would bring the score down to 24 bytes also. Perhaps I should try to write a patch...







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 28 at 11:25

























            answered Nov 27 at 22:30









            Peter Taylor

            38.9k453142




            38.9k453142












            • Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:32










            • @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:34






            • 1




              Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:47


















            • Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:32










            • @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 27 at 22:34






            • 1




              Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
              – flawr
              Nov 27 at 22:47
















            Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 22:32




            Yay, I beat you by 10 seconds, I don't think I was ever that close :)
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 22:32












            @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 27 at 22:34




            @flawr, I did consider posting before writing a dissection, but I thought I had time to knock it out quickly. Then I saw "New answer", so I deleted my part-written dissection, posted, and edited.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 27 at 22:34




            1




            1




            Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 22:47




            Thanks for -5 bytes btw :D
            – flawr
            Nov 27 at 22:47










            up vote
            4
            down vote














            Jelly, 15 14 bytes



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S


            Try it online!



            -1 byte based on Peter Taylor's comment.



            Uses flawr's illustration directly, instead of the resulting formula.



            How it works



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S    Main link (monad). Input: positive integer N.
            Ø.x Make an array containing N zeros and ones
            Œ!Q All unique permutations
            Œɠ€ Run-length encode on each permutation
            ’§ Decrement and sum each
            2*S Raise to power of 2 and sum


            Take every possible route on a square grid. The number of ways to move L units in one direction as a rook is 2**(L-1). Apply this to every route and sum the number of ways to traverse each route.






            share|improve this answer























            • Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:27















            up vote
            4
            down vote














            Jelly, 15 14 bytes



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S


            Try it online!



            -1 byte based on Peter Taylor's comment.



            Uses flawr's illustration directly, instead of the resulting formula.



            How it works



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S    Main link (monad). Input: positive integer N.
            Ø.x Make an array containing N zeros and ones
            Œ!Q All unique permutations
            Œɠ€ Run-length encode on each permutation
            ’§ Decrement and sum each
            2*S Raise to power of 2 and sum


            Take every possible route on a square grid. The number of ways to move L units in one direction as a rook is 2**(L-1). Apply this to every route and sum the number of ways to traverse each route.






            share|improve this answer























            • Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:27













            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote










            Jelly, 15 14 bytes



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S


            Try it online!



            -1 byte based on Peter Taylor's comment.



            Uses flawr's illustration directly, instead of the resulting formula.



            How it works



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S    Main link (monad). Input: positive integer N.
            Ø.x Make an array containing N zeros and ones
            Œ!Q All unique permutations
            Œɠ€ Run-length encode on each permutation
            ’§ Decrement and sum each
            2*S Raise to power of 2 and sum


            Take every possible route on a square grid. The number of ways to move L units in one direction as a rook is 2**(L-1). Apply this to every route and sum the number of ways to traverse each route.






            share|improve this answer















            Jelly, 15 14 bytes



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S


            Try it online!



            -1 byte based on Peter Taylor's comment.



            Uses flawr's illustration directly, instead of the resulting formula.



            How it works



            Ø.xŒ!QŒɠ€’§2*S    Main link (monad). Input: positive integer N.
            Ø.x Make an array containing N zeros and ones
            Œ!Q All unique permutations
            Œɠ€ Run-length encode on each permutation
            ’§ Decrement and sum each
            2*S Raise to power of 2 and sum


            Take every possible route on a square grid. The number of ways to move L units in one direction as a rook is 2**(L-1). Apply this to every route and sum the number of ways to traverse each route.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 28 at 23:21

























            answered Nov 28 at 0:42









            Bubbler

            6,179759




            6,179759












            • Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:27


















            • Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
              – Peter Taylor
              Nov 28 at 11:27
















            Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 28 at 11:27




            Nice approach. When I ported it to CJam it was shorter to decrement the lengths, sum, and then raise 2 to the sum; rather than raising 2 to the length, halving, and then multiplying. Don't know whether it might save you a byte.
            – Peter Taylor
            Nov 28 at 11:27










            up vote
            3
            down vote














            Charcoal, 44 31 bytes



            crossed out 44 is still regular 44



            F⊕θ«≔⟦⟧ηF⊕θ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹⊞υη»I⊟⊟υ


            Try it online! Explanation: Works by calculating the number of ways to partition a trapezium of opposite side lengths m,n into triangles which all lie on integer offsets. This is simply a general case of the rectangle of size n in the question. The number of partitions is given recursively as the sums of the numbers of partitions for all sides m,0..n-1 and n,0..m-1. This is equivalent to generalised problem of the rooks, OEIS A035002. The code simply calculates the number of partitions working from 0,0 up to n,n using the previously calculated values as it goes.



