Count ones in a segment (binary)












2















There is a problem which i am working on it right now and it's as follows :



there are two numbers x1 and x2 and x2 > x1.



for example x1 = 5; and x2 = 10;



and I must find the sum of ones between x1 and x2 in binary representations.



5 = 101   => 2 ones
6 = 110 => 2 ones
7 = 111 => 3 ones
8 = 1000 => 1 one
9 = 1001 => 2 ones
10= 1010 => 2 ones
so the sum will be
sum = 2 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 12 ones;


so I have managed to do the code without even transfer the numbers to binary and wasting execution time.



I noticed that the numbers of ones in every 2^n with n >= 1 is 1
Ex : 2^1 => num of ones is 1
2^2 => 1 2^15 => 1



you can test it here if you want: https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/decimal-to-binary.html?x=191



and between each 2^n and 2^(n+1) there are Consecutive numbers as you will see in this example :



      num              number of ones
2^4 = 16 1
17 2
18 2
19 3
20 2
21 3
22 3
23 4
24 2
25 3
26 3
27 4
28 3
29 4
30 4
31 5
2^5 = 32 1


so I did a code that can find how many ones between 2^n and 2^(n+1)



int t;                ////turns
int bin = 1; //// numbers of ones in the binary format ,,, and 1 for 2^5
int n1 = 32; //// 2^5 this is just for clarification
int n2 = 64; //// 2^6
int *keep = malloc(sizeof(int) * (n2 - n1); ///this is to keep numbers because
/// i'll need it later in my consecutive numbers
int i = 0;
int a = 0;
n1 = 33 //// I'll start from 33 cause "bin" of 32 is "1";

while (n1 < n2) /// try to understand it now by yourself
{
t = 0;
while (t <= 3)
{

if (t == 0 || t == 2)
bin = bin + 1;

else if (t == 1)
bin = bin;

else if (t == 3)
{
bin = keep[i];
i++;
}
keep[a] = bin;
a++;
t++;
}
n1++;
}


anyway as you see I am close to solve the problem but they give me huge numbers and i must find the ones between them, unfortunately I have tried a lot of methods to calculate the "sum" using this code above and I end up with Time executing problem.

Ex: 1, 1000000000 the numbers of ones is >>> 14846928141



so can you give me a little hint what to do next, thanx in advance.



I'm doing this for a code war challenge: https://www.codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c










share|improve this question

























  • See Bit Population (middle algorithm)

    – David C. Rankin
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:53











  • Just solve how many ones are between 1 and x, then for a y-x range the answer is from 1 to x - from 1 to y. notice that for the least significant bit, you get a 1 every 2 numers. For the second, 2 every 4, for the third, 4 every 8...

    – juvian
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:55











  • It should be fairly straight forward to calculate this in constant time (i.e. without looping through every number)

    – paddy
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:58
















2















There is a problem which i am working on it right now and it's as follows :



there are two numbers x1 and x2 and x2 > x1.



for example x1 = 5; and x2 = 10;



and I must find the sum of ones between x1 and x2 in binary representations.



5 = 101   => 2 ones
6 = 110 => 2 ones
7 = 111 => 3 ones
8 = 1000 => 1 one
9 = 1001 => 2 ones
10= 1010 => 2 ones
so the sum will be
sum = 2 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 12 ones;


so I have managed to do the code without even transfer the numbers to binary and wasting execution time.



I noticed that the numbers of ones in every 2^n with n >= 1 is 1
Ex : 2^1 => num of ones is 1
2^2 => 1 2^15 => 1



you can test it here if you want: https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/decimal-to-binary.html?x=191



and between each 2^n and 2^(n+1) there are Consecutive numbers as you will see in this example :



      num              number of ones
2^4 = 16 1
17 2
18 2
19 3
20 2
21 3
22 3
23 4
24 2
25 3
26 3
27 4
28 3
29 4
30 4
31 5
2^5 = 32 1


so I did a code that can find how many ones between 2^n and 2^(n+1)



int t;                ////turns
int bin = 1; //// numbers of ones in the binary format ,,, and 1 for 2^5
int n1 = 32; //// 2^5 this is just for clarification
int n2 = 64; //// 2^6
int *keep = malloc(sizeof(int) * (n2 - n1); ///this is to keep numbers because
/// i'll need it later in my consecutive numbers
int i = 0;
int a = 0;
n1 = 33 //// I'll start from 33 cause "bin" of 32 is "1";

while (n1 < n2) /// try to understand it now by yourself
{
t = 0;
while (t <= 3)
{

if (t == 0 || t == 2)
bin = bin + 1;

else if (t == 1)
bin = bin;

else if (t == 3)
{
bin = keep[i];
i++;
}
keep[a] = bin;
a++;
t++;
}
n1++;
}


anyway as you see I am close to solve the problem but they give me huge numbers and i must find the ones between them, unfortunately I have tried a lot of methods to calculate the "sum" using this code above and I end up with Time executing problem.

Ex: 1, 1000000000 the numbers of ones is >>> 14846928141



so can you give me a little hint what to do next, thanx in advance.



I'm doing this for a code war challenge: https://www.codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c










share|improve this question

























  • See Bit Population (middle algorithm)

    – David C. Rankin
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:53











  • Just solve how many ones are between 1 and x, then for a y-x range the answer is from 1 to x - from 1 to y. notice that for the least significant bit, you get a 1 every 2 numers. For the second, 2 every 4, for the third, 4 every 8...

    – juvian
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:55











  • It should be fairly straight forward to calculate this in constant time (i.e. without looping through every number)

    – paddy
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:58














2












2








2


0






There is a problem which i am working on it right now and it's as follows :



there are two numbers x1 and x2 and x2 > x1.



for example x1 = 5; and x2 = 10;



and I must find the sum of ones between x1 and x2 in binary representations.



