Series convergence without sigma notation











up vote
12
down vote

favorite












Consider the following series:



$$frac{1}{1} + frac{10}{2} + frac{100}{3} - frac{37}{4} - frac{37}{5} - frac{37}{6} + frac{1}{7} + frac{10}{8} + frac{100}{9} - frac{37}{10} - frac{37}{11} - frac{37}{12} + dots$$



This series seems to converge but I am not able to prove it. It seems impossible to write thing whole thing into summation notation. I tried to group by modulo 6, but then for example sum of $frac{1}{6n+1}$ diverges already so that doesn't seem right. Also tried to change the 37s into powers of 10 to maybe use the comparison test but also failed.
Any suggestions?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Related: 1 and 2
    – Mason
    Dec 13 at 2:02















up vote
12
down vote

favorite












Consider the following series:



$$frac{1}{1} + frac{10}{2} + frac{100}{3} - frac{37}{4} - frac{37}{5} - frac{37}{6} + frac{1}{7} + frac{10}{8} + frac{100}{9} - frac{37}{10} - frac{37}{11} - frac{37}{12} + dots$$



This series seems to converge but I am not able to prove it. It seems impossible to write thing whole thing into summation notation. I tried to group by modulo 6, but then for example sum of $frac{1}{6n+1}$ diverges already so that doesn't seem right. Also tried to change the 37s into powers of 10 to maybe use the comparison test but also failed.
Any suggestions?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Related: 1 and 2
    – Mason
    Dec 13 at 2:02













up vote
12
down vote

favorite









up vote
12
down vote

favorite











Consider the following series:



$$frac{1}{1} + frac{10}{2} + frac{100}{3} - frac{37}{4} - frac{37}{5} - frac{37}{6} + frac{1}{7} + frac{10}{8} + frac{100}{9} - frac{37}{10} - frac{37}{11} - frac{37}{12} + dots$$



This series seems to converge but I am not able to prove it. It seems impossible to write thing whole thing into summation notation. I tried to group by modulo 6, but then for example sum of $frac{1}{6n+1}$ diverges already so that doesn't seem right. Also tried to change the 37s into powers of 10 to maybe use the comparison test but also failed.
Any suggestions?










share|cite|improve this question













Consider the following series:



$$frac{1}{1} + frac{10}{2} + frac{100}{3} - frac{37}{4} - frac{37}{5} - frac{37}{6} + frac{1}{7} + frac{10}{8} + frac{100}{9} - frac{37}{10} - frac{37}{11} - frac{37}{12} + dots$$



This series seems to converge but I am not able to prove it. It seems impossible to write thing whole thing into summation notation. I tried to group by modulo 6, but then for example sum of $frac{1}{6n+1}$ diverges already so that doesn't seem right. Also tried to change the 37s into powers of 10 to maybe use the comparison test but also failed.
Any suggestions?







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 12 at 21:34









Markus Punnar

1549




1549












  • Related: 1 and 2
    – Mason
    Dec 13 at 2:02


















  • Related: 1 and 2
    – Mason
    Dec 13 at 2:02
















Related: 1 and 2
– Mason
Dec 13 at 2:02




Related: 1 and 2
– Mason
Dec 13 at 2:02










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote



accepted










First, notice that $$F_n=frac{1}{6n+1}+frac{10}{6n+2}+frac{100}{6n+3}-frac{37}{6n+4}-frac{37}{6n+5}-frac{37}{6n+6} geq frac{111}{6n+3}-frac{111}{6n+4} > 0.$$
Then, notice that $$F_n leq frac{111}{6n+1}-frac{111}{6n+6}=frac{555}{(6n+1)(6n+6)}.$$



Thus the sum of $F_n$ converges. How can you infer the final result from this?