            F⊕θ«


            Loop over the rows 0..n.



            ≔⟦⟧η


            Start with an empty row.



            F⊕θ


            Loop over the columns in the row 0..n.



            ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹


            Take the row so far and the values in the previous rows at the current column, and add the sum total to the current row. However, if there are no values at all, then substitute 1 in place of the sum.



            ⊞υη»


            Add the finished row to the list of rows so far.



            I⊟⊟υ


            Output the final value calculated.






            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              3
              down vote














              Charcoal, 44 31 bytes



              crossed out 44 is still regular 44



              F⊕θ«≔⟦⟧ηF⊕θ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹⊞υη»I⊟⊟υ


              Try it online! Explanation: Works by calculating the number of ways to partition a trapezium of opposite side lengths m,n into triangles which all lie on integer offsets. This is simply a general case of the rectangle of size n in the question. The number of partitions is given recursively as the sums of the numbers of partitions for all sides m,0..n-1 and n,0..m-1. This is equivalent to generalised problem of the rooks, OEIS A035002. The code simply calculates the number of partitions working from 0,0 up to n,n using the previously calculated values as it goes.



              F⊕θ«


              Loop over the rows 0..n.



              ≔⟦⟧η


              Start with an empty row.



              F⊕θ


              Loop over the columns in the row 0..n.



              ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹


              Take the row so far and the values in the previous rows at the current column, and add the sum total to the current row. However, if there are no values at all, then substitute 1 in place of the sum.



              ⊞υη»


              Add the finished row to the list of rows so far.



              I⊟⊟υ


              Output the final value calculated.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote










                Charcoal, 44 31 bytes



                crossed out 44 is still regular 44



                F⊕θ«≔⟦⟧ηF⊕θ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹⊞υη»I⊟⊟υ


                Try it online! Explanation: Works by calculating the number of ways to partition a trapezium of opposite side lengths m,n into triangles which all lie on integer offsets. This is simply a general case of the rectangle of size n in the question. The number of partitions is given recursively as the sums of the numbers of partitions for all sides m,0..n-1 and n,0..m-1. This is equivalent to generalised problem of the rooks, OEIS A035002. The code simply calculates the number of partitions working from 0,0 up to n,n using the previously calculated values as it goes.



                F⊕θ«


                Loop over the rows 0..n.



                ≔⟦⟧η


                Start with an empty row.



                F⊕θ


                Loop over the columns in the row 0..n.



                ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹


                Take the row so far and the values in the previous rows at the current column, and add the sum total to the current row. However, if there are no values at all, then substitute 1 in place of the sum.



                ⊞υη»


                Add the finished row to the list of rows so far.



                I⊟⊟υ


                Output the final value calculated.






                share|improve this answer















                Charcoal, 44 31 bytes



                crossed out 44 is still regular 44



                F⊕θ«≔⟦⟧ηF⊕θ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹⊞υη»I⊟⊟υ


                Try it online! Explanation: Works by calculating the number of ways to partition a trapezium of opposite side lengths m,n into triangles which all lie on integer offsets. This is simply a general case of the rectangle of size n in the question. The number of partitions is given recursively as the sums of the numbers of partitions for all sides m,0..n-1 and n,0..m-1. This is equivalent to generalised problem of the rooks, OEIS A035002. The code simply calculates the number of partitions working from 0,0 up to n,n using the previously calculated values as it goes.



                F⊕θ«


                Loop over the rows 0..n.



                ≔⟦⟧η


                Start with an empty row.



                F⊕θ


                Loop over the columns in the row 0..n.



                ⊞ηΣ∨⁺ηEυ§λκ¹


                Take the row so far and the values in the previous rows at the current column, and add the sum total to the current row. However, if there are no values at all, then substitute 1 in place of the sum.