5 = 101   => 2 ones
6 = 110 => 2 ones
7 = 111 => 3 ones
8 = 1000 => 1 one
9 = 1001 => 2 ones
10= 1010 => 2 ones
so the sum will be
sum = 2 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 12 ones;


so I have managed to do the code without even transfer the numbers to binary and wasting execution time.



I noticed that the numbers of ones in every 2^n with n >= 1 is 1
Ex : 2^1 => num of ones is 1
2^2 => 1 2^15 => 1



you can test it here if you want: https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/decimal-to-binary.html?x=191



and between each 2^n and 2^(n+1) there are Consecutive numbers as you will see in this example :



      num              number of ones
2^4 = 16 1
17 2
18 2
19 3
20 2
21 3
22 3
23 4
24 2
25 3
26 3
27 4
28 3
29 4
30 4
31 5
2^5 = 32 1


so I did a code that can find how many ones between 2^n and 2^(n+1)



int t;                ////turns
int bin = 1; //// numbers of ones in the binary format ,,, and 1 for 2^5
int n1 = 32; //// 2^5 this is just for clarification
int n2 = 64; //// 2^6
int *keep = malloc(sizeof(int) * (n2 - n1); ///this is to keep numbers because
/// i'll need it later in my consecutive numbers
int i = 0;
int a = 0;
n1 = 33 //// I'll start from 33 cause "bin" of 32 is "1";

while (n1 < n2) /// try to understand it now by yourself
{
t = 0;
while (t <= 3)
{

if (t == 0 || t == 2)
bin = bin + 1;

else if (t == 1)
bin = bin;

else if (t == 3)
{
bin = keep[i];
i++;
}
keep[a] = bin;
a++;
t++;
}
n1++;
}


anyway as you see I am close to solve the problem but they give me huge numbers and i must find the ones between them, unfortunately I have tried a lot of methods to calculate the "sum" using this code above and I end up with Time executing problem.

Ex: 1, 1000000000 the numbers of ones is >>> 14846928141



so can you give me a little hint what to do next, thanx in advance.



I'm doing this for a code war challenge: https://www.codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c










share|improve this question
















There is a problem which i am working on it right now and it's as follows :



there are two numbers x1 and x2 and x2 > x1.



for example x1 = 5; and x2 = 10;



and I must find the sum of ones between x1 and x2 in binary representations.



5 = 101   => 2 ones
6 = 110 => 2 ones
7 = 111 => 3 ones
8 = 1000 => 1 one
9 = 1001 => 2 ones
10= 1010 => 2 ones
so the sum will be
sum = 2 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 12 ones;


so I have managed to do the code without even transfer the numbers to binary and wasting execution time.



I noticed that the numbers of ones in every 2^n with n >= 1 is 1
Ex : 2^1 => num of ones is 1
2^2 => 1 2^15 => 1



you can test it here if you want: https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/decimal-to-binary.html?x=191



and between each 2^n and 2^(n+1) there are Consecutive numbers as you will see in this example :



      num              number of ones
2^4 = 16 1
17 2
18 2
19 3
20 2
21 3
22 3
23 4
24 2
25 3
26 3
27 4
28 3
29 4
30 4
31 5
2^5 = 32 1


so I did a code that can find how many ones between 2^n and 2^(n+1)



int t;                ////turns
int bin = 1; //// numbers of ones in the binary format ,,, and 1 for 2^5
int n1 = 32; //// 2^5 this is just for clarification
int n2 = 64; //// 2^6
int *keep = malloc(sizeof(int) * (n2 - n1); ///this is to keep numbers because
/// i'll need it later in my consecutive numbers
int i = 0;
int a = 0;
n1 = 33 //// I'll start from 33 cause "bin" of 32 is "1";

while (n1 < n2) /// try to understand it now by yourself
{
t = 0;
while (t <= 3)
{

if (t == 0 || t == 2)
bin = bin + 1;

else if (t == 1)
bin = bin;

else if (t == 3)
{
bin = keep[i];
i++;
}
keep[a] = bin;
a++;
t++;
}
n1++;
}


anyway as you see I am close to solve the problem but they give me huge numbers and i must find the ones between them, unfortunately I have tried a lot of methods to calculate the "sum" using this code above and I end up with Time executing problem.

Ex: 1, 1000000000 the numbers of ones is >>> 14846928141



so can you give me a little hint what to do next, thanx in advance.



I'm doing this for a code war challenge: https://www.codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c







c algorithm math binary






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 14:01







He Is

















asked Nov 21 '18 at 0:47









He IsHe Is

15210




15210













  • See Bit Population (middle algorithm)

    – David C. Rankin
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:53











  • Just solve how many ones are between 1 and x, then for a y-x range the answer is from 1 to x - from 1 to y. notice that for the least significant bit, you get a 1 every 2 numers. For the second, 2 every 4, for the third, 4 every 8...

    – juvian
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:55











  • It should be fairly straight forward to calculate this in constant time (i.e. without looping through every number)

    – paddy
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:58



















  • See Bit Population (middle algorithm)

    – David C. Rankin
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:53











  • Just solve how many ones are between 1 and x, then for a y-x range the answer is from 1 to x - from 1 to y. notice that for the least significant bit, you get a 1 every 2 numers. For the second, 2 every 4, for the third, 4 every 8...

