The usage of ‘We’ [on hold]












0















Is the royal ‘We’ to be used when a single individual is speaking on behalf of those whom he commands?






grammar







share|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Janus Bahs Jacquet, J. Taylor, curiousdannii, Ellie Kesselman, Cascabel yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1





    Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/424588

    – tchrist♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    This could use some context. Can you include the sentence where you'd use it?

    – Laurel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    If one is speaking on behalf of others, it would be a rather conventional we, not a royal one.

    – choster
    2 days ago











  • The "royal we" is used only when a monarch is making a formal statement in their official capacity.

    – Kate Bunting
    yesterday
















0















Is the royal ‘We’ to be used when a single individual is speaking on behalf of those whom he commands?






grammar







share|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Janus Bahs Jacquet, J. Taylor, curiousdannii, Ellie Kesselman, Cascabel yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1





    Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/424588

    – tchrist♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    This could use some context. Can you include the sentence where you'd use it?

    – Laurel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    If one is speaking on behalf of others, it would be a rather conventional we, not a royal one.

    – choster
    2 days ago











  • The "royal we" is used only when a monarch is making a formal statement in their official capacity.

    – Kate Bunting
    yesterday














0












0








0








Is the royal ‘We’ to be used when a single individual is speaking on behalf of those whom he commands?






grammar







share|improve this question














Is the royal ‘We’ to be used when a single individual is speaking on behalf of those whom he commands?






grammar




grammar






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









gfrenchgfrench

746




746




put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Janus Bahs Jacquet, J. Taylor, curiousdannii, Ellie Kesselman, Cascabel yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Janus Bahs Jacquet, J. Taylor, curiousdannii, Ellie Kesselman, Cascabel yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1





    Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/424588

    – tchrist♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    This could use some context. Can you include the sentence where you'd use it?

    – Laurel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    If one is speaking on behalf of others, it would be a rather conventional we, not a royal one.

    – choster
    2 days ago











  • The "royal we" is used only when a monarch is making a formal statement in their official capacity.

    – Kate Bunting
    yesterday














  • 1





    Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/424588

    – tchrist♦
    2 days ago






  • 1





    This could use some context. Can you include the sentence where you'd use it?

    – Laurel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    If one is speaking on behalf of others, it would be a rather conventional we, not a royal one.

    – choster
    2 days ago











  • The "royal we" is used only when a monarch is making a formal statement in their official capacity.

    – Kate Bunting
    yesterday








1




1





Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/424588

– tchrist♦
2 days ago





Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/424588

– tchrist♦
2 days ago




1




1





This could use some context. Can you include the sentence where you'd use it?

– Laurel
2 days ago





This could use some context. Can you include the sentence where you'd use it?

– Laurel
2 days ago




1




1





If one is speaking on behalf of others, it would be a rather conventional we, not a royal one.

– choster
2 days ago





If one is speaking on behalf of others, it would be a rather conventional we, not a royal one.

– choster
2 days ago













The "royal we" is used only when a monarch is making a formal statement in their official capacity.

– Kate Bunting
yesterday





The "royal we" is used only when a monarch is making a formal statement in their official capacity.

– Kate Bunting
yesterday










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

-

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Image
5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

Image
9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
Read more