                ⊞υη»


                Add the finished row to the list of rows so far.



                I⊟⊟υ


                Output the final value calculated.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 28 at 0:25

























                answered Nov 28 at 0:02









                Neil

                78.6k744175




                78.6k744175






















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    JavaScript (ES6),  45 44  42 bytes



                    Uses the recursive formula found by Peter Taylor and flawr.





                    f=n=>n<2?n+1:(10-6/n)*f(--n)+9/~n*f(--n)*n


                    Try it online!






                    share|improve this answer



























                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      JavaScript (ES6),  45 44  42 bytes



                      Uses the recursive formula found by Peter Taylor and flawr.





                      f=n=>n<2?n+1:(10-6/n)*f(--n)+9/~n*f(--n)*n


                      Try it online!






                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote










                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote









                        JavaScript (ES6),  45 44  42 bytes



                        Uses the recursive formula found by Peter Taylor and flawr.





                        f=n=>n<2?n+1:(10-6/n)*f(--n)+9/~n*f(--n)*n


                        Try it online!






                        share|improve this answer














                        JavaScript (ES6),  45 44  42 bytes



                        Uses the recursive formula found by Peter Taylor and flawr.





                        f=n=>n<2?n+1:(10-6/n)*f(--n)+9/~n*f(--n)*n


                        Try it online!







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Nov 28 at 6:49

























                        answered Nov 27 at 23:06









                        Arnauld

                        70.7k688298




                        70.7k688298






















                            up vote
                            2
                            down vote














                            Pari/GP, 43 bytes



                            According to OEIS, the generating function of this sequence is



                            $$frac{1}{2}left(sqrt{frac{1-x}{1-9x}}+1right)$$



                            n->Vec(sqrt((1-x)/(1-9*x)+O(x^n++))+1)[n]/2


                            Try it online!






                            share|improve this answer



























                              up vote
                              2
                              down vote














                              Pari/GP, 43 bytes



                              According to OEIS, the generating function of this sequence is



                              $$frac{1}{2}left(sqrt{frac{1-x}{1-9x}}+1right)$$



                              n->Vec(sqrt((1-x)/(1-9*x)+O(x^n++))+1)[n]/2


                              Try it online!






                              share|improve this answer

























                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote










                                Pari/GP, 43 bytes



                                According to OEIS, the generating function of this sequence is



                                $$frac{1}{2}left(sqrt{frac{1-x}{1-9x}}+1right)$$



                                n->Vec(sqrt((1-x)/(1-9*x)+O(x^n++))+1)[n]/2


                                Try it online!






                                share|improve this answer















                                Pari/GP, 43 bytes



                                According to OEIS, the generating function of this sequence is



                                $$frac{1}{2}left(sqrt{frac{1-x}{1-9x}}+1right)$$



                                n->Vec(sqrt((1-x)/(1-9*x)+O(x^n++))+1)[n]/2


                                Try it online!







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Nov 28 at 13:53

























                                answered Nov 28 at 9:49









                                alephalpha

                                21k32888




                                21k32888






















                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote














                                    Python 3, 51 bytes





                                    lambda n:-~n*(n<2)or(10-6/n)*f(n-1)-(9-18/n)*f(n-2)


                                    Try it online!



                                    Port of flawr's answer






                                    share|improve this answer



























                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote














                                      Python 3, 51 bytes





                                      lambda n:-~n*(n<2)or(10-6/n)*f(n-1)-(9-18/n)*f(n-2)


                                      Try it online!



                                      Port of flawr's answer






                                      share|improve this answer

























                                        up vote
                                        1
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        1
                                        down vote










                                        Python 3, 51 bytes





                                        lambda n:-~n*(n<2)or(10-6/n)*f(n-1)-(9-18/n)*f(n-2)


                                        Try it online!



                                        Port of flawr's answer






                                        share|improve this answer















                                        Python 3, 51 bytes





                                        lambda n:-~n*(n<2)or(10-6/n)*f(n-1)-(9-18/n)*f(n-2)


                                        Try it online!