    – juvian
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:55











  • It should be fairly straight forward to calculate this in constant time (i.e. without looping through every number)

    – paddy
    Nov 21 '18 at 0:58

















See Bit Population (middle algorithm)

– David C. Rankin
Nov 21 '18 at 0:53





See Bit Population (middle algorithm)

– David C. Rankin
Nov 21 '18 at 0:53













Just solve how many ones are between 1 and x, then for a y-x range the answer is from 1 to x - from 1 to y. notice that for the least significant bit, you get a 1 every 2 numers. For the second, 2 every 4, for the third, 4 every 8...

– juvian
Nov 21 '18 at 0:55





Just solve how many ones are between 1 and x, then for a y-x range the answer is from 1 to x - from 1 to y. notice that for the least significant bit, you get a 1 every 2 numers. For the second, 2 every 4, for the third, 4 every 8...

– juvian
Nov 21 '18 at 0:55













It should be fairly straight forward to calculate this in constant time (i.e. without looping through every number)

– paddy
Nov 21 '18 at 0:58





It should be fairly straight forward to calculate this in constant time (i.e. without looping through every number)

– paddy
Nov 21 '18 at 0:58












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














Here is a proposal for a speedup:




  1. Find smallest y1 such that y1 >= x1 and that y1 is a power of 2


  2. Find largest y2 such that y2 <= x2 and that y2 is a power of 2


  3. Find p1 and p2 such that 2^p1=y1 and 2^p2=y2


  4. Calculate the amount of 1:s between y1 and y2


  5. Deal with x1 to y1 and y2 to x2 separately


  6. Sum the results from 4 and 5



Let's focus on step 4. Let f(n) be the sum of ones up to (2^n)-1. We can quickly realize that f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1) and that f(1)=1. This can be even further refined so that you don't have to deal with recursive calls, but I highly doubt it will be of any importance. Anyway, f(n) = n*2^(n-1)



To get the result between y1 and y2, just use f(p2)-f(p1)



For step 5, you can likely use a modified version of step 4.



EDIT:



Maybe I was to quick to say "quickly realize". Here is a way to understand it. The amounts of ones up to 2¹-1 is easy to see. The only two binary numbers below 2¹ are 0 and 1. To get the number of ones up to 2² we take the numbers below 2¹ and make a column:



0
1


Clone it:



0
1
0
1


And put 0:s before the first half and 1:s before the second half:



00
01
10
11


To get 2³ we do the same. Clone it:



00
01
10
11
00
01
10
11


And add 0 and 1:



000
001
010
011
100
101
110
111


Now it should be easy to see why f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1). The cloning gives 2f(n-1) and adding the 0:s and 1:s gives 2^(n-1). If 2^(n-1) is hard to understand, remember that 2^(n-1)=(2^n)/2. In each step we have 2^n rows and half of them get an extra 1.



EDIT2:



When I looked at these columns, I got an idea for how to do step 5. Let's say that you want to find the amounts of 1:s from 10 to 15. Binary table for this would be:



10: 1010
11: 1011
12: 1100
13: 1101
14: 1110
15: 1111


Look at the interval 12-15. The last two digits in binary is a copy of the corresponding table for 0-3. That could be utilized, but I leave that to you.



EDIT 3:



This was a fun problem. I wrote some python code that does this. I get some problems with too many recursive calls, but that could be solved pretty easily, and it should not be too complicated to convert this to C:



def f(n):
return n*2**(n-1)

def numberOfOnes(x):
if(x==0):
return 0
p = floor(log(x,2))
a = f(p)
b = numberOfOnes(x-2**p)
c = x - 2**p +1
return a+b+c


I made an image so that you easier can understand what a, b and c does in the function numberOfOnes if we call it with numberOfOnes(12):



enter image description here



I have finally converted it to C. Of course I have used some code I found here on Stack overflow. I borrowed code for integer versions of log2 and pow, and made some small modifications.



This code is probably possible to optimize further, but it is not necessary. It is lighting fast, and I was not able to measure it's performance.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
typedef uint64_t T;

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/11398748/6699433
const int tab64[64] = {
63, 0, 58, 1, 59, 47, 53, 2,
60, 39, 48, 27, 54, 33, 42, 3,
61, 51, 37, 40, 49, 18, 28, 20,
55, 30, 34, 11, 43, 14, 22, 4,
62, 57, 46, 52, 38, 26, 32, 41,
50, 36, 17, 19, 29, 10, 13, 21,
56, 45, 25, 31, 35, 16, 9, 12,
44, 24, 15, 8, 23, 7, 6, 5};

T log2_64 (T value) {
value |= value >> 1;
value |= value >> 2;
value |= value >> 4;
value |= value >> 8;
value |= value >> 16;
value |= value >> 32;
return tab64[((T)((value - (value >> 1))*0x07EDD5E59A4E28C2)) >> 58];
}

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/101613/6699433
T ipow(T base, T exp) {
T result = 1;
for (;;) {
if (exp & 1) result *= base;
exp >>= 1;
if (!exp) break;
base *= base;
}
return result;
}

T f(T n) { return ipow(2,n-1)*n; }

T numberOfOnes(T x) {
if(x==0) return 0;

T p = floor(log2(x));
T a = f(p);
T e = ipow(2,p);
T b = numberOfOnes(x-e);
T c = x - e + 1;
return a+b+c;
}

void test(T u, T v) {
assert(numberOfOnes(u) == v);
}

int main() {
// Sanity checks
test(0,0);
test(1,1);
test(2,2);
test(3,4);
test(4,5);
test(5,7);
test(6,9);
// Test case provided in question
test(1000000000,14846928141);
}





share|improve this answer


























  • @Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:33













  • @HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41











  • @Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:45











  • @HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:00











  • @HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:05



















3














You can solve this problem by computing the number of bits in the range 1 to n and use a simple subtraction for any subrange:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/* compute the number of bits set in all numbers between 0 and n excluded */
unsigned long long bitpop(unsigned long long n) {
unsigned long long count = 0, p = 1;
while (p < n) {
p += p;
/* half the numbers in complete slices of p values have the n-th bit set */
count += n / p * p / 2;
if (n % p >= p / 2) {
/* all the numbers above p / 2 in the last partial slice have it */
count += n % p - p / 2;
}
}
return count;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv) {
unsigned long long from = 1000, to = 2000;

if (argc > 1) {
to = from = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
if (argc > 2) {
to = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
}
}

printf("bitpop from %llu to %llu: %llun", from, to, bitpop(to + 1) - bitpop(from));
return 0;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • yeah it works and the executing is good :)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:52



