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 at 22:09


















up vote
8
down vote













I presume the pattern $(1, 10, 100, -37, -37, -37)$ continues forever, so this is
$$ sum_{n=1}^infty frac{a_n}{n}$$
where $$ a_n = cases{1 & if $n equiv 1 mod 6$cr
10 & if $n equiv 2 mod 6$cr
100 & if $n equiv 3 mod 6$cr
-37 & if $n equiv 4,5$ or $0 mod 6$cr}$$

Note that $1+10+100 - 3times 37 = 0$. Then the $6m$
-th partial sum
$$ eqalign{S_m &= sum_{n=1}^{6m} frac{a_n}{n}cr
& = sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+1} +
10 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+2} + 100 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+3}
- 37 sum_{k=4}^6 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+k}cr
&= frac{1}{6} left(Psi(m+1+1/6) - Psi(1/6) + 10 (Psi(m+1+2/6) - Psi(2/6)) + 100 (Psi(m+1+3/6) - Psi(3/6)) - 37 (Psi(m+1+4/6)+Psi(m+1+5/6)+Psi(m+1+6/6)-Psi(4/6)-Psi(5/6)-Psi(6/6))right)cr}$$



and since $Psi(x) = ln(x) + O(1/x)$ as $x to infty$, the sum converges.
In fact, the limit is
$$ frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
    – Karlo
    Dec 13 at 10:13






  • 1




    Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 13 at 13:28


















up vote
3
down vote













Added for your curiosity but too long for a comment.



Starting from Robert Israel's elegant answer, it is possible to have quite accurate approximations of the partiel sums using the fact that, for large values of $p$ we have
$$Psi (p)=log left({p}right)-frac{1}{2 p}-frac{1}{12 p^2}+frac{1}{120
p^4}+Oleft(frac{1}{p^6}right)$$
making
$$S_m=left(frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}right)-frac{13}{2
m}+frac{23}{3 m^2}-frac{311}{36 m^3}+frac{499}{54 m^4}-frac{36377}{3888
m^5}+Oleft(frac{1}{m^6}right)$$
Below are listed some values
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
m & text{approximation} & text{exact} \
2 & 19.691108 & 19.787015 \
3 & 20.259944 & 20.269370 \
4 & 20.565282 & 20.567065 \
5 & 20.768485 & 20.768971 \
6 & 20.914700 & 20.914867 \
7 & 21.025135 & 21.025202 \
8 & 21.111527 & 21.111558 \
9 & 21.180965 & 21.180981
end{array}
right)$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037247%2fseries-convergence-without-sigma-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted










    First, notice that $$F_n=frac{1}{6n+1}+frac{10}{6n+2}+frac{100}{6n+3}-frac{37}{6n+4}-frac{37}{6n+5}-frac{37}{6n+6} geq frac{111}{6n+3}-frac{111}{6n+4} > 0.$$
    Then, notice that $$F_n leq frac{111}{6n+1}-frac{111}{6n+6}=frac{555}{(6n+1)(6n+6)}.$$



    Thus the sum of $F_n$ converges. How can you infer the final result from this?






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 2




      Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 12 at 22:09















    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted










    First, notice that $$F_n=frac{1}{6n+1}+frac{10}{6n+2}+frac{100}{6n+3}-frac{37}{6n+4}-frac{37}{6n+5}-frac{37}{6n+6} geq frac{111}{6n+3}-frac{111}{6n+4} > 0.$$
    Then, notice that $$F_n leq frac{111}{6n+1}-frac{111}{6n+6}=frac{555}{(6n+1)(6n+6)}.$$



    Thus the sum of $F_n$ converges. How can you infer the final result from this?






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 2




      Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 12 at 22:09













    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    13
    down vote



    accepted






    First, notice that $$F_n=frac{1}{6n+1}+frac{10}{6n+2}+frac{100}{6n+3}-frac{37}{6n+4}-frac{37}{6n+5}-frac{37}{6n+6} geq frac{111}{6n+3}-frac{111}{6n+4} > 0.$$
    Then, notice that $$F_n leq frac{111}{6n+1}-frac{111}{6n+6}=frac{555}{(6n+1)(6n+6)}.$$



    Thus the sum of $F_n$ converges. How can you infer the final result from this?