                                        Port of flawr's answer







                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited Nov 27 at 23:17

























                                        answered Nov 27 at 23:11









                                        lirtosiast

                                        15.6k436107




                                        15.6k436107






















                                            up vote
                                            0
                                            down vote














                                            05AB1E, 13 bytes



                                            ·LÉœÙεÅγo;P}O


                                            Port of @Bubbler's Jelly answer.



                                            Very slow due to the permutations builtin.



                                            Try it online or verify the first four inputs.



                                            Explanation:





                                            ·                # Double the (implicit) input
                                            L # Create a list in the range [1, doubled_input]
                                            É # Check for each if they're odd (1 if truthy, 0 is falsey)
                                            # We now have a list of n 0s and n 1s (n being the input)
                                            œ # Get all permutations of that list
                                            Ù # Only leave the unique permutations
                                            ε } # Map each permutation to:
                                            Åγ # Run-length encode the current value (short for `γ€g`)
                                            o # Take 2 to the power for each
                                            ; # Halve each
                                            P # Take the product of the mapped permutation
                                            O # Sum all mapped values together (and output implicitly)





                                            share|improve this answer

























                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote














                                              05AB1E, 13 bytes



                                              ·LÉœÙεÅγo;P}O


                                              Port of @Bubbler's Jelly answer.



                                              Very slow due to the permutations builtin.



                                              Try it online or verify the first four inputs.



                                              Explanation:





                                              ·                # Double the (implicit) input
                                              L # Create a list in the range [1, doubled_input]
                                              É # Check for each if they're odd (1 if truthy, 0 is falsey)
                                              # We now have a list of n 0s and n 1s (n being the input)
                                              œ # Get all permutations of that list
                                              Ù # Only leave the unique permutations
                                              ε } # Map each permutation to:
                                              Åγ # Run-length encode the current value (short for `γ€g`)
                                              o # Take 2 to the power for each
                                              ; # Halve each
                                              P # Take the product of the mapped permutation
                                              O # Sum all mapped values together (and output implicitly)





                                              share|improve this answer























                                                up vote
                                                0
                                                down vote










                                                up vote
                                                0
                                                down vote










                                                05AB1E, 13 bytes



                                                ·LÉœÙεÅγo;P}O


                                                Port of @Bubbler's Jelly answer.



                                                Very slow due to the permutations builtin.



                                                Try it online or verify the first four inputs.



                                                Explanation:





                                                ·                # Double the (implicit) input
                                                L # Create a list in the range [1, doubled_input]
                                                É # Check for each if they're odd (1 if truthy, 0 is falsey)
                                                # We now have a list of n 0s and n 1s (n being the input)
                                                œ # Get all permutations of that list
                                                Ù # Only leave the unique permutations
                                                ε } # Map each permutation to:
                                                Åγ # Run-length encode the current value (short for `γ€g`)
                                                o # Take 2 to the power for each
                                                ; # Halve each
                                                P # Take the product of the mapped permutation
                                                O # Sum all mapped values together (and output implicitly)





                                                share|improve this answer













                                                05AB1E, 13 bytes



                                                ·LÉœÙεÅγo;P}O


                                                Port of @Bubbler's Jelly answer.



                                                Very slow due to the permutations builtin.



                                                Try it online or verify the first four inputs.



                                                Explanation:





                                                ·                # Double the (implicit) input
                                                L # Create a list in the range [1, doubled_input]
                                                É # Check for each if they're odd (1 if truthy, 0 is falsey)
                                                # We now have a list of n 0s and n 1s (n being the input)
                                                œ # Get all permutations of that list
                                                Ù # Only leave the unique permutations
                                                ε } # Map each permutation to:
                                                Åγ # Run-length encode the current value (short for `γ€g`)
                                                o # Take 2 to the power for each
                                                ; # Halve each
                                                P # Take the product of the mapped permutation
                                                O # Sum all mapped values together (and output implicitly)






                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered Nov 28 at 17:36









                                                Kevin Cruijssen

                                                34.9k554184




                                                34.9k554184






























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded




















































                                                    If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                    • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                    • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                      Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                    • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                    More generally…




                                                    • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                    • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).






                                                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function () {
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176646%2fpartitioning-the-grid-into-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                    }
                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                                                    Alcedinidae

                                                    Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?