1














int x1 = 5;
int x2 = 10;
int i=0;
int looper = 0;
unsigned long long ones_count = 0;

for(i=x1; i<=x2; i++){
looper = i;
while(looper){
if(looper & 0x01){
ones_count++;
}
looper >>= 1;
}
}

printf("ones_count is %llun", ones_count);
return 0;


OUTPUT: ones_count is 12



Here is a way to count every single bit for every value in between the two values. The shift/mask will be faster than your arithmetic operators most likely, but will still probably time out. You need a clever algorithm like the other answer suggests i think, but heres the stupid brute force way :)






share|improve this answer


























  • yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:07













  • x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:10













  • try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:19













  • is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:28











  • unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:31











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403775%2fcount-ones-in-a-segment-binary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Here is a proposal for a speedup:




  1. Find smallest y1 such that y1 >= x1 and that y1 is a power of 2


  2. Find largest y2 such that y2 <= x2 and that y2 is a power of 2


  3. Find p1 and p2 such that 2^p1=y1 and 2^p2=y2


  4. Calculate the amount of 1:s between y1 and y2


  5. Deal with x1 to y1 and y2 to x2 separately


  6. Sum the results from 4 and 5



Let's focus on step 4. Let f(n) be the sum of ones up to (2^n)-1. We can quickly realize that f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1) and that f(1)=1. This can be even further refined so that you don't have to deal with recursive calls, but I highly doubt it will be of any importance. Anyway, f(n) = n*2^(n-1)



To get the result between y1 and y2, just use f(p2)-f(p1)



For step 5, you can likely use a modified version of step 4.



EDIT:



Maybe I was to quick to say "quickly realize". Here is a way to understand it. The amounts of ones up to 2¹-1 is easy to see. The only two binary numbers below 2¹ are 0 and 1. To get the number of ones up to 2² we take the numbers below 2¹ and make a column:



0
1


Clone it:



0
1
0
1


And put 0:s before the first half and 1:s before the second half:



00
01
10
11


To get 2³ we do the same. Clone it:



00
01
10
11
00
01
10
11


And add 0 and 1:



000
001
010
011
100
101
110
111


Now it should be easy to see why f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1). The cloning gives 2f(n-1) and adding the 0:s and 1:s gives 2^(n-1). If 2^(n-1) is hard to understand, remember that 2^(n-1)=(2^n)/2. In each step we have 2^n rows and half of them get an extra 1.



EDIT2:



When I looked at these columns, I got an idea for how to do step 5. Let's say that you want to find the amounts of 1:s from 10 to 15. Binary table for this would be:



10: 1010
11: 1011
12: 1100
13: 1101
14: 1110
15: 1111


Look at the interval 12-15. The last two digits in binary is a copy of the corresponding table for 0-3. That could be utilized, but I leave that to you.



EDIT 3:



This was a fun problem. I wrote some python code that does this. I get some problems with too many recursive calls, but that could be solved pretty easily, and it should not be too complicated to convert this to C:



def f(n):
return n*2**(n-1)

def numberOfOnes(x):
if(x==0):
return 0
p = floor(log(x,2))
a = f(p)
b = numberOfOnes(x-2**p)
c = x - 2**p +1
return a+b+c


I made an image so that you easier can understand what a, b and c does in the function numberOfOnes if we call it with numberOfOnes(12):



enter image description here



I have finally converted it to C. Of course I have used some code I found here on Stack overflow. I borrowed code for integer versions of log2 and pow, and made some small modifications.



This code is probably possible to optimize further, but it is not necessary. It is lighting fast, and I was not able to measure it's performance.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
typedef uint64_t T;

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/11398748/6699433
const int tab64[64] = {
63, 0, 58, 1, 59, 47, 53, 2,
60, 39, 48, 27, 54, 33, 42, 3,
61, 51, 37, 40, 49, 18, 28, 20,
55, 30, 34, 11, 43, 14, 22, 4,
62, 57, 46, 52, 38, 26, 32, 41,
50, 36, 17, 19, 29, 10, 13, 21,
56, 45, 25, 31, 35, 16, 9, 12,
44, 24, 15, 8, 23, 7, 6, 5};

T log2_64 (T value) {
value |= value >> 1;
value |= value >> 2;
value |= value >> 4;
value |= value >> 8;
value |= value >> 16;
value |= value >> 32;
return tab64[((T)((value - (value >> 1))*0x07EDD5E59A4E28C2)) >> 58];
}

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/101613/6699433
T ipow(T base, T exp) {
T result = 1;
for (;;) {
if (exp & 1) result *= base;
exp >>= 1;
if (!exp) break;
base *= base;
}
return result;
}

T f(T n) { return ipow(2,n-1)*n; }

T numberOfOnes(T x) {
if(x==0) return 0;