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    First, notice that $$F_n=frac{1}{6n+1}+frac{10}{6n+2}+frac{100}{6n+3}-frac{37}{6n+4}-frac{37}{6n+5}-frac{37}{6n+6} geq frac{111}{6n+3}-frac{111}{6n+4} > 0.$$
    Then, notice that $$F_n leq frac{111}{6n+1}-frac{111}{6n+6}=frac{555}{(6n+1)(6n+6)}.$$



    Thus the sum of $F_n$ converges. How can you infer the final result from this?







    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Dec 12 at 21:43









    Mindlack

    88716




    88716




    New contributor




    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Mindlack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 2




      Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 12 at 22:09














    • 2




      Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 12 at 22:09








    2




    2




    Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 at 22:09




    Alternatively, you can write $$F_n = {frac {303264,{n}^{4}+649296,{n}^{3}+471096,{n}^{2}+132516,n+ 11892}{ left( 6,n+1 right) left( 6,n+2 right) left( 6,n+3 right) left( 6,n+4 right) left( 6,n+5 right) left( 6,n+6 right) }} $$ and note that the numerator has degree $4$ and denominator degree $6$, so $F_n = O(1/n^2)$.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 at 22:09










    up vote
    8
    down vote













    I presume the pattern $(1, 10, 100, -37, -37, -37)$ continues forever, so this is
    $$ sum_{n=1}^infty frac{a_n}{n}$$
    where $$ a_n = cases{1 & if $n equiv 1 mod 6$cr
    10 & if $n equiv 2 mod 6$cr
    100 & if $n equiv 3 mod 6$cr
    -37 & if $n equiv 4,5$ or $0 mod 6$cr}$$

    Note that $1+10+100 - 3times 37 = 0$. Then the $6m$
    -th partial sum
    $$ eqalign{S_m &= sum_{n=1}^{6m} frac{a_n}{n}cr
    & = sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+1} +
    10 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+2} + 100 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+3}
    - 37 sum_{k=4}^6 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+k}cr
    &= frac{1}{6} left(Psi(m+1+1/6) - Psi(1/6) + 10 (Psi(m+1+2/6) - Psi(2/6)) + 100 (Psi(m+1+3/6) - Psi(3/6)) - 37 (Psi(m+1+4/6)+Psi(m+1+5/6)+Psi(m+1+6/6)-Psi(4/6)-Psi(5/6)-Psi(6/6))right)cr}$$



    and since $Psi(x) = ln(x) + O(1/x)$ as $x to infty$, the sum converges.
    In fact, the limit is
    $$ frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
      – Karlo
      Dec 13 at 10:13






    • 1




      Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 13 at 13:28















    up vote
    8
    down vote













    I presume the pattern $(1, 10, 100, -37, -37, -37)$ continues forever, so this is
    $$ sum_{n=1}^infty frac{a_n}{n}$$
    where $$ a_n = cases{1 & if $n equiv 1 mod 6$cr
    10 & if $n equiv 2 mod 6$cr
    100 & if $n equiv 3 mod 6$cr
    -37 & if $n equiv 4,5$ or $0 mod 6$cr}$$

    Note that $1+10+100 - 3times 37 = 0$. Then the $6m$
    -th partial sum
    $$ eqalign{S_m &= sum_{n=1}^{6m} frac{a_n}{n}cr
    & = sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+1} +
    10 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+2} + 100 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+3}
    - 37 sum_{k=4}^6 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+k}cr
    &= frac{1}{6} left(Psi(m+1+1/6) - Psi(1/6) + 10 (Psi(m+1+2/6) - Psi(2/6)) + 100 (Psi(m+1+3/6) - Psi(3/6)) - 37 (Psi(m+1+4/6)+Psi(m+1+5/6)+Psi(m+1+6/6)-Psi(4/6)-Psi(5/6)-Psi(6/6))right)cr}$$



    and since $Psi(x) = ln(x) + O(1/x)$ as $x to infty$, the sum converges.
    In fact, the limit is
    $$ frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
      – Karlo
      Dec 13 at 10:13