T p = floor(log2(x));
T a = f(p);
T e = ipow(2,p);
T b = numberOfOnes(x-e);
T c = x - e + 1;
return a+b+c;
}

void test(T u, T v) {
assert(numberOfOnes(u) == v);
}

int main() {
// Sanity checks
test(0,0);
test(1,1);
test(2,2);
test(3,4);
test(4,5);
test(5,7);
test(6,9);
// Test case provided in question
test(1000000000,14846928141);
}





share|improve this answer


























  • @Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:33













  • @HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41











  • @Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:45











  • @HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:00











  • @HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:05
















2














Here is a proposal for a speedup:




  1. Find smallest y1 such that y1 >= x1 and that y1 is a power of 2


  2. Find largest y2 such that y2 <= x2 and that y2 is a power of 2


  3. Find p1 and p2 such that 2^p1=y1 and 2^p2=y2


  4. Calculate the amount of 1:s between y1 and y2


  5. Deal with x1 to y1 and y2 to x2 separately


  6. Sum the results from 4 and 5



Let's focus on step 4. Let f(n) be the sum of ones up to (2^n)-1. We can quickly realize that f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1) and that f(1)=1. This can be even further refined so that you don't have to deal with recursive calls, but I highly doubt it will be of any importance. Anyway, f(n) = n*2^(n-1)



To get the result between y1 and y2, just use f(p2)-f(p1)



For step 5, you can likely use a modified version of step 4.



EDIT:



Maybe I was to quick to say "quickly realize". Here is a way to understand it. The amounts of ones up to 2¹-1 is easy to see. The only two binary numbers below 2¹ are 0 and 1. To get the number of ones up to 2² we take the numbers below 2¹ and make a column:



0
1


Clone it:



0
1
0
1


And put 0:s before the first half and 1:s before the second half:



00
01
10
11


To get 2³ we do the same. Clone it:



00
01
10
11
00
01
10
11


And add 0 and 1:



000
001
010
011
100
101
110
111


Now it should be easy to see why f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1). The cloning gives 2f(n-1) and adding the 0:s and 1:s gives 2^(n-1). If 2^(n-1) is hard to understand, remember that 2^(n-1)=(2^n)/2. In each step we have 2^n rows and half of them get an extra 1.



EDIT2:



When I looked at these columns, I got an idea for how to do step 5. Let's say that you want to find the amounts of 1:s from 10 to 15. Binary table for this would be:



10: 1010
11: 1011
12: 1100
13: 1101
14: 1110
15: 1111


Look at the interval 12-15. The last two digits in binary is a copy of the corresponding table for 0-3. That could be utilized, but I leave that to you.



EDIT 3:



This was a fun problem. I wrote some python code that does this. I get some problems with too many recursive calls, but that could be solved pretty easily, and it should not be too complicated to convert this to C:



def f(n):
return n*2**(n-1)

def numberOfOnes(x):
if(x==0):
return 0
p = floor(log(x,2))
a = f(p)
b = numberOfOnes(x-2**p)
c = x - 2**p +1
return a+b+c


I made an image so that you easier can understand what a, b and c does in the function numberOfOnes if we call it with numberOfOnes(12):



enter image description here



I have finally converted it to C. Of course I have used some code I found here on Stack overflow. I borrowed code for integer versions of log2 and pow, and made some small modifications.



This code is probably possible to optimize further, but it is not necessary. It is lighting fast, and I was not able to measure it's performance.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
typedef uint64_t T;

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/11398748/6699433
const int tab64[64] = {
63, 0, 58, 1, 59, 47, 53, 2,
60, 39, 48, 27, 54, 33, 42, 3,
61, 51, 37, 40, 49, 18, 28, 20,
55, 30, 34, 11, 43, 14, 22, 4,
62, 57, 46, 52, 38, 26, 32, 41,
50, 36, 17, 19, 29, 10, 13, 21,
56, 45, 25, 31, 35, 16, 9, 12,
44, 24, 15, 8, 23, 7, 6, 5};

T log2_64 (T value) {
value |= value >> 1;
value |= value >> 2;
value |= value >> 4;
value |= value >> 8;
value |= value >> 16;
value |= value >> 32;
return tab64[((T)((value - (value >> 1))*0x07EDD5E59A4E28C2)) >> 58];
}

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/101613/6699433
T ipow(T base, T exp) {
T result = 1;
for (;;) {
if (exp & 1) result *= base;
exp >>= 1;
if (!exp) break;
base *= base;
}
return result;
}

T f(T n) { return ipow(2,n-1)*n; }

T numberOfOnes(T x) {
if(x==0) return 0;

T p = floor(log2(x));
T a = f(p);
T e = ipow(2,p);
T b = numberOfOnes(x-e);
T c = x - e + 1;
return a+b+c;
}

void test(T u, T v) {
assert(numberOfOnes(u) == v);
}

int main() {
// Sanity checks
test(0,0);
test(1,1);
test(2,2);
test(3,4);
test(4,5);
test(5,7);
test(6,9);
// Test case provided in question
test(1000000000,14846928141);
}





share|improve this answer


























  • @Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:33













  • @HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41











  • @Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:45











  • @HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:00











  • @HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:05














2












2








2







Here is a proposal for a speedup:




  1. Find smallest y1 such that y1 >= x1 and that y1 is a power of 2


  2. Find largest y2 such that y2 <= x2 and that y2 is a power of 2


  3. Find p1 and p2 such that 2^p1=y1 and 2^p2=y2


  4. Calculate the amount of 1:s between y1 and y2


  5. Deal with x1 to y1 and y2 to x2 separately


  6. Sum the results from 4 and 5



Let's focus on step 4. Let f(n) be the sum of ones up to (2^n)-1. We can quickly realize that f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1) and that f(1)=1. This can be even further refined so that you don't have to deal with recursive calls, but I highly doubt it will be of any importance. Anyway, f(n) = n*2^(n-1)



To get the result between y1 and y2, just use f(p2)-f(p1)



For step 5, you can likely use a modified version of step 4.



EDIT:



Maybe I was to quick to say "quickly realize". Here is a way to understand it. The amounts of ones up to 2¹-1 is easy to see. The only two binary numbers below 2¹ are 0 and 1. To get the number of ones up to 2² we take the numbers below 2¹ and make a column:



0
1


Clone it:



0
1
0
1


And put 0:s before the first half and 1:s before the second half:



00
01
10
11


To get 2³ we do the same. Clone it:



00
01
10
11
00
01
10
11


And add 0 and 1:



000
001
010
011
100
101
110
111


Now it should be easy to see why f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1). The cloning gives 2f(n-1) and adding the 0:s and 1:s gives 2^(n-1). If 2^(n-1) is hard to understand, remember that 2^(n-1)=(2^n)/2. In each step we have 2^n rows and half of them get an extra 1.



EDIT2:



When I looked at these columns, I got an idea for how to do step 5. Let's say that you want to find the amounts of 1:s from 10 to 15. Binary table for this would be:



10: 1010
11: 1011
12: 1100
13: 1101
14: 1110
15: 1111


Look at the interval 12-15. The last two digits in binary is a copy of the corresponding table for 0-3. That could be utilized, but I leave that to you.



EDIT 3:



This was a fun problem. I wrote some python code that does this. I get some problems with too many recursive calls, but that could be solved pretty easily, and it should not be too complicated to convert this to C:



def f(n):
return n*2**(n-1)

def numberOfOnes(x):
if(x==0):
return 0
p = floor(log(x,2))
a = f(p)
b = numberOfOnes(x-2**p)
c = x - 2**p +1
return a+b+c


I made an image so that you easier can understand what a, b and c does in the function numberOfOnes if we call it with numberOfOnes(12):



enter image description here



I have finally converted it to C. Of course I have used some code I found here on Stack overflow. I borrowed code for integer versions of log2 and pow, and made some small modifications.



This code is probably possible to optimize further, but it is not necessary. It is lighting fast, and I was not able to measure it's performance.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
typedef uint64_t T;

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/11398748/6699433
const int tab64[64] = {
63, 0, 58, 1, 59, 47, 53, 2,
60, 39, 48, 27, 54, 33, 42, 3,
61, 51, 37, 40, 49, 18, 28, 20,
55, 30, 34, 11, 43, 14, 22, 4,
62, 57, 46, 52, 38, 26, 32, 41,
50, 36, 17, 19, 29, 10, 13, 21,
56, 45, 25, 31, 35, 16, 9, 12,
44, 24, 15, 8, 23, 7, 6, 5};

T log2_64 (T value) {
value |= value >> 1;
value |= value >> 2;
value |= value >> 4;
value |= value >> 8;
value |= value >> 16;
value |= value >> 32;
return tab64[((T)((value - (value >> 1))*0x07EDD5E59A4E28C2)) >> 58];
}

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/101613/6699433
T ipow(T base, T exp) {
T result = 1;
for (;;) {
if (exp & 1) result *= base;
exp >>= 1;
if (!exp) break;
base *= base;
}
return result;
}

T f(T n) { return ipow(2,n-1)*n; }

T numberOfOnes(T x) {
if(x==0) return 0;

T p = floor(log2(x));
T a = f(p);
T e = ipow(2,p);
T b = numberOfOnes(x-e);
T c = x - e + 1;
return a+b+c;
}

void test(T u, T v) {
assert(numberOfOnes(u) == v);
}

int main() {
// Sanity checks
test(0,0);
test(1,1);
test(2,2);
test(3,4);
test(4,5);
test(5,7);
test(6,9);
// Test case provided in question
test(1000000000,14846928141);
}





share|improve this answer















Here is a proposal for a speedup:




  1. Find smallest y1 such that y1 >= x1 and that y1 is a power of 2


  2. Find largest y2 such that y2 <= x2 and that y2 is a power of 2


  3. Find p1 and p2 such that 2^p1=y1 and 2^p2=y2


  4. Calculate the amount of 1:s between y1 and y2


  5. Deal with x1 to y1 and y2 to x2 separately


  6. Sum the results from 4 and 5



Let's focus on step 4. Let f(n) be the sum of ones up to (2^n)-1. We can quickly realize that f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1) and that f(1)=1. This can be even further refined so that you don't have to deal with recursive calls, but I highly doubt it will be of any importance. Anyway, f(n) = n*2^(n-1)



To get the result between y1 and y2, just use f(p2)-f(p1)



For step 5, you can likely use a modified version of step 4.



EDIT:



Maybe I was to quick to say "quickly realize". Here is a way to understand it. The amounts of ones up to 2¹-1 is easy to see. The only two binary numbers below 2¹ are 0 and 1. To get the number of ones up to 2² we take the numbers below 2¹ and make a column:



0
1


Clone it:



0
1
0
1


And put 0:s before the first half and 1:s before the second half:



00
01
10
11


To get 2³ we do the same. Clone it:



00
01
10
11
00
01
10
11


And add 0 and 1:



000
001
010
011
100
101
110
111


Now it should be easy to see why f(n) = 2*f(n-1) + 2^(n-1). The cloning gives 2f(n-1) and adding the 0:s and 1:s gives 2^(n-1). If 2^(n-1) is hard to understand, remember that 2^(n-1)=(2^n)/2. In each step we have 2^n rows and half of them get an extra 1.



EDIT2:



When I looked at these columns, I got an idea for how to do step 5. Let's say that you want to find the amounts of 1:s from 10 to 15. Binary table for this would be:



10: 1010
11: 1011
12: 1100
13: 1101
14: 1110
15: 1111


Look at the interval 12-15. The last two digits in binary is a copy of the corresponding table for 0-3. That could be utilized, but I leave that to you.