    • 1




      Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 13 at 13:28













    up vote
    8
    down vote










    up vote
    8
    down vote









    I presume the pattern $(1, 10, 100, -37, -37, -37)$ continues forever, so this is
    $$ sum_{n=1}^infty frac{a_n}{n}$$
    where $$ a_n = cases{1 & if $n equiv 1 mod 6$cr
    10 & if $n equiv 2 mod 6$cr
    100 & if $n equiv 3 mod 6$cr
    -37 & if $n equiv 4,5$ or $0 mod 6$cr}$$

    Note that $1+10+100 - 3times 37 = 0$. Then the $6m$
    -th partial sum
    $$ eqalign{S_m &= sum_{n=1}^{6m} frac{a_n}{n}cr
    & = sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+1} +
    10 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+2} + 100 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+3}
    - 37 sum_{k=4}^6 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+k}cr
    &= frac{1}{6} left(Psi(m+1+1/6) - Psi(1/6) + 10 (Psi(m+1+2/6) - Psi(2/6)) + 100 (Psi(m+1+3/6) - Psi(3/6)) - 37 (Psi(m+1+4/6)+Psi(m+1+5/6)+Psi(m+1+6/6)-Psi(4/6)-Psi(5/6)-Psi(6/6))right)cr}$$



    and since $Psi(x) = ln(x) + O(1/x)$ as $x to infty$, the sum converges.
    In fact, the limit is
    $$ frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    I presume the pattern $(1, 10, 100, -37, -37, -37)$ continues forever, so this is
    $$ sum_{n=1}^infty frac{a_n}{n}$$
    where $$ a_n = cases{1 & if $n equiv 1 mod 6$cr
    10 & if $n equiv 2 mod 6$cr
    100 & if $n equiv 3 mod 6$cr
    -37 & if $n equiv 4,5$ or $0 mod 6$cr}$$

    Note that $1+10+100 - 3times 37 = 0$. Then the $6m$
    -th partial sum
    $$ eqalign{S_m &= sum_{n=1}^{6m} frac{a_n}{n}cr
    & = sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+1} +
    10 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+2} + 100 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+3}
    - 37 sum_{k=4}^6 sum_{j=0}^m frac{1}{6j+k}cr
    &= frac{1}{6} left(Psi(m+1+1/6) - Psi(1/6) + 10 (Psi(m+1+2/6) - Psi(2/6)) + 100 (Psi(m+1+3/6) - Psi(3/6)) - 37 (Psi(m+1+4/6)+Psi(m+1+5/6)+Psi(m+1+6/6)-Psi(4/6)-Psi(5/6)-Psi(6/6))right)cr}$$



    and since $Psi(x) = ln(x) + O(1/x)$ as $x to infty$, the sum converges.
    In fact, the limit is
    $$ frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 12 at 21:55









    Robert Israel

    317k23206457




    317k23206457












    • How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
      – Karlo
      Dec 13 at 10:13






    • 1




      Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 13 at 13:28


















    • How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
      – Karlo
      Dec 13 at 10:13






    • 1




      Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
      – Robert Israel
      Dec 13 at 13:28
















    How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
    – Karlo
    Dec 13 at 10:13




    How is $Psi$ defined exactly?
    – Karlo
    Dec 13 at 10:13




    1




    1




    Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 13 at 13:28




    Also known as the Digamma function. $Psi(x) = dfrac{d}{dx} ln(Gamma(x))$.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 13 at 13:28










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Added for your curiosity but too long for a comment.



    Starting from Robert Israel's elegant answer, it is possible to have quite accurate approximations of the partiel sums using the fact that, for large values of $p$ we have
    $$Psi (p)=log left({p}right)-frac{1}{2 p}-frac{1}{12 p^2}+frac{1}{120
    p^4}+Oleft(frac{1}{p^6}right)$$
    making
    $$S_m=left(frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}right)-frac{13}{2
    m}+frac{23}{3 m^2}-frac{311}{36 m^3}+frac{499}{54 m^4}-frac{36377}{3888
    m^5}+Oleft(frac{1}{m^6}right)$$
    Below are listed some values
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    m & text{approximation} & text{exact} \
    2 & 19.691108 & 19.787015 \
    3 & 20.259944 & 20.269370 \
    4 & 20.565282 & 20.567065 \
    5 & 20.768485 & 20.768971 \
    6 & 20.914700 & 20.914867 \
    7 & 21.025135 & 21.025202 \
    8 & 21.111527 & 21.111558 \
    9 & 21.180965 & 21.180981
    end{array}
    right)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Added for your curiosity but too long for a comment.