EDIT 3:



This was a fun problem. I wrote some python code that does this. I get some problems with too many recursive calls, but that could be solved pretty easily, and it should not be too complicated to convert this to C:



def f(n):
return n*2**(n-1)

def numberOfOnes(x):
if(x==0):
return 0
p = floor(log(x,2))
a = f(p)
b = numberOfOnes(x-2**p)
c = x - 2**p +1
return a+b+c


I made an image so that you easier can understand what a, b and c does in the function numberOfOnes if we call it with numberOfOnes(12):



enter image description here



I have finally converted it to C. Of course I have used some code I found here on Stack overflow. I borrowed code for integer versions of log2 and pow, and made some small modifications.



This code is probably possible to optimize further, but it is not necessary. It is lighting fast, and I was not able to measure it's performance.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
typedef uint64_t T;

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/11398748/6699433
const int tab64[64] = {
63, 0, 58, 1, 59, 47, 53, 2,
60, 39, 48, 27, 54, 33, 42, 3,
61, 51, 37, 40, 49, 18, 28, 20,
55, 30, 34, 11, 43, 14, 22, 4,
62, 57, 46, 52, 38, 26, 32, 41,
50, 36, 17, 19, 29, 10, 13, 21,
56, 45, 25, 31, 35, 16, 9, 12,
44, 24, 15, 8, 23, 7, 6, 5};

T log2_64 (T value) {
value |= value >> 1;
value |= value >> 2;
value |= value >> 4;
value |= value >> 8;
value |= value >> 16;
value |= value >> 32;
return tab64[((T)((value - (value >> 1))*0x07EDD5E59A4E28C2)) >> 58];
}

// https://stackoverflow.com/a/101613/6699433
T ipow(T base, T exp) {
T result = 1;
for (;;) {
if (exp & 1) result *= base;
exp >>= 1;
if (!exp) break;
base *= base;
}
return result;
}

T f(T n) { return ipow(2,n-1)*n; }

T numberOfOnes(T x) {
if(x==0) return 0;

T p = floor(log2(x));
T a = f(p);
T e = ipow(2,p);
T b = numberOfOnes(x-e);
T c = x - e + 1;
return a+b+c;
}

void test(T u, T v) {
assert(numberOfOnes(u) == v);
}

int main() {
// Sanity checks
test(0,0);
test(1,1);
test(2,2);
test(3,4);
test(4,5);
test(5,7);
test(6,9);
// Test case provided in question
test(1000000000,14846928141);
}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 '18 at 8:16

























answered Nov 21 '18 at 1:22









BromanBroman

6,256112241




6,256112241













  • @Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:33













  • @HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41











  • @Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:45











  • @HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:00











  • @HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:05



















  • @Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:33













  • @HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:41











  • @Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:45











  • @HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:00











  • @HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

    – Broman
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:05

















@Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 7:33







@Broman emmm maybe there is a bug in your code Error: countOnes(476744280, 477171088) Expected: 6676768 Got: 6676755 i did sum = numberOfOnes(477171088) - numberOfOnes(476744280)

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 7:33















@HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

– Broman
Nov 21 '18 at 7:41





@HeIs Where do you find the test cases?

– Broman
Nov 21 '18 at 7:41













@Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 7:45





@Broman I am doing a challenge in codewars codewars.com/kata/596d34df24a04ee1e3000a25/train/c

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 7:45













@HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

– Broman
Nov 21 '18 at 8:00





@HeIs What can I say? I have tested it for the n=1 to 10⁸ and no failures at all.

– Broman
Nov 21 '18 at 8:00













@HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

– Broman
Nov 21 '18 at 8:05





@HeIs I spotted your mistake. You should use numberOfOnes(right) - numberOfOnes(left - 1)

– Broman
Nov 21 '18 at 8:05













3














You can solve this problem by computing the number of bits in the range 1 to n and use a simple subtraction for any subrange:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/* compute the number of bits set in all numbers between 0 and n excluded */
unsigned long long bitpop(unsigned long long n) {
unsigned long long count = 0, p = 1;
while (p < n) {
p += p;
/* half the numbers in complete slices of p values have the n-th bit set */
count += n / p * p / 2;
if (n % p >= p / 2) {
/* all the numbers above p / 2 in the last partial slice have it */
count += n % p - p / 2;
}
}
return count;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv) {
unsigned long long from = 1000, to = 2000;

if (argc > 1) {
to = from = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
if (argc > 2) {
to = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
}
}

printf("bitpop from %llu to %llu: %llun", from, to, bitpop(to + 1) - bitpop(from));
return 0;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • yeah it works and the executing is good :)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:52
















3














You can solve this problem by computing the number of bits in the range 1 to n and use a simple subtraction for any subrange:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/* compute the number of bits set in all numbers between 0 and n excluded */
unsigned long long bitpop(unsigned long long n) {
unsigned long long count = 0, p = 1;
while (p < n) {
p += p;
/* half the numbers in complete slices of p values have the n-th bit set */
count += n / p * p / 2;
if (n % p >= p / 2) {
/* all the numbers above p / 2 in the last partial slice have it */
count += n % p - p / 2;
}
}
return count;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv) {
unsigned long long from = 1000, to = 2000;

if (argc > 1) {
to = from = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
if (argc > 2) {
to = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
}
}

printf("bitpop from %llu to %llu: %llun", from, to, bitpop(to + 1) - bitpop(from));
return 0;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • yeah it works and the executing is good :)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:52