      Starting from Robert Israel's elegant answer, it is possible to have quite accurate approximations of the partiel sums using the fact that, for large values of $p$ we have
      $$Psi (p)=log left({p}right)-frac{1}{2 p}-frac{1}{12 p^2}+frac{1}{120
      p^4}+Oleft(frac{1}{p^6}right)$$
      making
      $$S_m=left(frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}right)-frac{13}{2
      m}+frac{23}{3 m^2}-frac{311}{36 m^3}+frac{499}{54 m^4}-frac{36377}{3888
      m^5}+Oleft(frac{1}{m^6}right)$$
      Below are listed some values
      $$left(
      begin{array}{ccc}
      m & text{approximation} & text{exact} \
      2 & 19.691108 & 19.787015 \
      3 & 20.259944 & 20.269370 \
      4 & 20.565282 & 20.567065 \
      5 & 20.768485 & 20.768971 \
      6 & 20.914700 & 20.914867 \
      7 & 21.025135 & 21.025202 \
      8 & 21.111527 & 21.111558 \
      9 & 21.180965 & 21.180981
      end{array}
      right)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        Added for your curiosity but too long for a comment.



        Starting from Robert Israel's elegant answer, it is possible to have quite accurate approximations of the partiel sums using the fact that, for large values of $p$ we have
        $$Psi (p)=log left({p}right)-frac{1}{2 p}-frac{1}{12 p^2}+frac{1}{120
        p^4}+Oleft(frac{1}{p^6}right)$$
        making
        $$S_m=left(frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}right)-frac{13}{2
        m}+frac{23}{3 m^2}-frac{311}{36 m^3}+frac{499}{54 m^4}-frac{36377}{3888
        m^5}+Oleft(frac{1}{m^6}right)$$
        Below are listed some values
        $$left(
        begin{array}{ccc}
        m & text{approximation} & text{exact} \
        2 & 19.691108 & 19.787015 \
        3 & 20.259944 & 20.269370 \
        4 & 20.565282 & 20.567065 \
        5 & 20.768485 & 20.768971 \
        6 & 20.914700 & 20.914867 \
        7 & 21.025135 & 21.025202 \
        8 & 21.111527 & 21.111558 \
        9 & 21.180965 & 21.180981
        end{array}
        right)$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Added for your curiosity but too long for a comment.



        Starting from Robert Israel's elegant answer, it is possible to have quite accurate approximations of the partiel sums using the fact that, for large values of $p$ we have
        $$Psi (p)=log left({p}right)-frac{1}{2 p}-frac{1}{12 p^2}+frac{1}{120
        p^4}+Oleft(frac{1}{p^6}right)$$
        making
        $$S_m=left(frac{64}{3} ln(2) - frac{63}{4} ln(3) +frac{161}{36} pi sqrt{3}right)-frac{13}{2
        m}+frac{23}{3 m^2}-frac{311}{36 m^3}+frac{499}{54 m^4}-frac{36377}{3888
        m^5}+Oleft(frac{1}{m^6}right)$$
        Below are listed some values
        $$left(
        begin{array}{ccc}
        m & text{approximation} & text{exact} \
        2 & 19.691108 & 19.787015 \
        3 & 20.259944 & 20.269370 \
        4 & 20.565282 & 20.567065 \
        5 & 20.768485 & 20.768971 \
        6 & 20.914700 & 20.914867 \
        7 & 21.025135 & 21.025202 \
        8 & 21.111527 & 21.111558 \
        9 & 21.180965 & 21.180981
        end{array}
        right)$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 13 at 4:30









        Claude Leibovici

        118k1156131




        118k1156131






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037247%2fseries-convergence-without-sigma-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?