3












3








3







You can solve this problem by computing the number of bits in the range 1 to n and use a simple subtraction for any subrange:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/* compute the number of bits set in all numbers between 0 and n excluded */
unsigned long long bitpop(unsigned long long n) {
unsigned long long count = 0, p = 1;
while (p < n) {
p += p;
/* half the numbers in complete slices of p values have the n-th bit set */
count += n / p * p / 2;
if (n % p >= p / 2) {
/* all the numbers above p / 2 in the last partial slice have it */
count += n % p - p / 2;
}
}
return count;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv) {
unsigned long long from = 1000, to = 2000;

if (argc > 1) {
to = from = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
if (argc > 2) {
to = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
}
}

printf("bitpop from %llu to %llu: %llun", from, to, bitpop(to + 1) - bitpop(from));
return 0;
}





share|improve this answer















You can solve this problem by computing the number of bits in the range 1 to n and use a simple subtraction for any subrange:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/* compute the number of bits set in all numbers between 0 and n excluded */
unsigned long long bitpop(unsigned long long n) {
unsigned long long count = 0, p = 1;
while (p < n) {
p += p;
/* half the numbers in complete slices of p values have the n-th bit set */
count += n / p * p / 2;
if (n % p >= p / 2) {
/* all the numbers above p / 2 in the last partial slice have it */
count += n % p - p / 2;
}
}
return count;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv) {
unsigned long long from = 1000, to = 2000;

if (argc > 1) {
to = from = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
if (argc > 2) {
to = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
}
}

printf("bitpop from %llu to %llu: %llun", from, to, bitpop(to + 1) - bitpop(from));
return 0;
}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 '18 at 8:54

























answered Nov 21 '18 at 7:38









chqrliechqrlie

58.7k745101




58.7k745101













  • yeah it works and the executing is good :)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:52



















  • yeah it works and the executing is good :)

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:52

















yeah it works and the executing is good :)

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 7:52





yeah it works and the executing is good :)

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 7:52











1














int x1 = 5;
int x2 = 10;
int i=0;
int looper = 0;
unsigned long long ones_count = 0;

for(i=x1; i<=x2; i++){
looper = i;
while(looper){
if(looper & 0x01){
ones_count++;
}
looper >>= 1;
}
}

printf("ones_count is %llun", ones_count);
return 0;


OUTPUT: ones_count is 12



Here is a way to count every single bit for every value in between the two values. The shift/mask will be faster than your arithmetic operators most likely, but will still probably time out. You need a clever algorithm like the other answer suggests i think, but heres the stupid brute force way :)






share|improve this answer


























  • yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:07













  • x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:10













  • try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:19













  • is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:28











  • unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:31
















1














int x1 = 5;
int x2 = 10;
int i=0;
int looper = 0;
unsigned long long ones_count = 0;

for(i=x1; i<=x2; i++){
looper = i;
while(looper){
if(looper & 0x01){
ones_count++;
}
looper >>= 1;
}
}

printf("ones_count is %llun", ones_count);
return 0;


OUTPUT: ones_count is 12



Here is a way to count every single bit for every value in between the two values. The shift/mask will be faster than your arithmetic operators most likely, but will still probably time out. You need a clever algorithm like the other answer suggests i think, but heres the stupid brute force way :)






share|improve this answer


























  • yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:07













  • x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:10













  • try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:19













  • is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:28











  • unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:31














1












1








1







int x1 = 5;
int x2 = 10;
int i=0;
int looper = 0;
unsigned long long ones_count = 0;

for(i=x1; i<=x2; i++){
looper = i;
while(looper){
if(looper & 0x01){
ones_count++;
}
looper >>= 1;
}
}

printf("ones_count is %llun", ones_count);
return 0;


OUTPUT: ones_count is 12



Here is a way to count every single bit for every value in between the two values. The shift/mask will be faster than your arithmetic operators most likely, but will still probably time out. You need a clever algorithm like the other answer suggests i think, but heres the stupid brute force way :)






share|improve this answer















int x1 = 5;
int x2 = 10;
int i=0;
int looper = 0;
unsigned long long ones_count = 0;

for(i=x1; i<=x2; i++){
looper = i;
while(looper){
if(looper & 0x01){
ones_count++;
}
looper >>= 1;
}
}

printf("ones_count is %llun", ones_count);
return 0;


OUTPUT: ones_count is 12



Here is a way to count every single bit for every value in between the two values. The shift/mask will be faster than your arithmetic operators most likely, but will still probably time out. You need a clever algorithm like the other answer suggests i think, but heres the stupid brute force way :)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 '18 at 4:12

























answered Nov 21 '18 at 2:02









BwebbBwebb

3558




3558













  • yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:07













  • x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:10













  • try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:19













  • is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:28











  • unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:31



















  • yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:07













  • x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:10













  • try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:19













  • is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

    – Bwebb
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:28











  • unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

    – He Is
    Nov 21 '18 at 4:31

















yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 4:07







yeah it's useful but the code needs to find sum of all 1s between x1 and x2.

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 4:07















x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

– Bwebb
Nov 21 '18 at 4:10







x1 and x2 are min_val and max_val in that code. it works for 5,10 but 1,1000000000 times out on codechef, ill update the code to use the variable names in the OP.

– Bwebb
Nov 21 '18 at 4:10















try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 4:19







try and execute your code in this site it works for 1000000000 but it takes time onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 4:19















is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

– Bwebb
Nov 21 '18 at 4:28





is it faster than the arithmetic way? Is it fast enough for your test?

– Bwebb
Nov 21 '18 at 4:28













unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 4:31





unfortunately I got "Execution Timed Out".

– He Is
Nov 21 '18 at 4:31


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403775%2fcount-ones-in-a-segment-binary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?